Research on presidential coattails in elections has focused nearly exclusively on two-party systems like the United States. Much less is known, however, about presidential coattails in multiparty systems where electoral and governing coalitions are common currency. Under coalitional presidentialism, we argue that presidential coattails are diffused, benefiting the president’s party but also her coalition party members, especially those most strongly associated with the coalition itself. Using electoral data from Chile and Brazil, two widely studied but distinct cases of coalitional presidentialism, we find strong evidence supporting this claim. The results carry important implications for students of coalitional presidentialism, presidential coattails, and party systems, more generally.
AlbalaA (2014) The timing effect of presidentialism on coalition governments: evidence from latin america. In: 23rd IPSA World Congress, 20–24 July 2014, Montreal, CA.
2.
AlemánESaieghSM (2007) Legislative preferences, political parties, and coalition unity in chile. Comparative Politics39(3): 253–272.
3.
AmesB (2001) The Deadlock of Democracy in Brazil: Interests, Identities, and Institutions in Comparative Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
4.
Amorim NetoO (2006) The presidential calculus: executive policy making and cabinet formation in the americas. Comparative Political Studies39: 415–440.
5.
Amorim NetoOCoxGWMcCubbinsMD (2003) Agenda power in Brazil’s câmara dos deputados, 1989–98. World Politics55(4): 550–578.
6.
AngellAReigC (2006) Change or continuity? The Chilean elections of 2005/2006. Bulletin of Latin American Research25(4): 481–502.
7.
BorgesA (2015) Nacionalização partidária e estratégias eleitorais no presidencialismo de coalizão. Dados58(3): 239–274.
CampbellJE (1986) Predicting seat gains from presidential coattails. American Journal of Political Science30(1): 165–183.
10.
CampbellJE (1991) The presidential surge and its midterm decline in congressional elections, 1868–1988. The Journal of Politics53(02): 477–487.
11.
CampbellJESumnersJA (1990) Presidential coattails in Senate elections. The American Political Science Review84: 513–524.
12.
CarreirãoYS (2014) O sistema partidário brasileiro: um debate com a literatura recente. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política14: 255.
13.
ChaistyPCheesemanNPowerT (2014) Rethinking the ‘presidentialism debate’: conceptualizing coalitional politics in cross-regional perspective. Democratization21(1): 72–94.
14.
ChasquettiD (2001) Democracia, multipartidismo y coaliciones en américa latina: Evaluando la difícil combinación. In: LanzaroJ (ed) Tipos de presidencialismos y coaliciones políticas en América Latina. Buenos Aires: CLACSO, pp. 319–357.
15.
CheibubJAPrzeworskiASaieghSM (2004) Government coalitions and legislative success under presidentialism and parliamentarism. British Journal of Poltical Studies34: 565–587.
16.
ColomerJMNegrettoGL (2005) Can presidentialism work like parliamentarism?Government & Opposition40(1): 60–89.
17.
ConversePEMillerWEStokesDE (1960) The American Voter. New York: Iohn Wiley.
18.
CortezR (2009) Eleições majoritárias e entrada estratégica no sistema partidário-eleitoral brasileiro. PhD Thesis, Department of Political Science, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
19.
CoxGW (1997) Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
CruzF (2010) Relaciones e interacciones partidarias en coaliciones de gobierno. Los casos de la alianza, la concertación y el frente amplio. Revista Debates Latinoamericanos8: 15.
21.
EriksonRS (1971) The advantage of incumbency in congressional elections. Polity, 3(3): 395–405.
22.
FerenjohnJACalvertR (1984) Presidential coattails in historical perspective. American Journal of Political Science28(1): 127–146.
23.
FreudenreichJ (2016) The formation of cabinet coalitions in presidential systems. Latin American Politics and Society58: 80–102.
24.
GolderM (2006) Presidential coattails and legislative fragmentation. American Journal of Political Science50(1): 34–48.
25.
HickensAStollH (2011) Presidents and parties: how presidential elections shape coordination in legislative elections. Comparative Political Studies44: 854–883.
26.
HuangCWangTY (2013) Presidential coattails in taiwan: an analysis of voter- and candidate-specific data. Electoral Studies, forthcoming. 33: 175–185.
27.
