The main objective of this article is to provide a comparative analysis of the impact of the components that determine positions on the left–right scale using data from the European Social Survey (ESS) which, in addition and in contrast to previous studies, includes the post-communist countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Our findings show the stronger effect of the partisan component vis-à-vis other factors, resulting in further proof of the main role that parties play in influencing voters’ positions on the left–right scale, as long as they constitute the main and most visible actors around which electoral competition develops. Moreover, there are significant variations among countries regarding the impact of the partisan component, principally stemming from the degree of ideological polarization in party systems.
BartoliniSMairP (1990) Identity Competition and Electoral Availability. The Stabilisation of European Electorates 1885–1985. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
BélangerÉLewis-BeckMSChicheJ. (2006) Party, ideology, and vote intentions: Dynamics from the 2002 French electoral panel. Political Research Quarterly59: 503–515.
3.
BerglundFHolmbergSSchmittH. (2005) Party identification and party choice. In: ThomassenJ (ed.) The European Voter: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies, pp. 106–124. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
BilleL (2008) Denmark. European Journal of Political Research47: 952–961.
5.
BobbioN (1998) Derecha e izquierda. Madrid: Taurus.
6.
CampbellAConversePEMillerWEStokesDE (1960) The American Voter. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
7.
ConoverPJFeldmanS (1981) The origins and meaning of liberal/conservative self-identifications. American Journal of Political Science25: 617–645.
8.
DownsA (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
9.
EriksonRGoldthorpeJH (1992) The Constant Flux. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
10.
EvansGWhitefieldS (2000) Explaining the formation of electoral cleavages in post-communist democracies. In: KlingemannH-DMochmannENewtonK (eds) Elections in Central and Eastern Europe: The First Wave, pp. 36–67. Berlin: Sigma.
11.
FleuryCJLewis-BeckMS (1993) Anchoring the French voter: Ideology versus party. Journal of Politics55: 1100–1109.
12.
FreireA (2006a) Esquerda e direita na politica europeia. Portugal, Espanha e Grécia em perspectiva comparada. Lisboa: Imprensa de Ciências Sociais.
13.
FreireA (2006b) Bringing social identities back in: The social anchors of left–right orientation in Western Europe. International Political Science Review27: 359–378.
14.
FreireA (2006c) Left–right ideological identities in new democracies: Greece, Portugal and Spain in the Western European context. Pôle Sud – Revue de Science Politique de l’Europe Méridionale25: 153–173.
15.
FreireA (2008) Party polarization and citizen’s left–right orientations. Party Politics14: 189–209.
16.
FreireACosta LoboMMagalhãesP (2009) The clarity of policy alternatives, left–right and the European Parliament vote in 2004. Journal of European Integration31: 665–683.
17.
HazanRY (1995) Centre parties and systemic polarization. An exploration of recent trends in Western Europe. Journal of Theoretical Politics7: 421–445.
18.
HazanRY (1997) Centre Parties. Polarization and Competition in European Parliamentary Democracies. London: Continuum.
19.
HinichMMungerM (1994) Ideology and the Theory of Political Choice. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
20.
HuberJD (1989) Values and partisanship in left–right orientations: Measuring ideology. European Journal of Political Research17: 599–621.
21.
InglehartR (1979) Political action: The impact of values, cognitive level, and social background. In: BarnesSHKaaseM. Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies, pp. 343–380. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
22.
InglehartRKlingemannHD (1976) Party identification, ideological preference and the left–right dimension among Western mass publics. In: BudgeICreweIFarlieD (eds) Party Identification and Beyond. Representations of Voting and Party Competition, pp. 243–273. London: Wiley.
23.
IversenT (1994) The logics of electoral politics. Spatial, directional and mobilizational effects. Comparative Political Studies27: 159–189.
24.
KitscheltH (1994) The Transformation of European Social Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
25.
KlingemannHD (1979) Measuring ideological conceptualizations. In: BarnesSHKaaseM. Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies, pp. 215–54. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
26.
KnutsenO (1995) Value orientations, political conflicts and left–right identification: A comparative study. European Journal of Political Research28: 63–93.
27.
KnutsenO (1997) The partisan and the value-based component of left–right self-placement: A comparative study. International Political Science Review18: 191–225.
28.
LauRRRedlawskDP (2001) Advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision making. American Journal of Political Science45: 951–971.
29.
