Outside the US, the crucial question of how well politicians represent the preferences of voters is usually investigated at the party level. Reversing this perspective, we examine representation in Europe from the point of view of individual candidates running in national parliamentary elections. This is especially insightful in a period that seems characterized by a decline in parties’ representational capacities and an increasing personalization of politics. We analyze representation by considering the incongruence between candidates’ left–right positions and the average placement of their party voters. By combining candidate survey data with mass survey data on voters, we assess how ideological incongruence varies according to predictors measured at the levels of candidates, parties, and party systems. The results highlight a systematic association between a partisan style of representation and candidates’ proximity to voters, as well as the interactions between representational roles and factors such as the anti-establishment nature of parties and ideological polarization in the party system.
AbediA (2004) Anti-Political Establishment Parties: A Comparative Analysis. London: Routledge.
2.
AdamSMaierM (2010) Personalization of politics: a critical review and agenda for research. Annals of the International Communication Association34(1): 213–257.
3.
AndewegRB (2011) Approaching perfect policy congruence measurement, development, and relevance for political representation. In: RosemaMDentersBAartsK (eds) How Democracy Works. Political Representation and Policy Congruence in Modern Societies. Amsterdam: Pallas Publications–Amsterdam University Press, pp. 39–52.
4.
AndewegRBThomassenJ (2005) Modes of political representation: toward a new typology. Legislative Studies Quarterly30(4): 507–528.
5.
BakkerREdwardsEHoogheL. et al. (2015) 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey, Version 2015.1. Available at: www.chesdata.eu (accessed 24 February 2020).
6.
BarnesSH (1977) Representation in Italy: Institutionalized Tradition and Electoral Choice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
7.
BelchiorAM (2013) Explaining left–right party congruence across European party systems: a test of micro-, meso-, and macro-level models. Comparative Political Studies46(3): 352–386.
8.
BlaisABodetA (2006) Does proportional representation foster closer congruence between citizens and policymakers?Comparative Political Studies39(10): 1243–1262.
9.
ClausenARHolmbergSDeHaven-SmithL (1983) Contextual factors in the accuracy of leader perceptions of constituents’ views. Journal of Politics45(2): 449–472.
10.
ConversePEPierceR (1986) Political Representation in France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
Costa LoboMCurticeJ (eds) (2015) Personality Politics? The Role of Leader Evaluations in Democratic Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
CostelloRThomassenJRosemaM (2012) European parliament elections and political representation: policy congruence between voters and parties. West European Politics35(6): 1226–1248.
13.
CottaMBestH (eds) (2008) Democratic Representation in Europe. Diversity, Change and Convergence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14.
CutlerF (2002) The simplest shortcut of all: sociodemographic characteristics and electoral choice. Journal of Politics64(2): 466–490.
15.
DaltonRJ (1985) Political parties and political representation: party supporters and party elites in nine nations. Comparative Political Studies18(3): 267–299.
16.
DaltonRJFarrellDMMcAllisterI (2011) Political Parties and Democratic Linkage: How Parties Organize Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17.
De WinterLKarlsenRSchmittH (2020) Introduction. Candidates, Parties and Voters in Representative Democracies. In: De WinterLKarlsenRSchmittH (eds) Parliamentary Candidates between Voters and Parties. A Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge.
18.
Di VirgilioASegattiP (eds) (2016) La rappresentanza Politica in Italia. Bologna: Il Mulino.
19.
DolnýBBabošP (2015) Voter-representative congruence in Europe: A loss of institutional influence?West European Politics38(6): 1274–1304.
20.
DownsA (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York, NY: Harper.
21.
EnyediZPedrazzaniASegattiP (2020) Policy Representation in Europe. In: De WinterLKarlsenRSchmittH (eds) Parliamentary Candidates Between Voters and Parties. A Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge, pp. 164–195.
22.
EulauHKarpsPD (1977) The puzzle of representation: specifying components of responsiveness. Legislative Studies Quarterly2(3): 233–254.
23.
EulauHWahlkeJCBuchananW. et al. (1959) The role of the representative: some empirical observations on the theory of Edmund burke. American Political Science Review53(3): 742–756.
24.
EzrowL (2010) Linking Citizens and Parties: How Electoral Systems Matter for Political Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
GallagherM (1991) Proportionality, disproportionality and electoral systems. Electoral Studies10(1): 33–51.
26.
GieblerHWesselsB (2013) Whom to Represent? The Role of Individual Characteristics as Well as Institutional and Organizational Incentives. In: ECPR General Conference, Bordeaux, France, 4–7 September 2013.
27.
GolderMLloydG (2014) Re-evaluating the relationship between electoral rules and ideological congruence. European Journal of Political Research53(1): 200–212.
28.
GolderMStramskiJ (2010) Ideological congruence and electoral institutions. American Journal of Political Science54(1): 90–106.
29.
