Focusing on the relationship between the access of political parties to direct public funding and electoral support for anti-political-establishment (e.g. populist, extremist) parties (APEp), this article tries to fill an important gap in the literature. Whereas previous contributions, mostly focused on the United States or established democracies in Western Europe, have presented contradictory findings, our study of 19 new democracies in East Central Europe clearly shows that the absence of state subsidies for political parties boosts support for those with an anti-political-establishment character. More importantly, and taking into account the minimum legal payout threshold that grants parties access to public subsidies, our results show that the more restrictive the regulations and the greater the difficulties faced by parties in obtaining state help, the higher the support for APEp. Our findings have obvious implications for the development of post-Communist party systems and the future of legislative (party funding) reform in the region.
AbediA (2004) Anti-Political Establishment Parties. A Comparative Analyses. London and New York, NY: Routledge.
2.
BaronDP (1994) Electoral competition with informed and uninformed voters. American Political Science Review88(1): 33–47.
3.
BartoliniSMairP (1990) Identity, Competition, and Electoral Availability: The Stabilization of European Electorates 1885–1985. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
BichayN (2020) Public campaign financing and the rise of radical-right parties. Electoral Studies66: 102159.
van BiezenI (2014) “Introduction”, On Parties, Party Systems and Democracy: Selected Writings of Peter Mair. Colchester: ECPR Press.
7.
van BiezenICasal BértoaF (2014) Party regulation in post-authoritarian contexts: Southern Europe in comparative perspective. South European Society and Politics19(1): 71–87.
8.
van BiezenIKopeckýP (2017) The paradox of party funding: the limited impact of state subsidies on party membership. In: ScarrowSEWebbPDPoguntkeT (eds) Organizing Political Parties: Representation, Participation and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9.
BirnirJK (2005) Public venture capital and party institutionalization. Comparative Political Studies38(8): 915–938.
10.
BolleyerN (2013) New Parties in Old Party Systems: Persistence and Decline in Seventeen Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
BolleyerNRuthS (2018) Elite investments in party institutionalization in new democracies: a two-dimensional approach. Journal of Politics80(1): 288–302.
12.
BoothERobbinsJ (2010) Assessing the impact of campaign finance on party system institutionalization. Party Politics16(5): 629–650.
13.
BrücknerMGrünerHP (2010) Economic Growth and the Rise of Political Extremism: Theory and Evidence. Working Paper. Discussion Papers 7723, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers. Available at: https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/7723.html (accessed 29 April 2021).
14.
CarterE (2005) The Extreme Right in Western Europe. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
15.
Casal BértoaF (2021) Database on WHO GOVERNS in Europe and beyond, PSGo. Available at: whogoverns.eu (accessed 29 April 2021).
16.
Casal BértoaFvan BiezenI (2018) Introduction: party regulation and party politics in post-communist Europe. In: BértoaFCvan BiezenI (eds) The Regulation of Post- Communist Party Politics. Abingdon and New York, NY: Routledge.
17.
Casal BértoaFRamaJ (2020) Party decline or social transformation? Economic, institutional and sociological change and the rise of anti-political-establishment parties in Western Europe. European Political Science Review12(4): 503–523.
18.
Casal BértoaFRamaJ (2021) The antiestablishment challenge. Journal of Democracy32(1): 37–51.
19.
Casal BértoaFSpirovaM (2019) Parties between thresholds: state subsidies and party behavior in post-communist democracies. Party Politics25(3): 233–244.
20.
Casal BértoaFTaleskiD (2016) Regulating party politics in the Western Balkans: the legal sources of party system development in Macedonia. Democratization23(3): 545–567.
21.
Casal BértoaFMolenaarFPiccioDR, et al. (2014) The world upside down: de-legitimising political finance regulation. International Political Science Review35(3): 355–376.
22.
ChiaramonteAEmanueleV (2017) Party system volatility, regeneration and de-institutionalization in Western Europe (1945-2015). Party Politics23(4): 376–388.
23.
ColemanJMannaP (2000) Congressional campaign spending and the quality of democracy. The Journal of Politics62(3): 757–789.
