Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2019-3
The interplay between parties and media in putting EU issues on the agenda: A temporal pattern analysis of the 2014 European Parliamentary election campaigns in Austria,Germany and the United Kingdom
We investigate the interplay between party communication and media coverage in putting EU issues on the agenda during the 2014 European Parliamentary election campaigns in Austria, Germany and the United Kingdom. A temporal pattern analysis focuses on the dynamic perspective of media–parties’ interactions based on a quantitative content analysis of (a) the press releases published by parties and (b) the coverage of two leading newspapers per country 12 weeks prior to the elections. We find that most public discourses are started by the media; however, political parties especially in Austria are also quite successful in initiating discussions about EU issues. Interestingly, once an issue has been placed on the agenda, only a few parties take the opportunity of exploiting their issue-ownership in response to the media agenda. On the other side, media react to publications of all party types, even radical parties.
AdamS (2007) Domestic adaptations of Europe: a comparative study of the debates on EU enlargement and a common constitution in the German and French quality press. International Journal of Public Opinion Research19(4): 409–33.
2.
AdamSAntl-WittenbergEEugsterB. (2016) Strategies of pro-European parties in the face of a Eurosceptic challenge. European Union Politics0(0): 1–23. DOI: 10.1177/1465116516661248.
3.
AdamSMaierM (2016) Campaigning or downplaying European union integration? Explaining the salience parties attach to EU matters in European parliamentary election campaigns. In: Van der BrugWDe VreeseCH (eds) (Un)Intended Consequences of European Parliament Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 148–170.
4.
BennettWL (1990) Toward a theory of press-state relations in the United States. Journal of Communication40(2): 103–127. DOI:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1990.tb02265.x.
5.
BoomgaardenHGDe VreeseCHSchuckART. (2013) Across time and space: explaining variation in news coverage of the European Union. European Journal of Political Research52(5): 608–629. DOI:10.1111/1475-6765.12009.
6.
BorrieAJonssonGKMagnussonMS (2002) Temporal pattern analysis and its applicability in sport: an explanation and exemplar data. Journal of Sports Sciences20(10): 845–852. DOI:10.1080/026404102320675675.
7.
BrandenburgH (2002) Who follows whom? The impact of parties on media agenda formation in the 1997 British general election campaign. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics7(3): 34–54. DOI:10.1177/1081180X0200700303.
8.
CasarrubeaMJonssonGKFaulisiF. (2015) T-pattern analysis for the study of temporal structure of animal and human behavior: a comprehensive review. Journal of Neuroscience Methods239: 34–46. DOI:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.09.024.
9.
De VreeseCH (2003) Framing Europe: Television News and European Integration. Amsterdam: Aksant.
10.
De VreeseCHLaufEPeterJ (2007) The media and European parliament elections. Second-rate coverage of a second-order event? In: Van der BrugWVan der EijkC (eds) European Elections & Domestic Politics. Lessons from the Past and Scenarios for the Future. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 116–130.
11.
De VriesCEHoboltSB (2012). When dimensions collide: the electoral success of issue entrepreneurs. European Union Politics13(2): 246–268. DOI:10.1177/1465116511434788.
12.
DolezalMEberlJMJacobiC. (2014) Die Rolle der Spitzenkandidatinnen und –kandidaten. In: KritzingerSMüllerWCSchönbachK (eds) Die Nationalratswahlen 2013. Wien: Böhlau, pp. 76–86.
13.
EES (2009) European Parliament Election Study 2009[Media Study, Advance Release]. Available at:http://www.piredeu.eu(accessed 16 May 2010).
14.
EllinasAA (2010) The Media and the Far Right in Western Europe: Playing the Nationalist Card. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
FroehlichRRüdigerB (2006). Framing political public relations: measuring success of political communication strategies in Germany. Public Relations Review32(1): 18–25. DOI:10.1016/j.pubrev.2005.10.003.
16.
Green-PedersenC (2007) The growing importance of issue competition: the changing nature of party competition in Western Europe. Political Studies55(3): 607–628. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00686.x.
17.
Green-PedersenCStubagerR (2010) The political conditionality of mass media influence: when do parties follow mass media attention?British Journal of Political Science40(3): 663–677. DOI:10.1017/S0007123410000037.
18.
HoogheLMarksG (2009) A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: from permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science39(1): 1–23. DOI:10.1017/s0007123408000409.
19.
HoboltSBDe VriesCE (2015) Issue entrepreneurship and multiparty competition. Comparative Political Studies48(9): 1159–1185. DOI:10.1177/0010414015575030.
20.
HolianDB (2004) He’s stealing my issues! Clinton’s crime rhetoric and the dynamics of issue ownership. Political Behavior26(2): 95–124. DOI:10.1023/B: POBE.0000035959.35567.16.
21.
HopmannDNElmelund-PræstekærCAlbækE. (2012) Party media agenda-setting: how parties influence election news coverage. Party Politics18(2): 173–191. DOI:10.1177/1354068810380097.
22.
HurrelmannAGoraAWagnerA (2015) The politicization of European integration: more than an elite affair?Political Studies63(1): 43–59. DOI:10.1111/1467-9248.12090.
23.
JalaliCSilvaT (2011) Everyone ignores Europe? Party campaigns and media coverage in the 2009 European Parliament Elections. In: MaierMStrömböckJKaidLL (eds) Political Communication in European Parliamentary Elections. Farnham and Burlington: Ashgate, pp. 111–126.
