The remarkable trajectories of transformation of the communist successor parties have been the focus of research since the collapse of communism. In contrast, the impact of these different outcomes, the ways in which communist successors adapted to democracy and transformed their organization, has been neglected. In this article, I argue that communist transformation played a crucial role in the formation of a strong and robust party opposition which could constrain rentseeking and lead to the rise of a stronger institutional framework.
¡gh, Attila (1994) ‘The Hungarian Party System and Party Theory in the Transition of Central Europe’ , Journal of Theoretical Politics6: 217–238 .
2.
Appel, Hilary (2001) ‘Corruption and the Collapse of the Czech Transition Miracle’ , East European Politics and Society15: 528–553 .
3.
Bartlett, David (1996) ‘Democracy, Institutional Change, and Stabilisation Policy in Hungary’ , Europe–Asia Studies48: 47–83 .
4.
Bartolini, Stefano (1999 – 2000) ‘Collusion, Competition, and Democracy’ , Journal of Theoretical Politics11: 435–470 and 12: 33–65 .
5.
Bernhard, Michael (2000) ‘Institutional Choice after Communism: A Critique of Theory-Building in an Empirical Wasteland’ , East European Politics and Societies12: 316–347 .
6.
Bielasiak, Jack (2002) ‘The Institutionalization of Electoral and Party Systems in Postcommunist States’ , Comparative Politics34: 189–210 .
7.
Birch, Sarah (2003) Electoral Systems and Political Transformation in Post-Communist Europe. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan .
8.
Birch, Sarah , Frances Millard and Kieran Williams (2002) Embodying Democracy: Electoral System Design in Post-Communist Europe. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan .
9.
Blaz.yca, George and Ryszard Rapacki (1996) ‘Continuity and Change in Polish Economic Policy: The Impact of the 1993 Elections’ , Europe–Asia Studies48: 85–100 .
10.
Bruszt, L. and Stark, D. (1991) ‘Remaking the Political Field in Hungary: From the Politics of Confrontation to the Politics of Competition’ , Journal of International Affairs45: 201–245 .
11.
Bunce, Valerie (2003) ‘Rethinking Recent Democratization: Lessons from the Postcommunist Experience’ , World Politics55: 167–192 .
12.
Colomer, Joseph M. (1995) ‘Strategies and Outcomes in Eastern Europe’ , Journal of Democracy6: 74–85 .
13.
Coppedge, Michael (1994) Strong Parties and Lame Ducks. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press .
14.
Crampton, R. J. (1997) Eastern Europe in the Twentieth Century – And After. London: Routledge .
15.
Duverger, Maurice (1954) Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. New York: Wiley and Sons .
16.
Ekiert, Grzegorz and Stephen Hanson (eds) (2003) Capitalism and Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe: Assessing the Legacy of Communist Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
17.
Elster, Jon (ed.) (1996) The Round Table Talks and the Breakdown of Communism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press .
18.
Evans, Geoffrey and Stephen Whitefield (1993) ‘Identifying the Bases of Party Competition in Eastern Europe’ , British Journal of Political Science23: 521–548 .
19.
Fish, M. Steven (1998) ‘The Determinants of Economic Reform in the Post-Communist World’ , East European Politics and Societies12: 31–77 .
20.
Gallagher, Tom (1996) Romania after Ceaucescu. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press .
21.
Ganev, Venelin (2001) ‘The Dorian Gray Effect: Winners as State Breakers in Postcommunism’ , Communist and Post-Communist Studies34: 1–25 .
22.
Geddes, Barbara (1995) ‘A Comparative Perspective on the Leninist Legacy in Eastern Europe’ , Comparative Political Studies28: 239–274 .
23.
Grzymala-Busse, Anna (2002) Redeeming the Communist Past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
24.
Grzymala-Busse, Anna (2003) ‘Political Competition and the Politicization of the State’ , Comparative Political Studies36: 1123–1147 .
25.
Hanson, Stephen (1995) ‘The Leninist Legacy and Institutional Change’ , Comparative Political Studies28: 306–314 .
26.
Hellman, Joel (1998) ‘Winner Take All: the Politics of Partial Reform in Postcommunist Transitions’ , World Politics50: 203–234 .
27.
Huntington, Samuel (1968) Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press .
28.
Innes, Abby (1997) ‘The Breakup of Czechoslovakia: the Impact of Party Development on the Separation of the State’ , East European Politics and Societies11: 393–435 .
29.
Ishiyama, John T. (1995) ‘Communist Parties in Transition: Structures, Leaders, and Process of Democratization in Eastern Europe’ , Comparative Politics27: 147–166 .
30.
Ishiyama, John T. (1997) ‘The Sickle or the Rose? Previous Regime Types and the Evolution of the Ex-Communist Parties in Post-Communist Politics’ , Comparative Political Studies30: 258–274 .
31.
Ishiyama, John T. (2001) ‘Sickles into Roses: the Successor Parties and Democratic Consolidation in Post-Communist Politics’, in Paul Lewis (ed.) Party Development and Democratic Change in Post-Communist Europe. London: Frank Cass .
