Over the past four decades, there has been a proliferation of interest in the causes, consequences, and dynamics of contestation over collective memories across a variety of fields. Unfortunately, collective memories—particularly those of traumatic experiences of violence such as wars and revolutions—have been largely absent from party politics research. Using data collected in an expert survey on the policy positions and ideological orientations of all relevant political parties, as well as an extensive survey of more than ten thousand voters in the six post-conflict countries of Southeast Europe, we demonstrate that collective memories of war are not only subjects of historiographical contestation but are also significant sources of ideological and policy differentiation among political parties, as well as one of the strongest determinants of voter choice. Our analysis shows that collective memories are politically contested and that party politics research would benefit from taking them seriously.
AlexanderJ (2004) Toward a theory of cultural trauma. In: AlexanderJCEyermanRGiesenB, et al. (eds) Cultural Trauma and Collective Identity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 1–30.
2.
AnsolabehereSRiversD (2013) Cooperative survey research. Annual Review of Political Science16(1): 307–329.
3.
AshplantTGDawsonGRoperM (2015) The Politics of War Memory and Commemoration. London, UK: Routledge.
4.
AssmannA (2007) Europe: a community of memory?Bulletin of the GHI Washington40: 11–25.
BieberF (2019) The Rise of Authoritarianism in the Western Balkans. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
7.
BudgeI (2000) Expert judgements of party policy positions: uses and limitations in political research. European Journal of Political Research37(1): 103–113.
8.
BurtBJNeimanM (1987) Elite belief consistency and the effect of position in the policy-making process. Western Political Quarterly40(1): 121–136.
9.
ChirotDShinG-WSneiderDC (2014) Confronting Memories of World War II: European and Asian Legacies. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
10.
ConversePE (1964) The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In: ApterDE (ed) Ideology and its Discontent. New York, NY: Free Press of Glencoe, pp. 206–261.
11.
De VriesCEVan der BrugWVan EgmondMH, et al. (2011) Individual and contextual variation in EU issue voting: the role of political information. Electoral Studies30(1): 16–28.
12.
DixonJM (2018) Dark Pasts: Changing the State’s Story in Turkey and Japan. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
13.
DolenecD (2017) A soldier’s state? Veterans and the welfare regime in Croatia. Anali Hrvatskog Politološkog Društva14(1): 55–77.
14.
DownsA (1957) An economic theory of political action in a democracy. Journal of Political Economy65(2): 135–150.
15.
EdkinsJ (2003) Trauma and the Memory of Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16.
GallagherM (1985) Political Parties in the Republic of Ireland. Dublin, Ireland: Gill&Macmillan.
17.
GillisJR (1994) Memory and identity: the history of a relationship. In: GillisJR (ed) Commemorations: The Politics of National Identity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 3–24.
GödlD (2007) Challenging the past: Serbian and Croatian aggressor-victim narratives. International Journal of Sociology37(1): 43–57.
21.
GreenJHoboltSB (2008) Owning the issue agenda: party strategies and vote choices in British elections. Electoral Studies27(3): 460–476.
22.
HackmannJ (2018) Defending the “good name” of the Polish nation: politics of history as a battlefield in Poland, 2015–18. Journal of Genocide Research20(4): 587–606.
23.
HashimotoA (2015) The Long Defeat: Cultural Trauma, Memory, and Identity in Japan. New York; NY: Oxford University Press.
24.
HiteK (2012) Politics and the Art of Commemoration: Memorials to Struggle in Latin America and Spain. London, UK: Routledge.
25.
HlousekVKopecekL (2016) Origin, Ideology and Transformation of Political Parties: East-Central and Western Europe Compared. London, UK: Routledge.
26.
HoogheLBakkerRBrigevichA, et al. (2010) Reliability and validity of the 2002 and 2006 chapel hill expert surveys on party positioning. European Journal of Political Research49(5): 687–703.
27.
InglehartRKlingemannHD (1976) Party identification, ideological preference and the left–right dimension among western mass publics. In: BudgeICreweIFarlieD (eds) Party Identification and Beyond: Representations of Voting and Party Competition. London, UK: Wiley, pp. 243–273.
28.
InglehartR (1984) The changing structure of political cleavages in Western societies. In: DaltonJFlanaganRCBeckPA (eds). Electoral Change in Advanced Industrial Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 25–69.
29.
InglehartR (2015) The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
IyengarSKinderDR (1987) News that Matters: Television and American Opinion. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
31.
JenningsMK (1992) Ideological thinking among mass publics and political elites. Public Opinion Quarterly56(4): 419–441.
32.
KaltonGFlores-CervantesI (2003) Weighting methods. Journal of Official Statistics19(2): 81–97.
33.
KasapovićM (2019) Povijest, povijesni revizionizam i politike povijesti. Časopis za Suvremenu Povijest51(3): 939–960.
34.
KitscheltHHellemansS (1990) The left–right semantics and the new politics cleavage. Comparative Political Studies23(2): 210–238.
