The article applies and develops Katz and Mair’s ‘cartel party’ thesis to the Russian case. Challenging the accepted characterization of the Russian party system as ‘hegemonic’, the article contends that this underplays the systemic importance of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation and its collusion with pro-Kremlin parties in the fields of electoral and party reform. By applying the concepts of cartelization to the Russian case, it appears that the intersection of state and party goes beyond simply the ‘top-down’ establishment of political parties towards a party system in which there is inter-party collusion around a strong state-based regime.
DeO (2010) Analysis of cartel duration: Evidence from EC prosecuted cartels. International Journal of the Economics of Business17(1): 33–65.
13.
DetterbeckK (2005) Cartel parties in Western Europe?Party Politics11(2: 173–191.
14.
Fair Russia and United Russia (2010) Politicheskoe soglashenie mezhdu Vserossiiskoi politicheskoi partiei ‘Edinaya Rossiya’ i Politicheskoi Partiei ‘Spravedelivaya Rossiya’, 8 February 2010. Available online: http://www.spravedlivo.ru/themes/10560.php?&topic=80&open=news(accessed 1 July 2010).
15.
Gel’manV (2008) Party politics in Russia: From competition to hierarchy. Europe–Asia Studies60(6): 913–930.
16.
GolosovGV (2004) Political Parties in the Regions of Russia: Democracy Unclaimed. Boulder, CO and London: Lynne Rienner.
17.
GreeneKF (2007) Why Dominant Parties Lose: Mexico’s Democratization in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
Grzymała-BusseA (2007) Rebuilding Leviathan: Party Competition and State Exploitation in Post-Communist Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
HaleHE (2006) Why Not Parties in Russia? Democracy, Federalism and the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
HirschmanAO (1970) Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Response to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21.
HutchesonDS (2003) Political Parties in the Russian Regions. London: RoutledgeCurzon.
22.
HutchesonDS (2009a) Russia. In: SagarDJ (ed.) Political Parties of the World. London: John Harper Publishing, pp. 484–491.
23.
HutchesonDS (2009b) Russia: Electoral campaigning in a ‘managed democracy’. In: JohnsonDW (ed.) Routledge Handbook of Political Management. New York and London: Routledge, pp. 332–345.
24.
IvanovV (2008) Partiya Putina: Istoriya ‘Edinoi Rossii’. Moscow: Olma.
25.
JonesMHwangW (2005) Party government in presidential democracies: Extending cartel theory beyond the U.S. Congress. American Journal of Political Science49(2): 267–282.
26.
KatzRMairP (1995) Changing models of party organisation and party democracy: The emergence of the cartel party. Party Politics1(1): 5–28.
27.
KatzRMairP (2009) The cartel party thesis: A restatement. Perspectives on Politics7(4): 753–766.
28.
KitscheltH (2000) Citizens, politicians, and party cartelization: Political representation and state failure in post-industrial democracies. European Journal of Political Research37(2): 149–179.
29.
KlingemannH-D (1994) Current Political and Economic Problems in Russia. Dataset available from Zentralarchiv für empirische Sozialforschung, Cologne, Germany (study ZA-2818), fieldwork conducted by Mnenie Poll Service, Moscow, January 1994, N=3,535.
30.
KolomeitsevNV (2009) Speech in State Duma, transcribed in Stenogrammy GD FS RF, 15 April 2009.
31.
KonitzerAWegrenSK (2006) Federalism and political recentralization in the Russian Federation: United Russia as the party of power. Publius: Journal of Federalism36(4): 503–522.
32.
KooleR (1996) Cadre, catch-all or cartel? A comment on the notion of the cartel party. Party Politics2(4): 507–524.
33.
KwakJ-Y (2003) The party–state liaison in Korea: Searching for evidence of a cartelized system. Asian Perspective27(1): 109–135.
34.
LaaksoMTaageperaR (1979) The effective number of parties: A measure with application to Western Europe. Comparative Political Studies12(1): 3–27.
35.
Law on Political Parties (2001) Federal Law of 11 July 2001, N95-F3, ‘O politicheskikh partiyakh’, Vestnik Tsentral’noi Izbiratel’noi Komissii, No. 6 (120): 5–35. Modified 24 times since publication, at the time of writing. Latest version (accurate to 4 April 2011) on Central Electoral Commission website (http://www.cikrf.ru/law/federal_law/2001_95fz.html) (accessed 3 May 2011).
