Collective Representations As a Metaconstruct: An Analysis Based on Methodological Relationalism

Abstract

The authors discem an emerging paradigmatic shift in psychology: from methodological individualism to methodological relationalism, which asserts that social behavior invariably takes place in relational contexts, regardless of socioeconomic or cultural variations. Informed by methodological relationalism, we revisit the debate over collective representations, regarded as a metaconstruct designating collective representations as members of a class of constructs. This class may be restricted to constructs designating shared meanings and reality (e.g. knowledge, beliefs and values) among a collectivity of individuals. The article is then devoted to a clarification of what is meant by 'shared meanings and reality' and 'collectivity'. A study of two particular collective representations, individualism and collectivism, follows. We present a method for obtaining variant estimates of three variables: (a) collective sharing, (b) representations of generalized others, and (c) collective nonconformity. Having outlined a procedure for approximating collective representations through a summation of individual representations, we pose a challenge to methodological holists to be more explicit in delineating the emergent properties of collective representations.

Keywords

collective representations collectivism individual representations individualism metaconstruct methodological relationalism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bishir, J.W. , & Drewes, D.W. (1970). Mathematics in the behavioral and social sciences. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.

Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Chiu, C. , Krauss, R.M. , & Lau, I.Y. (in press). Some cognitive consequences of communication. In S.R. Fussell & R.J. Kreuz (Eds.), Social and cognitive psychological approaches to interpersonal communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

De Vos, G. , & Wagatsuma, H. (1967). Japan's invisible race: Caste in culture and personality. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Durkheim, I. (1898). Representations individuelles et representations collectives. Revue de Metaphysique, 6, 274-302.

Durkheim, I. (1938). The rules of sociological method (8th ed.; S.A. Solovay & J.H. Mueller, Trans.; G.E.G. Catlin , Ed.). New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1895)

Fussell, S.R. , & Krauss, R.M. (1992). Coordination of knowledge in communication: Effects of speakers' assumptions about others' knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 378-391.

Hardin, C. , & Higgins, E.T. (1996). Shared reality: How social verification makes the subjective objective. In R.M. Sorrentino & E.T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (Vol. 3, pp. 28-84). New York: Guilford.

Ho, D.Y.F. (1995). Internalized culture, culturocentrism, and transcendence. The Counseling Psychologist, 23, 4-24.

10.

Ho, D.Y.F. (1998). Interpersonal relationships and relationship dominance: An analysis based on methodological relationalism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 1-16.

11.

Ho, D.Y.F. , & Chiu, C.Y. (1994). Component ideas of individualism, collectivism, and social organization: An application in the study of Chinese culture. In U. Kim , H.C. Triandis , C. Kagitcibasi , S.C. Choi , & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theoretical and methodological issues (pp. 137-156). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

12.

Isaacs, E.A. , & Clark, H.H. (1987). References in conversation between experts and novices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 26-37.

13.

Kim, U. , Triandis, H.C. , Kagitcibasi, C. , Choi, S.C. , & Yoon, G. (Eds.). (1994). Individualism and collectivism: Theoretical and methodological issues. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

14.

Kluckhohn, C. (1954). Culture and behavior. In G. Lindzey (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology: Vol. 2. Special fields and applications (pp. 921-976). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

15.

Krauss, R.M. , & Chiu, C. (1998). Language and social behavior. In D.T. Gilbert , S.T. Fiske , & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 41-88). New York: Guilford.

16.

Krauss, R.M. , Weinheimer, S. , & Vivekananthan, P.S. (1968). 'Inner speech' and 'external speech': Characteristics and communication effectiveness of socially and nonsocially encoded messages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 295-300.

17.

Lukes, S. (1973). Types of individualism. In P.P. Wiener (Ed.), Dictionary of the history of ideas: Studies of selected pivotal ideas (Vol. 2, pp. 594-604). New York: Scribner's Sons.

18.

Nagel, E. (1961). The structure of science: Problems in the logic of scientific explanation. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.

19.

Popper, K.R. (1966). The open society and its enemies: Vol 2. The high tide of prophecy: Hegel, Marx, and the aftermath (5th ed.). London: Routledge.

20.

Ruscher, J.B. , Hammer, E.Y. , & Hammer, E.D. (1996). Forming shared impressions through conversation: An adaptation of the continuum model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 705-720.

21.

Sperber, D. (1996). Explaining culture: A naturalistic approach. Oxford: Blackwell.

22.

Waldman, P. (1996, June 21-2). Caste aside: Reforms bring little change to lowest of India's low. Asian Wall Street Journal, pp. 1-1, 4-4.

23.

Watkins, J.W.N. (1957). Historical explanation in the social sciences. British Journalfor the Philosophy of Science, 8, 104-117.

24.

Zheng, B.X. (1991). Familism and leadership behavior. In C.F. Yang & H.S.R. Kao (Eds.), Chinese people and Chinese psychology: Personality and society (pp. 365-407). Taipei: Yuan Liu. (In Chinese)