In this article, we extend our understanding of fringe politics to include relational and thematic elements, namely, the relationship of far-right collective actors with their broader network and the claims made within it. Locating our analysis at the intersection of protest event and social network analysis, we focus on the far-right Movement for a Better Hungary (Jobbik) which, since late 2013, has committed to moderation. Analysing the protest events in which Jobbik took part and the types of claims upon which it mobilized between 2009 and 2017, we examine whether there has been a corresponding distancing from extremist groups and radical claims – a finding that would indeed validate the substantive transformation of Jobbik. By focusing on often neglected relational and thematic aspects, the study provides new ways to analyse fringe collective actors, the relationship with their environment and the evolution of such a relationship over time.
AndrettaMPavanE (2018) Mapping protest on the refugee crisis: insights from online protest event analysis. In: Della PortaD (ed) Solidarity Mobilizations in the ‘Refugee Crisis’: Contentious Moves. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 299–324.
2.
ArzheimerK (2011) Fringe Parties. In: KurianGT (ed) The Encyclopaedia of Political Science. Washington: CQ Press, pp. 639–642.
3.
BakkeESitterN (2003) Why do parties fail? Cleavages, government fatigue and electoral failure in the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary 1992–2012. East European Politics29(2): 208–225.
4.
BakkerRde VriesCEdwardsE, et al. (2015) Measuring party positions in Europe: the Chapel Hill expert survey trend file, 1999–2010. Party Politics21(1): 143–152.
5.
BenoitKLaverM (2006) Party Policy in Modern Democracies. London: Routledge.
6.
Bíró-NagyABorosT (2016) Jobbik going mainstream. Strategy shift of the far-right in Hungary. In: JaminJ (ed) The Extreme Right in Europe. Brussels: Bruylant, pp. 242–262.
7.
BorgattiSPEverettMGJohnsonJC (2013) Analyzing Social Networks. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
8.
CarterE (2005) The Extreme Right in Western Europe. Success or Failure?Manchester: Manchester University Press.
9.
Casal BértoaF (2014) Parties, regime and cleavages: explaining party system institutionalisation in East Central Europe. East European Politics28(4): 452–472.
10.
Castelli GattinaraPPirroALP (2018) The far right as social movement. European Societies. DOI: 10.1080/14616696.2018.1494301.
11.
DanielWT (2016) First-order contests for second-order parties? Differentiated candidate nomination strategies in European Parliament elections. Journal of European Integration38(7): 807–822.
12.
DavenportC (2009) Media Bias, Perspective, and State Repression: The Black Panther Party. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
DianiM (2003) Leaders or brokers? Positions and influence in social movement networks. In: DianiMMcAdamD (eds) Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 105–122.
14.
DianiMKousisM (2014) The duality of claims and events: the Greek campaign against the Troika’s memoranda and austerity, 2010–2012. Mobilization: An International Quarterly19(4): 387–404.
15.
DianiMMcAdamD (eds) (2003) Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16.
DianiMMischeA (2015) Network approaches and social movements. In: Della PortaDDianiM (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Social Movements. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 306–325.
17.
EnyediZ (2015) Plebeians, citoyens and aristocrats or where is the bottom of bottom-up? The case of Hungary. In: KriesiHPappasTS (eds) Populism in the Shadow of the Great Recession. Colchester: ECPR Press, pp. 229–244.
18.
EnyediZTókaG (2007) The only game in town: party politics in Hungary. In: WebbPWhiteS (eds) Party Politics in New Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 147–178.
FreemanLC (2002 [1979]) Centrality in social networks: conceptual clarifications. In: ScottJ (ed) Social Networks: Critical Concepts in Sociology (Vol. I). London: Routledge, pp. 238–263.
21.
GherghinaS (2014) Party Organization and Electoral Volatility in Central and Eastern Europe: Enhancing Voter Loyalty. London: Routledge.
22.
GherghinaSFaganA (2021) Fringe political parties or political parties at the fringes? The dynamics of political competition in post-communist Europe. Party Politics27(1): 3–8.
