We investigate retrospective voting in the Central–Eastern European countries since the democratic transition. We find that the phenomenon of ‘hyper-accountability’ identified by earlier scholarship is still prevalent in the region – incumbents lose substantially on average. Economic conditions – unemployment and wealth – exert influence on the chances of incumbent re-election. However, contrary to expectations expressed in earlier scholarship, the influence of the economy on the election results does not strengthen over time. We also explore additional facets of retrospective voting and find that changes in socio-economic inequality are correlated with the vote share of incumbents. Finally, we also find evidence of an interaction between economic conditions and corruption as well as inequality when it comes to explaining incumbents’ electoral results.
BentonAL (2005) Dissatisfied democrats or retrospective voters? Economic hardship, political institutions, and voting behavior in Latin America. Comparative Political Studies38: 417–442.
2.
BerelsonBRLazarsfeldPFMcPheeWN (1954) Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
3.
BochslerDHanniM (2018) The three stages of the anti-incumbency vote: retrospective economic voting in young and established democracies. European Journal of Political Research58: 30–55.
BurlacuD (2014) It’s not only the economy, stupid! Good governance matters in elections. Electoral Studies 36: 173–185.
6.
CampbellAConversePEMillerWE, et al. (1960) The American Voter. New York, NY: Wiley.
7.
CasalBF (2014) Party systems and cleavage structures revisited: a sociological explanation of party system institutionalization in East Central Europe. Party Politics20(1): 16–36.
8.
CoffeyE (2013) Pain tolerance: economic voting in the Czech republic. Electoral Studies32(3): 432–437.
9.
DassonnevilleRLewis-BeckMS (2017) Rules, institutions and the economic vote: clarifying clarity of responsibility. West European Politics40(3): 534–559.
10.
De VriesCEHoboltSBTilleyJ (2017) Facing up to the facts: what causes economic perceptions?Electoral Studies51: 115–122.
11.
DownsA (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York, NY: Harper.
12.
DuchRM (2001) A developmental model of heterogeneous economic voting in new democracies. American Political Science Review95(4): 895–910.
13.
DuchRMStevensonR (2008) The Economic Vote: How Political and Economic Institutions Condition Election Results. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14.
EmanueleVChiaramonteASoareS (2018) Does the Iron Curtain Still Exist? The Convergence in Electoral Volatility between Eastern and Western Europe. Government and Opposition, 1–19. DOI: 10.1017/gov.2018.25
15.
EriksonRSMacKuenMBStimsonJA (2002) The Macro Polity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
16.
European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (2000) Transition Report. London, UK: EBRD.
17.
FerrinMKriesiH (eds) (2016) How Europeans View and Evaluate Democracy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
18.
FidrmucJ (2000) Economics of voting in post-communist countries. Electoral Studies19: 199–217.
19.
FiorinaMP (1981) Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
GélineauF (2013) Electoral accountability in the developing world. Electoral Studies32: 418–424.
22.
HanSMChangECC (2016) Economic inequality, winner-loser gap, and satisfaction with democracy. Electoral Studies44: 85–97.
23.
HarperMAG (2000) Economic voting in postcommunist eastern Europe. Comparative Political Studies33(9): 1191–1227.
24.
HausmanJA (1978) Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica46: 1251–1271.
25.
HernandezE (2016) Europeans’ views of democracy: the core elements of democracy. In: FerrinMKriesiH (eds), How Europeans View and Evaluate Democrac. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 43–64.
26.
HernándezEKriesiH (2016) The electoral consequences of the financial and economic crisis in Europe. European Journal of Political Research55: 203–224.
27.
KitscheltH (1995) Formation of party cleavages in post-communist democracies. Party Politics4(1): 447–472.
28.
KlašnjaM (2015) Corruption and the incumbency disadvantage: theory and evidence. The Journal of Politics77(4): 928–942.
29.
KlašnjaM (2016) Increasing rents and incumbency disadvantage. Journal of Theoretical Politics28(2): 225–265.
30.