24.
Costa LoboMRazzuoliI (2017) Party finance and perceived party responsiveness. In: SusanESPaulDWPoguntkeT (eds) Organizing Political Parties: Representation, Participation and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
De la TorreCMazzoleniO (2019) Do we need a minimum definition of populism? An appraisal of Mudde’s conceptualization. Populism2: 79–95.
26.
DownsA (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
27.
DuvergerM (1954) Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. New York, NY: Wiley.
28.
EmanueleVChiaramonteASoareS (2020) Does the iron curtain still exist? The convergence in electoral volatility between Eastern and Western Europe. Government and Opposition55(2): 308–326.
29.
EnyediZCasal BértoaF (2018) Institutionalization and de-institutionalization in post-communist party systems. East European Politics and Societies32(3): 422–450.
30.
FalgueraEJonesSOhmanM (2014) Funding of Political Parties and Election Campaigns: A Handbook of Political Finance. Stockholm: International IDEA.
31.
FranciaPL (2003) The Financiers of Congressional Elections: Investors, Ideologues, and Intimates. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
32.
FranciaPLGreenJCHerrnsonPS, et al. (2005) Limousine liberals and corporate conservatives: the financial constituencies of the democratic and republican parties. Social Science Quarterly86(4): 761–778.
33.
FunkeMSchularickMTrebeschC (2016) Going to extremes: politics after financial crisis, 1870–2014. European Economic Review88(C): 227–260.
34.
GallagherM (1991) Proportionality, disproportionality and electoral systems. Electoral Studies10(1): 33–51.
HallAB (2014) Public funding of elections increases candidate polarization by reducing the influence of moderate donors. LSE American Politics and Policy (14th May). Available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/58893/ (accessed 29 April 2021)
37.
HanleySSikkA (2016) Economy, corruption or floating voters? Explaining the breakthroughs of anti-establishment reform parties in Eastern Europe?Party Politics22(4): 522–533.
38.
HoboltSBJames TilleyJ (2016) Fleeing the centre: the rise of challenger parties in the aftermath of the euro crisis. West European Politics39(5): 971–991.
39.
HowardMM (2003) The Weakness of Civil Society in Post-Communist Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40.
HummelCGerringJBurtT (2020) Do political finance reforms reduce corruption?British Journal of Political Science51(2), 869–889.
JackmanRWVolpertK (1996) Conditions favouring parties of the extreme right in Western Europe. British Journal of Political Science26(4): 501–521.
44.
JonesR (1981) State public campaign finance: Implications for partisan politics. American Journal of Political Science25(2): 342–361. doi:10.2307/2110857
45.
KarpJAMilazzoC (2015) Democratic scepticism and political participation in europe. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties25(1): 97–110. doi: 10.1080/17457289.2014.996157
46.
KatzRSMairP (1995) Changing models of party organization and party democracy: the emergence of the cartel party. Party Politics1(1): 5–28.
47.
KatzRSMairP (2009) The cartel party thesis: a restatement. Perspectives on Politics7(4): 753–766.
48.
KatzRSMairP (2018) Democracy and the Cartelization of Political Parties. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49.
KayserMAWlezienC (2011) Performance pressure: patterns of partisanship and the economic vote. European Journal of Political Research50(3): 365–394.
50.
KostelkaF (2014) The state of political participation in post-communist democracies: Low but surprisingly little biased citizen engagement. Europe-Asia Studies66(6): 945–968. doi: 10.1080/09668136.2014.905386
51.
KriesiHPappasTS (2015) European Populism in the Shadow of the Great Recession. Colchester: ECPR Press.
52.
LaaksoMTaageperaR (1979) Effective number of parties. A measure with applications to West Europe. Comparative Political Studies12(4): 3–27.
53.
LeckeyA (2001) The Lack of Money is the Root of All Evil: Mark Twain’s Timeless Wisdom on Money and Wealth for Today’s Investor. New Jersey, NJ: Prentice Hall Press.
54.
LetkiN (2004) Socialization for participation? Trust, membership, and democratization in East-Central Europe. Political Research Quarterly57(4): 65–679.