24.
KleinnijenhuisJVan AtteveldtW (2016) The impact of the explosion of EU News on Voter Choive in the 2014 EU Elections. Politics and Governance4(1): 104–115. DOI: 10.17645/pag.v4i1.471
25.
KritzingerSZeglovitsEAichholzerJ. (2014) AUTNES Pre- and Post Panel Study, 2013. Cologne: GESIS Data Archive. DOI:10.4232/1.12425.
26.
MagnussonMS (2000) Discovering hidden time patterns in behavior: T-patterns and their detection. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers32(1): 93–110. DOI:10.3758/BF03200792.
MaierJFaasTRittbergerB. (2017) This time it’s different? Effects of the Eurovision Debate on young citizens and its consequence for EU democracy – evidence from a quasiexperiment in 24 countries. Journal of European Public Policy0(0): 1–24. DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2016.1268643.
29.
MeijersMJ (2015) Contagious Euroscepticism: the impact of Eurosceptic support on mainstream party positions on European integration. Party Politics:1–11. DOI:10.1177/1354068815601787.
30.
MeijersMJRauhC (2016). Has Eurosceptic mobilization become more contagious? Comparing the 2009 and 2014 EP election campaigns in The Netherlands and France. Politics and Governance4(1): 83–103. DOI:10.17645/pag.v4i1.455.
31.
MintzbergH (1978) Patterns in strategy formation. Management Science24(9): 934–948.
32.
NetjesCEBinnemaHA (2007) The salience of the European integration issue: three data sources compared. Electoral Studies26(1): 39–49. DOI:10.1016/j.electstud.2006.04.007.
33.
PolkJRovnyJBakkerR. (2017) Explaining the salience of anti-elitism and reducing political corruption for political parties in Europe with the 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey data. Research & Politics4(1): 1–9. DOI: 10.1177/2053168016686915.
SchuckARTXezonakisGElenbaasM. (2011) Party contestation and Europe on the news agenda: the 2009 European parliamentary elections. Electoral Studies30(1): 41–52. DOI:10.1016/j.electstud.2010.09.021.
36.
SchwabFUnzD (2008) Die T-Pattern-analyse: eine methode zur untersuchung von zeitlichen Strukturen in (Ereignis)Daten. In: MatthesJWirthWDaschmannGFahrA (eds) Die Brücke zwischen Theorie und Empirie: Operationalisierung, Messung und Validierung in der Kommunikationswissenschaft. Köln: Halem, pp. 257–270.
37.
ShoemakerPJVosTPReeseSD (2009) Journalists as gatekeepers. In: Wahl-JorgensenKHanitzschT (eds) The Handbook of journalism studies. New York: Routledge, pp. 73–87.
38.
StrömbäckJ (2008) Four phases of mediatization: an analysis of the mediatization of politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics13(3): 228–246. DOI:10.1177/1940161208319097.
39.
ThesenG (2013) Political agenda setting as mediatized Politics? Media–politics interactions from a party and issue competition perspective. The International Journal of Press/Politics19(2): 181–201. DOI:10.1177/1940161213515756.
40.
Van AelstPWalgraveS (2011) Minimal or massive? The political agenda-setting power of the mass media according to different methods. The International Journal of Press/Politics6(3): 295–313. DOI:10.1177/1940161211406727.
41.
Van der BrugWGattermannKDe VreeseCH (2016) How different were the European elections of 2014?Politics and Governance4(1): 1–8. DOI: 10.17645/pag.v4i1.591.
42.
Van der PasD (2014) Making hay while the sun shines: do parties only respond to media attention when the framing is right?The International Journal of Press/Politics19(1): 42–65. DOI: 10.1177/1940161213508207.
43.
Van de WardtMDe VriesCEHoboltSB (2014). Exploiting the cracks: wedge issues in multiparty competition. The Journal of Politics76(4): 986–999. DOI:10.1017/s0022381614000565.
44.
Van NoijeLKleinnijenhuisJAOegemaD (2008) Loss of parliamentary control due to mediatization and Europeanization: a longitudinal and cross-sectional analysis of agenda building in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. British Journal of Political Science38(3): 455–478. DOI:10.1017/S0007123408000239.
45.
Van SpanjeJDe VreeseCH (2011) So what’s wrong with the EU? Motivations underlying the Eurosceptic vote in the 2009 European elections. European Union Politics12(3): 405–429. DOI: 10.1177/1465116511410750.
46.
VesaJBlombergHKrollC (2015) Minimal and massive! Politicians’ views on the media’s political agenda-setting power revisited. The International Journal of Press/Politics20(3): 279–296. DOI:10.1177/1940161215575391.
47.
VliegenthartRMontesNM (2014) How political and media system characteristics moderate interactions between newspapers and parliaments: economic crisis attention in Spain and the Netherlands. The International Journal of Press/Politics19(3): 318–339. DOI:10.1177/1940161214531335.
48.
VliegenthartRWalgraveSMeppelinkC (2011) Inter-party agenda-setting in the Belgian parliament: the role of party characteristics and competition. Political Studies59(2): 368–388. DOI:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00867.x.
49.
WalgraveSVan AelstP (2006) The contingency of the mass media’s political agenda setting power: Toward a preliminary theory. Journal of Communication56(1): 88–109. DOI:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00005.x.
50.
WhiteleyPFSandersD (2014) British Election Study, 2010: Face-to-Face-Survey. Colchester: UK Data Archive.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
