Theory tells us that competition is the chief driver of improved efficiency and effectiveness in government contracting, yet contract provider markets are often noncompetitive. This study offers a detailed, contextualized examination of public administrative responses to thin contract markets. Following an inductive approach with data from semistructured interviews with contract administrators, the authors offer a preliminary typology of the conditions that give rise to thin markets, and the “market management” strategies used to create, enhance, and sustain competition in the markets from where governments purchase goods and services. The authors then review the efficacy and implications of these strategies for public services to citizens.
AmirkhanyanA. A. (2007). The smart-seller challenge: Exploring the determinants of privatizing public nursing homes. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17, 501-527.
2.
BarrS. (2007, October11). House rejects IRS program. The Washington Post, p. D01.
3.
BoyneG. A. (1998). Bureaucratic theory meets reality: Public choice and service contracting in the U.S. local government. Public Administration Review, 58, 474-484.
4.
BozemanB. (2007). Public values and public interest: Counterbalancing economic individualism. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
5.
BretschneiderS.Ya NiA. (2007). The decision to contract out: A study of contracting for e-government service. Public Administration Review, 67, 531-544.
6.
BrownT. L.PotoskiM. (2004). Managing the public service market. Public Administration Review, 64, 656-668.
7.
BuchananJ. M. (1972). Theory of public choice. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
ChoiY.HeinrichC. J. (2004, October). Privatization and performance-based contracting in public welfare programs. Paper presented at the Fall Research Conference of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management Atlanta, GA.
10.
CoaseR. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4, 386-405.
11.
CohenS. (2001). A strategic framework for devolving responsibility and functions from government to the private sector. Public Administration Review, 61, 432-440.
12.
CooperP. J. (2003). Governing by contract: Challenges and opportunities for public managers. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
13.
DahlmanC. J. (1979). The problem of externality. Journal of Law & Economics, 22, 141-162.
14.
DeHoogR. H. (1990). Competition, negotiation, or cooperation: Three models for service contracting. Administration & Society, 22, 317-340.
15.
DonahueJ. D. (1989). The privatization decision. New York, NY: Basic Books.
16.
DurantR. F.GirthA. M.JohnstonJ. M. (2009). American exceptionalism, human resource management, and the contract state. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 29, 207-229.
17.
EggersW. D.O’LearyJ. (1995). Revolution at the roots: Making our government smaller, better, and closer to home. New York, NY: Free Press.
FredericksonH. G. (1996). The spirit of public administration. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
20.
FredericksonH. G.StazykE. C. (2010). Myths, markets and the “visible hand” of American bureaucracy. In DurantR. F. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of American bureaucracy (pp. 349-371). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
21.
GlaserB.StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
22.
GoldfarbZ. A. (2007, September3). Mid-tier contractors getting left out. Washington Post, p. D01.
23.
GoldsmithS. (1997). The twenty-first century city: Resurrecting urban America. Washington, DC: Regnery.
24.
GoldsmithS.EggersW. D. (2004). Governing by network: The new shape of the public sector. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
25.
GraddyE. A.ChenB. (2006). Influences on the size and scope of networks for social service delivery. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 533-552.
26.
HefetzA.WarnerM. E. (2011), Contracting or public delivery? The importance of service, market and management characteristics. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1093/jopart/MUR00610.1093/jopart/MUR006
27.
HeinrichC. J. (2010). Third-party governance under No Child Left Behind: Accountability and performance management challenges. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20, i59-i80.
28.
JohnstonJ. M.RomzekB. S. (1999). Contracting and accountability in state Medicaid reform: Rhetoric, theories, and reality. Public Administration Review59(5): 383-399.
29.
JohnstonJ. M.RomzekB. S.WoodC. H. (2004). The challenges of contracting and accountability across the federal system: From ambulances to space shuttles. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 34, 155-182.
30.
JohnstonJ. M.RomzekB. S. (2008). Social welfare contracts as networks: The impact of networks stability on management and performance. Administration & Society, 40, 115-146.
31.
JohnstonJ. M.RomzekB. S. (2010). Contracting: Promise, performance, perils, possibilities. In DurantR. F. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of American bureaucracy (pp.396-420). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
32.
KelleherC. A.YackeeS. W. (2009). A political consequence of contracting: Organized interests and state agency decision making. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19, 579-602.
33.
KelmanS. J. (2002). Contracting. In SalamonL. M., (Ed.), The tools of government: A guide to the new governance (pp. 282-318). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
34.
KettlD. F. (1993). Sharing power: Public governance and private markets. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
35.
