This article compares and contrasts the way a set of fundamental issues are treated in social representations theory and discursive psychology. These are: action, representation, communication, cognition, construction, epistemology and method. In each case we indicate arguments for the discursive psychological treatment. These arguments are then developed and illustrated through a discussion of Wagner, Duveen, Themel and Verma (1999) which highlights in particular the way the analysis fails to address the activitiesdone by people when they are producing representations, and the epistemological troublesthat arise from failing to address the role of the researcher’s own representations.
Ashmore, M.
(1989). The reflexive thesis: Wrighting sociology of scientific knowledge. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
2.
Ashmore, M.
, Myers, G., & Potter, J. (1994). Discourse, rhetoric and reflexivity: Seven days in the library. In S. Jasanoff, G. Markle, T. Pinch, & J. Petersen (Eds.), Handbook of science, technology and society(pp. 321–342). London: Sage.
3.
Atkinson, P.
(1990). The ethnographic imagination: Textual constructions of reality. London: Routledge.
4.
Billig, M.
(1988). Social representations, objectification and anchoring: A rhetorical analysis. Social Behaviour, 3, 1–16.
5.
Billig, M.
(1993). Studying the thinking society: Social representations, rhetoric and attitudes. In G. Breakwell & D. Canter (Eds.), Empirical approaches to social representations(pp. 39–62). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6.
Cicourel, A.V.
(1974). Theory and method in a study of Argentine fertility. New York: Wiley.
7.
Edwards, D.
(1997). Discourse and cognition. London/Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
8.
Edwards, D.
, Ashmore, M., & Potter, J. (1995). Death and furniture: The rhetoric, politics and theology of bottom line arguments against relativism, History of the Human Sciences, 8, 25–49.
9.
Edwards, D.
, & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.
10.
Flick, U.
(1998). Introduction: Social representations in knowledge and language as approaches to a psychology of the social. In U. Flick (Ed.), The psychology of the social(pp. 1–14). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Heritage, J.C.
, & Greatbatch, D.L. (1991). On the institutional character of institutional talk: The case of news interviews. In D. Boden & D.H. Zimmerman (Eds.), Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis(pp. 93–137). Oxford: Polity.
12.
Hutchby, I.
, & Wooffitt, R. (1998). Conversation analysis: Principles, practices and applications. Oxford: Polity.
13.
Jefferson, G.
(1993). Caveat speaker: Preliminary notes on recipient topic-shift implicature. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26, 1–30.
14.
Knorr Cetina, K.D.
(1999). Epistemic cultures: How sciences make knowledge. Chicago, IL: Indiana University Press.
15.
Latour, B.
(1987). Science in action. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
16.
Litton, I.
, & Potter, J. (1985). Social representations in the ordinary explanation of a ‘riot.’European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 371–388.
17.
McKinlay, A.
, & Potter, J. (1987). Social representations: A conceptual critique. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 17, 471–487.
18.
McKinlay, A.
, Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1993). Discourse analysis and social representations. In G. Breakwell & D. Canter (Eds.), Empirical approaches to social representations(pp. 134–156). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19.
Moscovici, S.
(1985). Comment on Potter and Litton. British Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 91–93.
20.
Moscovici, S.
(1994). Social representations and pragmatic communication. Social Science Information, 33, 163–177.
21.
Moscovici, S.
(1998). The history and actuality of social representations. In U. Flick (Ed.), The psychology of the social(pp. 209–247). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Moscovici, S.
, & Markov·, I. (1998). Investigation into ideas: Dialogue with Serge Moscovici. Culture & Psychology, 4, 371–410.
23.
Mulkay, M.
(1985). The word and the world: Explorations in the form of sociological analysis. London: Allen & Unwin.
24.
Palmer, D. (1998). The methods of madness: Recognizing delusional talk. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of York.
25.
Potter, J.
(1996a). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: Sage.
26.
Potter, J.
(1996b). Attitudes, social representations, and discursive psychology. In M. Wetherell (Ed.), Identities, groups and social issues(pp. 119–173). London: Sage.
27.
Potter, J.
(1997). Discourse analysis as a way of analysing naturally occurring talk. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative analysis: Issues of theory and method(pp. 144–160). London: Sage.
28.
Potter, J.
(1998a). Cognition as context (whose cognition?). Research on Language and Social Interaction, 31, 29–44.
29.
Potter, J.
(1998b). Fragments in the realization of relativism. In I. Parker (Ed.), Social constructionism, discourse and realism(pp. 27–45). London: Sage.
30.
Potter, J.
, & Billig, M. (1992). Re-representing representations. Ongoing Production on Social Representations, 1, 15–20.
31.
Potter, J.
, & Litton I. (1985). Some problems underlying the theory of social representations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 81–90.
32.
Potter, J.
, & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage.
33.
Potter, J.
, & Wetherell, M. (1998). Social representations, discourse analysis and racism. In U. Flick (Ed.), The psychology of the social(pp. 138–155). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
Sacks, H.
(1992). Lectures on conversation(2 vols; G. Jefferson, Ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Smith, D.
(1978). K is mentally ill: The anatomy of a factual account. Sociology, 12, 23–53.
38.
Wagner, W.
(1998). Social representations and beyond: Brute facts, symbolic coping and domesticated worlds. Culture & Psychology, 4, 297–329.
39.
Wagner, W.
, Duveen, G., Themel, M., & Verma, J. (1999). The modernization of tradition: Thinking about madness in Patna, India. Culture & Psychology, 5(4), 413–445.
40.
Wetherell, M.
(1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse & Society, 9(3), 387–412.
41.
Wetherell, M.
, & Potter, J. (1992) Mapping the language of racism: Discourse and the legitimation of exploitation. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf; New York: Columbia University Press.
42.
Widdicombe, S.
, & Wooffitt, R. (1995). The language of youth subcultures: Social identity in action. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
