Focusing on Bulgaria, and covering the 1990–2009 period, this article analyses what factors predict if print media will report election promises made by political parties. The study utilizes two original datasets. One consists of 3083 pledges made by 15 parties ahead of seven elections. The second dataset includes news stories published by six newspapers during each election campaign. The analysis reveals that pledges made by the main political opponents during each election are more likely to be published than those by smaller parties. Pledges related to economic policy are also more likely to be discussed in the news than other types of pledges, although the opposite is true regarding promises related specifically to the country’s economic transition. Finally, in their reporting of pledges, print media do not reflect the salient ideological priorities of political parties.
AalbergTStrömbäckJde VreeseCH (2012) The framing of politics as strategy and game: A review of concepts operationalizations and key findings. Journalism13(2): 162–178.
2.
AllernS (2007) From party press to independent observers? An analysis of election campaign coverage prior to the general elections of 1981 and 2005 in two Norwegian newspapers. Nordicom Review28(Jubilee Issue): 63–79.
3.
AndersenRTilleyJHeathA (2005) Political knowledge and enlightened preferences: Party choice through the electoral cycle. British Journal of Political Science35(2): 285–302.
4.
ArtésJ (2013) Do Spanish politicians keep their promises?Party Politics19(1): 143–158.
5.
BoomgaardenHGde VreeseCHSchuckART. (2013) Across time and space: Explaining variation in news coverage of the European Union. European Journal of Political Research52: 608–629.
6.
BrandenburgH (2005) Political bias in the Irish media: A quantitative study of campaign coverage during the 2002 general election. Irish Political Studies20(3): 297–322.
7.
BrandenburgH (2006) Party strategy and media bias: A quantitative analysis of the 2005 UK election campaign. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties16(2): 157–178.
8.
BrettschneiderF (1997) The press and the polls in Germany, 1980–1994. Poll coverage as an essential part of election campaign reporting. International Journal of Public Opinion Research9(3): 248–265.
9.
BudgeIFarlieD (1983) Party competition – Selective emphasis or direct confrontation? An alternative view with data. In: DaalderHMairP (eds) Western European Party Systems. London: Sage, pp. 267–305.
10.
BudgeIKlingemannH-DVolkensA. (2001) Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945-1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
CappellaJJamiesonK (1997) Spiral of Cynicism: The Press and the Public Good. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
12.
CostelloRThomsonR (2008) Election pledges and their enactment in coalition governments: A comparative analysis of Ireland. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion, and Policy18(3): 239–256.
13.
DaltonRJ (2002) Citizen Politics. Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. New York: Chatham House.
14.
DimitrovaDVKostadinovaPA (2013) Identifying antedecents of the strategic game frame: A longitudinal analysis. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly90(1): 75–88.
15.
DimitrovaDVPostelnicuM (2008) Coverage of the election in candidate countries: A view from Bulgaria and Romania. In: KaidLL (ed.) The EU Expansion: Communicating Shared Sovereignty in the Parliamentary Elections. New York: Peter Lang, pp. 175–188.
16.
Dobek-OstrowskaB (2011) Political parallelism or political bias? Consequences for the quality of democracy in Poland. In: Dobek-OstrowskaBGłowackiM (eds) Making Democracy in 20 Years. Media and Politics in Central and Eastern Europe. Wrozlaw: University of Wrozlaw, pp. 193–212.
17.
DownsA (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.
18.
EildersCDegenhardtKHerrmannP. (2004) Surfing the tide: An analysis of party and issue coverage in the national election campaign 2002. German Politics13(2): 218–242.
19.
GerthMSiegertG (2012) Patterns of consistence and constriction: How news media frame the coverage of direct democratic campaigns. American Behavioral Scientist56(3): 279–299.
20.
GoldmanSMutzD (2011) The friendly media phenomenon: A cross-national analysis of cross-cutting exposure. Political Communication28(1): 42–66.
21.
HakanssonNNaurinE (2011) News media in the pledge chain: Mediated election pledges in Sweden. Paper presented at the XVI Nordic Political Science Congress (NOPSA), Vaasa, Finland, 9–12August 2011.
22.
