Why do political parties implement primary elections? With multi-party elections firmly established, political parties in many young democracies have begun to democratize internally by adopting mass primaries. Previous work argues that parties institute primaries to select for high quality candidates, incentivize campaigning effort, and reduce intra-party conflict. In this paper, I theorize that parties also implement mass primaries to open up the political elite while protecting their most senior members. Consistent with this hypothesis, using original data from Botswana’s ruling party, I find that primaries facilitate a limited and controlled turnover, decreasing the likelihood of re-nomination of long-term incumbents in favor of political newcomers while still protecting senior ministers. Combined with qualitative and historical evidence, these results suggest that electorally successful political parties may implement mass primaries to replace unpopular and entrenched leaders.
AdamsJMerrillS (2008) Candidate and party strategies in two-stage elections beginning with a primary. American Journal of Political Science52(2): 344–359.
2.
AragónFM (2014) Why do parties use primaries?: Political selection versus candidate incentives. Public Choice160(1–2): 205–225.
3.
ArriolaLR (2013) Multi-Ethnic Coalitions in Africa: Business Financing of Opposition Election Campaigns. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BaldwinK (2013) Why vote with the chief? Political connections and public goods provision in Zambia. American journal of Political Science57(4): 794–809.
5.
BentonAL (2007) The strategic struggle for patronage. Journal of Theoretical Politics19(1): 55–82.
6.
BesleyT (2005) Political selection. Journal of Economic Perspectives19(3): 43–60.
7.
BilleL (2001) Democratizing a democratic procedure: myth or reality?Party Politics7(3): 363–380.
8.
BlaydesL (2010) Elections and Distributive Politics in Mubarak’s Egypt. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9.
BoixCSvolikMW (2013) The foundations of limited authoritarian government: institutions, commitment, and power-sharing in dictatorships. The Journal of Politics75(2): 300–316.
10.
CareyJMPolga-HecimovichJ (2006) Primary elections and candidate strength in Latin America. The Journal of Politics68(3): 530–543.
11.
CaseyKKamaraABMeriggiN (2019) An Experiment in Candidate Selection. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
12.
ChhibberP (2013) Dynastic parties. Party Politics19(2): 277–295.
13.
ChoiDD (2019) Party Control of Primary Elections: Experimental Evidence from Kenya. Unpublished Working Paper. Mimeo, UC Berkeley.
14.
CrutzenBSYCastanheiraMSahuguetN (2009) Party organization and electoral competition. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization26(2): 212–242.
15.
CruzCLabonneJQuerubÍnP (2017) Politician family networks and electoral outcomes: Evidence from the philippines. American Economic Review107(10): 3006–3037.
16.
ElischerS (2013) Political Parties in Africa: Ethnicity and Party Formation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17.
GallagherMMarshM (1988) Candidate Selection in Comparative Perspective: The Secrete Garden of Politics. Vol. 18. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
GandhiJPrzeworskiA (2007) Authoritarian institutions and the survival of autocrats. Comparative Political Studies40(11): 1279–1301.
19.
GoodKTaylorI (2006) Unpacking the ‘model’: presidential succession in Botswana. In: SouthallRMelberH (eds) Leadership Change and Former Presidents in African Politics. Bloemfontein, South Africa: HSRC Press, 51.
20.
GossettCWLotshwaoK (2009) Report on the 1965 general election and the 1966 local government election. Botswana Notes and Records41.
21.
HazanRYRahatG (2006) Candidate selection: methods and consequences. Handbook of Party Politics4: 1545–1591.
22.
HazanRYRahatG (2010) Democracy within Parties: Candidate Selection Methods and their Political Consequences. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
23.
HiranoSSnyderJMJr (2014) Primary elections and the quality of elected officials. Quarterly Journal of Political Science9(4): 473–500.
24.
Hortala-VallveRMuellerH (2015) Primaries: the unifying force. Public Choice163(3–4): 289–305.
25.
IchinoNNathanNL (2012) Primaries on demand? Intra-party politics and nominations in Ghana. British journal of political science42(04): 769–791.
26.
IchinoNNathanNL (2013) Do primaries improve electoral performance? Clientelism and intra-party conflict in ghana. American Journal of Political Science57(2): 428–441.
27.
KatzRS (2001) The problem of candidate selection and models of party democracy. Party Politics7(3): 277–296.
28.
KatzRSMairP (1995) Changing models of party organization and party democracy. Party Politics1(1): 5–28.
29.
KatzRSMairP (2009) The cartel party thesis: a restatement. Perspectives on Politics7(4): 753–766.
30.
KemahliogluOWeitz-ShapiroRHiranoS (2009) Why primaries in Latin American presidential elections?The Journal of Politics71(01): 339–352.
31.
KeyVO (1949) Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
32.
KollmanKHickenACaramaniD, et al. (2011) Constituency-Level Elections Archive (Clea). Ann Arbor, MI: University of michigan center for political studies.
33.
KrookML (2010) Quotas for Women in Politics: Gender and Candidate Selection Reform Worldwide. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
34.
LangstonJ (2006) The changing party of the institutional revolution. Party Politics12(3): 395–413.
35.