23.
GouldRVFernandezRM (1989) Structures of mediation: a formal approach to brokerage in transaction networks. Sociological Methodology19(1): 89–126.
24.
HarmelRSvåsandL (1997) The influence of new parties on old parties’ platforms: the cases of the progress parties and conservative parties of Denmark and Norway. Party Politics3(3): 315–340.
25.
HutterS (2014) Protest event analysis and its offspring. In: Della PortaD (ed) Methodological Practices in Social Movement Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 335–367.
JollySK (2007) The Europhile fringe? Regionalist party support for European integration. European Union Politics8(1): 109–130.
32.
KitscheltH (2006) Movement parties. In: KatzRSCrottyW (eds) Handbook of Party Politics. Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 278–290.
33.
KoopmansRStathamP (1999) Political claims analysis: integrating protest event and political discourse approaches. Mobilization: An International Quarterly4(2): 203–221.
34.
KriesiHKoopmansRDuyvendakJW, et al. (1995) New Social Movements in Western Europe: A Comparative Perspective. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
35.
LaverMHuntWB (1992) Policy and Party Competition. London: Routledge.
36.
McAdamDTarrowS (2010) Ballots and barricades: on the reciprocal relationship between elections and social movements. Perspectives on Politics8(2): 529–542.
37.
MeguidBM (2005) Competition between unequals: the role of mainstream party strategy in niche party success. American Political Science Review99(3): 347–359.
38.
MinkenbergM (2013) From pariah to policy-maker? The radical right in Europe, West and East: between margin and mainstream. Journal of Contemporary European Studies21(1): 5–24.
39.
MinkenbergM (ed) (2015) Transforming the Transformation? The East European Radical Right in the Political Process. London: Routledge.
40.
MolnárV (2016) Civil society, radicalism and the rediscovery of mythic nationalism. Nations and Nationalism22(1): 165–185.
41.
MuddeC (2007) Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
PirroALP (2014a) Populist radical right parties in Central and Eastern Europe: the different context and issues of the prophets of the patria. Government and Opposition49(4): 599–628.
43.
PirroALP (2014b) Digging into the breeding ground: insights into the electoral performance of populist radical right parties in Central and Eastern Europe. East European Politics30(2): 246–270.
44.
PirroALP (2015) The Populist Radical Right in Central and Eastern Europe: Ideology, Impact, and Electoral Performance. London: Routledge.
45.
PirroALP (2017) Hardly ever relevant? An appraisal of nativist economics through the Hungarian case. Acta Politica52(3): 339–360.
46.
PirroALP (2019) Ballots and barricades enhanced: far-right ‘movement parties’ and movement-electoral interactions. Nations and Nationalism25(3): 782–802.
47.
PirroALPCastelli GattinaraP (2018) Movement parties of the far right: the organization and strategies of nativist collective actors. Mobilization: An International Quarterly23(3): 367–383.
48.
PirroALPRónaD (2018) Far-right activism in Hungary: youth participation in Jobbik and its network. European Societies. DOI: 10.1080/14616696.2018.1494292.
49.
PolkJRovnyJBakkerR, et al. (2017) Explaining the salience of anti-elitism and reducing political corruption for political parties in Europe with the 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey data. Research and Politics4(1): 1–9.
RydgrenJ (2007) The sociology of the radical right. Annual Review of Sociology33: 241–262.
52.
TeorellJTorcalMMonteroJR (2007) Political participation. In: van DethJWMonteroJRWestholmA (eds) Citizenship and Involvement in European Democracies: A Comparative Analysis. London: Routledge, pp. 334–357.
53.
TillyC (1995) Popular Contention in Great Britain, 1758–1834. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
54.
TillyC (2005) Identities, Boundaries, and Social Ties. Boulder: Paradigm.
55.
TillyC (2008) Contentious Performances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56.
Van SpanjeJ (2010) Contagious parties: anti-immigration parties and their impact on other parties’ immigration stances in contemporary Western Europe. Party Politics16(5): 563–586.
57.
WodakR (2015) The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