36.
MagaloniB (2008) Credible power-sharing and the longevity of authoritarian rule. Comparative Political Studies41(4–5): 715–741.
37.
MarchL (2001) For victory? The crises and dilemmas of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation. Europe–Asia Studies53(2): 263–290.
38.
MarchL (2002) The Communist Party in Post-Soviet Russia. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
39.
MayJD (1973) Opinion structure of political parties: The special law of curvilinear disparity. Political Studies21(2): 135–151.
Ministry of Justice (2011) Spisok zaregistrirovannykh politicheskikh partii. Available at: http://www.minjust.ru/ru/activity/nko/partii/(accessed 3 May 2011). (Also contains links to party manifestos, financial statements and statutes).
42.
‘Ovnesenii izmenenii…’ (2004) Federal Law of 20 December 2004, N168-F3, ‘O vnesenii izmenenii v Federal’nyi zakon “O politicheskikh partiyakh”’. Rossiiskaya Gazeta, 24December.
43.
‘Ovnesenii izmenenii…’ (2005) Federal Law of 21 July 2005, N93-F3, ‘O vnesenii izmenenii v zakonodatel’nye akty Rossiiskoi Federatsii o vyborakh i referendumakh i inye zakondatel’nye akty Rossiiskoi Federatsii’, Rossiiskaya Gazeta, 26July.
44.
‘Ovnesenii izmenenii…’ (2008) Federal Law of 22 July 2008, N144-F3, ‘ O vnesenii izmenenii v stat’i 30 i 33 Federal’nogo zakona ‘O politicheskikh partiyakh’, Rossiiskaya Gazeta, 25July.
45.
‘Ovnesenii izmenenii…’ (2009a) Federal Law of 9 February 2009, N3-F3, ‘O vnesenii izmenenii v otdel’nye zakonodatel’nye akty Rossiiskoi Federatsii v svyazi s otmenoi ozbiratel’nogo zaloga pri provedenii vyborov’, Rossiiskaya Gazeta, 11February.
46.
‘Ovnesenii izmenenii…’ (2009b) Federal Law of 28 April 2009, N75-F3, ‘O vnesenii izmenenii v Federalny’ zakon “O politicheskikh partiyakh v svyazi s poetapnym snizheniem minimal’noi chislennosti chlenov politicheskikh partii’, Rossiiskaya Gazeta, 5May.
47.
‘Ovnesenii izmenenii…’ (2009c) Federal Law of 3 July 2009, N108-F3, ‘O vnesenii izmenenii v otdel’nye zakonodatel’nye akty Rossiiskoi Federatsii v svyazi s sokrashcheniem kolichestva podpisei izbiratelei v podderzhku vydvizheniya federal’nykh spiskov kandidatov na vyborakh deputatov Gosudarsvtennoi Dumy Federal’nogo Sobraniya Rossiiskoi Federatsii i otochneniem osnovanii dlya registratsii kandidatov, spiskov kandidatov na vyborakh v organy gosudarstvennoi vlasti i organy mestnogo samoupravleniya’, Rossiiskaya Gazeta, 10July.
48.
‘Ovnesenii izmenenii …’ (2009d) Federal Law of 19 July 2009, N203-F3, ‘O vnesenii izmenenii v zakonodatel’nye akty Rossiiskoi Federatsii o vyborakh i referendumakh v chasti predostavleniya efirnogo vremeni i pechatnoi ploshchadi dlya provedeniya predvybornoi agitatsii’, Rossiiskaya Gazeta, 21July.
49.
PedersenMN (1979) The dynamics of European party systems: Changing patterns of electoral volatility. European Journal of Political Research7(1): 1–26.
50.
PeregudovSP (2009) Politcheskaya sistema Rossii posle vyborov 2007–2008gg.: Faktory stabilizatsii i destabilizatsii. Polis, No. 2: 23–38.
51.
PierreJSvåsundLWidfeldtA (2000) State subsidies to political parties: Confronting rhetoric with reality. West European Politics23(3): 1–24.
52.
PopovaEV (2007) Programmnye strategii i modeli elektoral’nogo sorevnovaniya na dumskikh i prezidentskikh vyborakh 1995–2004 godov. In: Gel’manV (ed.) Tretii elektoral’nyi tsikl v Rossii, 2003–2004. St Petersburg: European University at St. Petersburg Press, pp. 156–95.