LeBasA (2011) From Protest to Parties: Party-Building and Democratization in Africa. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
36.
LekorweM (2005) Organisation of political parties. In: MaundeniZ (ed) 40 years of Demoracy in Botswana, 1965-2005. Gaborone, Botswana: Mmegi Publishing, 122–146.
37.
LindbergSIMorrisonMKC (2008) Are African voters really ethnic or clientelistic? Survey evidence from Ghana. Political Science Quarterly123(1): 95–122.
38.
LublinD (2015) Election Passport. Washington, DC: American University. Available at: http://www.electionpassport.com/(Accessed 31 March 2015).
39.
LynchGCrawfordG (2011) Democratization in Africa 1990-2010: an assessment. Democratization18(2): 275–310.
40.
MagaloniB (2006) Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Semise in Mexico. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
41.
MagaloniB (2008) Credible power-sharing and the longevity of authoritarian rule. Comparative Political Studies41(4–5): 715–741.
42.
MakgalaCJ (2006) Elite Conflict in Botswana: A History. Pretoria, South Africa: Africa Institute of South Africa.
43.
MakgalaCJBotlhomilweMZ (2017) Elite interests and political participation in Botswana, 1966-2014. Journal of Contemporary African Studies35(1): 54–72.
44.
MasireQKJLewisSR (2006) Very Brave or Very Foolish? Memoirs of an African Democrat. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
45.
MatlandREStudlarDT (2004) Determinants of legislative turnover: a cross-national analysis. British Journal of Political Science34(1): 87–108.
46.
MoehlerDCLindbergSI (2009) Narrowing the legitimacy gap: turnovers as a cause of democratic consolidation. The Journal of Politics71(4): 1448–1466.
47.
MokopakgosiBTMolomoMG (2000) Democracy in the face of a weak opposition in Botswana. Pula: Botswana Journal of African Studies14(1): 3–22.
48.
MolomoMG (2000) Understanding government and opposition parties in Botswana. Commonwealth and Comparative Politics38(1): 65–92.
49.
MolomoR (2012) Democratic Deficit in the Parliament of Botswana. Cape Town, South Africa: Centre for Advanced Studies of African Society.
50.
MolutsiP (1989) Whose Interests Do Botswana’s Politicians Represent? Democracy in Botswana. Gaborone, Botswana: Macmillan, pp. 120–132.
51.
MolutsiPPHolmJD (1990) Developing democracy when civil society is weak: the case of Botswana. African Affairs89(356): 323–340.
52.
MozaffarS (2002) Patterns of electoral governance in Africa’s emerging democracies. International Political Science Review23(1): 85–101.
53.
NorrisP (1997a) Introduction: theories of recruitment. In: NorrisP (ed) Passages to Power: Legislative Recruitment in Advanced Democracies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1–14.
54.
NorrisP (1997b) Passages to Power: Legislative Recruitment in Advanced Democracies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
55.
ParsonJ (1993) Liberal democracy, the liberal state and the 1989 general elections in Botswana. In: StedmanSJ (ed) Botswana: The Political Economy of Democratic Development. Boulder, CO: Rienner.
56.
PoteeteAR (2012) Electoral competition, factionalism, and persistent party dominance in Botswana. The Journal of Modern African Studies50(01): 75–102.
57.
QuerubinP (2016) Family and politics: dynastic persistence in the Philippines. Quarterly Journal of Political Science11(2): 151–181.
58.
Lise RaknerLNicolas van de WalleN (2009) Opposition weakness in Africa. Journal of Democracy20(3): 108–121.
59.
Rashid MotenA (2009) 2004 and 2008 general elections in Malaysia: towards a multicultural, bi-party political system?Asian Journal of Political Science17(2): 173–194.
60.
ReuterOJGandhiJ (2011) Economic performance and elite defection from hegemonic parties. British Journal of Political Science41(1): 83–110.
61.
SaharaAS (1971-2018) Africa South of the Sahara, Regional Surveys of the World. London, UK: Routledge, Europa Publications Limited.
62.
SchattschneiderEE (1942) Party Government: American Government in Action. London, UK: Routledge.
63.
SchedlerA (2002) The menu of manipulation. Journal of Democracy13(2): 36–50.
64.
SerraG (2011) Why primaries? The party’s tradeoff between policy and valence. Journal of Theoretical Politics23(1): 21–51.
65.
ShojiK (2013) When Do Party Leaders Democratize? Analyzing Three Reforms of Voter Registration and Candidate Selection. PhD Thesis. New York, NY: Columbia University.
66.
SiavelisPMMorgensternS (2012) Pathways to Power: Political Recruitment and Candidate Selection in Latin America. University Park, PA: Penn State Press.
67.
SnyderJMJrTingMM (2011) Electoral selection with parties and primaries. American Journal of Political Science55(4): 782–796.
68.
VaishnavM (2017) When Crime Pays: Money and Muscle in Indian Politics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
69.
WantchekonL (2003) Clientelism and voting behavior: evidence from a field experiment in Benin. World Politics55(3): 399–422.
70.
WarrenS (2019) An Uphill Battle: Candidate Selection and Political Accountability in African Legislative Elections. Mimeo, New: York University.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
