We examine the impact of direct presidential elections on legislative party systems. We argue that presidential power (PRESPOW) shapes the effective number of presidential candidates in a way that has a reductive effect on the legislative party system within an intermediary range of PRESPOW. We also argue that this proposition should be tested solely on the population of countries with direct presidential elections. We find that the effect of presidential coattails is less important than has typically been suggested and that we need to think carefully about how to capture variation in PRESPOW when trying to estimate its effect.
Amorim NetoOctavioCoxGary M.1997. “Electoral Institutions, Cleavage Structures, and the Number of Parties.” American Journal of Political Science41 (1): 149–74.
Costa LoboMarinaNetoOctavio Amorim. 2009. “Um modelo lusófono de semipresidencialismo?” In Semipresidencialismo nos Países de Língua Portuguesa, edited by LoboMarina CostaNetoOctavio Amorim, 261-280. Lisbon, Imprensa de Ciências Sociais.
7.
CoxGary W.1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
CranenburghOda van. 2008. “‘Big Men’ Rule: Presidential Power, Regime Type and Democracy in 30 African Countries.” Democratization15 (5): 952–73.
9.
DunningThad. 2008. “Improving Causal Inference Strengths and Limitations of Natural Experiments.” Political Research Quarterly61 (2): 282–93.
10.
ElgieRobertMoestrupSophia. 2008. “The Impact of Semi-presidentialism on the Performance of Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe.” In Semi-presidentialism in Central and Eastern Europe, edited by ElgieRobertMoestrupSophia, 239–57. London: Routledge.
11.
FearonJames. 2003. “Ethnic and Cultural Diversity by Country.” Journal of Economic Growth8 (2): 195–222.
12.
FortinJessica. 2013. “Measuring Presidential Powers: Some Pitfalls of Aggregate Measurement.” International Political Science Review34 (1): 91–112.
13.
FryeTimothy. 2002. “Presidents, Parliaments, and Democracy: Insights from the Post-Communist World.” In The Architecture of Democracy, edited by ReynoldsAndrew, 81–103. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14.
GolderMatt. 2006. “Presidential Coattails and Legislative Fragmentation.” American Journal of Political Science50 (1): 34–48.
HickenAllenStollHeather. 2008. “Electoral Rules and the Size of the Prize: How Political Institutions Shape Presidential Party Systems.” Journal of Politics70 (4): 1009–127.
17.
HickenAllenStollHeather. 2013. “Are All Presidents Created Equal? Presidential Powers and the Shadow of Presidential Elections.” Comparative Political Studies46 (3): 291–319.
18.
JohannsenLars. 2003. “IPA: The Index of Presidential Authority. Explorations into the Measurement and Impact of a Political Institution.” Paper prepared for the ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, University of Edinburgh, UK, March 28–April 4.
19.
LijphartArend. 1994. Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies 1945-1990. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20.
MoestrupSophia. 2011. “Semi-presidentialism in Africa: Patterns and Trends.” In Semi-presidentialism and Democracy, edited by ElgieRobertMoestrupSophiaWuYu-Shan, 134–55. London: Palgrave.
21.
MozaffarShaheenScarrittJames R.GalaichGlen. 2003. “Electoral Institutions, Ethnopolitical Cleavages, and Party Systems in Africa’s Emerging Democracies.” American Political Science Review97 (3): 379–90.
22.
SamuelsDavid J.ShugartMatthew S.2010. Presidents, Parties, and Prime Ministers: How the Separation of Powers Affects Party Organization and Behavior. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23.
SekhonJasjeet S.TitiunikRocío. 2012. “When Natural Experiments Are Neither Natural nor Experiments.” American Political Science Review106 (1): 35–57.
24.
ShugartMatthew S.1995. “The Electoral Cycle and Institutional Sources of Divided Presidential Government.” American Political Science Review89 (2): 327–43.
25.
ShugartMatthew S.2005. “Comparative Electoral Systems Research: The Maturation of a Field and New Challenges Ahead.” In The Politics of Electoral Systems, edited by GallagherMichaelMitchellPaul, 25–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26.
ShugartMatthew S.CareyJohn M.1992. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
27.
SiaroffAlan. 2003. “Comparative Presidencies: The Inadequacy of the Presidential, Semi-presidential and Parliamentary Distinction.” European Journal of Political Research42 (3): 287–312.
28.
StollHeather. “Presidential Coattails: A Closer Look.” Party Politics. Published electronically before June 7, 2013. doi:10.1177/1354068813487102
29.
TavitsMargit. 2009. “Direct Presidential Elections and Turnout in Parliamentary Contests.” Political Research Quarterly62 (1): 42–54.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