IrwinGAThomassenJ (1975) Issue-consensus in a multi-party system: voters and leaders in the Netherlands. Acta Politica10(4): 389–420.
30.
KimHPowellGBFordingR (2010) Electoral systems, party systems, and ideological representation: an analysis of distortion in western democracies. Comparative Politics42(2): 167–185.
31.
KitscheltHMansfeldovaZMarkowskiR. et al. (1999) Post-Communist Party Systems: Competition, Representation and Inter-Party Cooperation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
32.
LupuNSeliosLWarnerZ (2017) A new measure of congruence: the earth mover’s distance. Political Analysis25(1): 95–113.
33.
MattilaMRaunioT (2006) Cautious voters—supportive parties: opinion congruence between voters and parties on the EU dimension. European Union Politics7(4): 427–449.
34.
McAllisterI (2007) The personalization of politics. In: DaltonRJKlingemannH-D (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 571–588.
35.
McEvoyC (2012) Unequal representation in the EU: a multilevel analysis of voter–party congruence in EP elections. Representation48(1): 83–99.
36.
MillerWEStokesD (1963) Constituency influence in congress. American Political Science Review57(1): 165–177.
37.
MillerWEPierceRThomassenJ. et al. (1999) Policy Representation in Western Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38.
NorrisP (2005) Recruitment. In: KatzRSCrottyW (eds) The Handbook of Party Politics. London: Sage, pp. 89–108.
39.
ÖnnudóttirEH (2014) Policy congruence and style of representation: party voters and political parties. West European Politics37(3): 538–563.
40.
ÖnnudóttirEHVon SchoultzA (2020) Candidates’ representational roles. In: De WinterLKarlsenRSchmittH (eds) Parliamentary Candidates Between Voters and Parties. A Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge, pp. 120–141.
41.
PitkinHF (1967) The Concept of Representation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
42.
PowellGB (2000) Elections as Instruments of Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
43.
PowellGB (2011) Party polarization and the ideological congruence of governments. In: DaltonRJ (ed) Citizens, Context and Choice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 197–213.
44.
PrzeworskiASpragueJ (1986) Paper Stones: A History of Electoral Socialism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
45.
RahatGKenigO (2018) From Party Politics to Personalized Politics? Party Change and Political Personalization in Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
46.
RohrschneiderRWhitefieldS (2012) The Strain of Representation: How Parties Represent Diverse Voters in Western and Eastern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
47.
SchmittHThomassenJ (eds) (1999) Political Representation and Legitimacy in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48.
ShugartMS (2001) Electoral “efficiency” and the move to mixed-member systems. Electoral Studies20(2): 173–193.
49.
ShugartMSValdiniMLSuominenK (2005) Looking for locals: voter information demands and personal vote-earning attributes of legislators under proportional representation. American Journal of Political Science49(2): 437–449.
50.
StrømK (2012) Roles as strategies: towards a logic of legislative behaviour. In: BlomgrenMRozenbergO (eds) Parliamentary Roles in Modern Legislatures. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 85–100.
51.
ThomassenJ (1994) Empirical research into political representation. In: JenningsMKMannTE (eds) Elections at Home and Abroad. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 237–264.
52.
Van AelstPSheaferTSHubéN. et al. (2016) Personalization. In: De VreeseCHEsserFHopmannD (eds) Where’s the Good News? Comparing Political Journalism in 16 Countries. London: Routledge, pp. 112–130.
53.
Van BiezenIMairPPoguntkeT (2012) Going, going,…gone? The decline of party membership in contemporary Europe. European Journal of Political Research51(1): 24–56.
54.
Van der BrugWFennemaM (2007) Causes of voting for the radical right. International Journal of Public Opinion Research19(4): 474–487.
55.
Van der EijkCSchmittHBinderT (2005) Left-right orientations and party choice. In: ThomassenJ (ed) The European Voter: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 167–191.
56.
Van HauwaertSMVan KesselS (2018) Beyond protest and discontent: a cross-national analysis of the effect of populist attitudes and issue positions on populist party support. European Journal of Political Research57(1): 68–92.
57.
VandeleeneADe WinterLBaudewynsP (eds) (2019) Candidates, Parties and Voters in the Belgian Partitocracy. Cham: Palgrave MacMillan.
58.
WalczakAVan der BrugW (2013) Representation in the European parliament: factors affecting the attitude congruence of voters and candidates in the EP elections. European Union Politics14(1): 3–22.
59.
WarwickP (2016) The ideological congruence illusion: the impact of valence. Legislative Studies Quarterly41(2): 445–469.
60.
WeberTFranklinMN (2018) A behavioral theory of electoral structure. Political Behavior40(4): 831–856.
61.
WesselsB (1999) System characteristics matter: empirical evidence from ten representation studies. In: MillerWPierceRThomassenJ. et al. (eds) Policy Representation in Western Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 137–161.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
