Political parties shape electoral outcomes by determining who stands for election and what campaign resources they have at their disposal. The introduction of gender quotas have led party leaders to nominate more women candidates, however, those women disproportionately lose. We contend that one of the reasons that women routinely lose is because party elites withhold the campaign resources necessary to mount an effective campaign. In this paper, we test this resource gatekeeping argument using data on the provision of campaign resources in Brazil. We analyze the distribution of three different types of party resources: candidate identification numbers, financial support, and television airtime. Our findings show that party elites provide female candidates less advantageous candidate identification numbers, less financial support, and less media access than they provide male candidates. Importantly, we do not find that gender gaps in campaign contributions are attributable to differences in candidate quality. This finding suggests that even when women are recruited to run for office, party elites may still undermine their electoral prospects.
AguilarRCunowSDesposatoS (2015) Choice sets, gender, and candidate choice in Brazil. Electoral Studies39: 230–242.
2.
AlbuquerqueADSteibelFBCarneiroCMZ (2008) A Outra Face do Horário Gratuito: Partidos Políticos e Eleições Proporcionais na Televisão. Dados51(2): 459–487.
3.
AmesB (1995) Electoral strategy under open-list proportional representation. American Journal of Political Science39(2): 406–433.
4.
AraújoCBorgesD (2013) Trajetórias Políticas e Chances Eleitorais: Analisando o “Gênero” das Candidaturas em 2010. Revista de Sociologia e Política21(46): 69–91.
5.
AraújoCCalasantiAHtunM (2018) Women, power, and policy in Brazil. In: Schwindt-BayerLA (ed.), Gender and Representation in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 211–227.
6.
AvelinoGFischA (2018) Money, elections, and candidates. In: AmesB (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Brazilian Politics. London: Routledge, pp. 161–174.
7.
BarnesTDHolmanMR (2020) Gender quotas, women’s representation, and legislative diversity. The Journal of Politics82(4): 1271–1286.
8.
BatesonR (2020) Strategic discrimination. Perspectives on Politics18(4): 1068–1087.
9.
Batista PereiraF (2020) Electoral rules and voter bias against female candidates in Brazilian congressional elections. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties. Epub ahead of print 12 August 2020. DOI: 10.1080/17457289.2020.1806287.
10.
BjarnegårdEKennyM (2015) Revealing the “secret garden”: the informal dimensions of political recruitment. Politics & Gender11(4): 748–753.
11.
BjarnegårdEZetterbergP (2016) Political parties and gender quota implementation: the role of bureaucratized candidate selection procedures. Comparative Politics48(3): 393–417.
12.
BuenoNDunningT (2017) Race, resources, and representation evidence from Brazilian politicians. World Politics69: 327.
13.
BurrellBC (1996) A Woman’s Place is in the House: Campaigning for Congress in the Feminist Era. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
14.
ButlerDMPreeceJR (2016) Recruitment and perceptions of gender bias in party leader support. Political Research Quarterly69(4): 842–851.
15.
CamposLA (2015) Socialismo Moreno, Conservadorismo Pálido? Cor e Recrutamento Partidário em São Paulo e Rio de Janeiro nas Eleições de 2012. Dados-Revista de Cîencias Sociais58(3): 689–719.
16.
CareyJMShugartMS (1995) Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: a rank ordering of electoral formulas. Electoral Studies14(4): 417–439.
17.
CarnesNLupuN (2015) Rethinking the comparative perspective on class and representation: evidence from Latin America. American Journal of Political Science59(1): 1–18.
18.
CarvalhoFCDKniessABFontesGS (2018) Representação Feminina na Propaganda Eleitoral Partidária no Brasil: As Candidatas a Deputada Federal pelo Paraná na TV. Estudos em Comunicação1(26): 231–246.
19.
Casas-ZamoraK (2016) The State of Political Finance Regulations in Latin America. Stockholm: International IDEA, Discussion Paper.
20.
CerviEU (2011) O Uso do HGPE Como Recurso Partidário em Eleições Proporcionais no Brasil: Um Instrumento de Análise de Conteúdo. Opinião Pública17(1): 106–136.
21.
CheibubJASinG (2020) Preference vote and intra-party competition in open list PR systems. Journal of Theoretical Politics32(1): 70–95.
22.
CorrêaDSChavesVS (2020) Gender quotas and placement mandates in open and closed lists: similar effects, different mechanisms. Electoral Studies66: 102157.
23.
Crowder-MeyerM (2013) Gendered recruitment without trying: how local party recruiters affect women’s representation. Politics & Gender9(4): 390–413.
24.
CunowSDesposatoSJanuszASellsC (2021) Less is more: the paradox of choice in voting behavior. Electoral Studies69: 102230.
25.
DamoreDFHansfordTG (1999) The allocation of party controlled campaign resources in the house of representatives, 1989-1996. Political Research Quarterly52(2): 371–385.
26.
