Conventional belief suggests that the ruling party in the ‘single non-transferable voting’ (SNTV) system can often coordinate legislative candidates through the allocation of resources, and previous research shows that both local factions and budget distribution influence the process of candidate coordination. Modeling the seat shares of the Kuomintang (KMT) in the 1992, 1995, 1998 and 2001 legislative elections, this article contends that the number of local factions and chairmen in parliament largely determines the KMT’s seat gains. Evidence shows that the KMT was apt to coordinate candidates through the position of committee chairpersons in the Legislative Yuan, and its failure to do so in the 2001 election contributed to its fall.
Cain, Bruce E. , John Ferejohn and Morris P. Fiorina (1987) The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
2.
Chu, Yun-han (1994) ‘SNTV and the Evolving Party System in Taiwan’ , Chinese Political Science Review22: 33-51 .
3.
Chen, Ming-tung and Lin Jih-wen (1998) ‘The Source of Local Elections in Taiwan and the Transformation of the State-Society Relationship’, in Cheng Ming-tong and Chen Yun-Nien (eds) Cross-Strait Grass-Root Election and Change of Politics and Society. Taipei: Yeh-Tan Press .
4.
Cox, Gary W. (1996) ‘Is the Single Nontransferable Vote Super proportional? Evidence from Japan and Taiwan’ , American Journal of Political Science40: 740-755 .
5.
Cox, Gary W. (1997) Making Votes Count. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
6.
Cox, Gary W. (1999) ‘Electoral Rules and Electoral Coordination’ , Annual Review Political Science2: 145-161 .
7.
Cox, Gary W. and Matthew D. McCubbins (1993) Legislative leviathan: Party government in the house. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press .
8.
Cox, Gary W. and Emerson Niou (1994) ‘Seat Bonuses under the Single Nontransferable Vote System: Evidence from Japan and Taiwan’ , Comparative Politics26: 221-236 .
9.
Cox, Gary W. and Frances McCall Rosenbluth (1995) ‘Structural Determinants of Electoral Cohesiveness’, in Peter F. Cowhey and Mathew D. McCubbins (eds) Structure and Policy in Japan and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
10.
Crook, Sara Brandes and John R. Hibbing (1985) ‘Congressional Reform and Party Discipline: The Effects of Changes in the Seniority System on Party Loyalty in the US House of Representatives’ , British Journal of Political Science15: 207-226 .
11.
Duverger, Maurice (1954) Political Parties. Translated by Barbara and Robert North. New York: John Wiley .
12.
Epstein, David , David Brady , Sadafumi Kawato and Sharyn O’Halloran (1997) ‘A Comparative Approach to Legislative Organization: Careerism and Seniority in the United States and Japan’ , American Journal of Political Science41: 965-998 .
13.
Fenno, Richard F. (1973) Congressmen in Committees. Boston, MA: Little, Brown .
14.
Grofman, Bernard (1999) ‘SNTV: An Inventory of Theoretically Derived Propositions and a Brief Review of the Evidence from Japan, Korea, Taiwan, and Alabama’, in Bernard Grofman , Sung-Chull Lee , Edwin A. Winckler and Brian Woodall (eds) Elections in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan under the Single Non-Transferable Vote. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press .
15.
Hawang, Shiow-Duan (2000) ‘A Comparison of Three Different Types of Committees in the Legislative Yuan of Taiwan’ , Soochow Journal of Political Science11: 35-70 .
16.
Hsieh, John Fuh-shen (1999) ‘Manipulating the Electoral System under the SNTV: The Case of the Republic of China on Taiwan’, in Bernard Grofman , Sung-Chull Lee , Edwin A. Winckler and Brian Woodall (eds) Elections in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan under the Single Non-Transferable Vote. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press .
17.
Hsieh, John Fuh-shen and Richard G. Niemi (1999) ‘Can Duverger’s Law Be Extended to SNTV? The Case of Taiwan’s Legislative Yuan Elections’ , Electoral Studies18: 101-116 .
18.
