This study applies black box scaling to the German Longitudinal Election Study candidate survey 2013 to shed light on an emerging right-wing party in Germany, the Alternative für Deutschland (AfD). The scaling procedure extracts two meaningful and robust ideological dimensions described as socialism versus liberalism and libertarian versus authoritarian. Placing the ideal point of candidates from all parties into this two-dimensional space shows that AfD candidates are significantly more market liberal than Christian Democratic Union candidates but not more authoritarian. On these grounds, the AfD can hardly be regarded as a right-wing extremist party. Yet exploring ideological heterogeneity within parties indicates that East German AfD candidates are generally more authoritarian than their West German colleagues, highlighting a potential source of the party’s recent shift from primarily Eurosceptic toward more nationalist conservative positions.
AbediALundbergTC (2009) Doomed to failure? UKIP and the organisational challenges facing right-wing populist anti-political establishment parties. Parliamentary Affairs62(1): 72–87.
2.
AldrichJHMcKelveyRD (1977) A method of scaling with applications to the 1968 and 1972 presidential elections. American Political Science Review71(1): 111–130.
3.
AndersLH (2014) Wen kümmert schon Europa? Europa als Wahlkampfthema bei der Bundestagswahl 2013. Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen45(1): 55–72.
4.
ArmstrongDABakkerRCarrollR. (2014) Analyzing spatial models of choice and judgement with R. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall.
5.
ArzheimerK (2015) The AfD: finally a successful right-wing populist Eurosceptic party for Germany?West European Politics38(3): 535–566.
6.
BerbuirNLewandowskyMSiriJ (2015) The AfD and its sympathisers: finally a right-wing populist movement in Germany?German Politics24(2): 154–178.
7.
ClarkA (2012) Political Parties in the UK. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
8.
ConversePE (1964) The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In: ApterDE (ed) Ideology and Discontent. New York: Free Press, pp. 206–261.
9.
DebusMFaasT (2013) Die Piratenpartei in der ideologisch-programmatischen parteienkonstellation Deutschlands: Das füllen einer Lücke? In: NiedermayerO (ed) Die Piratenpartei. Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag, pp. 189–213.
10.
DeckerF (2004) Der neue Rechtspopulismus. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
11.
DennisonJGoodwinM (2015) Immigration, issue ownership and the rise of UKIP. Parliamentary Affairs68(suppl. 1): 168–187.
12.
EvansGHeathALalljeeM (1996) Measuring left-right and libertarian-authoritarian values in the British electorate. British Journal of Sociology47(1): 93–112.
13.
WahlenForschungsgruppe (2013) Bundestagswahl. Eine Analyse der Wahl vom 22. September 2013. Berichte der FGW, Berichte e.V. Nr. 154. Mannheim: Forschungsgruppe Wahlen.
14.
FranzmannST (2014) Die Wahlprogrammatik der AfD in vergleichender Perspektive. Mitteilungen des Institutes für Internationales Parteienrecht und Parteienforschung20: 115–124.
15.
FranzmannSTKaiserA (2006) Locating political parties in policy space: a reanalysis of party manifesto data. Party Politics12(2): 163–188.
16.
HeathAEvansGMartinJ (1994) The measurement of core beliefs and values: The development of balanced socialist/laissez faire and libertarian/authoritarian scales. British Journal of Political Science24(1): 115–132.
17.
ImmerzeelTLubbersMCofféH (2015) Competing with the radical right: distances between the European radical right and other parties on typical radical right issues. Party Politics25(6): 823–834, DOI: 10.1177/1354068814567975.
18.
JannB (2014) Plotting regression coefficients and other estimates. The Stata Journal14(4): 708–737.
19.
KamCFranzeseRJJr. (2007) Modeling and Interpreting Interactive Hypotheses in Regression Analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
20.
KießlingA (2007) Christlich-Soziale Union in Bayern e. V. (CSU). In: DeckerFNeuV (eds) Handbuch der deutschen Parteien. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, pp. 223–235.
21.
KitscheltH (1994) The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
KlingemannHD (1979) Measuring ideological conceptualization. In: BarnesSKaaseM (eds) Political action. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, pp. 215–254.
23.
KlingemannHDVolkensABaraJ. (2006) Mapping Policy Preferences II: Estimates for Parties, Electors and Governments in Central and Eastern Europe, European Union and OECD 1990-2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
LoJProkschSOGschwendT (2014) A common left-right scale for voters and parties in Europe. Political Analysis22(2): 1–19.
25.
MuddeC (2007) Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
MuddeC (2013) Three decades of populist radical right parties in Western Europe: So what?European Journal of Political Research52(1): 1–19.
27.
NiedermayerO (2015) Eine neue Konkurrentin im Parteiensystem? Die Alternative für Deutschland. In: NiedermayerO (ed) Die Parteien nach der Bundestagswahl 2013. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, pp. 175–207.
28.
NorrisP (2005) Radical Right: Voters and Parties in the Electoral Market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
NorrisPLovenduskiJ (1995) Political Recruitment. Gender, Race and Class in the British Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
OrdeshookPC (1976) The spatial theory of elections: A review and a critique. In: BudgeICreweIFarlieD (eds) Party Identification and Beyond. New York: Wiley, pp. 285–313.
31.
PieperMHaußnerSKaedingM (2015) Die Vermessung des Euroskeptizismus der Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) im Frühjahr 2014. In: KaedingMSwitekN (eds) Die Europawahl 2014. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, pp. 149–160.
32.
PoguntkeT (2014) Towards a new party system: the vanishing hold of the catch-all parties in Germany. Party Politics20(6): 950–963.
33.
PooleKT (1998) Recovering a basic space from a set of issue scales. American Journal of Political Science42(3): 954–993.
34.
PooleKT (2005) Spatial Models of Parliamentary Voting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
PooleKTRosenthalH (1997) Congress: A Political-economic History of Roll Call Voting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36.
PooleKTLewisJBRosenthalH. (2015) Recovering a basic space from issue scales in R. Journal of Statistical Software. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v069.i07.
SaieghSM (2015) Using joint scaling methods to study ideology and representation: Evidence from Latin America. Political Analysis23(3): 363–384.
39.
Schmitt-BeckR (2014) Euro-Kritik, Wirtschaftspessimismus und Einwanderungsskepsis: Hintergründe des Beinah-Wahlerfolgs der Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) bei der Bundestagswahl 2013. Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen45(1): 94–112.
40.
SchneiderSHTepeM (2015) Bundestagskandidaten und ihre Einstellung zur Wirtschafts- und Finanzkrise. In: GieblerHWagnerA (eds) Wirtschaft, Krise und Wahlverhalten. Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 267–300.
41.
SlapinJBProkschSO (2008) A scaling model for estimating time-series party positions from texts. American Journal of Political Science52(3): 705–722.
42.
WagnerALewandowskyMGieblerH (2015) Alles neu macht der Mai? Die Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) und die Europawahl 2014. In: KaedingMSwitekN (eds) Die Europawahl 2014. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, pp. 137–148.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
