The process of formation of electoral expectations in proportional representation systems is analysed in this article. Contrary to Duvergerian or electoral coordination theories, by using survey and in-depth elite interview data from Spain in the 1970s and 1980s, it is shown that strategic voting depends on heuristics (i.e. extrapolations from the previous election) rather than on rational expectations. The main implication is that strategic voting is possible in large districts.
Álvarez, R. Michael and Jonathan Nagler (1998) `When Politics and Models Collide: Estimating Models of Multiparty Elections', American Journal of Political Science42: 55—96.
2.
Álvarez, R. Michael and Jonathan Nagler (2000) `A New Approach for Modelling Strategic Voting in Multiparty Elections', British Journal of Political Science30: 57—75.
3.
Beck, Paul Allen, Russell J. Dalton, Steven Greene and Robert Huckfeldt (2002) `The Social Calculus of Voting: Interpersonal, Media, and Organizational Influences on Presidential Choices ', American Political Science Review96: 57—73.
4.
Berelson, Bernard, Paul F. Lazarsfeld and William N. McPhee (1954) Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
5.
Blais, André, Robert Young and Martin Turcotte (2005) `Direct or Indirect? Assessing Two Approaches to the Measurement of Strategic Voting', Electoral Studies24: 163—76.
6.
Converse, Philip E. (1964) `The Nature of Belief System in Mass Publics', in D. E. Apter (ed.) Ideology and Discontent. New York, NY: Free Press.
7.
Cox, Gary W. (1997) Making Votes Count. Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Cox, Gary W. (1999) `Electoral Rules and Electoral Coordination', Annual Review of Political Science2: 145—61.
9.
Cox, Gary W. and Mathew S. Shugart (1996) `Strategic Voting under Proportional Representation', Journal of Law, Economics and Organizations12: 299—324.
10.
Delli Carpini, M.X. and S. Keeter (1991) `Stability and Change in the US Public's Knowledge of Politics', Public Opinion Quarterly55: 583—612.
11.
Downs, Anthony (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York, NY: Harper.
12.
Evans, Geoffrey (2002) `On the Validation of Measures of Strategic Motivations: A Critical Comment of Alvarez and Nagler', British Journal of Political Science32: 185—8.
13.
Fisher, Stephen D. (1999) Tactical Voting in England 1987 to 1997 (PhD Thesis) . Nuffield College, Oxford.
14.
Fisher, Stephen D. (2004) `Definition and Measurement of Tactical Voting: The Role of Rational Choice', British Journal of Political Science34: 152—66.
15.
Forsythe, Robert, Roger B. Myerson, Thomas A. Rietz and Robert J. Weber (1993) `An Experiment on Coordination in Multi-Candidate Elections: The Importance of Polls and Election Histories ', Social Choice and Welfare10: 223—47.
16.
Fraile, Marta (2001) Does the Economy Enter the Ballot Box? A Study of the Spanish Voters' Decisions . Madrid: Instituto Juan March.
17.
Gschwend, Thomas (2005) `Institutional Incentives for Strategic Voting: The Case of Portugal'. Paper presented at the Conference `Electoral Behaviour and Political Attitudes: Portugal in the European Context Project', Lisbon, 27—28 January 2005.
18.
Gschwend, Thomas, Michael Stoiber and Mareen Günther (2004) `Strategic Voting in Proportional Representation Systems: The Case of Finland'. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Science Association, 14—18 April, Chicago, IL.
19.
Gunther, Richard (1989) `Electoral Laws, Party Systems, and Elites: The Case of Spain', American Political Science Review83: 835—58.
20.
Huckfeldt, Robert (2001) `The Social Communication of Political Expertise ', American Journal of Political Science45: 425—38.
21.
Iyengar, Shanto and Donald R. Kinder (1987) News That Matters. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press .
22.
Kinder Donald R.. (1983) `Diversity and Complexity in American Public Opinion', in Ada Finifter (ed.) Political Science: The State of the Discipline, Washington, D.C.: American Political Science Association .
23.
King, Gary W., Robert O. Keohane and Sidney Verba ( 1994) Designing Social Inquiry. Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24.
Kuklinski, James S., Paul J. Quirk, Jennifer Jerit and Robert F. Rich (2001) `The Political Environment and Citizen Competence', American Journal of Political Science45: 410—24.
25.
Lago, Ignacio (2005) El voto estratégico en las elecciones generales en España (1977—2000): efectos y mecanismos causales en la explicación del comportamiento electoral. Madrid: CIS.
26.
Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Bernard Berelson and Hazel Gaudet ([1944] 1968) The People's Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Election, 3rd edn. New York: Columbia University Press.
27.
Lijphart, Arend (1999) Patterns of Democracy, Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
28.
Long, Scott J. and Jeremy Freese ( 2001) Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. College Station, Texas: Stata Corporation.
29.
Lupia, Arthur (1992) `Busy Voters, Agenda Control and the Power of Information ', American Political Science Review86: 390—404.
30.
Lupia, Arthur and Mathew D. McCubbins (1998) The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know?New York, NY : Cambridge University Press.
31.
Meehl, Paul E. (1977) `The Selfish Voter Paradox and the Thrown-away Vote Argument', American Political Science Review61: 11—30.
32.
Monroe, Burt L. and Amanda G. Rose (2002) `Electoral Systems and Unimagined Consequences. Partisan Effects of Districted Proportional Representation', American Journal of Political Science46: 67—89.
33.
Montero, José Ramó and Richard Gunther (1994) `Sistemas “cerrados” y listas “abiertas”: sobre algunas propuestas de reforma del sistema electoral en España', in José Ramón Montero , Richard Gunther, José Ignacio Wert, Julián Santamaría and Miguel Ángel Abad (eds) La reforma del sistema electoral español. Madrid: Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios Constitucionales .
34.
Myatt, David P. (2000) Multi-party Tactical Voting Incentives. Nuffield College Economics Discussion Paper 2000-W19.
35.
Neuman, W.R. (1986) The Paradox of Mass Politics: Knowledge and Opinion in the American Electorate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36.
Popkin, Samuel L. (1991) The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
37.
Reed, Steven R. (1991) `Structure and Behaviour: Extending Duverger's Law to the Japanese Case', British Journal of Political Science20: 335—56.
38.
Richards, Diana (2001) `Coordination and Shared Mental Models', American Journal of Political Science45: 259—76.
39.
Riker, William H. (1982) `The Two-Party System and Duverger's Law: An Essay on the History of Political Science', American Political Science Review76: 753—66.
40.
Schelling, Thomas C. (1960) The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41.
Sniderman, Paul M., Richard A. Brody and Philip E. Tetlock (1991) Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
42.
Sniderman, Paul M. (1993) `The New Look in Public Opinion Research', in Ada Finifter (ed.) Political Science: The State of the Discipline II. Washington, D.C. : American Political Science Association.