53.
PopovaEV (2009) Russian Electoral Party Rhetoric: Before and Under Putin. Department of Political Science, Universityof Tomsk (unpublished paper).
54.
ReuterJO (2010) The politics of dominant party formation: United Russia and Russia’s governors. Europe–Asia Studies62(2): 293–327.
55.
RemingtonTF (2001) The Russian Parliament: Institutional Evolution in a Transitional Regime, 1989–99. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.
56.
RemingtonT (2008) Patronage and the party of power: President–Parliament relations under Vladimir Putin. Europe–Asia Studies60(6): 959–987.
57.
ReuterJORemingtonTF (2009) Dominant party regimes and the commitment problem: The case of United Russia. Comparative Political Studies42(4): 501–526.
58.
RoperSD (2006) The influence of party patronage and state finance on electoral outcomes: Evidence from Romania. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics22(3): 362–382.
59.
RoseRMunroNWhiteS (2001) Voting in a floating party system: The 1999 Duma election. Europe-Asia Studies533: 419–443.
60.
RoseR (2009) Understanding Post-Communist Transformation: A Bottom-Up Approach. Londonand New York: Routledge.
61.
RossC (2010) Political Parties in Russia’s Regions: From Fragmentation to Annihilation. Paper presented at ‘Party Politics in Russia’ (One-day conference), University of Birmingham(25 June).
62.
SartoriG (2005) Parties and Party Systems. Essex: ECPR Press.
63.
ScarrowSE (1996) Parties and their Members: Organizing for Victory in Britain and Germany. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
64.
ScarrowSE (2006) Party subsidies and the freezing of party competition: Do cartel mechanisms work?West European Politics29(4): 619–639.
65.
SmythRLowryAWilkeningB (2007) Engineering victory: Institutional reform, informal institutions, and the formation of a hegemonic regime in the Russian Federation. Post-Soviet Affairs23(2): 118–137.
66.
State Duma Law (2007/11) Federal Law of 18 May 2005, ‘O vyborakh deputatov Gosudarstvennoi Dumy Federal’nogo Sobraniya Rossiiskoi Federatsii’, Sobranie zakonodatel’stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii 21, §1919; law modified eight times up to 24 July 2007, and final version for 2007 election published under same title by Omega-L, 2007. For 2011 election, 17 further amendments up to 25 July 2011, all published in Rossiiskaya Gazeta.
67.
State Duma Protocol (2005) Gosudarstvennaya Duma Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiiskoi Federatsii, Protocol No. 176, 6 July 2005.
68.
State Duma Protocols (2008) Gosudarstvennaya Duma Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiiskoi Federatsii pyatogo sozyva, Protocol No. 49, 4 July 2008; No. 50, 5 July 2008. Available at: http://asozd2.duma.gov.ru/(‘Aktualnye dokumenty protokoly plenarnykh zasedanii Gosudarstvennoi Dumy’) (accessed 1 July 2010).
69.
State Duma Protocols (2009) Gosudarstvennaya Duma Federal'nogo Sobraniya Rossiiskoi Federatsii pyatogo sozyva, Protocol No. 136, 15 April 2009; No. 150, 20 May 2009; No. 152, 22 May 2009. Available at: http://asozd2.duma.gov.ru/(‘Aktualnye dokumenty protokoly plenarnykh zasedanii Gosudarstvennoi Dumy’) (accessed 1 July 2010).
van BiezenI (2008) State intervention in party politics: The public funding and regulation of political parties. European Review16(3): 337–353.
75.
van BiezenIMairPPoguntkeT (2012) ‘Going, Going…Gone? The Decline of Party Membership in Contemporary Europe’, European Journal of Political Research51(1): 24–56.
76.
WhiteSMcAllisterI (2010) National representative survey dataset, funded by ESRC grant RES-062-23-1378 fieldwork conducted by Russian Research Ltd, 12 February to 1 March 2010, N=2,017.
77.
WilsonA (2005) Virtual Politics: Faking Democracy in the Post-Soviet World. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.
78.
WilsonK (2008) Party System Institutionalization and Democracy: The Case of Russia. UCL-SSEES Centre for the Study of Economic and Social Change in Europe, Economics Working Paper No. 91. Available at: http://www.ssees.ucl.ac.uk/publications/working_papers/wp91.pdf(accessed 3 May 2011).