35.
KitscheltHMansfeldovaZMarkowskiR, et al. (1999) Post-Communist Party Systems: Competition, Representation, and Inter-party Cooperation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
36.
KnutsenO (1995) Value orientations, political conflicts and left–right identification: a comparative study. European Journal of Political Research28(1): 63–93.
37.
KriesiH (2010) Restructuration of partisan politics and the emergence of a new cleavage based on values. West European Politics33(3): 673–685.
38.
KubikJBernhardM (2014) A theory of politics of memory. In: BernhardMKubikJ (eds) Twenty Years after Communism: The Politics of Memory and Commemoration. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
39.
LazicS (2013) Memory claims and memory constraints. (re)negotiating statehood and identities in Serbia. Nationalities Papers41(6): 936–952.
40.
LefkofridiZWagnerMWillmannJE (2014) Left-authoritarians and policy representation in Western Europe: electoral choice across ideological dimensions. West European Politics37(1): 65–90.
41.
LesschaeveC (2017) The predictive power of the left–right self-placement scale for the policy positions of voters and parties. West European Politics40(2): 357–377.
42.
LijphartA (1999) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
43.
LindJ (2008) Sorry States: Apologies in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
44.
LinzJJStepanA (1996) Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
45.
MalkaRIShenhavSRRahatG, et al. (2019) The collective memory of dominant parties in parliamentary discourse. Party Politics27(3): pp. 489–500. Online first, 1–12.
46.
MarksGHoogheLSteenbergenMR, et al. (2007) Crossvalidating data on party positioning on European integration. Electoral Studies26(1): 23–38.
47.
OlickJK (2016) The Sins of the Fathers: Germany, Memory, Method. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
48.
OlickJKRobbinsJ (1998) Social memory studies: from “collective memory” to the historical sociology of mnemonic practices. Annual Review of Sociology24: 105–140.
49.
OlickJKVinitzky-SeroussiVLevyD (2011) The Collective Memory Reader. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
50.
PolkJRovnyJBakkerR, et al. (2017) Explaining the salience of anti-elitism and reducing political corruption for political parties in Europe with the 2014 Chapel hill expert survey data. Research & Politics1–9.
51.
Rabe-HeskethSSkrondalA (2008) Multilevel and Longitudinal Modeling Using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press Publication.
52.
RigneyA (2012) Reconciliation and remembering: (How) does it work?Memory Studies5(3): 251–258.
53.
RohrschneiderRWhitefieldS (2009) Understanding cleavages in party systems. Comparative Political Studies42(2): 280–313.
54.
RuedinDMoralesL (2019) Estimating party positions on immigration: assessing the reliability and validity of different methods. Party Politics25(3): 303–314.
55.
SaidEW (2000) Invention, memory, and place. Critical Inquiry26(2): 175–192.
56.
SartoriG (1969) From the sociology of politics to political sociology. In: LipsetS (ed) Politics and Social Sciences. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
57.
SartoriG (1976) Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
58.
ScheufeleDATewksburyD (2006) Framing, agenda setting, and priming: the evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication57(1): 9–20.
59.
SorokaSN (2006) Good news and bad news: asymmetric responses to economic information. The Journal of Politics68(2): 372–385.
60.
SteenbergenMRMarksG (2007) Evaluating expert judgments. European Journal of Political Research46(3): 347–366.
61.
TillyC (1975) The Formation of National States in Western Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
62.
TorcalMMainwaringS (2003) The political recrafting of social bases of party competition: Chile, 1973–95. British Journal of Political Science33(1): 55–84.
Van der BrugW (2010) Structural and ideological voting in age cohorts. West European Politics33(3): 586–607.
65.
Van der EijkCFranklinMN (1996) Choosing Europe? The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
66.
Van der EijkCvan der BrugWKrohM, et al. (2006) Rethinking the dependent variable in voting behavior: on the measurement and analysis of electoral utilities. Electoral Studies25(3): 424–447.
67.
WalczakAvan der BrugWde VriesCE (2012) Long- and short-term determinants of party preferences: inter-generational differences in Western and East Central Europe. Electoral Studies31(2): 273–284.
68.
WalgraveSLefevereJ (2013) Ideology, salience, and complexity: determinants of policy issue incongruence between voters and parties. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties23(4): 456–483.
69.
WolfrumE (1999) Geschichtspolitik in Der Bundesrepublic Deutschland: Der Weg Zur Bundesrepublikanischen Erinnerung 1948–1990. Darmstadt, Germany: WBG.
70.
WoodEJ (2008) The social processes of civil war: the wartime transformation of social networks. Annual Review of Political Science11: 539–561.
71.
ZallerJR (1992) The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
72.
ZhangBMildenbergerMHowePD, et al (2018) Quota sampling using Facebook advertisements. Political Science Research and Methods8(3): 558–564.
73.
ZubrzyckiGWoźnyA (2020) The comparative politics of collective memory. Annual Review of Sociology46: 175–194.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
