This study examines whether ethnic majority party selectors’ ethnic biases (e.g. beliefs about the political traits of ethnic minority aspirants) impede the selection of ethnic minority aspirants in a proportional representation system. To this end, a quasi-experiment was conducted among local party chairs in Flanders (Belgium). The participants were asked to evaluate both a hypothetical ethnic minority aspirant and an ethnic majority aspirant. When the participants were negatively biased against the ethnic minority aspirant, the selection chances of the ethnic minority aspirant vis-à-vis the ethnic majority aspirant declined. Additionally, the quasi-experimental data were linked to an analysis of the real-life candidate lists composed by the participants for the 2018 local elections in Flanders. The participants’ ethnic biases could not predict the percentage of ethnic minority candidates on the real-life candidate lists. Instead, the presence of ethnic minority voters, aspirants and co-selectors determined the diversity of the lists.
AkhtarPPeaceT (2018) Ethnic minorities in British politics: Candidate selection and clan politics in the labour Party. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies45(1): 1–17.
4.
AlanyaABaysuGSwyngedouwM (2015) Identifying city differences in perceived group discrimination among second-generation Turks and Moroccans in Belgium. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies41(7): 1088–1110.
5.
AsheJStewartK (2012) Legislative recruitment. Party Politics18: 687–707.
6.
AzabarSThijssenPVan ErkelP (2020) Is there such thing as a Muslim vote?Electoral Studies66.
7.
BachTVeitS (2018) The determinants of promotion to high public office in Germany: Partisan loyalty, political craft, or managerial competencies?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory28: 254–269.
8.
BatesonR (2020) Strategic discrimination. Perspectives on Politics18: 1068–1087.
9.
BescoR (2020) Friendly fire: Electoral discrimination and ethnic minority candidates. Party Politics26: 215–226.
10.
BinggeliSKringsFSczesnyS (2014) Stereotype content associated with immigrant groups in Switzerland. Swiss Journal of Psychology73: 123–133.
11.
BrancatiD (2008) Winning alone: The electoral fate of independent candidates worldwide. The Journal of Politics70(3): 648–662.
12.
ByeHHHerrebrødenHHjetlandGJ, et al. (2014) Stereotypes of norwegian social groups. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology55: 469–476.
13.
CampbellRCowleyP (2014) What voters want: Reactions to candidate characteristics in a survey experiment. Political Studies62: 745–765.
14.
CarnesN (2018) The Cash Ceiling: Why Only the Rich Run for Office - and What We Can Do about It. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
15.
CelisKErzeelS (2017) The complementarity advantage: Parties, representativeness and newcomers' access to power. Parliamentary Affairs70: 43–61.
16.
CeyhanS (2018) Why not ask the representatives? Parliamentary candidates' attitudes towards immigrant representation in Germany. Representation54: 103–127.
17.
ChiruMDe WinterLVandeleeneA (2020) Candidate selection. In: De WinterLKarlsenRSchmittH (eds), Parliamentary Candidates between Voters and Parties. A comparative Perspective. Oxon: Routledge, pp. 54–77.
18.
DancygierRM (2014) Electoral rules or electoral leverage? Explaining Muslim representation in England. World Politics66: 229–263.
19.
De WinterLErzeelSVandeleeneA, et al. (2013) Nationale bemoeienis of lokale autonomie? Het lijstvormingsproces bij gemeenteraadsleden. In: DeschouwerKVerthéTRihouxB (eds), Op zoek naar de kiezers: lokale partijafdelingen en de gemeenteraadsverkiezingen van oktober 2012. Brussel: Academic & Scientific Publishers, pp. 93–121.
20.
DodeigneJMeulewaeterCLesschaeveC (2019) Constituting the list amid time of personalisation of politics. The balance of congruent and popular candidates in Belgian political parties. In: VandeleeneADe WinterLBaudewynsP (eds), Candidates, Parties and Voters in the Belgian Partitocracy. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
21.
DovidioJFGaertnerSL (2000) Aversive racism and selection decisions: 1989 and 1999. Psychological Science11: 315–319.
22.
DuroseCRichardsonLCombsR, et al. (2013) 'Acceptable difference': Diversity, representation and pathways to UK politics. Parliamentary Affairs66: 246–267.
23.
EnglishP (2018) Opinionated Opportunity: How Public Opinion Mediates The Representation of Immigrant Origin Groups in Britain and Europe. Manchester, UK: The University of Manchester.
24.
EnglishP (2020) High rejection, low selection: How ‘punitive parties’ shape ethnic minority representation. Party Politics 1354068820973851.
25.
FarrerBDZingherJN (2018) Explaining the nomination of ethnic minority candidates: How party-level factors and district-level factors interact. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties28: 467–487.
26.