DancygierRLindgrenKONymanP, et al. (2020) Candidate supply is not a barrier to immigrant representation: a case–control study. American Journal of Political Science, 1–16. DOI: 10.1111/ajps.12553.
27.
DolanKA (2014) When Does Gender Matter?: Women Candidates and Gender Stereotypes in American Elections. USA: Oxford University Press.
28.
dos SantosPAWylieKN (2018) The representation of women. In: AmesB (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Brazilian Politics. London: Routledge, pp.57–71.
29.
FoxRLLawlessJL (2010) If only they’d ask: gender, recruitment, and political ambition. The Journal of Politics72(2): 310–326.
30.
FragaBLHassellHJ (2018) Are minority and women candidates penalized by party politics? Race, gender, and access to party support. Political Research Quarterly2018: 1–16.
31.
FranceschetSKrookMLPiscopoJM (2012) Conceptualizing the impact of gender quotas. In: FranceschetSKrookMLPiscopoJM (eds) The Impact of Gender Quotas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–26.
32.
GallagherMMarshM (1988) Candidate Selection in Comparative Perspective: The Secret Garden of Politics, Vol. 18. London; Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.
33.
GattoML (2016) Endogenous Institutionalism and the Puzzle of Gender Quotas: Insights From Latin America. PhD Thesis, University of Oxford, UK.
34.
GattoMLWylieK (2021) Informal institutions and gendered candidate selection in Brazilian parties. Party Politics. Epub ahead of print 5 May 2021. DOI: 10.1177/13540688211008842.
35.
HassellHJ (2016) Party control of party primaries: party influence in nominations for the US senate. The Journal of Politics78(1): 75–87.
36.
HassellHJ (2018) The Party’s Primary: Control of Congressional Nominations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
37.
HassellHJVisalvanichN (2019) The party’s primary preferences: race, gender, and party support of congressional primary candidates. American Journal of Political Science63(4): 905–919.
38.
Herrnson PaulS (2009) The roles of party organizations, party-connected committees, and party allies in elections. The Journal of Politics71(4): 1207–1224.
39.
HinojosaM (2012) Selecting Women, Electing Women: Political Representation and Candidate Selection in Latin America. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
40.
HinojosaMPiscopoJM (2013) Promoting women’s right to be elected: twenty-five years of quotas in Latin America. In: TeigenMEngelstadF (eds) Gender Quotas: Comparative Perspectives. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.
41.
HinojosaMVázquezL (2018) Selección de Candidaturas, Partidos y Mujeres en América Latina. Mujeres en la Política: Experiencias Nacionales y Subnacionales en América Latina. México, NA: Instituto Electoral de la Ciudad de México e Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas, UNAM.
42.
HtunMNJonesMP (2002) Engendering the right to participate in decision-making: electoral quotas and women’s leadership in Latin America. In: CraskeNMolyneuxM (eds), Gender and the Politics of Rights and Democracy in Latin America. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 32–56.
43.
IPU (2019) Women in National Parliaments. Geneva: The Inter-Parliamentary Union.
44.
JacobsonGC (1985) Party organization and distribution of campaign resources: republicans and democrats in 1982. Political Science Quarterly100(4): 603–625.
45.
JacobsonGC (1993) The misallocation of resources in house campaigns. In: DoddLCOppenheimerBI (eds) Congress Reconsidered. New York, NY: SAGE Publications, pp. 115–139.
46.
JankowskiMMarcinkiewiczK (2019) Ineffective and counterproductive? The impact of gender quotas in open-list proportional representation systems. Politics & Gender15(1): 1–33.
47.
JanuszACamposLA (forthcoming) Candidate advertisements and Afro-Brazilian political marginalization. Latin American Research Review. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3690578. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3690578.
48.
JonesMP (2009) Gender quotas, electoral laws, and the election of women: evidence from the Latin American vanguard. Comparative Political Studies42(1): 56–81.
49.
KolodnyR (1998) Pursuing Majorities: Congressional Campaign Committees in American Politics. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
50.
KrookML (2010) Quotas for Women in Politics: Gender and Candidate Selection Reform Worldwide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
51.
LawlessJL (2004) Women, war, and winning elections: gender stereotyping in the post-September 11th Era. Political Research Quarterly57(3): 479–490.
52.
LawlessJLFoxRL (2010) It Still Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don’t Run for Office. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53.
LlanosBSampleK (2008) 30 Years of Democracy: Riding the Wave? Women’s Political Participation in Latin America. Stockholm, Sweden: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.
54.
McElroyGMarshM (2011) Electing women to the Dil: gender cues and the Irish voter. Irish Political Studies26(4): 521–534.
55.
MustilloTPolga-HecimovichJ (2020) Party, candidate, and voter incentives under free list proportional representation. Journal of Theoretical Politics32(1): 143–167.
56.
NivenD (1998) Party Elites and women candidates: the shape of bias. Women & Politics19(2): 57–80.
57.