KlašnjaMTuckerJADeegan-KrauseK (2014) Pocketbook vs. sociotropic corruption voting. British Journal of Political Science46: 67–94.
31.
KotnarowskiMMarkowskiR (2014) Political preferences in times of crisis: economic voting in the 2011 polish elections. Acta Politica49: 431–461.
32.
KrieckhausJSonBBellingerNM, et al. (2014) Economic inequality and democratic support. The Journal of Politics76(1): 139–151.
33.
LazarsfeldPBerelsonBGaudetH (1944) The People’s Choice: How the Voter Makes up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
34.
LeDucLPammettJH (2013) The fate of governing parties in times of economic crisis. Electoral Studies32: 494–499.
35.
Lewis-BeckMS (1988) Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
36.
Lewis-BeckMSPaldamM (2000) Economic voting: an introduction. Electoral Studies19: 113–121.
37.
Lewis-BeckMSStegmaierM (2000) Economic determinants of electoral outcomes. Annual Review of Political Science3: 183–219.
38.
Lewis-BeckMSStegmaierM (2007) Economic models of voting. In: DaltonRJKlingemannHD (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Behaviour. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 518–537.
39.
Lewis-BeckMSStegmaierM (2008) The economic vote in transitional democracies. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties18(3): 303–323.
40.
Lewis-BeckMSStegmaierM (2013) The VP-function revisited: a survey of the literature on vote and popularity functions after over 40 years. Public Choice157(2/3): 367–385.
41.
LippényiZMaasIJansenW (2013) Economic voting in Hungary, 1998–2008. Electoral Studies32: 838–851.
42.
MacKuenMBEriksonRSStimsonJA (1992) Peasants or bankers? The American electorate and the U.S. Economy. American Political Science Review86(3): 597–611.
43.
MainwaringSGervasoniCEspana-NajeraA (2017) Extra- and within-system electoral volatility. Party Politics23(6): 623–635.
44.
MainnwaringSZocoE (2007) Political sequences and the stabilization of interparty competition: electoral volatility in old and new democracies. Party Politics13(2): 155–178.
45.
MishlerWRoseR (2001) What are the origins of political trust? Testing institutional and cultural theories in post-communist societies. Comparative Political Studies34(1): 30–62.
46.
PacekAC (1994) Macroeconomic conditions and electoral politics in east central Europe. American Journal of Political Science38(3): 723–744.
47.
ParkJY (2018) Punishing without rewards? A comprehensive examination of the asymmetry in economic voting. Electoral Studies57: 1–18.
48.
Pop-ElechesGTuckerJ (2017) Communism’s Shadow: Historical Legacies and Contemporary Political Attitudes. Pricenton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
49.
PowellGBJrWhittenGD (1993) A cross-national analysis of economic voting: taking account of the political context. American Journal of Political Science37(2): 391–414.
50.
PowellNFTuckerJA (2014) Revisiting electoral volatility in post-communist countries: new data, new results and new approaches. British Journal of Political Science44(1): 123–147.
51.
RobertsA (2008) Hyperaccountability: economic voting in central and eastern Europe. Electoral Studies27(3): 533–546.
52.
RobertsKMWibbelsE (1999) Party systems and electoral volatility in Latin America: a test of economic, institutional and structural explanations. The American Political Science Review93: 575–590.
53.
SikkAHanleyS (2016) Economy, corruption or floating voters? Explaining the breakthroughs of anti-establishment reform parties in eastern Europe. Party Politics22(4): 522–533.
54.
SoltF (2019) The standardized world income inequality database, version 8. Harvard DataverseV2. Available at: https://doi:10.7910/DVN/LM4OWF (accessed 20 June 2019).
55.
StegmaierMLewis-BeckMS (2009) Learning the economic vote: Hungarian forecasts, 1998–2010. Politics and Policy37(4): 769–80.
56.
TavitsM (2008) On the linkage between electoral volatility and party system instability in Central and Eastern Europe. European Journal of Political Research47: 537–555.
57.
TuckerJA (2006) Regional Economic Voting: Russia, Poland, Hungary, Slovakia, and the Czech Republic, 1990-1999. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