HarrisPFuryDLockA (2006) Do political parties and the press influence the public agenda?Journal of Political Marketing5(3): 1–28.
23.
HopmannDde VreeseCHAlbækE (2011) Incumbency bonus in election news coverage explained: The logics of political power and the media market. Journal of Communication61: 264–282.
24.
IyengarSKinderD (1987) News That Matters. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
25.
KlingemannHHofferbertRBudgeI (1994) Parties, Policies, and Democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
26.
KlingemannH-DVolkensABaraJ. (2006) Mapping Policy Preferences II. Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments in Eastern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
KonstantinidisI (2008) Who sets the agenda? Parties and media competing for the electorate’s main topic of political discussion. Journal of Political Marketing7(3–4): 323–337.
28.
KostadinovaPA (2013) Democratic performance in post-communist Bulgaria: Election pledges and levels of fulfillment, 1997–2005. East European Politics29(2): 190–207.
29.
KostadinovaPA (2015) Media in the new democracies of post-communist Eastern Europe. East European Politics and Societies29(2): 453–466.
30.
KostadinovaPADimitrovaDV (2012) Communicating policy change: Media framing of economic news in post-Communist Bulgaria. European Journal of Communication27(2): 171–186.
31.
LengauerG (2006) Framing campaigns: The media and Austrian elections. In: BischofGPlasserF (eds) The Changing Austrian Voter. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, pp. 123–149.
32.
LongSJFreeseJ (2006) Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata Press Corporation.
33.
McCombsMShawD (1972) The agenda-setting function of the mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly36: 176–187.
34.
NorrisPCurticeJSandersD. (1999) On Message: Communicating the Campaign. London: Sage.
35.
PattersonT (2002) The Vanishing Voter: Public Involvement in an Age of Uncertainty. New York, NY: Alfred Knopf.
36.
PowellB (2000) Elections as Instruments of Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
37.
SchuckARTBoomgaardenHGde VreeseCH (2013) Cynics all around? The impact of election news on political cynicism in comparative perspective. Journal of Communication63: 287–311.
38.
SemetkoHCanelMJ (1997) Agenda-senders versus agenda-setters: Television in Spain’s 1996 election campaign. Political Communication14: 459–479.
39.
SemetkoHSchönbachK (1994) Germany’s “Unity Election”: Voters and the Media. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
40.
SemetkoHSchönbachK (2003) News and elections: German Bundestag campaigns in the Bild 1990–2002. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics8(3): 54–69.
41.
SemetkoHBlumlerJGurevitchM. (1991) The Formation of Campaign Agendas. London: Routledge.
42.
StetkaV (2012) From multinationals to business tycoons: Media ownership and journalistic autonomy in Central and Eastern Europe. The International Journal of Press/Politics17: 433–456.
43.
StrombackJ (2005) In search of a standard: Four models of democracy and their normative implications for journalism. Journalism Studies6(3): 331–345.
44.
StrombackJ (2007) Marketplace of ideas and marketplace of money: A study of commercialism and the Swedish election news coverage in 1998 and 2002. Nordicom Review28(Jubilee Issue): 51–62.
45.
ThomsonR (2001) The programme to policy linkage: The fullfillment of election pledges on socio-economic policy in The Netherlands, 1986–1998. European Journal of Political Research40: 171–197.
46.
TworzeckiHSemetkoHA (2010) Media uses and effects in new democracies: The case of Poland’s 2005 parliamentary and presidential elections. The International Journal of Press/Politics15: 155–174.
47.
ValentinoNABuhrTABeckmannMN (2001) When the frame is the game: Revisiting the impact of ‘strategic’ campaign coverage on citizens’ information retention. Journalism and & Mass Communication Quarterly78: 93–112.
48.
van KempenH (2007) Media-party parallelism and its effects: A cross-national comparative study. Political Communication24(3): 303–320.
49.
VolkensALehmannPMatthiesT. (2015) The Manifesto Data Collection. Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR). Version 2015a. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB).
50.
WalgraveSde SwertK (2007) Where does issue ownership come from? From the party or from the media? Issue-party identifications in Belgium, 1991–2005. Press/Politics12(1): 37–67.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