NorrisP (ed.) (1997) Passages to Power: Legislative Recruitment in Advanced Democracies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
58.
NorrisPLovenduskiJ (1995) Political Recruitment: Gender, Race and Class in the British Parliament. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
59.
OcampoAX (2018) The wielding influence of political networks: representation in majority-Latino districts. Political Research Quarterly71(1): 184–198.
60.
PiscopoJM (2016) Democracy as gender balance: the shift from quotas to parity in Latin America. Politics, Groups, and Identities4(2): 214–230.
61.
PortoM (2006) Political advertising and democracy in Brazil. In: KaidLHoltz-BachaC (eds), The Sage Handbook of Political Advertising. Thousand Oakes: SAGE Publications, pp.129–143.
62.
RikerWH (1962) The Theory of Political Coalitions, Vol. 173. London: Yale University Press.
63.
RomeroKFigueiredoMAraújoC (2012) Participação Feminina e Dinâmica de Campanha no HGPE nas Eleições 2010 para a Câmara dos Deputados.
64.
RosenJ (2013) The effects of political institutions on women’s political representation: a comparative analysis of 168 countries from 1992 to 2010. Political Research Quarterly66(2): 306–321.
65.
SacchetT (2011) Partidos Políticos e Sub-representação Feminina: Um Estudo Sobre Recrutamento Legislativo e Financiamento de Campanhas no Brasil. In: PaivaDBezerraHD (Orgs.). Mulheres, Política e Poder. Goiânia: Cânone Editorial.
66.
SacchetTSpeckB (2012) Financiamento Eleitoral, Representação Política e Gênero: Uma Análise das Eleições de 2006. Opinião Pública18(1): 177–197.
67.
SamuelsD (2001a) Money, elections, and democracy in Brazil. Latin American Politics and Society43(2): 27–48.
68.
SamuelsD (2001b) When does every penny count? Intra-party competition and campaign finance in Brazil. Party Politics7(1): 89–102.
69.
SanbonmatsuK (2006) Do parties know that “women win”? Party leader beliefs about women’s electoral chances. Politics & Gender2(4): 431.
70.
SanbonmatsuK (2010) Where Women Run: Gender and Party in the American States. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
71.
SchattschneiderE (1960) Party Government. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
72.
SchmidtGD (2009) The election of women in list PR systems: testing the conventional wisdom. Electoral Studies28(2): 190–203.
73.
SchmittRCarneiroLPKuschnirK (1999) Estratégias de Campanha no Horário Gratuito de Propaganda Eleitoral em Eleições Proporcionais. Dados42(2): 00–00.
74.
Schwindt-BayerLA (2009) Making quotas work: the effect of gender quota laws on the election of women. Legislative Studies Quarterly34(1): 5–28.
75.
SchwarzSHuntWCoppockA (2018) What have we learned about gender from candidate choice experiments? A meta-analysis of 30 factorial survey experiments. Unpublished Manuscript.
76.
SeltzerRANewmanJLeightonMV (1997) Sex as a Political Variable: Women as Candidates and Voters in US Elections. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
77.
ShugartMS (2005) Comparative electoral systems research: the maturation of a field and new challenges ahead. In: GallagherMMitchellP (eds) The Politics of Electoral Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
78.
SiavelisPM (2012) Pathways to Power: Political Recruitment and Candidate Selection in Latin America. University Park, PA: Penn State Press.
79.
SilvaBFDCerviEU (2017) Padrões de Financiamento Eleitoral no Brasil: As Receitas de Postulantes à Câmara dos Deputados em 2010 e 2014. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política23: 75–110.
80.
SilveiraBSMelloJ (2011) Campaign advertising and election outcomes: quasi natural experiment evidence from gubernatorial elections in Brazil. The Review of Economic Studies78(2): 590–612.
81.
SpeckBWCerviEU (2016) Dinheiro, Tempo e Memória Eleitoral: Os Mecanismos que Levam ao Voto nas Eleições para Prefeito em 2012. Dados-Revista de Ciências Sociais59(1): 53–90.
82.
ThomasMBodetMA (2013) Sacrificial lambs, women candidates, and district competitiveness in Canada. Electoral Studies32(1): 153–166.
83.
TrippAMKangA (2008) The global impact of quotas: on the fast track to increased female legislative representation. Comparative Political Studies41(3): 338–361.
84.
WylieKN (2018) Party Institutionalization and Women’s Representation in Democratic Brazil. New York: Cambridge University Press.
85.
WylieK (2020) Taking bread off the table: race, gender, resources and political ambition in Brazil. European Journal of Politics and Gender3(1): 121–142.
86.
WylieKdos SantosP (2016) A law on paper only: electoral rules, parties, and the persistent underrepresentation of women in Brazilian legislatures. Politics & Gender12(3): 415.
87.
WylieKdos SantosPMarcelinoD (2019) Extreme non-viable candidates and quota maneuvering in Brazilian legislative elections. Opinião Pública25(1): 1–28.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