Hsu, Yung-ming and Hung-Chung Chen (2002) ‘Old Dog Learns New Tactics: the Effectiveness of Party Nomination in the Legislative Election’ , Soochow Journal of Politics15: 87-121 .
19.
Hwang, Shiao-tuan (1999) ‘Strategic Voting: Comparing Single-Member District and SNTV System’ , Journal of Electoral Studies6: 1-31 .
20.
Hwang, The-fu (1994) ‘Modernization, Electoral Competition, and Logical Factions: An Analysis of the 1992 Election of Legislators’ , Journal of Electoral Studies1: 75-91 .
21.
Jesse, Neal G. (1999) ‘Candidate Success in Multi-Member Districts: an Investigation of Duverger and Cox’ , Electoral Studies18: 323-340 .
22.
Krehbiel, Keith , Kenneth A. Shepsle and Barry R. Weingast (1987) ‘Why Are Congressional Committees Powerful?’American Political Science Review81: 929-945 .
23.
Lijphart, Arend (1999) Patterns of Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press .
24.
Lijphart, Arend , Rafael López and Yasumori Sone (1986) ‘The Limited Vote and the Single Nontransferable Vote: Lessons from the Japanese and Spanish Examples’, in Bernard Grofman and Arend Lijphart (eds) Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences. New York: Agathon Press .
25.
Lin, Jih-wen (1996) ‘Consequences of the Single Nontransferable Voting Rule: Comparing the Japan and Taiwan Experiences’. PhD dissertation, UCLA.
26.
Lin, Jih-wen (1999) ‘Territorial Division and Electoral Competition: The Application of Correspondence Analysis on the Study of Multi-seat Elections’ , Journal of Electoral Studies5: 103-128 .
27.
Liu, I-chou (1996) ‘The Behavior of Taiwanese Voters in 1992: Consolidation of Partisan Ties’, in Hung-mao Tien (ed.) Taiwan’s Electoral Politics and Democratic Transition. New York: M. E. Sharpe .
28.
Liu, I-chou (1999) ‘Campaigning in an SNTV System: The Case of the Kuomintang in Taiwan’, in Bernard Grofman , Sung-Chull Lee , Edwin A. Winckler and Brian Woodall (eds) Elections in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan under the Single Non-Transferable Vote. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press .
29.
Luor, Ching-jyuhn (2001) Distributive Politics in Taiwan. Taipei: Avantguard Publishing Company .
30.
McCubbins, Mathew D. and Frances McCall Rosenbluth (1995) ‘Party Provision for Personal Politics: Dividing the Vote in Japan’, in Peter F. Cowhey and Mathew D. McCubbins (eds) Structure and Policy in Japan and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
31.
Owens, John E. (1997) ‘The Return of Party Government in the US House of Representatives: Central Leadership - Committee Relations in the 104th Congress’ , British Journal of Political Science27: 247-272 .
32.
Polsby, Nelson W. (1968) ‘The Institutionalization of the U.S. House of Representatives’ , American Political Science Review62: 144-168 .
33.
Reed, Steven (1991) ‘Structure and Behaviour: Extending Duverger’s Law to the Japanese Case’ , British Journal of Political Science29: 335-356 .
34.
Richardson, Bradley M. (1997) Japanese Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press .
35.
Rohde, David W. and Kenneth A. Shepsle (1973) ‘Democratic Committee Assignments in the House of Representatives: Strategic Aspects of a Social Choice Process’ , American Political Science Review67: 889-905 .
36.
Rohde, David W. (1991) Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press .
37.
Sheng, Shing-Yuan (1998) ‘Parties’ Vote-Equalizing Strategies and Their Impacts under a SNTV Electoral System: a Study on Taiwan’s Legislative Elections from 1983 to 1995’ , Journal of Electoral Studies5: 73-102 .
38.
Shvetsova, Olga (1995) ‘Design of Political Institutions in Divided Societies’, PhD dissertation, California Institute of Technology.
39.
Taagepera, Rein and Matthew Soberg Shugart (1989) Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press .
40.
Wang, Yeh-lih (1998) ‘Election, Democratization, and Factionalism’ , Journal of Electoral Politics5: 77-94 .
