The literature has pointed to a change in radical right-wing parties’ (RRWPs) position regarding the welfare state. Those parties have abandoned the neoliberal approach on distributive issues and have become defenders of social expenditure for deserving groups. Nevertheless, as RRWPs have joined with right-wing mainstream parties to form governments, their distributive policy position might cause conflict in a coalition. This study, therefore, addresses this puzzle by analysing the social policy outcomes of RRWPs’ government participation. The conclusion is that those parties contribute to the welfare state retrenchment. However, policies are not affected evenly. Expenditure that targets groups regarded as undeserving by the radical right is retrenched the most.
AfonsoA (2015) Choosing whom to betray: radical right-wing parties, welfare state reforms and the trade-off between office and votes. European Political Science Review7(2): 271–292.
2.
AfonsoARennwaldL (2018) Social class and the changing welfare state agenda of radical right parties in Europe. In: PhilipMBrunoPHannaS (eds) Welfare Democracies and Party Politics: Explaining Electoral Dynamics in Times of Changing Welfare Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 171–194.
3.
AkkermanT (2012) Comparing radical right parties in government: immigration and integration policies in nine countries (1996–2010). West European Politics35(3): 511–529.
4.
AllanJScruggsL (2004) Political partisanship and welfare state reform in advanced industrial societies. American Journal of Political Science48(3): 496–512.
AndersenGJBjørklundT (1990) Structural change and new cleavages: the progress parties in Denmark and Norway. Acta Sociologica33(3): 195–217.
7.
ArndtCThomsenJPF (2019) Ethnicity coding revisited: Right‐wing parties as catalysts for mobilization against immigrant welfare rights. Scandinavian Political Studies42(2): 93–117.
8.
BakkerRde VriesCEdwardsE, et al. (2015) Measuring party positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill expert survey trend file, 1999–2010. Party Politics21(1): 143–152.
9.
BaleT (2008) Turning round the telescope. Centre-right parties and immigration and integration policy in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy15(3): 315–330.
10.
BetzH (1994) Radical Right-Wing Populism in Western Europe. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
11.
BurgoonB (2014) Immigration, integration, and support for redistribution in Europe. World Politics66(3): 365–405
12.
CarejaRElmelund‐PræstekærCBaggesen KlitgaardM, et al. (2016) Direct and indirect welfare chauvinism as party strategies: an analysis of the Danish people's party. Scandinavian Political Studies39(4): 435–457.
13.
CastlesFG (1982) The Impact of Parties: Politics and Policies in Democratic Capitalist States. London: Sage Publication.
14.
ChristiansenFJ (2017) Conflict and co-operation among the Danish mainstream as a condition for adaptation to the populist radical right. In: OdmalmPontusHepburnEve (eds) The European Mainstream and the Populist Radical Right. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 49–70.
15.
ChristiansenFJPedersenHH (2014) Minority coalition governance in Denmark. Party Politics20(6): 940–949.
de KosterWAchterbergPVan der WaalJ (2013) The new right and the welfare state: the electoral relevance of welfare chauvinism and welfare populism in the Netherlands. International Political Science Review34(1): 3–20.
18.
de Lange SL (2007) A new winning formula? The programmatic appeal of the radical right. Party Politics13(4): 411–435.
19.
de LangeSL (2012) New alliances: why mainstream parties govern with radical right-wing populist parties. Political Studies60(4): 899–918.
20.
DEMIG (2015) DEMIG POLICY, version 1.3, Online Edition. Oxford: International Migration Institute, University of Oxford. Available at: www.migrationdeterminants.eu (accessed 10 June 2018).
21.
DerksA (2006) Populism and the ambivalence of egalitarianism. How do the underprivileged reconcile a right-wing party preference with their socio-economic attitudes?World Political Science2(3): 175–200.
EmmeneggerPCarejaR (2012) From dilemma to dualisation: social and migration policies in the ‘reluctant countries off immigration. In: PatrickESiljaHBrunoPMartinS-K (eds) Age of Dualization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 124–150.
26.
Esping-AndersenG (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
27.
HansenJLofstromM (2009) The dynamics of immigrant welfare and labor market behavior. Journal of Population Economics22(4): 941–970.
28.
HicksASwankDHAmbuhlM (1989) Welfare expansion revisited: policy routines and their mediation by party, class and crisis, 1957–1982. European Journal of Political Research17(4): 401–430.
29.
HuberEStephensJD (2001) Development and Crisis of The Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
IvarsflatenE (2008) What unites right-wing populists in Western Europe? Re-examining grievance mobilization models in seven successful cases. Comparative Political Studies41(1): 3–23.
32.
JensenC (2011) Less bad than its reputation: social spending as a proxy for welfare effort in cross-national studies. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice13(3): 327–340.
33.
JørgensenMBThomsenTL (2018) ‘Needed but Undeserving’: contestations of entitlement in the Danish policy framework on migration and integration. In: FossumJKastoryanoRSiimB (eds) Diversity and Contestations over Nationalism in Europe and Canada. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 337–364.
