This article examines the continuing importance of the left–right dimension for voting behavior in Western Europe. We test the extent to which economic internationalization may affect the capacity of this dimension to structure party preferences. We explore two dimensions of internationalization, long-term openness and short-term changes, assessing, respectively, the impact of international trade and foreign investments on voters’ preference formation. To study the influence of changing context, we use four waves of the European Election Study (1999, 2004, 2009, and 2014). We show that openness to international economic exchanges tends to weaken the left–right cleavage. At the same time, long-term economic openness appears to soften the impact of short-term shocks for the relevance of left–right politics.
Abou-ChadiT (2016) Niche party success and mainstream party policy shifts–How green and radical right parties differ in their impact. British Journal of Political Science46(2): 417–436.
2.
AdamsJEzrowL (2009) Who do European parties represent? How Western European parties represent the policy preferences of opinion leaders. Journal of Politics71(1): 206–223. DOI: 10.1017/S0022381608090130.
3.
AdamsJClarkMEzrowL. (2004) Understanding change and stability in party ideologies: Do parties respond to public opinion or to past election results?British Journal of Political Science34(4): 589–610.
4.
AdamsJClarkMEzrowL. (2006) Are niche parties fundamentally different from mainstream parties? The causes and the electoral consequences of Western European parties’ policy shifts, 1976–1998. American Journal of Political Science50(3): 513–529.
5.
AdamsJHauptABStollH (2009) What moves parties? The role of public opinion and global economic conditions in Western Europe. Comparative Political Studies42(5): 611–639.
6.
AldrichJPopaS (2008) Clarity of party positions on ideology: a cross-national analysis. In: CSES conference: Political institutions—rationality—electoral behavior, Warsaw, Poland.
7.
AldrichJHFernandezM (2013) Uncertainty or Ambiguity? Sources of Variation in Ideological Placements of Political Parties. Chicago: Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.
8.
AldrichJHDorobantuS (2010) The Use of the Left-Right Scale in Individual’s Voting Decisions. Washington, DC: Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, p. 28.
9.
BakkerRJollySPolkJ (2012) Complexity in the European party space: exploring dimensionality with experts. European Union Politics13(2): 219–245.
10.
BakkerRde VriesCEdwardsE (2015) Measuring party positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill expert survey trend file, 1999-2010. Party Politics21(1): 143–152.
11.
DorussenHNanouK (2006) European integration, intergovernmental bargaining, and convergence of party programmes. European Union Politics7(2): 235–256.
12.
DreherAGastonNMartensP (2008) Measuring Globalisation: Gauging Its Consequences. Springer Science & Business Media.
13.
EichenbergRCDaltonRJ (2007) Post-Maastricht blues: the transformation of citizen support for European integration, 1973-2004. Acta Politica42(2–3): 128–152.
14.
FreireA (2008) Party polarization and citizens’ left-right orientations. Party Politics14: 189–209.
15.
FriedenJ (1991) Invested interests: the politics of national economic policies in a world of global finance. International Organization45(4): 425–451.
16.
GabelMJ (1998) Economic integration and mass politics: market liberalization and public attitudes in the European Union. American Journal of Political Science42(3): 936–953.
17.
GourevitchP (1978) The second image reversed: the international sources of domestic politics. International Organization32: 881–911.
18.
Green-PedersenC (2007) The growing importance of issue competition: the changing nature of party competition in Western Europe. Political Studies55(3): 607–628.
19.
HarteveldEVan Der BrugWDahlbergS. (2015) The gender gap in populist radical-right voting: examining the demand side in Western and Eastern Europe. Patterns of Prejudice49(1–2): 103–134.
20.
HellwigT (2007) Globalization and perceptions of policy maker competence: evidence from France. Political Research Quarterly60(1): 146–158.
21.
HellwigT (2014) Globalization and Mass Politics: Retaining the Room to Maneuver. Cambridge University Press.
22.
HellwigTSamuelsD (2007) Voting in open economies the electoral consequences of globalization. Comparative Political Studies40(3): 283–306.
23.
HoogheLMarksG (2009) A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: from permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science39(1): 1–23.
24.
KatzensteinPJ (1985) Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
25.
KatzensteinPJ (2003) “Small states” and small states revisited. New Political Economy8(1): 9–30.
26.
KayserMA (2007) How domestic is domestic politics? Globalization and elections. Annual Review of Political Science10: 341–362.
27.
KitscheltH (1994) The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
KriesiH (2008) West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
LachatR (2008) The impact of party polarization on ideological voting. Electoral Studies27: 687–698.
