In the postcommunist period, political parties in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) had to convincingly demonstrate that they are a vital part of a functioning democratic society. Well-developed intraparty democracy (IPD) is one way of accomplishing this. By asking what factors are relevant to an explanation of IPD formation, we present an analytical framework in which the formation of IPD can be investigated and explore the patterns of IPD and their determinants. We draw on a newly constructed data set based on standardized content analysis, including 129 party statutes from 14 major political parties from Hungary, Romania, and Slovakia between 1989 and 2011. Relying on unit fixed-effects regression approaches, our analyses suggest that especially imperatives related to party origin and Europeanization have important implications for the formation of IPD within CEE parties.
ÁghA (1995) Partial consolidation of the East-Central European parties. The case of the Hungarian Socialist Party. Party Politics1(4): 491–514.
2.
ArmingeonKIslerCKnöpfelL. (2016) Comparative Political Data Set 1960–2014. Bern: Institute of Political Science, University of Bern.
3.
BarneaSRahatG (2007) Reforming candidate selection methods. A three-level approach. Party Politics13(3): 375–394.
4.
BäckH (2008) Intra-party politics and coalition formation. Evidence from Swedish local government. Party Politics14(1): 71–89.
5.
BeckNLKatzJN (1995) What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. American Political Science Review89(3): 634–647.
6.
von dem BergeB (2015) Im Osten was Neues: Die Osterweiterung der Europarteien und ihr Einfluss auf mittel- und osteuropäische Partnerparteien. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
7.
von dem BergeBPoguntkeT (2013) The influence of Europarties on Central and Eastern European partner parties. A theoretical and analytical model. European Political Science Review5(2): 311–334.
8.
von dem BergeBPoguntkeTObertP. (2013) Measuring Intra-Party Democracy. A Guide for the Content Analysis of Party Statutes with Examples from Hungary, Romania and Slovakia. Heidelberg: Springer Briefs in Political Science.
BolleyerNBytzekE (2013) Origins of party formation and new party success in advanced democracies. European Journal of Political Research52(6): 773–796.
11.
BozókiAIshiyamaJT (2002) The Communist Successor Parties of Central and Eastern Europe. Armonk and London: M.E. Sharpe.
12.
ChiruMGherghinaS (2012) Keeping the doors closed. Leadership selection in post-communist Romania. East European Politics and Societies26(3): 510–537.
13.
CrossWBlaisA (2012) Who selects the party leader?Party Politics18(2): 127–150.
14.
CrossWPKatzRS (2013) The challenges of intra-party democracy. In: CrossWPKatzRS (eds) The Challenges of Intra-Party Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–10.
15.
CularG (2004) Organisational development of parties and internal party democracy in Croatia. Politicka miasoXLI (5): 28–51.
16.
DelsoldatoG (2002) Eastward enlargement by the European Union and transnational parties. International Political Science Review23(3): 269–289.
17.
EisingR (2003) Europäisierung und Integration. Konzepte in der EU-Forschung. In: JachtenfuchsMKohler-KochB (eds) Europäische Integration. Opladen: Leske + Budrich, pp. 387–416.
18.
EzrowL (2007) The variance matters: how party systems represent the preferences of voters. The Journal of Politics69(1): 182–192.
19.
GherghinaS (2014) Party Organization and Electoral Volatility in Central and Eastern Europe. Enhancing Voter Loyalty. London and New York: Routledge.
20.
HarmelR (2002) Party organizational change. Competing explanations? In: LutherKRMüller-RommelF (eds) Political Parties in the New Europe. Political and Analytical Challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 119–142.
21.
HarmelRJandaK (1994) An integrated theory of party goals and party change. Journal of Theoretical Politics6(3): 259–287.
22.
HolmesMLightfootS (2011) Limited influence? The role of the Party of European Socialists in shaping social democracy in Central and Eastern Europe. Government and Opposition46(1): 32–55.
23.
IlonszkiGKurtánS (1999) Hungary. European Journal of Political Research36(3–4): 409–418.