KleinA. (2007, August24). For security in Iraq, a turn to British know-how. Washington Post, p. D01.
36.
LamotheM.LamotheS. (2010). Competing for what? Linking competition to performance in social service contracting. American Review of Public Administration, 40(3), 326-350.
37.
MartinsonK.HolcombP. A. (2002). Reforming welfare: Institutional change and challenges, assessing the New Federalism Series, Urban Institute. Retrieved from http://www.urban.org/url.cfm?ID=310535
38.
MarvelM. K.MarvelH. P. (2007). Outsourcing oversight: A comparison for in-house and contracted services. Public Administration Review, 67, 521-530.
39.
McDougallP.HooverJ. N. (2005, November21). Virginia is for outsourcing. InformationWeek, pp. 24-26.
40.
MilwardH. B.ProvanK. G. (2000). Governing the hollow state. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 359-379.
41.
MoeR. C. (1987). Exploring the limits of privatization. Public Administration Review, 47, 453-461.
42.
Nicholson-CrottyS. (2004). The politics and administration of privatization: Contracting out for corrections management in the American states. Policy Studies Journal, 32, 52-61.
43.
OppelR. A. (2011, May19). Private prisons found to offer little in savings. New York Times, p. A1.
44.
OsborneD.GaeblerT. (1993). Reinventing government. How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. New York, NY: Penguin.
45.
PackJ. R. (1987). Privatization of public-sector services in theory, practice. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 6, 523-540.
46.
PriceB. E.RiccucciN. M. (2005). Exploring the determinants of decisions to privatize state prisons. American Review of Public Administration, 35, 223-235.
47.
RadinB. A. (2006). Challenging the performance movement: Accountability, complexity and democratic values. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
48.
ReshW. G.MarvelJ. D. (2011, March). Loopholes to load-shed: Goal displacement, contract management capacity, and representative bureaucracy in the implementation of the SBA 8(a) program. Presented at the 2011 Annual Conference of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
49.
RomzekB. S.JohnstonJ.M. (2005). State social services contracting: Exploring the determinants of effective contract accountability. Public Administration Review, 65: 436-449.
50.
RosenbloomD. H.PiotrowskiS. J. (2005). Outsourcing the constitution and administrative law norms. American Review of Public Administration, 35, 103-121.
51.
SandfortJ. (2000). Moving beyond discretion and outcomes: Examining public management from the front lines of the welfare system. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 729-756.
52.
SangerM. B. (2003). The welfare marketplace: Privatization and welfare reform. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
53.
SavasE. S. (2000). Privatization and public-private partnerships. New York, NY: Seven Bridges Press.
54.
SavasE.S. (2002). Competition and choice in New York city social services. Public Administration Review, 62, 82-91.
55.
SchlesingerM.DorwardR.PuliceR. (1986). Competitive bidding and states’ purchase of services: The case of mental health care in Massachusetts. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 5, 245-263.
56.
SclarE. D. (2000). You don’t always get what you pay for: The economics of privatization. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
57.
TuckerN. (2005, October19). A web of truth: Whistle-blower or troublemaker, Bunny Greenhouse isn’t backing down. Washington Post, p. C01.
58.
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (1997). Privatization: Lessons learned by state and local governments. Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov
59.
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2006). Federal acquisition challenges and opportunities in the 21st Century: Highlights of a GAO forum. Retrieved from www.gao.gov
60.
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2007). Contract management: Protégés value DODs mentor-protégé program, but annual reporting to congress needs improvement. Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov
61.
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2008). Defense contracting: Army case study delineates concerns with use of contractors as contract specialists. Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov
62.
Van SlykeD. M. (2007). Agents or stewards: Using theory to understand the government-nonprofit social service contracting relationship. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17, 157-187.
63.
WarnerM. E.BelG. (2008). Competition or monopoly? Comparing privatization of local public services in the US and Spain. Public Administration, 86, 723-735.
64.
WarnerM. E.HefetzA. (2008). Managing markets for public service: The role of mixed public/private delivery of city services. Public Administration Review, 68, 155-166.
65.
WeimerD. L.ViningA. R. (2005). Policy analysis (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
66.
WeissertC. S.GogginM. L. (2002). Nonincremental policy change: Lesson from Michigan’s Medicaid managed care initiative. Public Administration Review, 62, 206-216.
67.
WilliamsonO. E. (1981). The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach. American Journal of Sociology, 87, 548-577.
68.
YostP. (2007, September1). Group troubled by rise in government secrecy. Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com
