When Green parties emerged in the 1970s and 1980s, their political project included a strong commitment to a new type of internal party organization, giving power to the ‘grass roots’. With Green parties having become well established in most West European party systems, has the vision of ‘grass-roots democracy’ survived the party foundation stage? What drives the ongoing or waning commitment to grass-roots democracy? Analysing party membership survey data from 15 parties collected in the early 2000s when many Green parties had for the first time become involved in national government, we find that it is the social movement oriented, pacifist, left-wing membership that is most committed to grass-roots democracy. It is the current involvement in social movements rather than past activity that is most important. Support for grass-roots democracy is also stronger in ‘Latin Europe’ and Greece but weaker in parties which have become established in parliament and government.
BarberBR (1984) Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
2.
BlühdornISzarkaJ (2004) Managing strategic positioning choices. A reappraisal of the development paths of the French and German Green partiesJournal of Contemporary European Studies12(3): 303–319.
3.
BuelensJDelwitP (2008) Belgium: Ecolo and Agalev (Groen!): two institutionalized Green parties with parallel but different stories. In: Frankland EG, LucardiePRihouxB (eds), Green Parties in Transition: The End of Grass-roots Democracy? Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate, pp. 75–91.
4.
BukowSRammeltS (2003) Parteimanagement vor neuen Herausforderungen. Münster: LIT-Verlag.
5.
BurchellJ (2001) Evolving or conforming? Assessing organisational reform within European Green parties. West European Politics24 (3): 113–134.
6.
BurchellJ (2002) The Evolution of Green Politics: Development and Change within European Green Parties. London: Earthscan.
7.
DohertyBde GeusM (1996) Introduction. In: DohertyBde GeusM (eds), Democracy and Green Political Thought. London: Routledge, pp. 1–15.
8.
DunlapREvan LiereK (1978) The ‘new environmental paradigm’: a proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. Journal of Environmental Education9(4): 10–19.
9.
DuvergerM (1964) Political Parties, 3rd ed. London: Methuen.
10.
el-OjeiliC (2014) Anarchism as the contemporary spirit of anti-capitalism? A critical survey of recent debatesCritical Sociology40(3): 451–468.
11.
ESS Round 1: European Social Survey Round 1 Data (2002). Data file edition 6.5. NSD – Norwegian Centre for Research Data, Norway. Data Archive and distributor of ESS data for ESS ERIC.
12.
European Commission (2002) Eurobarometer 57.1 (March–May 2002). European Opinion Research Group (EORG), Brussels. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA3639 data file version 1.0.1. DOI: 10.4232/1.10949.
13.
FranklandEGLucardiePRihouxB (eds) (2008) Green Parties in Transition: The End of Grass-roots Democracy? Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
14.
HansenBSaglieJ (2005) Who should govern political parties? Organizational values in Norwegian and Danish political parties. Scandinavian Political Studies28(1): 1–23.
15.
HayP (2002) Main Currents in Western Environmental Thought. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
16.
HeinrichG (1993) Basisdemokratie (Regelungen und Revisionen). In: RaschkeJ, Die Grünen. Wie sie wurden, was sie sind. Cologne: Bund-Verlag, pp. 488–498.
17.
InglehartR (1977) The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles in Western Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18.
InglehartR (1990) Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19.
InglehartRBasáñezMDíez-MedranoJ, et al. (eds) (2004) Human Beliefs and Values: A Cross-cultural Sourcebook Based on the 1999–2002 Values Surveys. Mexico: Siglo XXI Editores.
20.
KitscheltH (1988) Organization and strategy of Belgian and West German ecology parties: a new dynamic of party politics in Western Europe. Comparative Politics20(2): 127–154.
21.
KitscheltH (1989) The Logics of Party Formation: Ecological Politics in Belgium and West Germany. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
22.
KitscheltH (1990) The medium is the message: democracy and oligarchy in Belgian ecology parties. In: RüdigW (ed), Green Politics One. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 82–114.
23.
KitscheltHHellemansS (1990) Beyond the European Left: Ideology and Political Action in the Belgian Ecology Parties. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
24.
