Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Drawing on a unique panel data set of supporters of the Alternative for Germany (AfD), the study shows that programmatic differences between supporters of Frauke Petry and Bernd Lucke cannot sufficiently explain the crucial intraparty leadership contest of July 2015. Programmatic differences were minor in 2013 but became pronounced over time. Politically active supporters were disaffected with the old moderate leadership of Bernd Lucke, who pursued an organizational reform to reduce the influence of the rank-and-file. Social media also played a key role in the leadership turnover, as alternative news sources on social media were only politicized by the intraparty opposition. It is conceivable that the structure of social media networks influences opinion formation processes and internal affairs of right-wing populist parties in general, as their supporters tend to have low trust in mainstream news.

Keywords

Alternative for Germany (AfD)intraparty conflict leadership contest party activists social media

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abedi

Lundberg

(2009) Doomed to failure? UKIP and the organisational challenges facing right-wing populist anti-political establishment parties. Parliamentary Affairs 62(1): 72–87.

Adams

Clark

Ezrow

, et al. (2006) Are niche parties fundamentally different from mainstream parties? The causes and the electoral consequences of Western European parties’ policy shifts, 1976–1998. American Journal of Political Science 50(3): 513–529.

Akkerman

De Lange

(2012) Radical right parties in office: incumbency records and the electoral cost of governing. Government and Opposition 47(4): 574–596.

Art

(2005) The Politics of the Nazi Past in Germany and Austria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Art

(2011) Inside the Radical Right: The Development of Anti-immigrant Parties in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Arzheimer

(2015a) The AfD: finally a successful right-wing populist Eurosceptic party for Germany? West European Politics 38(3): 535–556.

Arzheimer

(2015b) The AfD’s Facebook wall: A new hub for far-right mobilisation in Germany? APSA Annual Meeting, San Francisco, 3–6 September 2015.

Del Vicario

Vivaldo

Bessi

, et al. (2016) Echo chambers: emotional contagion and group polarization on Facebook. Scientific Reports 6: 37825.

Dostal

(2015) The Pegida movement and German political culture: Is right-wing populism here to stay? The Political Quarterly 86(4): 523–531.

10.

Ennser-Jedenastik

Müller

(2015) Intra-party democracy, political performance and the survival of party leaders: Austria, 1945–2011. Party Politics 21(6): 930–943.

11.

Goerres

Spies

Kumlin

(2018) The electoral supporter base of the Alternative for Germany. Swiss Political Science Review 24(3): 246–269.

12.

Greene

Haber

(2016) Leadership competition and disagreement at party national congresses. British Journal of Political Science 46(3): 611–632.

13.

Heinisch

(2003) Success in opposition–failure in government: explaining the performance of right-wing populist parties in public office. West European Politics 26(3): 91–130.

14.

Jäger

(2017) The potential of online sampling for studying political activists around the world and across time. Political Analysis 25(3): 329–343.

15.

Jankowski

Schneider

Tepe

(2017) Ideological alternative? Analyzing Alternative für Deutschland candidates’ ideal points via black box scaling. Party Politics 23(6): 704–716.

16.

King

Tomz

Wittenberg

(2000) Making the most of statistical analyses: improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science 44(2): 347–361.

17.

Kitschelt

(1995) The Radical Right in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

18.

Klandermans

Mayer

(2005) Extreme Right Activists in Europe: Through the Magnifying Glass. London: Routledge.

19.

Kriesi

(2002) Individual opinion formation in a direct democratic campaign. British Journal of Political Science 32(1): 171–185.

20.

Lynch

Whitaker

Loomes

(2012) The UK independence party: understanding a niche party’s strategy, candidates and supporters. Parliamentary Affairs 65(4): 733–757.

21.

Michels

(1915) Political Parties: A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of Modern Democracy. New York: Hearst’s International Library Company.

22.

Mudde

(2007) Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

23.

Neuerer

(2015) Wie Facebook die AfD-Krise befeuert. Handelsblatt, June 5.

24.

Patzelt

Klose

(2016) PEGIDA. Dresden: Thelem.

25.

Quattrociocchi

Scala

Sunstein

(2016) Echo chambers on Facebook. Discussion Paper No. 877. The Harvard John M. Olin Discussion Paper Series.

26.

Reiser

(2018) Contagion effects by the AfD? Candidate selection in Germany. In: Coller

Cordero

Jaime-Castillo

(eds) The Selection of Politicians in Times of Crisis. London: Routledge, pp. 81–97.

27.

Reuter

Szakonyi

(2015) Online social media and political awareness in authoritarian regimes. British Journal of Political Science 45(1): 29–51.

28.

Robertson

(2017) Political orientation, information and perceptions of election fraud: evidence from Russia. British Journal of Political Science 47(3): 589–608.

29.

Rydgren

(2007) The sociology of the radical right. Annual Review of Sociology 33: 241–262.

30.

Samuels

Zucco

(2014) The strength of party labels in Brazil: evidence from survey experiments. American Journal of Political Science 58(1): 212–235.

31.

Schmitt-Beck

(2017) The ‘Alternative für Deutschland in the electorate’: between single-issue and right-wing populist party. German Politics 26(1): 124–148.

32.

Schneider

(2015) Luckes einsamer Sieg. Süddeutsche Zeitung, 2 February.

33.

Stein

(2015) Die Entscheidung. Junge Freiheit, 12 May.

34.

Tomz

Wittenberg

King

(2003) CLARIFY: software for interpreting and presenting statistical results. Journal of Statistical Software 8(1): 1–30.

35.

Wessendorf

(2015) Es droht das Schicksal der Republikaner. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 1 July.

36.

Zaller

(1992) The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.53 MB