LevitinTEMillerWE (1979) Ideological interpretations of presidential elections. American Political Science Review73: 751–771.
30.
Lewis-BeckMSCosta LoboM (2011) Anchoring the Portuguese voter: Panel dynamics in a newer electorate. Political Research Quarterly64: 293–308.
31.
LewisPG (2000) Political Parties in Post-Communist Eastern Europe. London: Routledge.
32.
ListhaughOMacDonaldSERabinowitzG (1994) Ideology and party support in comparative perspective. European Journal of Political Research25: 111–149.
33.
LodgeMHamillR (1986) A partisan schema for political information processing. American Political Science Review80: 505–519.
34.
MainwaringSTorcalM (2005) Party System Institutionalization and Party System Theory after the Third Wave of Democratization. Helen Kellogg Institute for International Studies. Notre Dame. Working Paper 319.
35.
MairP (1993) Party competition and the changing party system. In: CoakleyJGallagherM (eds) Politics in the Republic of Ireland, pp. 113–134. Dublin: PSAI Press.
36.
MavrogordatosGTh (2008) Greece. European Journal of Political Research47: 990–997.
37.
MedinaL (2004) La evolución de las identificaciones ideológicas en España sobre la base del esquema izquierda-derecha (1979–2000). Barcelona: Institut de Ciències Polítiques i Socials.
38.
MedinaL (2010) Oferta partidista y ubicaciones en el eje izquierda-derecha: un estudio comparado. In: TorcalM (ed.) La ciudadanía europea en el siglo XXI. Estudio comparado de sus actitudes, opinión pública y comportamiento político, pp. 107–141. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
39.
MillardF (2006) Poland’s and the travails of transition after 2001: The 2005 elections. Europe–Asia Studies58: 1007–1031.
40.
Müller-RommelFPoguntkeT (1995) New Politics. Aldershot: Dartmouth.
41.
OskarssonM (2005) Social structure and party choice. In: ThomassenJ (ed.) The European Voter, pp. 84–105. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42.
PercheronAJenningsMK (1981) Political continuities in French families: A new perspectives on an old controversy. Comparative Politics13: 421–436.
43.
PrzeworskiASprageJ (1986) Paper Stones. A History of Electoral Socialism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
44.
RabinowitzGMacDonaldSE (1989) A directional theory of issue voting. American Political Science Review83: 93–121.
45.
RahnWM (1993) The role of partisan stereotypes in information processing about political candidates. American Journal of Political Science37: 472–496.
46.
RicoG (2010) La formación de identidades partidistas en Europa: más allá de la teoría de Converse. In: TorcalM (ed.) La ciudadanía europea en el siglo XXI. Estudio comparado de sus actitudes, opinión pública y comportamiento político, pp. 143–174. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
47.
SandersD (1999) The impact of left–right ideology. In: EvansGNorrisP (eds) Critical Elections. British Parties and Voters in Long-term Perspective, pp. 181–206. London: Sage.
48.
SaniG (1974) A test of the least-distance model of voting choice. Comparative Political Studies7: 193–208.
49.
SaniGMonteroJR (1986) El espectro político: Izquierda, derecha y centro. In: LinzJJMonteroJR (eds) Crisis y cambio: Electores y partidos en la España de los años ochenta, pp. 155–200. Madrid: Centro de Estudios Constitucionales.
50.
SchmittHHolmbergS (1995) Political parties in decline? In: KlingemannH-DFuchsD (eds) Citizens and the State, pp. 95–133. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
51.
ShivelyWP (1979) The development of party identification among adults: Explorations of a functional model. American Political Science Review73: 1039–1054.
52.
SnidermanPM (1993) The new look in public opinion research. In: FiniftetAW (ed.) Political Science: The State of the Discipline II, pp. 219–245. Washington, D.C.: American Political Science Association.
53.
SnidermanPMTetlockPE (1986) Interrelationship of political ideology and public opinion. In: HermannMG (ed.) Political Psychology. Contemporary Problems and Issues, pp. 63–96. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
54.
SnidermanPMBrodyRATetlockPE (1991) Reasoning and Choice. Explorations in Political Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55.
Van der BrugWFranklinMTókaG (2008) One electorate or many? Differences in party preference formation between new and established European democracies. Electoral Studies27: 589–600.
56.
Von BeymeK (1986) Los partidos políticos en las democracias occidentales. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
