The variables explaining party system fragmentation have been investigated extensively, but little is known about changes in the number of parties over time within countries. This article is an attempt to fill the gap by explaining the entry of new viable competitors in party systems after the founding election. Using empirical evidence from Spain, we show that when there is an electoral market failure and a high number of perfectly elastic voters, there is a high probability of new viable entrants.
Amorim Neto, Octavio and Gary W. Cox ( 1997) ‘Electoral Institutions, Cleavage Structures and the Number of Parties’, American Journal of Political Science41: 149-74.
2.
Bartolini, Stefano ( 2002) ‘Electoral and Party Competition: Analytical Dimensions and Empirical Problems’, in Richard Gunther, José Ramón Montero and Juan J. Linz (eds) Political Parties. Old Concepts and New Changes, pp. 84-110. New York: Oxford University Press.
3.
Bélanger, Eric ( 2004) ‘Antipartyism and Third-Party Vote Choice. A Comparison of Canada, Britain, and Australia’, Comparative Political Studies31: 312-32.
4.
Boix, Carles ( 2007) ‘The Emergence of Parties and Party Systems’ , in Carles Boix and Susan Stokes (eds) Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, pp. 314-34. New York: Oxford University Press.
5.
Bollin, Niklas ( 2007) ‘New Party Entrance - Analyzing the Impact of Political Institutions’, Umea Working Papers in Political Science2.
6.
Bosch, Núria and Marta Espasa ( 2006) La Hisenda Local à la Unión Europea (UE-15) . Barcelona: Diputació de Barcelona.
7.
Chhibber, Pradeep and Ken Kollman ( 1998) ‘Party Aggregation and the Number of Parties in India and the United States’, American Political Science Review92: 329-42.
8.
Chhibber, Pradeep and Ken Kollman ( 2004) The Formation of National Party Systems: Federalism and Party Competition in Canada, Great Britain, India, and the United States . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9.
Cox, Gary W. ( 1997) Making Votes Count. Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10.
Cox, Gary W. ( 1999) ‘Electoral Rules and Electoral Coordination’ , Annual Review of Political Science2: 145-61.
11.
Gerring, John ( 2004) ‘What Is a Case Study and What Is It Good For? ’ American Political Science Review98: 341-54.
12.
Gerring, John ( 2007) ‘The Case Study: What It Is and What It Does’ , in Carles Boix and Susan Stokes (eds) Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, pp. 90-122. New York: Oxford University Press.
13.
Gidengil, Elisabeth, André Blais, Neil R. Nevitte and Richard Nadeau ( 2001) ‘The Correlation and Consequences of Anti-Partyism in the 1997 Canadian Election’, Party Politics7: 491-513.
14.
Greene, William H. ( 1998) Econometric Analysis, 3rd edn. London: Prentice Hall.
15.
Gunther, Richard, José Ramón Montero and Joan Botella (2004) Democracy in Modern Spain. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
16.
Harmel, Robert ( 1985) ‘On the Study of New Parties’, International Political Science Review6: 403-18.
17.
Harmel, Robert and John H. Robertson ( 1985) ‘Formation and Success of New Parties’ , International Political Science Review6: 501-23.
18.
Hauss, Charles and David Rayside ( 1978) ‘The Development of New Parties in Western Democracies Since 1945’, in L. Maisel and J. Cooper (eds) Political Parties: Development and Decay. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage .
19.
Hearl, Derek J., Ian Budge and Bernard Peterson ( 1996) ‘Distinctiveness of Regional Voting: A Comparative Analysis Across the European Community (1979-1993)’, Electoral Studies15: 167-82.
20.
Hino, Airo ( 2006) New Parties’ Success in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. Essex: University of Essex .
21.
Hirschman, Albert O. ( 1970) Exit, Voice, and Loyalty. Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
Hug, Simon ( 2000) ‘Studying the Electoral Success of New Political Parties’, Party Politics6: 187-97.
23.
Hug, Simon ( 2001) Altering Party System. Ann Arbor, MI : University of Michigan Press.
