Did the ideological discourse of the KPRF, the communist successor party in post-Communist Russia, evolve in the same direction as the identity and discourse of the majority of ex-communist parties in Eastern and Central Europe which now embrace social democracy? In particular, did the KPRF’s Marxist–Leninist and nationalist–socialist rhetoric change with time as the political climate for its functioning as the only viable Russian opposition party continued to deteriorate? This question is addressed through content analysis of public documents and internal party documents, which reveals that the latter are considerably more liberal and democratic in tone than the former.
BorzelTanya (1999) ‘Towards Convergence in Europe?: Institutional Adaptation to Europeanization in Germany and Spain’, Journal of Common Market Studies37: 573–86.
2.
BozokiAndrasIshiyamaJohn (eds) (2002a) The Communist Successor Parties of Central and Eastern Europe. Armonk, NY: N. E. Sharpe.
3.
BozokiAndrasIshiyamaJohn (2002b) ‘Introduction and Theoretical Framework’, in BozokiAndrasIshiyamaJohn (eds) The Communist Successor Parties of Central and Eastern Europe, pp. 3–13. Armonk, NY: N. E. Sharpe.
4.
BuyukakinciErhan (2005) ‘The Neo-Communist Parties and Power in Central and Eastern Europe: Change in Political Discourses and Foreign Policy Positions’, East European Quarterly39: 367–99.
5.
CurryJane LeftwichUrbanJoan Barth (eds) (2003) The Left Transformed in Post-Communist Societies: The Cases of East-Central Europe, Russia, and Ukraine. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
6.
DownsAnthony (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.
7.
DuvergerMaurice (1964) Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. Trans. by BarbaraNorthRobert. London: Methuen.
8.
Grzymala-BusseAnna (2002) Redeeming the Communist Past: The Regeneration of Communist Parties in East Central Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Grzymala-BusseAnnaInnesAbby (2003) ‘The Great Expectations: The EU and Domestic Political Competition in East-Central Europe’, Eastern European Politics and Societies17: 64–73.
10.
HarmelRobertJandaKenneth (1994) ‘An Integrated Theory of Party Goals and Party Change’, Journal of Theoretical Politics6: 259–87.
11.
HoughDanKossMichaelOlsenJonathan (2007) The Left Party in Contemporary German Politics. London: Palgrave.
12.
InnesAbby (2002) ‘Party Competition in Post-Communist Europe: The Great Electoral Lottery’, Comparative Politics35: 85–104.
13.
IshiyamaJohn (1997) ‘The Sickle or the Rose? Previous Regime Types and the Evolution of the Ex-Communist Parties in Post-Communist Politics’, Comparative Political Studies30: 299–330.
14.
IshiyamaJohn (2000) ‘Candidate Recruitment, Party Organization and the Communist Successor Parties: The Cases of the MSzP, the KPRF and the LDDP’, Europe–Asia Studies52: 875–96.
15.
IshiyamaJohn (2006) ‘Europeanization and the Communist Successor Parties in Post-Communist Politics’, Politics & Policy34: 3–29.
16.
IshiyamaJohnBozokiAndras (2001) ‘Adaptation and Change: Characterizing the Survival Strategies of the Communist Successor Parties’, Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics17: 32–51.
17.
KitscheltHerbert (1995) ‘Formation of Party Cleavages in Post-Communist Democracies: Theoretical Propositions’, Party Politics1: 447–72.
18.
KitscheltHerbert (2006) ‘The Internal Politics of Parties: The Law of Curvilinear Disparity Revisited’, Political Studies3: 400–21.
19.
KopeckyPetr (1995) ‘Developing Party Organizations in East-Central Europe: What Type of Party Is Likely to Emerge?’, Party Politics1: 515–44.
20.
LijphartArend (1984) Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian & Consensus Government in Twenty-one Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
21.
LijphartArend (1994) Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies, 1945–1990. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
MarchLuke (2001) ‘For Victory? The Crisis and Dilemmas of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation’, Europe–Asia Studies2: 263–90.
23.
MarchLuke (2002) The Communist Party in Post-Soviet Russia. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
24.
MarchLuke (2003) ‘The Pragmatic Radicalism of Russia’s Communists’, in CurryJane LeftwichUrbanJoan Barth (eds) The Left Transformed in Post-Communist Societies: The Cases of East-Central Europe, Russia, and Ukraine, pp. 163–208. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
25.
MarchLuke (2006) ‘The Contemporary Russian Left after Communism: Into the Dustbin of History?’, Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics4: 431–56.
26.
MayJohn D. (1973) ‘Opinion Structure of Political Parties: The Special Law of Curvilinear Disparity’, Political Studies21: 135–51.
27.
MichelsRobert (1968) Political Parties: A Sociological Study of Oligarchic Tendencies in Modern Democracies. New York: Free Press.
28.
NorrisPippa (1995) ‘May’s Law of Curvilinear Disparity Revisited’, Party Politics1: 29–47.
29.
RaunioTapio (2002) ‘Why European Integration Increases Leadership Autonomy with Political Parties’, Party Politics8: 405–25.
30.
SakwaRichard (1998) ‘Left Or Right?: The CPRF and the Problem of Democratic Consolidation in Russia’, Journal of Communist Studies and Transitional Politics14: 128–58.
31.
SakwaRichard (2002) ‘The Russian KPRF’, in BozokiAndrasIshiyamaJohn (eds) The Communist Successor Parties of Central and Eastern Europe, pp. 240–67. Armonk, NY: N. E. Sharpe.
32.
StrømKaare (1990) ‘A Behavioral Theory of Competitive Political Parties’, American Journal of Political Science34: 566–8.
33.
UrbanJoan BarthSoloveiValerii D. (1997) Russia’s Communists at the Crossroads. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
34.
ZiblattDaniel F. (1998) ‘The Adaptation of Ex-Communist Parties to Post-Communist East Central Europe: A Comparative Study of the East German and Hungarian Ex-Communist Parties’, Communist and Post-Communist Studies31: 119–37.
