The aim of the article is to analyse whether democratization of the candidate selection process has occurred in Western European parties in general and in Denmark in particular in the period from 1960 to 1990. The analysis is based on the party rules in force around 1960 and 1990 of 57 and 71 Western European parties, respectively. The general assumption is that the greater the role of the individual party member, the more democratically the parties conduct their internal affairs and, furthermore, the more decentralized the procedure, the greater the possibilities for individual party members to play a role. The analysis indicates that the candidate selection process was more decentralized and the role of the individual party member in the process were greater at the beginning of the 1990s than they were around 1960.
Bardi, Luciano and Leonardo Morlino (1992) `Italy', in Richard S. Katz and Peter Mair (eds) Party Organizations: A Data Handbook on Party Organizations in Western Democracies, 1960-90, pp. 458-618. London: Sage.
2.
Bardi, Luciano and Leonardo Morlino (1994) `Italy: Tracing the Roots of the Great Transformation', in Richard S. Katz and Peter Mair (eds) How Parties Organize: Change and Adaptation in Party Organizations in Western Democracies, pp. 242-277. London: Sage.
3.
Bille, Lars (1992) `Internal Party Democracy: The Role of Party Members'. Paper presented to the Workshop on `Democracies and the Organization of Political Parties', ECPR Joint Sessions, Limerick1992.
4.
Bille, Lars (1994) `Denmark: The Decline of the Membership Party?', in Richard S. Katz and Peter Mair (eds) How Parties Organize: Change and Adaptation in Party Organizations in Western Democracies, pp. 134-157. London: Sage.
5.
Deschouwer, Chris (1994) `The Decline of Consociationalism and the Reluctant Modernization of Belgian Mass Parties', in Richard S. Katz and Peter Mair (eds) How Parties Organize: Change and Adaptation in Party Organizations in Western Democracies, pp. 80-108. London: Sage.
6.
Duverger, Maurice (1954) Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. London: Methuen.
7.
Elklit, Jørgen and Anne Birte Pade (1992) `Election Administration in Denmark', Journal of Behavioral and Social Sciences37: 24-53.
8.
Farrell, David M. (1994) `Ireland: Centralization, Professionalization and Competitive Pressures', in Richard S. Katz and Peter Mair (eds) How Parties Organize: Change and Adaptation in Party Organizations in Western Democracies, pp. 216-241. London: Sage.
9.
Gallagher, Michael and Michael Marsh (eds) (1988) Candidate Selection in Comparative Perspective: The Secret Garden of Politics. London: Sage.
10.
Katz, Richard S. and Peter Mair (1990) `Three Faces of Party Organization: Adaptation and Change', The European Policy Research Unit: EPRU Working Papers 4/90. Manchester: Department of Government, Victoria University of Manchester.
11.
Katz, Richard S. and Peter Mair (eds) (1992) Party Organizations: A Data Handbook on Party Organizations in Western Democracies, 1960-90. London: Sage.
12.
Katz, Richard S. and Peter Mair (1995) `Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party', Party Politics1(1): 5-28.
13.
Katz, Richard S.et al. (1992) `The Membership of Political Parties in European Democracies 1960-1990', European Journal of Political Research22: 329-345.
14.
Kirchheimer, Otto (1966) `The Transformation of the Western European Party Systems', in Joseph LaPalombara and Myron Weiner (eds) Political Parties and Political Development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15.
Koole, Ruud (1994) `The Vulnerability of the Modern Cadre Party in the Netherlands', in Richard S. Katz and Peter Mair (eds) How Parties Organize: Change and Adaptation in Party Organizations in Western Democracies, pp. 278-303. London: Sage.
16.
Lawson, Kay (1988) `When Linkage Fails', in Kay Lawson and Peter H. Merkl (eds) When Parties Fail: Emerging Alternative Organizations, pp. 13-38. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17.
Müller, Wolfgang C. (1994) `The Development of Austrian Party Organizations in the Post-War Period', in Richard S. Katz and Peter Mair (eds) How Parties Organize: Change and Adaptation in Party Organizations in Western Democracies, pp. 51-79. London: Sage.
18.
Panebianco, Angelo (1988) Political Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Pierre, Jon and Anders Widfeldt (1994) `Party Organizations in Sweden: Colossuses with Feet of Clay or Flexible Pillars of Government?', in Richard S. Katz and Peter Mair (eds) How Parties Organize: Change and Adaptation in Party Organizations in Western Democracies, pp. 332-356. London: Sage.
20.
Poguntke, Thomas (1994) `Parties in a Legalistic Culture: The Case of Germany', in Richard S. Katz and Peter Mair (eds) How Parties Organize: Change and Adaptation in Party Organizations in Western Democracies, pp. 185-215. London: Sage.
21.
Sartori, Giovanni (1976) Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Vol. I. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Sundberg, Jan (1994) `Finland: Nationalized Parties, Professionalized Organizations', in Richard S. Katz and Peter Mair (eds) How Parties Organize: Change and Adaptation in Party Organizations in Western Democracies, pp. 158-184. London: Sage.
23.
Svåsand, Lars (1994) `Change and Adaptation in Norwegian Party Organizations', in Richard S. Katz and Peter Mair (eds) How Parties Organize: Change and Adaptation in Party Organizations in Western Democracies, pp. 304-331. London: Sage.
24.
Webb, Paul (1994) `Party Organizational Change in Britain: The Iron Law of Centralization?', in Richard S. Katz and Peter Mair (eds) How Parties Organize: Change and Adaptation in Party Organizations in Western Democracies, pp. 109-133. London: Sage.