24.
Kitschelt, H. ( 1989) The Logic of Party Formation: Ecological Politics in Belgium and West Germany. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
25.
Lago, Ignacio ( 2004) ‘Cleavages and Thresholds: The Political Consequences of Electoral Laws in the Spanish Autonomous Communities’ , Electoral Studies23: 23-43.
26.
Lago, Ignacio, José Ramón Montero and Mariano Torcal (2007) ‘The 2006 Regional Election in Catalonia: Exit, Voice and Electoral Market Failures’ , South European Society & Politics12: 221-35.
27.
Lago, Ignacio and José Ramón Montero (2009) ‘Coordination between Electoral Arenas in Multilevel Countries’, European Journal of Political Research48: 176-203.
28.
Lago-Peñas, Santiago ( 2008) ‘Unbalanced Development and Regional Governments: How Much Equalize and How to Equalize?’, in Jorge Martínez-Vázquez and Francois Vaillancourt (eds) Public Policy for Regional Development , pp. 67-89. London: Routledge.
29.
Lee, Adrian ( 1988) ‘The Persistence of Difference: Electoral Change in Cornwall’. Paper presented at the Political Studies Association Conference, Plymouth.
30.
Lijphart, Arend ( 1994) Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-seven Democracies, 1945-1990. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31.
Linz, Juan J. and José Ramón Montero (2001) ‘The Party Systems of Spain: Old Cleavages and New Challenges’, in Lauri Karvonen and Stein Kuhnle (eds) Party Systems and Voter Alignments Revisited , pp. 150-96. London : Routledge.
32.
Llamazares, Iván and Gary Marks ( 2006) ‘Multi-Level Governance and the Transformation of Regional Mobilization and Identity in Southern Europe, with Particular Attention to Catalonia and the Basque Country’, in Richard Gunther, P. Nikiforos Diamandouros and Dimitri Sotiropoulos (eds) Democracy and the State in the New Southern Europe , pp. 235-62. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
33.
Lucardie, Paul ( 2000) ‘Prophets, Purifiers and Prolocutors’ , Party Politics6: 175-85.
34.
Mainwaring, Scott and Mariano Torcal ( 2006) ‘Party System Institutionalization and Party System Theory After the Third Wave of Democratization’, in Richard S. Katz and Willliam Crotty (eds) Handbook of Political Parties, pp. 204-27. London : Sage.
35.
Merton, Robert K. ( 1987) ‘Three Fragments from a Sociologist’s Notebook: Establishing the Phenomenon, Specified Ignorance and Strategic Research Materials’ , Annual Review of Sociology13: 1-28.
36.
Pedersen, Mogens ( 1983) ‘Changing Patterns of Electoral Volatility in European Party Systems, 1948-1977’, in Hans Daalder and Peter Mair (eds) Western European Party Systems: Continuity and Change, pp. 29-66. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
37.
Poguntke, Thomas ( 1996) ‘Anti-party Sentiment: Conceptual Thoughts and Empirical Evidence’, European Journal of Political Research29: 319-44.
38.
Przeworski, Adam ( 2003) States and Markets. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
39.
Roberts, Kenneth M. and Erik Wibbels ( 1999) ‘Party Systems and Electoral Volatility in Latin America: A Test of Economic, Institutional, and Structural Explanations’ , American Political Science Review93: 575-90.
40.
Sánchez-Cuenca, Ignacio (2004) ‘Party Moderation and Politicians’ Ideological Rigidity’, Party Politics10: 325-42.
41.
Subirats, Joan and Raquel Gallego ( 2002) ‘El análisis del rendimiento institucional: teoría y aplicación a las comunidades autónomas’ , in Joan Subirats and Raquel Gallego (eds) Veinte años de autonomías en España: leyes, políticas públicas, instituciones y opinión pública, pp. 3-27. Madrid : Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.
42.
Taagepera, Rein and Mathew S. Shugart ( 1989) Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
43.
Tavits, Margit ( 2006) ‘Party System Change’, Party Politics12: 99-119.