KitscheltHMcGannAJ (1995) The Radical Right in Western Europe. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
38.
KoningE (2013) Selective solidarity: the politics of immigrants’ social rights in western welfare states. (Doctoral dissertation). Kingston, Ontario, Canada: Retrieved from Queen’s University.
39.
KorpiWPalmeJ (2003) New politics and class politics in the context of austerity and globalization: welfare state regress in 18 countries, 1975–95. American Political Science Review97(3): 425–446.
40.
KriesiHGrandeELachatR, et al. (2006) Globalization and the transformation of the national political space: six European countries compared. European Journal of Political Research45(6): 921–956.
41.
KwonHYPontussonJ (2010) Globalization, labour power and partisan politics revisited. Socio-Economic Review8(2): 251–281.
42.
LupuNPontussonJ (2011) The structure of inequality and the politics of redistribution. American Political Science Review105(2): 316–336.
43.
MarksGHoogheLNelsonM, et al. (2006) Party competition and European integration in the east and west: different structure, same causality. Comparative Political Studies39(2): 155–175.
44.
MinkenbergM (2001) The radical right in public office: agenda-setting and policy effects. West European Politics24(4): 1–21.
45.
MuddeC (2004) The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition39(4): 541–563.
46.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2010) OECD social expenditure database, 1980-2015. Paris: OECD.
PontussonJ (1995) Explaining the decline of European social democracy: the role of structural economic change. World Politics47(4): 495–533.
53.
PutnamR (2007) E Pluribus Unum: diversity and community in the twenty-first century: the Johan Skytte prize lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies30(2): 134–167.
54.
ReeskensTVan OorschotW (2012) Disentangling the ‘New Liberal Dilemma’: On the relation between general welfare redistribution preferences and welfare chauvinism. International Journal of Comparative Sociology53(2): 120–139.
55.
RömerF (2017) Generous to all or ‘Insiders Only’? The relationship between welfare state generosity and immigrant welfare rights. Journal of European Social Policy27(2): 173–196.
56.
RöthLAfonsoASpiesDC (2017) The impact of populist radical right parties on socio-economic policies. European Political Science Review10(3): 325–350.
57.
RovnyJ (2013) Where do radical right parties stand? Position blurring in multidimensional competition. European Political Science Review5(1): 1–26.
58.
RydgrenJ (2004) Explaining the emergence of radical right-wing populist parties: the case of Denmark. West European Politics27(3): 474–502.
59.
RydgrenJ (2017) Radical right-wing parties in Europe: what’s populism got to do with it?Journal of Language and Politics16(4): 485–496.
60.
SchainMA (2006) The extreme-right and immigration policy-making: measuring direct and indirect effects. West European Politics29(2): 270–289.
61.
SchneiderAIngramH (1993) Social construction of target populations: implications for politics and policy. American Political Science Review87(2): 334–347.
62.
SchumacherGvan KersbergenK (2016) Do mainstream parties adapt to the welfare chauvinism of populist parties?Party Politics22(3): 300–312.
63.
ScruggsLJahnDKuittoK (2017) Comparative welfare entitlements dataset 2. Version 2017-09. University of Connecticut & University of Greifswald.
64.
SlothuusR (2007) Framing deservingness to win support for welfare state retrenchment. Scandinavian Political Studies30(3): 323–344.
65.
SorokaSNJohnstonRKevinsA, et al. (2016) Migration and welfare state spending. European Political Science Review8(2): 173–194.
66.
SorokaSJohnstonRBantingK (2006) Immigration and redistribution in a global era. In: BowlesSBardhanPWallersteinM (eds) Globalization and Egalitarian Redistribution. Princeton: Princeton University Press and Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 261–288.
67.
ThomannERappC (2017) Who deserves solidarity? Unequal treatment of immigrants in swiss welfare policy delivery. Policy Studies Journal46(3): 531–552.
68.
ValaJLimaMLopesD (2004) Social values, prejudice and solidarity in the European Union. In: WilhelmusAALoekH (eds) European Values at the End of the Millennium. Leiden: Brill, pp. 139–163.
69.
Van der WaalJAchterbergPHoutmanD, et al. (2010) ‘Some are more equal than others’: Economic egalitarianism and welfare chauvinism in the Netherlands. Journal of European Social Policy20(4): 350–363.
70.
Van OorschotW (2000) Who should get what, and why? On deservingness criteria and the conditionality of solidarity among the public. Policy and Politics28(1): 33–48.
71.
Van OorschotW (2006) Making the difference in social Europe: deservingness perceptions among citizens of European welfare states. Journal of European Social Policy16(1): 23–42.
72.
WilliamsMH (2006) The Impact of Radical Right-Wing Parties in West European Democracies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
73.
WooldridgeJM (2002) Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambrige: MIT press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
