What affects the adoption of affirmative gender equality measures across Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries, given that the European Union directives do not require them? Drawing on mandate theory of democracy and using original data on party positions on gender equality in eight postcommunist countries observed over 25 years, I argue that CEE political parties and their position on the issue are the answer to this empirical puzzle. Contrary to the earlier scholarship on new democracies that finds only limited mandate fulfillment (Roberts 2010; Stokes, 2001), the study shows that parties in government act responsively when it comes to gender equality promotion. My findings also demonstrate that it is parties, not feminist movements that drive the adoption of affirmative action policies in the region
AvdeyevaO (2015) Defending Women’s Rights in Europe. Gender Equality and EU Enlargement. New York, NY: State University of New York.
2.
BanaszakLA (1996) Why Movements Succeed or Fail: Opportunity, Culture, and the Struggle for Woman Suffrage. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
3.
BlondelJMüller-RommelFMalovaD (2007) Governing New European Democracies. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
4.
BohleDBélaG (2012) Capitalist Diversity on Europe’s Periphery. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
5.
Box-SteffensmeierJJonesB (2004) Event History Modeling. A Guide for Social Scientists. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BudgeIKlingemannHDVolkensA, et al. (2001). Mapping Policy Preferences. Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945-1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7.
CelisK (2008) Gendering representation. In: GoertzGMazurA (eds), Politics, Gender, and Concepts. Theory and Methodology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp.71–93.
CoppedgeMGerringJLindbergSI, et al. (2017). “V-Dem Dataset v7.1” and “Codebook”. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. University of Gothenburg, Varieties of Democracy Institute: Working Paper No. 21, 2nd edition.
10.
CowlesMCaporasoJRisseT (eds.) (2001) Transforming Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
11.
CurryJ (2011) Poland: the politics of ‘God’s playground. In: WolchikSCurryJ (eds), Central and East European Politics. From Communism to Democracy, Wolchik, Sharon and Jane Curry. New York, NY: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc., pp.161–186.
12.
DaltonRJWattenbergMP (2002) Parties Without Partisans. Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
13.
DownsA (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
14.
EastonD (1957) An approach to the analysis of political systems. World Politics9(3): 383–400.
15.
EinhornB (1993) Cinderella Goes to Market: Citizenship, Gender, and Women’s Movements in East Central Europe. New York, NY: Verso.
16.
EinhornB (2006) Citizenship in an Enlarging Europe. From Dream to Awakening. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
17.
EriksonRSMackuenMBStimsonJ (2002) The Macro Polity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Esping-AndersenC (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
19.
FischerME (1998) From tradition and ideology to elections and competition. The changing status of women in Romanian politics. In: RueschemeyerM (ed), Women in Politics of Postcommunist Eastern Europe. New York, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc, pp. 168–195.
20.
FodorE (2006) The Story behind the Numbers: Women and Employment in Central and Eastern Europe and the Western Commonwealth of Independent States. Bratislava: United Nations Development Fund for Women.
21.
FodorEvan der LippeT (1998) Changes in gender inequality in six Eastern European Countries. European Journal of Women’s Studies21(4): 382–398.
22.
GelbJ (2003) Gender Politics in Japan and the United States: Comparing Women’s Movements, Rights, and Politics. New York, NY: Palgrave.
23.
GhodseeK (2009) The return of the king: women in the Bulgarian Parliament. In: RueschemeyerMWolchikS (eds), Women in Power in Post-Communist Parliaments. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press; Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, pp. 161–192.
24.
GledhillJKingC (2011) Romania since 1989: living beyond the Past. In: WolchikSCurryJ (eds), Central and East European Politics. From Communism to Democracy. New York, NY: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, pp. 313–334
25.
GreyS (2006) Numbers and beyond. The relevance of critical mass in gender research. Politics and Gender2(4): 492–502.
26.
GwiazdaA (2019) Introduction to the special issue on politics and gender in Eastern Europe. Politics & Gender15: 175–181.
27.
HaneyL (2002) Inventing the Needy: Gender and the Politics of Welfare in Hungary. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
28.
HantraisL (ed) (2000) Gendered Policies in Europe. London, UK: Macmillan.
29.
HaywardCR (2009) Making interest: on representation and democratic legitimacy. In: ShapiroIStokesSWoodEJKirshnerAS (eds) Political Representation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp.111–138.
30.
HendersonSLJeydelAS (2014) Women and Politics in a Global World. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press.
31.
HtunMWeldonL (2012) The civic origins of progressive policy change: combating violence against women in global perspective. American Political Science Review106(3): 548–569.
32.
HtunMWeldonL (2018) The Logics of Gender Justice. State Action on Women’s Rights Around the World. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33.
KantolaJ (2010) Gender and the European Union. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
34.
KlingemannHDHofferbertRIBudgeI (1994) Parties, Policies, and Democracy. Boulder, San Francisco, Oxford: Westview Press.
35.
