The article contends that the political elite play a crucial role not just in representative systems, but also in the direct-democratic process. On the basis of the Swiss experience, the empirical analysis shows that the outcome of the direct-democratic vote heavily depends on the issue-specific configuration of power in the political elite, and that the impact of the mobilization of its different parts is, indeed, more complex than is usually suggested by the critics of the direct-democratic process. The results support the idea that consensual elites readily get their way, but that the situation is more complex when elites are divided. In a nutshell, the analysis shows that the coalition formation among political elites is a key determinant of the outcome of direct-democratic votes.
Borner, Silvio, Aymo Brunetti and Thomas Straubhaar (1994) Die Schweiz im Allein-gang. Zürich: NZZ-Verlag.
2.
Bowler, Shaun and Todd Donovan (1998) Demanding Choices. Opinion, Voting, and Direct Democracy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press .
3.
Broder, David S. (2000) Democracy Derailed. Initiative Campaigns and the Power of Money. New York: Harcourt .
4.
Budge, Ian (1996) The New Challenge of Direct Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press .
5.
Butler, David and Austin Ranney (1994) Referendums Around the World. The Growing Use of Direct Democracy. London: Macmillan .
6.
Erikson, Robert S. and Thomas R. Palfrey (2000) ‘Equilibria in Campaign Spending Games: Theory and Data’ , American Political Science Review94: 595-609 .
7.
Gerber, Elisabeth R. (1999) The Populist Paradox. Interest Group Influence and the Promise of Direct Legislation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
8.
Gruner, Erich and Hanspeter Hertig (1983) Der Stimmbürger und die “neue” Politik. Bern: Haupt.
9.
Hertig, Hanspeter (1982) ‘Sind Abstimmungserfolge käuflich? Elemente der Meinungsbildung bei eidgenässischen Abstimmungen’, Annuaire suisse de science politique 22: 35-57.
10.
Kriesi, Hanspeter (1998) Le système politique suisse. 2e Édition. Paris: Economica.
LeDuc, Lawrence (2002) ‘Opinion Change and Voting Behavior in Referendums’ , European Journal of Political Research41: 711-732 .
13.
Lijphart, Arend (1971) ‘Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method’ , American Political Science Review65: 682-693 .
14.
Linder, Wolf (1987) La décision politique en Suisse Genèse et mise en oeuvre de la législation. Lausanne: réalités sociales.
15.
Mach, André (2000) ‘Les relations industrielles en Suisse dans les années 90: une lente évolution vers le modèle anglo-saxon?’, in Klaus Armingeon and Simon Geissbühler (eds) Gewerkschaften in der Schweiz. Herausforderungen und Optionen, pp. 153-90. Züich: Seismo.
16.
Magleby, David B. (1984) Direct Legislation: Voting on Ballot Propositions in the United States. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press .
17.
Ossipow, William (1994) ‘Le système politique suisse ou l’art de la compensation’, in Yannis Papadopoulos (ed.) Elites politiques et peuple en Suisse. Analyse des votations fédérales: 1970-1987, pp. 9-56. Lausanne: réalités sociales.
18.
Papadopoulos, Yannis (1991) ‘Quel rôle pour les petits partis dans la démocratie directe?’, Annuaire suisse de science politique 31: 131-50.
19.
Papadopoulos, Yannis (ed.) (1994) Elites politiques et peuple en Suisse. Analyse ds votations fédérales: 1970-1987. Lausanne: réalités sociales.
20.
Papadopoulos, Yannis (1995) ‘Analysis of Functions and Dysfunctions of Direct Democracy: Top-Down and Bottom-Up Perspectives’ , Politics and Society23: 421-448 .
Schattschneider, E. E. ([1960]1988) The Semisovereign People. A Realist’s View of Democracy in America. London: Thomson Learning .
23.
Sciarini, Pascal (1994) Le système politique suisse face à la Communauté européenne et au GATT: le cas-test de la politique agricole. Genève: Georg.
24.
Sniderman, Paul A. (2000) ‘Taking Sides: A Fixed Choice Theory of Political Reasoning’, in Arthur Lupia , Mathew D. McCubbins and Samuel P. Popkin (eds) Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality, pp. 67-84. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
25.
Trechsel, Alexander and Hanspeter Kriesi (1996) ‘Switzerland: the Referendum and Initiative as a Centerpiece of the Political System’, in Michael Gallagher and Pier Vincenzo Uleri (eds) The Referendum Experience in Europe, pp. 185-208. London: Macmillan .
26.
Trechsel, Alexander and Pascal Sciarini (1998) ‘Direct Democracy in Switzerland: Do Elites Matter?’ , European Journal of Political Research33: 99-124 .
27.
Zaller, John R. (1992) The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
28.
Zorn, Christopher (2005) ‘A Solution to Separation in Binary Response Models’ , Political Analysis13: 157-170 .
