Based on real option theory and transaction cost theory, we hypothesize that a high level of governing party fractionalization in the host country’s government fosters FDI because high governing party fractionalization is associated with low economic policy uncertainty. By using the data of governing party fractionalization in 135 host countries and greenfield FDI projects from China from 2003 to 2015, the findings of the study confirm the positive effect of governing party fractionalization on FDI. Moreover, the results of our studies confirm that the positive effect of governing party fractionalization on FDI is weakened for investing firms with experience in host countries and with central government ownership, for FDI projects conducted in natural resource industries, and in host countries with high GDP growth and low capital abundance. We further confirm that economic policy uncertainty is a mechanism through which governing party fractionalization influences FDI.
BellingerNMSonB (2019) Political parties and foreign direct investment inflows among developing countries. Political Studies67(3): 712–731.
4.
BengoaMSanchez-RoblesB (2003) Foreign direct investment, economic freedom and growth: new evidence from Latin America. European Journal of Political Economy19(3): 529–549.
5.
BertrandOBetschingerMSettlesA (2015) The relevance of political affinity for the initial acquisition premium in cross-border acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal37(10): 2071–2091.
6.
BjorvatnKFarzaneganMRSchneiderF (2012) Resource curse and power balance: evidence from oil-rich countries. World Development40(7): 1308–1316.
BrinkT (2015) Chinese firms going global: recent OFDI trends, policy support and international implication. International Politics52: 666–683.
9.
BuckleyPJCleggLJCrossAR, et al. (2007) The determinants of Chinese outward foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies38(4): 499–518.
10.
BuckleyPJCleggLJCrossAR, et al. (2018) A retrospective and agenda for future research on Chinese outward foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies49(1): 4–23.
11.
BütheTMilnerHV (2008) The politics of foreign direct investment into developing countries: increasing FDI through international trade agreements?American Journal of Political Science52 (4): 741–762.
12.
BütheTMilnerHV (2009) Bilateral investment treaties and foreign direct investment: a political analysis. In: SauvantKPSachsLE (eds) The Effect of Treaties on Foreign Direct Investment: Bilateral Investment Treaties, Double Taxation Treaties, and Investment Flows. Oxford/New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp.171–224.
13.
CaballeroRJHammourML (1998) The macroeconomics of specificity. Journal of Political Economy106(4): 724–767.
14.
ChakrabartiA (2001) The determinants of foreign direct investment: sensitivity analyses of cross-country regressions. Kyklos54(1): 89–114.
15.
ChildJRodriguesSB (2005) The internationalization of Chinese firms: a case for theoretical extension. Management and Organizational Review1(3): 381–410.
16.
ChildJRodriguesSB (2011) How organizations engage with external complexity: a political action perspective. Organization Studies32(6): 803–824.
17.
ChoiSFurceriDYoonC (2021) Policy uncertainty and foreign direct investment. Review of International Economics29(2): 195–227.
18.
ClementsBNanouKReal-DatoJ (2018) Economic crisis and party responsiveness on the left-right dimension in the European Union. Party Politics24(1): 52–64.
19.
CoxGWMcCubbinsMD (2001) The institutional determinants of economic policy outcomes. In: HaggardSMcCubbinsMD (eds) Presidents, Parliaments and Policy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp.21–63.
Cuervo-CazurraALiC (2021) State ownership and internationalization: the advantage and disadvantage of stateness. Journal of World Business56(1). DOI: 10.1016/j.jwb.2020.101112.
22.
DaltonRJ (2008) The quantity and the quality of party systems comparative: party system polarization, its measurement, and its consequences. Comparative Political Studies41(7): 899–920.
23.
DixitAK (1992) Investment and hysteresis. Journal of Economic Perspectives6: 107–132.
24.
DixitAKPindyckRS (1994) Investment Under Uncertainty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25.
DreherAMikoschHVoigtS (2015) Membership has its privileges-the effect of membership in international organizations on FDI. World Development66: 346–358.
26.
DunningJH (2000) The eclectic paradigm as an envelope for economic and business: theories of MNE activity. International Business Review9(1): 163–190.
27.
DuttPMitraD (2005) Political ideology and endogenous trade policy: an empirical investigation. The Review of Economics and Statistics87(1): 59–72.
28.
EnikolopovRZhuravskayaE (2007) Decentralization and political institutions. Journal of Public Economics91(11–12): 2261–2290.
29.
GrittersováJMahutgaMC (2020) Government ownership of banks, political system transparency, and regulatory barriers to new firm entry. Journal of International Relations and Development23: 781–813.
30.
HaEKangM (2015) Government policy responses to financial crises: identifying patterns and policy origins in developing countries. World Development68: 264–281.
31.
HodlerR (2006) The curse of natural resources in fractionalized countries. European Economic Review50(6): 1367–1386.
32.
HuangYXieELiY, et al. (2017) Does state ownership facilitate outward FDI of Chinese SOEs? Institutional development, market competition, and the logic of interdependence between governments and SOEs. International Business Review26: 176–188.
33.
JensenN (2003) Democratic governance and multinational corporations: political regimes and inflows of foreign direct investment. International Organization57(3): 587–616.
34.
JiménezABenito-OsorioDPuckJ, et al. (2018) The multi-faceted role of experience dealing with policy risk: the impact of intensity and diversity of experiences. International Business Review27(1): 102–112.
35.
JulioBYookY (2016) Policy uncertainty, irreversibility, and cross-border flows of capital. Journal of International Economics103: 13–26.
36.
KingsleyAFNoordewierTGVanden BerghRG (2017) Overstating and understating interaction results in international business research. Journal of World Business52(2): 286–295.