FiskeST (2002) What we know now about bias and intergroup conflict, the problem of the century. Current Directions in Psychological Science11: 123–128.
27.
FragaBL (2016) Redistricting and the causal impact of race on voter turnout. The Journal of Politics78: 19–34.
28.
GarrettA (2017) An easy concession or meaningful representation? Minority women in French politics. French Politics15: 166–186.
29.
GeeseLSchachtD (2018) The more concentrated, the better represented? The geographical concentration of immigrants and their descriptive representation in the German mixed-member system. International Political Science Review40: 643–658.
30.
GreeneZDHaberM (2015) The consequences of appearing divided: An analysis of party evaluations and vote choice. Electoral Studies37: 15–27.
31.
HazanRYRahatG (2010) Democracy Within Parties : Candidate Selection Methods and Their Political Consequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32.
JacobsmeierML. (2015) From black and white to left and right: Race, perceptions of candidates' ideologies, and voting behavior in U.S. house elections. Political Behavior37: 595–621.
33.
JanssenC (2020) Shaping the (dis)advantage: the impact of partisan and demographic factors on ethnic minority candidates' success in preferential voting systems. Evidence from the Brussels case. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties: 1–24.
34.
JanssenCDandoyRErzeelS (2017) Het electorale succes van etnische minderheden in Brussel: De rol van kiezers en partijen. Res Publica59: 389–412.
35.
JonesPE (2014) Revisiting stereotypes of non-white politicians' ideological and partisan orientations. American Politics Research42: 283–310.
36.
LauRRRedlawskDP (2001) Advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision making. American Journal of Political Science45: 951–971.
37.
LermanAESadinML (2016) Stereotyping or projection? How white and black voters estimate black candidates' ideology. Political Psychology37: 147–163.
38.
MartinNSBlinderS (2020) Biases at the ballot box: How multiple forms of voter discrimination impede the descriptive and substantive representation of ethnic minority groups. Political Behavior.
39.
McDermottML (1998) Race and gender cues in low-information elections. Political Research Quarterly51: 895–918.
40.
MeulemanBBillietJ (2003) De houding van vlamingen tegenover “oude” en “nieuwe” migranten: diffuus of specifiek, Ministerie van de Vlaamse GemeenschapVlaanderen Gepeild! Brussel: pp. 137–176.
41.
NorrisPLovenduskiJ (1995) Political Recruitment: Gender, Race and Class in the British Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
OuyangYHaglundETWatermanRW (2017) The missing element: Examining the loyalty-competence nexus in presidential appointments. Presidential Studies Quarterly47: 62–91.
43.
PearsonARDovidioJFGaertnerSL (2009) The nature of contemporary prejudice: Insights from aversive racism. Social and Personality Psychology Compass3: 314–338.
44.
PhillipsA (1995) The politics of Presence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
45.
PortmannLStojanovićN (2019) Electoral discrimination against immigrant-origin candidates. Political Behavior41: 105–134.
46.
RoothDO (2010) Automatic associations and discrimination in hiring: Real world evidence. Labour Economics17: 523–534.
47.
RuedinD (2013) Why Aren’t They There? The Political Representation of Women, Ethnic Groups and Issue Positions in Legislatures. Colchester: ECPR Press.
48.
ShahP (2014) It takes a black candidate. Political Research Quarterly67: 266–279.
StevensPAJGörgözR (2010) Exploring the importance of institutional contexts for the development of ethnic stereotypes: A comparison of schools in Belgium and England. Ethnic and Racial Studies33: 1350–1371.
53.
TeneyCJacobsDReaA, et al. (2010) Ethnic voting in Brussels: Voting patterns among ethnic minorities in Brussels (Belgium) during the 2006 local elections. Acta Politica45: 273–297.
54.
ThrasherMBorisyukGRallingsC, et al. (2017) Candidate ethnic origins and voter preferences: Examining name discrimination in local elections in Britain. British Journal of Political Science47: 413–435.
55.
TolleyE (2019) Who you know: Local party presidents and minority candidate emergence. Electoral Studies58: 70–79.
56.
ValdiniME (2012) A deterrent to diversity: The conditional effect of electoral rules on the nomination of women candidates. Electoral Studies31: 740–749.
57.
Van der ZwanRLubbersMEisingaR (2019) The political representation of ethnic minorities in the Netherlands: ethnic minority candidates and the role of party characteristics. Acta Politica54: 245–267.
58.
van HauteECartyRK (2011) Ideological misfits. A distinctive class of party members. Party Politics18: 885–895.
59.
VisalvanichN (2017) When does race matter? Exploring white responses to minority congressional candidates. Politics, Groups, and Identities5: 618–641.
60.
WeaverVM (2012) The electoral consequences of skin color: The “Hidden” side of race in politics. Political Behavior34: 159–192.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
