Eastern European countries have adopted parliamentary institutions that resemble those in the West. This enables researchers to evaluate the effects of institutions in contrasting contexts. In this article, we study the impact of context on the allocation of government portfolios. We find that the distinct economic and cultural situation in less advanced Eastern European countries has a pronounced effect on coalition-bargaining over portfolios. In contrast, more advanced Eastern European countries exhibit patterns of allocation that match those found in the West. We discuss the implications of our results for studies of institutions and coalition theory.
Amorim Neto, Octavio and David Samuels (2003) ‘Cabinet Partisanship and Regime Type in Contemporary Democracies’ . Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, PA.
2.
Amorim Neto, Octavio and Kaare Strøm (2002) ‘Presidents, Voters, and Non-Partisan Cabinet Members in European Parliamentary Democracies’ . Paper presented at the Joint Sessions of the Nordic Political Science Association, Aalborg.
3.
Baron, David P . and John Ferejohn (1989) ‘Bargaining in Legislatures’ , American Political Science Review83: 1181-1206 .
4.
Blondel, Jean (2001) ‘Cabinets in Post-Communist East-Central Europe and in the Balkans: Introduction’, in Jean Blondel and Ferdinand Müller-Rommel (eds) Cabinets in Eastern Europe. New York: Palgrave .
5.
Bozóki, András and John T. Ishiyama (eds) (2002) The Communist Successor Parties of Central and Eastern Europe. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe .
6.
Browne, Eric C . and Mark N. Franklin (1973) ‘Aspects of Coalition Payoffs in European Parliamentary Democracies’ , American Political Science Review67: 453-469 .
7.
Browne, Eric C . and John P. Frendreis (1980) ‘Allocating Coalition Payoffs by Conventional Norm: An Assessment of the Evidence from Cabinet Coalition Situations’ , American Journal of Political Science24: 753-768 .
8.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce (1979) ‘Coalition Payoffs and Electoral Performance in European Democracies’ , Comparative Political Studies72: 61-81 .
9.
Bunce, Valerie and Mária Csanádi (1993) ‘Uncertainty in Transition: Postcommunism in Hungary’ , East European Politics and Societies7: 240-276 .
10.
De Winter, Lieven (1995) ‘The Role of Parliament in Government Formation and Resignation’, in Herbert Doring (ed.) Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe. Frankfurt: Campus Verlag .
11.
Druckman, James N . and Paul V. Warwick (2005) ‘The Missing Piece: Measuring Portfolio Salience in Western European Parliamentary Democracies’ , European Journal of Political Research.
12.
Evans, Geoffrey and Stephen Whitefield (1995) ‘Economic Ideology and Political Success: Communist Successor Parties in the Czech Republic, Slovakia and Hungary Compared’ , Party Politics1: 565-578 .
13.
Gamson, William A . (1961) ‘A Theory of Coalition Formation’ , American Sociological Review26: 373-382 .
14.
Geddes, Barbara (1996) ‘Initiation of New Democratic Institutions in Eastern Europe and Latin America’, in Arend Lijphart and Carlos H. Waisman (eds) Institutional Design in New Democracies: Eastern Europe and Latin America. Boulder, CO: Westview Press .
15.
Gryzmala-Busse, Anna (2001) ‘Coalition Formation and the Regime Divide in New Democracies: East Central Europe’ , Comparative Politics34: 85-104 .
16.
Harrington, Jr ., Joseph E . (1990) ‘The Power of the Proposal Maker in a Model of Endogenous Agenda Formation’ , Public Choice64: 1-20 .
17.
Holmes, Leslie (1997) Post-Communism: An Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press .
18.
Huber, Evelyne (2003) ‘The Role of Cross-regional Comparison’ , APSA-CP Newsletter14: 1-6 .
19.
Huntington, Samuel P . (1991) The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press .
20.
Ishiyama, John (1995) ‘Communist Parties in Transition: Structures, Leaders, and Processes of Democratization in Eastern Europe’ , Comparative Politics27: 147-166 .
21.