LowePDRüdigW (1986) Political ecology and the social sciences – the state of the art. British Journal of Political Science16(4): 513–550.
25.
MairPMuddeC (1998) The party family and its study. Annual Review of Political Science1: 211–229.
26.
McKenzieR (1982) Power in the labour party: the issue of intra-party democracy. In: KavanaghD (ed), The Politics of the Labour Party. London: George Allen & Unwin, pp. 191–201.
27.
MichelsR (1911) Zur Soziologie des Parteiwesens in der modernen Demokratie. Untersuchungen über die oligarchischen Tendenzen im Gruppenleben. Leipzig: Verlag von Dr. Werner Klinkhardt.
28.
MiragliottaN (2015) Minor organizational change in Green parties: an Australian case study. Party Politics21(5): 699–711.
29.
Müller-RommelF (ed) (1989) New Politics in Western Europe: The Rise and Success of Green Parties and Alternative Lists. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
30.
Müller-RommelF (2002) The lifespan and the political performance of Green parties in Western Europe. In: Müller-RommelFPoguntkeT (eds), Green Parties in National Governments. London: Frank Cass, pp. 1–16.
31.
O’NeillM (1997) Green Parties and Political Change in Contemporary Europe: New Politics, Old Predicaments. Aldershot: Ashgate.
32.
OstrogorskiM (1902) Democracy and the Organization of Political Parties. London: Macmillan and Co.
33.
PanebiancoA (1988) Political Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
ParkinS (1989) Green Parties: An International Guide. London: Heretic Books.
35.
PedersenMN (1982) Towards a new typology of party lifespans and minor parties. Scandinavian Political Studies5(1): 1–16.
36.
PedersenMN (1991) The birth, life and death of small parties in Danish politics. In: Müller-RommelFPridhamG (eds), Small Parties in Western Europe. Comparative and National Perspectives. London: Sage, pp. 95–114.
37.
PoguntkeT (1993) Alternative Politics: The German Green Party. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
38.
Poguntke T, ScarrowSEWebbPD (2016) Party rules, party resources and the politics of parliamentary democracies: how parties organize in the 21st century. Party Politics22(6): 661–678.
39.
RaschkeJ (2001) Die Zukunft der Grünen. Frankfurt/Main: Campus.
40.
RichardsonDRootesC (1995) The Green Challenge: The Development of Green Parties in Europe. London: Routledge.
41.
RihouxB (2001) Les partis politiques: organisations en changement. Le test des ecologistes. Paris: L’Harmattan.
42.
RihouxB (2006) Governmental participation and the organisational adaption of Green parties: on access, slack, overload and distress. European Journal of Political Research45(supplement 1): S69–S98.
43.
RihouxB (2016) Green party organisations: the difficult path from amateur-activist to professional-electoral logics. In: Van HauteE (ed) Green Parties in Europe. Abington: Routledge, pp. 298–314.
44.
RihouxBFranklandEG (2008) Conclusion: the metamorphosis of amateur-activist newborns into professional-activist centaurs In: FranklandEGLucardiePRihouxB (eds), Green Parties in Transition: The End of Grass-roots Democracy?Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate, pp. 259–287.
45.
RüdigW (1990) Explaining Green party development: reflections on a theoretical framework. Strathclyde Papers on Government and Politics71.
46.
RüdigW (2008) Green party organization in Britain: change and continuity. In: Frankland EG, LucardiePRihouxB (eds) Green Parties in Transition: The End of Grass-roots Democracy?Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate, pp. 199–223.
47.
SarkarS (1994) Green-Alternative Politics in West Germany, Vol. II: The Greens. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
48.
ScarrowSE (1999) Parties and the expansion of direct democracy. Party Politics5(3): 341–363.
49.
SeydP (1999) New parties/new politics? A case study of the British Labour Party. Party Politics5(3): 383–405.
50.
TanAC (1998) The impacts of party membership size: a cross-national comparison. Journal of Politics60(1): 188–198.
YoungLCrossW (2002) The rise of plebiscitary democracy in Canadian political parties. Party Politics8(6): 673–699.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