KostadinovaTKostadinovaP (2016) Party promises, voter understanding, and mandate responsiveness in East European Politics. Politics and Policy44(1): 20–29.
36.
KosteleckyT (2002) Political Parties after Communism. Developments in East-Central Europe. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
37.
KostovaD (1998) Similar or different? Women in Postcommunist Bulgaria. In: RueschemeyerM (ed), Women in Politics of Postcommunist Eastern Europe. New York, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc, pp. 249–266.
38.
KrupavičiusAMatonyteI (2003) Women in Lithuanian politics: from nomenklatura selection to representation. In: MatlandRMontgomeryK (eds), Women’s Access to Political Power in Post-Communist Europe. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 81–104.
39.
LaFontS (2001) One step forward, two steps back: women in the post-communist states. Communist and Post-Communist Studies34(2): 203–220.
40.
LinzJ (1978) The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes: Crisis, Breakdown, Re-equilibration. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.
LombardoEForestM (eds) (2012) The Europeanization of Gender Equality Policies. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
43.
LongJSFreeseJ (2014) Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. College Station, TX: A Stata Press Publication.
44.
MainwaringSTorcalM (2006) Party system institutionalization and party system theory after the third wave of democratization. Handbook of Party Politics11(6): 204–227.
45.
MartinsenDS (2007) The Europeanization of gender equality—who controls the scope of non-discrimination?Journal of European Public Policy14(4): 544–562.
46.
Mateo DiazM (2005) Representing Women? Female Legislators in West European Parliaments. Oxford, UK: ECPR.
47.
MatlandRMontgomeryK (eds) (2003) Women’s Access to Political Power in Post-Communist Europe. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
48.
MoghadamV (ed) (1993) Democratic Reform and the Position of Women in Transitional Economies. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
49.
NaurinE (2011) Election Promises, Party Behavior, and Voter Perceptions. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
50.
NorrisP (1987) Politics and Sexual Equality: The Comparative Position of Women in Western Democracies. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
51.
PitkinH (1967) The Concept of Representation. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
52.
PowellGBJr (1982) Contemporary Democracies: Participation, Stability, and Violence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
53.
PowellGBJr (2000) Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Views. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
54.
RistovaK (2003) Establishing a Machocracy: women and elections in Macedonia (1990-8). In: MatlandRMontgomeryK (eds), Women’s Access to Political Power in Post-Communist Europe. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 196–216.
55.
RobertsA (2010) The Quality of Democracy in Eastern Europe. Public Preferences and Policy Reforms. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
56.
RobertsonD (1976) A Theory of Party Competition. London, UK: Wiley.
57.
RoyedT (1996) Testing the mandate model in Britain and the United States: evidence from the Reagan and Thatcher Eras. British Journal of Political Science26(1): 45–80.
58.
RueschemeyerM (ed) (1998) Women in Politics of Postcommunist Eastern Europe. New York, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.
59.
RueschemeyerM (2011) Women’s Participation in Postcommunist politics. In: WolchikSCurryJ (eds), Central and East European Politics. From Communism to Democracy. New York, NY: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, pp. 109–124.
SiemeńskaR (2009) Women’s representation in the polish parliament and the determinants of their effectiveness. In: RueschemeyerMWolchikS (eds), Women in Power in Post-Communist Parliaments. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press; Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, pp. 61–92.
62.
SquiresJ (2007) The New Politics of Gender Equality. London, UK: Macmillan Education.
63.
StokesS (2001) Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin America. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
64.
StrømKMüllerWCBergmanT (2010) Cabinets and Coalition Bargaining: The Democratic Life Cycle in Western Europe. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
65.
ThomsonR (1999) The Party Mandate: Election Pledges and Governmental Actions in the Netherelands, 1986-1998. Groningen: ICS: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
66.
ThomsonRTerryRElinN, et al. (2017) The fulfillment of parties’ election pledges: a comparative study on the impact of power sharing. American Journal of Political Science61(3): 527–543.
67.
TsebelisG (2002) Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
VolkensAKrauseWLehmannP, et al. (2018) The Manifesto Data Collection. Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR). Version 2018b. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB). https://manifesto-project.wzb.eu/datasets/MPDS2018b (accessed 25 March 2020).
70.
WängnerudL (2009) Women in parliaments: descriptive and substantive representation. Annual Review of Political Science12: 51–69.
71.
WebbPWhiteS (2007) Party Politics in New Democracies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
72.
WebbPWhiteSDavidF, et al. (2002) Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
73.
WeldonSL (2002) Protest, Policy, and the Problem of Violence Against Women. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
74.
WenzelburgerG (2014) Parties, institutions and the politics of law and order: how political institutions and partisan ideologies shape law-and-order spending in twenty western industrialized countries. British Journal of Political Science45: 663–687.
75.
WolchikSL (2009) Parliament in the Czech Republic. In: RueschemeyerMWolchikS (eds), Women in Power in Post-Communist Parliaments. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press; Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, pp. 111–161.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