37.
KnutsenCHRyghAHveemH (2011) Does state ownership matter? Institutions’ effect on foreign direct investment revisited. Business and Politics13(1): 1–31.
38.
KolstadIWiigA (2012) What determines Chinese outward FDI?Journal of World Business47(1): 26–34.
39.
LiMHCuiLLuJ (2014) Varieties in state capitalism: outward FDI strategies of central and local state-owned enterprises from emerging economy countries. Journal of International Business Studies45 (8): 980–1004.
40.
LiQResnickA (2003) Reversal of fortunes: democratic institutions and foreign direct investment inflows to developing countries. International Organization57(1): 175–211.
41.
LijphartA (2012) Patterns of Democracy. New York, NY: Yale University Press.
42.
LuoYXueQHanB (2010) How emerging market governments promote outward FDI: experience from China. Journal of World Business45: 68–79.
43.
MacIntyreA (2003) The Power of Institutions: Political Architecture and Governance. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
44.
MahaniSNobakhtM (2014) Political regime and FDI inflows: empirical evidence from upper middle income countries. Journal of Finance and Economics2(3): 75–82.
45.
MariottiSMarzanoR (2019) Varieties of capitalism and the internationalization of state-owned enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies50(5): 669–691.
46.
MartinLWVanbergG (2013) Multiparty government, fiscal institutions and public spending. Journal of Politics75(4): 953–967.
47.
MartinLWVanbergG (2014) Parties and policymaking in multiparty governments: the legislative median, ministerial autonomy, and the coalition compromise. American Journal of Political Science58(4): 979–996.
48.
MoosaIA (2002) Foreign Direct Investment: Theory, Evidence and Practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
49.
NeumayerESpessL (2005) Do bilateral investment treaties increase foreign direct investment to developing countries. World Development33(10): 1567–1585.
50.
NooruddinI (2011) Coalition Politics and Economic Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51.
NwokoraZPelizzoR (2018) Measuring party system change: a systems perspective. Political Studies66(1): 100–118.
52.
OuyangCLiuMChenY, et al. (2019) Overcoming liabilities of origin: human resource management localization of Chinese multinational corporations in developed markets. Human Resource Management58(5): 543–561.
53.
OwenE (2019) Foreign direct investment and elections: the impact of greenfield FDI on incumbent party reelection in Brazil. Comparative Political Studies52(4): 613–645.
54.
PetersenM (2009) Estimation errors in finance panel data sets: comparing approach. Review of Financial Studies22(1): 435–480.
55.
PintoPMPintoS (2008) The politics of investment partisanship: and the sectoral allocation of foreign direct investment. Economics & Politics20(2): 216–254.
56.
RamasamyBYeungMLaforetS (2012) China’s outward foreign direct investment: location choice and firm ownership. Journal of World Business47(1): 17–25.
57.
RashidMLooiXHWongSJ (2017) Political stability and FDI in the most competitive Asia Pacific countries. Journal of Financial Economic Policy9(2): 140–155.
58.
RazinASadkaEYuenCW (1998) A pecking order of capital inflows and international tax principles. Journal of International Economics44(1): 45–68.
59.
RodrikD (1991) Policy uncertainty and private investment in developing countries. Journal of Development Economics36(2): 229–242.
60.
RoubiniNSachsJD (1989) Political and economic determinants of budget deficits in industrial democracies. European Economic Review33(5): 903–933.
61.
SaieghSM (2009) Coalition governments and sovereign debt crises. Economics & Politics21: 232–254.
62.
SchmidtMG (1996) When parties matter: a review of the possibilities and limits of partisan influence on public Policy. European Journal of Political Research30(2): 155–186.
63.
SimmonsJHickenAKollmanK, et al. (2018) Party system structure and its consequences for foreign direct investment. Party Politics24(2): 141–153.
64.
TornellALanePR (1999) The voracity effect. American Economic Review89 (1): 22–46.
65.
TsebelisG (1995) Decision making in political system: veto players in presidentialism, parliamentarism, multicameralism and multipartyism. British Journal of Political Science25(3): 289–325.
66.
TsebelisG (2002) Veto Payers: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
67.
TsebelisGKreppelA (1998) The history of conditional agenda-setting in European institutions. European Journal of Political Research33: 41–71.
68.
UNCTAD. World investment report (2005) Transnational Corporations and the Internationalization of R&D. New York and Geneva: UNCTAD.
69.
VadlamannatiKC (2012) Impact of political risk on FDI revisited—an aggregate firm-level analysis. International Interaction38: 111–139.
70.
WangCHongJKafourosM, et al. (2012) Exploring the role of government involvement in outward FDI from emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies43: 655–676.
71.
WangCYiJKafourosM, et al. (2015) Under what institutional conditions do business groups enhance innovation performance?Journal of Business Research68(3): 694–702.
72.
WilliamsonOE (1975) Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York, NY: Free Press.
73.
WilliamsonOE (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. New York, NY: Free Press.
74.
WisniewskiTPPathanSK (2014) Political environment and foreign direct investment: evidence from OECD countries. European Journal of Political Economy36: 13–23.
75.
ZhangJZhouCEbbersH (2011) Completion of Chinese overseas acquisitions: institutional perspectives and evidence. International Business Review20(2): 266–238.
76.
ZhangXDalyK (2011) The determinants of China’s outward foreign direct investment. Emerging Markets Review12(4): 389–398.
77.
ZhengY (2011) Credibility and flexibility: political institutions, governance, and foreign direct investment. International Interactions37(3): 293–319.