30.
MairPThomassenJ (2010) Political representation and government in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy17(1): 20–35.
31.
MarksGHoogheLNelsonM. (2006) Party competition and European integration in the east and west. Different structure, same causality. Comparative Political Studies39(2): 155–175.
32.
MarshallJFisherSD (2015) Compensation or constraint? How different dimensions of economic globalization affect government spending and electoral turnout. British Journal of Political Science45(2): 353–389.
33.
MeijersMJ (2015) Contagious Euroscepticism: the impact of Eurosceptic support on mainstream party positions on European integration. Party Politics23: 413–423. DOI: 10.1177/1354068815601787.
34.
MerrillSIIIGrofmanB (1999) A Unified Theory of Voting: Directional and Proximity Spatial Models. New York: Cambridge University Press, p. 213.
35.
MiklinE (2014) From “sleeping giant” to left–right politicization? National party competition on the EU and the Euro crisis. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies52(6): 1199–1206.
36.
MuddeC (2011) Radical right parties in Europe: What, who, why?Participation34(3): 12–15.
37.
NannestadPPaldamM (1997) From the pocketbook of the welfare man: a pooled cross-section study of economic voting in Denmark, 1986-92. British Journal of Political Science27(1): 119–136.
38.
NanouKDorussenH (2013) European integration and electoral democracy: how the European union constrains party competition in the Member States. European Journal of Political Research52(1): 71–93.
39.
NoëlAThérienJP (2008) Left and Right in Global Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 24.
40.
PiurkoYSchwartzSHDavidovE (2011) Basic personal values and the meaning of left-right political orientations in 20 Countries. Political Psychology32(4): 537–561.
41.
PolkJRovnyJBakkerR. (2017) Explaining the salience of anti-elitism and reducing political corruption for political parties in Europe with the 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey data. Research & Politics (January-March): 1–9.
42.
RodrikD (2011) The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy. WW Norton & Company.
43.
RogowskiR (1989) Commerce and Coalition: How Trade Affects Domestic Political Alignments. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
44.
SchmittHBartoliniSvan der BrugW (2009) European Election Study 2004, 2nd ed. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA4566 Data file Version 2.0.0 DOI: 10.4232/1.10086.
45.
SchmittHPopaSADevingerF (2015) European Parliament Election Study 2014, Voter Study, SVoter Study, Supplementary Study. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5161 Data file Version 1.0.0, DOI: 10.4232/1.5161.
46.
Schön-QuinlivanE (2017) “The elephant in the room” no more: Europe as a structuring line of political cleavage in the 2017 presidential election. French Politics15(3): 290–302. DOI: 10.1057/s41253-017-0041-x.
47.
SteinerND (2010) Economic globalization and voter turnout in established democracies. Electoral Studies29(3): 444–459.
48.
SteinerNDMartinCW (2012) Economic integration, party polarisation and electoral turnout. West European Politics35(2): 238–265.
49.
SwankDBetzHG (2003) Globalization, the welfare state and right-wing populism in Western Europe. Socio-Economic Review1(2): 215–245.
50.
TaggartP (1998) A touchstone of dissent: Euroscepticism in contemporary Western European party systems. European Journal of Political Research33(3): 363–388.
Van der BrugWVan der EijkCFranklinM (2007) The Economy and the Vote: Economic Conditions and Elections in Fifteen Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53.
Van der EijkCFranklinMSchoenbachK. International Research Group (1999). European Election Studies. Hamburg, Germany: IPSOS, (primary investigator) European Election Study. DANS. DOI: http://doi.org/10.17026/dans-z9j-vy6m.
54.
Van der EijkC (2002) Design issues in electoral research: taking care of (core) business. Electoral Studies21(2): 189–206.
55.
Van der EijkCSchmittHBinderT (2005) Left-right orientations and party choice. In: ThomassenJ (ed), The European Voter. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 134–158.
56.
Van der EijkCVan der BrugWKrohM. (2006) Rethinking the dependent variable in voting behavior: on the measurement and analysis of electoral utilities. Electoral Studies25(3): 424–447.
57.
Van EgmondMVan der BrugWHoboltS (2013) European Parliament Election Study 2009, Voter Study. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5055 Data file Version 1.1.0. DOI: 10.4232/1.11760.
58.
van ElsasEvan der BrugW (2015) The changing relationship between left–right ideology and Euroscepticism, 1973–2010. European Union Politics16(2): 194–215. DOI: 10.1177/1465116514562918.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