Jowitt, Kenneth (1992) ‘The Leninist Legacy’, in Ivo Banac (ed.) Eastern Europe in Revolution. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press .
King, Charles (2000) ‘Post-Postcommunism: Transition, Comparison, and the End of Eastern Europe’ , World Politics53: 143-172 .
24.
Kitschelt, Herbert , Zdenka Mansfeldova , Radoslaw Markowski and Gabor Toka (1999) Post-Communist Party Systems: Competition, Representation, and Inter-Party Cooperation. New York: Cambridge University Press .
25.
Kopstein, Jeffrey S . and David A. Reilly (2000) ‘Geographic Diffusion and the Transformation of the Postcommunist World’ , World Politics53: 1-37 .
26.
Laver, Michael and Norman Schofield (1990) Multiparty Government: The Politics of Coalition in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
27.
Martin, Lanny W . and Randolph T. Stevenson (2001) ‘Government Formation in Parliamentary Democracies’ , American Journal of Political Science45: 33-50 .
28.
Martin, Lanny W . and Randolph T. Stevenson (2002) ‘Electoral Outcomes and Cabinet Composition; The Impact of Formation Procedures’ . Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Public Choice Society, San Diego, CA.
29.
Mershon, Carol (1994) ‘Expectations and Informal Rules in Coalition Formation’ , Comparative Political Studies27: 40-79 .
30.
Mershon, Carol (2001) ‘Contending Models of Portfolio Allocation and Office Payoffs to Party Factions: Italy, 1963-79’ , American Journal of Political Science45: 277-293 .
31.
Mershon, Carol (2002) The Costs of Coalition. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press .
32.
Morelli, Massimo (1999) ‘Demand Competition and Policy Compromise in Legislative Bargaining’ , American Political Science Review93: 809-820 .
33.
Müller, Wolfgang C. and Kaare Strøm (eds) (2000) Coalition Governments in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
34.
Offe, Claus (1991) ‘Capitalism by Democratic Design? Democratic Theory Facing the Triple Transition in East Central Europe’ , Social Research58: 865-892 .
35.
Powell, G . Bingham, Jr . (1982) Contemporary Democracies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
36.
Roberts, Andrew (2003) ‘What Type of Democracy is Emerging in Eastern Europe?’ Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
37.
Schofield, Norman and Michael Laver (1985) ‘Bargaining Theory and Portfolio Payoffs in European Coalition Governments 1945-83’ , British Journal of Political Science15: 143-164 .
38.
Schöpflin, George (1994) ‘Postcommunism: The Problems of Democratic Construction’ , Daedalus123: 127-143 .
39.
Siegfried, Tom (2004) ‘Social Thermometers: Money-Game Experiments Show Cultural Variances in Behavior’ , The Dallas Morning News, 23 May.
40.
Snedecor, George W . and William G. Cochran (1989) Statistical Methods. 8th edn.Ames: Iowa State University Press .
41.
Strøm, Kaare (1990) Minority Government and Majority Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
42.
Strøm, Kaare , Ian Budge and Michael J. Laver (1994) ‘Constraints on Cabinet Formation in Parliamentary Democracies’ , American Journal of Political Science38: 303-335 .
43.
Strøm, Kaare and Stephen M. Swindle (2002) ‘Strategic Parliamentary Dissolution’ , American Political Science Review96: 575-591 .
44.
Sztompka, Piotr (1993) ‘Civilizational Incompetence: The Trap of Post-Communist Societies’ , Zeitschrift für Soziologie22: 85-95 .
45.
Tucker, Joshua A . (1999) ‘Rethinking Economic Voting: Party Type vs. Incumbency in Transition Countries’ . Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, GA.
46.
Vachudova, Milada Anna and Tim Snyder (1997) ‘Are Transitions Transitory?: Two Types of Political Change in Eastern Europe since 1989’ , East European Politics and Societies11: 1-35 .
47.
Warwick, Paul V . and James N. Druckman (2001) ‘Portfolio Salience and the Proportionality of Payoffs in Coalition Governments’ , British Journal of Political Science31: 627-649 .