24.
IsmayrW (2010) Die politischen Systeme Osteuropas im Vergleich. In: IsmayrW (ed.) Die politischen Systeme Osteuropas. 3rd ed. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 9–78.
25.
JandaK (1990) Toward a performance theory of change in political parties. Paper prepared for the 12th World Congress of the International Sociological Association, July 1990. Madrid, Spain.
26.
KatzRS (2006) Party in democratic theory. In: KatzRSCrottyW (eds) Handbook of Party Politics. London: Sage, pp. 34–46.
27.
KatzRSCrossWP (2013) Problematizing intra-party democracy. In: CrossWPKatzRS (eds) The Challenges of Intra-Party Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 170–176.
28.
KenigO (2008) Democratization of party leadership selection. Do wider selectorates produce more competitive contests?Electoral Studies28(2): 240–247.
29.
KopeckýP (2001) Parliaments in the Czech and Slovak Republics: Party Competition and Parliamentary Institutionalization. Aldershot: Ashgate.
30.
KosteleckýT (2002) Political Parties after Communism: Developments in East-Central Europe. Washington: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
31.
LewisPG (2000) Political Parties in Post-Communist Eastern Europe. London and New York: Routledge.
32.
LundellK (2004) Determinants of candidate selection. The degree of centralization in comparative perspective. Party Politics10(1): 25–47.
33.
MerkelW (2011) Plausible theory, unexpected results. The rapid democratic consolidation in Central and Eastern Europe. In: BakkeEPetersI (eds) 20 Years Since the Fall of the Berlin Wall. Transitions, State Break-Up and Democratic Politics in Central Europe and Germany. Berlin: BWV Berliner Wissenschaftsverlag, pp. 57–76.
34.
MichelsR (1911) Zur Soziologie des Parteiwesens in der modernen Demokratie. Untersuchungen über die oligarchischen Tendenzen des Gruppenlebens. Leipzig: Klinkhardt.
35.
MüllerWC (1997) Inside the black box. A confrontation of party executive behaviour and theories of party organizational change. Party Politics3(3): 293–313.
36.
OlsonDM (1998) Party formation and party system consolidation in the new democracies of Central Europe. Political Studies46(3): 432–464.
37.
PenningsPHazanRY (2001) Democratizing candidate selection. Causes and consequences. Party Politics7(3): 267–275.
38.
PowellENTuckerJA (2014) Revisiting electoral volatility in post-communist countries. New data, new results and new approaches. British Journal of Political Science44(1): 123–147.
39.
PridhamG (2014) Comparative perspectives on transnational party-building in new democracies: the case of Central and Eastern Europe. Acta Politica49(1): 30–50.
40.
RahatGHazanRYKatzRS (2008) Democracy and political parties. On the uneasy relationships between participation, competition and representation. Party Politics14(6): 663–683.
41.
RahatGShapiraA (2016) An intra-party democracy index. Theory, design and a demonstration. Parliamentary AffairsOnline First 1–27.
42.
RoseRMunroN (2009) Elections and parties in new European democracies. Colchester: ECPR Press.
43.
ScarrowSE (2005) Political parties and democracy in theoretical and practical perspectives. Implementing intra-party democracy. National Democratic Institute for International Affairs (NDI): Available at: http://www.ndi.org/files/1951_polpart_scarrow_110105.pdf (accessed 03 March 2010).
44.
SchumpeterJA (1942) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York and London: Harper.
45.
Stadelmann-SteffenIMarcB (2008) Space and time in comparative political research. Pooled time-series cross-section analysis and multilevel designs compared. Methoden, Daten, Analysen2(1): 29–57.
46.
TavitsM (2013) Post-Communist Democracies and Party Organization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van BiezenIPiccioDR (2013) Shaping intra-party democracy: on the legal regulation of internal party organizations. In: CrossWPKatzRS (eds) The Challenges of Intra-party Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 27–48.
49.
VolkensALehmannPMatthießT. (2016) The Manifesto Data Collection. Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR). Version 2016a. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB).
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