JaramilloFB (2008) Ambitious career-seekers: an analysis of career decisions and duration in Latin America. PhD Dissertation, University of Arizona, USA.
28.
JonesM (1994) Presidential election laws and multipartism in latin america. Political Research Quarterly61(1): 171–184.
29.
KellamM (2015) Why pre-electoral coalitions in presidential systems?British Journal of Political Science47: 391–411.
30.
KrauseSSchmittR (2005) Partidos e coligações eleitorais no Brasil. São Paulo: Editora Unesp.
31.
LeirasM (2007) Todos los caballos del rey: la integración de los partidos políticos y el gobierno democrático de la argentina, 1995–2003. Buenos Aires: Prometeo libros.
32.
Lewis-BeckMS (2009) The American voter revisited. USA: University of Michigan Press.
33.
LimongiFCortezR (2010) As eleições de 2010 eo quadro partidário. Novos estudos-CEBRAP (88): 21–37.
34.
Martínez-GallardoCKellamM (2016) Winning coalitions in presidential systems: preelectoral alliances and postelectoral governments in Latin America. In: ECPR 2016 General Conference, 7–10 September 2016, Prague.
35.
MeirelesFSilvaDCostaB (2016) ElectionsBR: R functions to download and clean Brazilian electoral data. Federal Univeristy of Minas Gerais (UFMG). Belo Horizonte, Brazil. Available at: http://fmeireles.com/fiels/electionsBR.pdf (accessed 1 May 2017)
36.
MeloCRCâmaraR (2012) Estrutura da competição pela presidência e consolidação do sistema partidário no Brasil. Revista Dados55(1): 71–117.
37.
NaviaP (2012) Legislative candidate selection in Chile. In: SiavelisPMMorgensterS (eds) Pathways to Power: Political Recruitment and Candidate Selection in Latin America. Pennsylvania: Penn State Press, pp. 92–118.
38.
PereiraCMuellerB (2004) The cost of governing: strategic behavior of the president and legislators in Brazil’s budgetary process. Comparative Political Studies37(7): 781–815.
39.
PowerTJZuccoJrC (2009) Estimating ideology of Brazilian legislative parties, 1990–2005: a research communication. Latin American Research Review44(1): 218–246.
40.
RaileEDPereiraCPowerTJ (2011) The executive toolbox: building legislative support in a multiparty presidential regime. Political Research Quarterly64(2): 323–334.
41.
SamuelsD (2000) The gubernatorial coattails effect: federalism and congressional elections in Brazil. Journal of Politics62(1): 240–253.
42.
SamuelsD (2002) Presidentialized parties: the separation of powers and party organization and behavior. Comparative Political Studies35(4): 461–483.
43.
SamuelsDShugartM (2010) Presidents, Parties and Prime Ministers: How the Separation of Powers Affects Party Organization and Behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press.
44.
ShugartM (1995) The electoral cycle and institutional sources of divided government. American Political Science Review89(2): 327–343.
45.
ShugartMCareyJM (1992) Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional design and electoral dynamics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
46.
SiavelisP (2002) The hidden logic of candidate selection for Chilean parliamentary elections. Comparative Politics4: 419–438.
47.
SiavelisP (2004) Sistema electoral, desintegración de coaliciones y democracia en Chile: El fin de la Concertación?Revista de Ciencia Política24(1): 58–80.
48.
SoaresMM (2013) Influência majoritária em eleições proporcionais: os efeitos presidenciais e governatoriais sobre as eleições para a câmara dos deputados brasileira (1994–2010). Dados-Revista de Ciências Sociais56(2): 413–437.
49.
SpoonJJWestKJ (2015) Alone or together? How institutions affect party entry in presidential elections in Europe and South America. Party Politics21: 393–403.
50.
Toro MaureiraS (2007) Conducta legislativa ante las iniciativas del ejecutivo: unidad de los bloques políticos en Chile. Revista de ciencia política (Santiago)27(1): 23–41.
51.
WestKJSpoonJJ (2015) Coordination and presidential coattails do parties’ presidential entry strategies affect legislative vote share?Party Politics1–11.
52.
ZellnerA (1962) An efficient method of estimating seemingly unrelated regressions and tests for aggregation bias. Journal of the American statistical Association57(298): 348–368.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