32.
Jasiewicz, Krzysztof (1993) ‘Structures of Representation’, in Stephen White , Judy Batt and Paul G. Lewis (eds) Developments in Eastern European Politics. London: Macmillan .
33.
Jowitt, Ken (1992) ‘The Leninist Legacy’, in Ken Jowitt (ed.) New World Disorder. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press .
34.
Karasimeonov, Georgi (1995) ‘Parliamentary Elections of 1994 and the Development of the Bulgarian Party System’ , Party Politics1: 579–587 .
35.
King, Gary , Robert Keohane and Sidney Verba (1994) Designing Social Inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
36.
Kitschelt, Herbert (1992) ‘The Formation of Party Systems in East Central Europe’ , Politics and Society20: 7–50 .
37.
Kitschelt, Herbert (1994) The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
38.
Kitschelt, Herbert (1995) ‘Party Systems in East Central Europe: Consolidation or Fluidity?’Studies in Public Policy. Glasgow: Center for the Study of Public Policy, University of Strathclyde , no. 241.
39.
Kitschelt, Herbert , Zdenka Mansfeldová , Radoslaw Markowski and Gabor Toka (1999) Post-Communist Party Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
40.
Koelble, Thomas (1992) The Left Unraveled: Social Democracy and the New Left Challenge. Durham, NC: Duke University Press .
41.
Kovacs, Andras (1995) ‘Two Lectures on the Electoral Victory of the Hungarian Socialists’ , Constellations2: 72–75 .
42.
Levitsky, Steven (2003) Transforming Labor-Based Parties in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
43.
Lewis, Paul (1996) ‘Political Institutionalisation and Party Development in Postcommunist Poland’ , Europe-Asia Studies48: 779–799 .
44.
Mainwaring, Scott and Timothy Scully (1995) Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press .
45.
Mair, Peter (1997) Party System Change: Approaches and Interpretations. Oxford: Clarendon Press .
46.
Markowski, Radoslaw (1997) ‘Political Parties and Ideological Spaces in East Central Europe’ , Communist and Post-Communist Studies30: 221–254 .
47.
Michels, Robert (1962 [1911]) Political Parties. New York: The Free Press .
48.
Millard, Frances (1994) ‘The Shaping of the Polish Party System, 1989–93’ , East European Politics and Societies8: 467–494 .
49.
Moraski, Bryon and Gerhard Loewenberg (1997) ‘The Effect of Legal Thresholds on the Revival of Former Communist Parties in East-Central Europe’ . Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, 28–31 August 1997, Washington, DC.
50.
Moser, Robert (1999) ‘Electoral Systems and the Number of Parties in Postcommunist States’ , World Politics51: 359–384 .
51.
Ordeshook, Peter and Olga Shvetsova (1994) ‘Ethnic Heterogeneity, District Magnitude, and the Number of Parties’ , American Journal of Political Science38: 100–123 .
52.
Panebianco, Angelo (1988) Political Parties: Organization and Power. New York: Cambridge University Press .
53.
Przeworski, Adam (1992) Democracy and the Market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
54.
Racz, Barnabas (1993) ‘The Socialist-Left Opposition in Hungary’ , Europe–Asia Studies45: 647–670 .
55.
Stanclik, Katarzyna (1997) ‘Electoral Law and the Formation of Political Party Systems in the New East European Democracies’ . Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, 28–31 August 1997, Washington, DC.
56.
Stroehlein, Andrew (1999) ‘The Czech Republic 1992 to 1999’, Central Europe Review. Available at http://www.ce-review.org/99/12/stroehlein12.html. Accessed 13 September online.
57.
Szelenyi, Ivan , Eva Fodor and Eric Hanley (1997) ‘Left Turn in Post Communist Politics: Bringing Class Back In?’East European Politics and Societies11: 190–224 .
58.
Taagepera, Rein and Matthew Shugart (1989) Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press .
59.
Tismaneanu, Vladimir (1996) ‘Romanian Exceptionalism?’ in Karen Dawisha and Bruce Parrott (eds) Politics, Power, and the Struggle for Democracy in South-East Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
60.
Tóka, Gábor (1996) ‘Electoral Choices in East-Central Europe’, in Geoffrey Pridham and Paul G. Lewis (eds) Stabilising Fragile Democracies: Comparing new party systems in Southern and Eastern Europe. London: Routledge .
61.
Vachudová, Milada Anna and Timothy Snyder (1997) ‘Are Transitions Transitory? Two Types of Political Change in Eastern Europe Since 1989’ , East European Politics and Societies11: 1–5 .
62.
Waller, Michael (1995) ‘Adaptation of the Former Communist Parties of East Central Europe’ , Party Politics1: 473–490 .
63.
Zubek, Voytek (1994) ‘The Reassertion of the Left in Post-Communist Poland’ , Europe-Asia Studies46: 801–837 .