55.
Lewis-BeckMSStegmaierM (2013) The V-P function revisited: a survey of the literature on vote and popularity functions after over 40 years. Public Choice157(3): 367–385.
56.
LinzJJ (1990a) The perils of presidentialis. Journal of Democracy1(1): 51–69.
57.
LinzJJ (1990b) The virtues of Parliamentarism. Journal of Democracy1(4): 84–91.
58.
MairP (2014) Representative vs. responsible government. In: MairP (ed), On Parties, Party Systems and Democracy: Selected Writings of Peter Mair. Colchester: ECPR Press.
59.
MasketSEMillerMG (2015) Does public election funding create more extreme legislators? Evidence from Arizona and Maine. State Politics Policy Quarterly15(1): 24–40.
60.
MorganJ (2013) Bankrupt Representation and Party System Collapse. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.
61.
MoscaLTronconiF (2019) Beyond left and right: the eclectic populism of the Five Star Movement. West European Politics42(6): 1258–1283.
62.
NassmacherK-H (2009) The Funding of Party Competition: Political Finance in 25 Democracies. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
63.
NorrisPvan EsAA (2016) Checkbook Elections? Political Finance in Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
64.
PedersonMN (1979) The dynamics of European party systems: Changing patterns of electoral volatility. European Journal of Political Research7(1): 1–26.
PotterJTavitsM (2015) The impact of campaign finance laws on party competition. British Journal of Political Science45(1): 73–95.
69.
PowellGB (1982) Contemporary democracies: Participation, stability and violence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
70.
RashkovaERSuY-P (2020) Political finance regimes and party system size: evidence from new and established European democracies. European Political Science Review12(1): 35–48.
71.
RamaJCasal BértoaF (2020) Are anti-political-establishment parties a peril for European democracy? A longitudinal study from 1950 till 2017. Representation56(3): 387–410.
72.
RooduijnMvan KesselSFroioC, et al. (2020) The PopuList 2.0: an overview of populist, far right, far left and Eurosceptic parties in Europe. Available at: https://popu-list.org/(accessed 29 April 2021).
73.
RoseR (1995) Mobilizing demobilized voters in post-Communist societies. Party Politics1(4): 549–563.
74.
RoseRMishlerW (1996) Testing the Churchill hypothesis: popular support for democracy and its alternatives. Journal of Public Policy16(1): 29–58.
75.
SartoriG (1976) Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
76.
ScarrowS (2006) Party subsidies and the freezing of party competition: do cartel mechanisms work?West European Politics29(4): 619–639.
77.
ScarrowSE (2007) Political finance in comparative perspective. Annual Review of Political Science10: 193–210.
78.
SchedlerA (1996) Anti-political-establishment parties. Party Politics2: 291–312.
79.
StanleyB (2008) The thin ideology of populism. Journal of Political Ideologies13(1): 95–110.
80.
StratmannT (2005) Some talk: money in politics. A (Partial) review of the literature. Public Choice124(1/2): 135–156.
81.
TavitsM (2013) Post-Communist Democracies and Party Organization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
82.
TavitsMLetkiN (2009) When left is right: party ideology and policy in post-communist Europe. American Political Science Review103(04): 555–569.
83.
TomashevskiyA (2019) Does private money increase party extremism?Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and PartiesFirst View Online.
84.
van KesselS (2015) Populist Parties in Europe: Agents of Discontent?Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
85.
WagnerM (2012) Defining and measuring niche parties. Party Politics18(6): 845–864.
86.
WhiteleyP (2011) Is the party over? The decline of party activism and membership across the democratic world. Party Politics17(1): 21–44.
87.
WhiteleyP (2014) Does regulation make political parties more popular? A multi-level analysis of party support in Europe. International Political Science Review35(3): 376–399.
88.
WinterRKBoltonJR (1973) Campaign Financing and Political Freedom. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
89.
WolinetzSZasloveA (2018) Absorbing the Blow. Populist Parties and Their Impact on Parties and Party Systems. London/New York, NY: Rowman and Littlefield.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
