This paper focuses on an examination of the uses of the past in intellectual history and in science. Borrowing the concept of symbolic market from Pierre Bourdieu, the production of new texts within a discursive formation (a la Michel Foucault) is pictured as a process of consumption-production whose outcomes are attributed a certain value by the consumers of the text. This view can be applied both to scientific and to historical products, which have their own independent-even if relatedepistemic markets with different criteria for attribution of value. Whatever the case, when events or discourses of the past appear in a current discourse it is because they are of some use as a way of providing a narrationality for current and future actions.
Bartlett, F.C. (1916). Transformations arisingfrom repeated representations: A contribution towards an experimental study of the process of conventionalization. Fellowship thesis. St John's College, Cambridge.
2.
Bartlett, F.C.
(1923). Psychology and primitive culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Bartlett, F.C.
(1926a). Critical notice of Head's Aphasia. British Journal of Psychology, 17. 154-161.
4.
Bartlett, F.C.
(1926b). Critical review of Head'sAphasia and kindred disorders of speech. Brain, 49, 581-587.
5.
Bartlett, F.C.
(1936). Frederick Charles Bartlett (Autobiography). In C. Murchison (Ed.), A history of psychology in autobiography (Vol. 3). New York: Russell & Russell.
6.
Bartlett, F.C.
(1937). Cambridge, England: 1887-1937. American Journal of Psychology, 50, 97-110.
7.
Bartlett, F.C.
(1938). Obituary notice: Prof. William McDougall, FRS. Nature, 142, 1107-1108.
8.
Bartlett, F.C.
(1956). Changing scene. British Journal of Psychology, 47, 81-87.
9.
Bartlett, F.C.
(1957). Thinking: An experimental and social study. London: Allen & Unwin.
10.
Bartlett, F.C.
(1961). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1932)
11.
Bartlett, F.C.
, & Mark, H. (1922). A note on local fatigue in the auditory system. British Journal of Psychology, 13, 215-218.
12.
Blanco, F.
& Rosa, A. (in press). Dilthey's dream:Teaching history to understand the future. International Journal of Educational Research.
13.
Bourdieu, P.
(1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14.
Brush, S.G.
(1974). Should the history of science be rated X?Science, 183, 1164-1172.
15.
Chalmers, A.F.
(1976). What is that thing called science?Sydney: University of Queensland Press.
16.
Danto, A.C.
(1985). Narration and knowledge. New York: Columbia University Press.
17.
Engestrom, Y.
, Brown, K., Engestrom, R., & Koistinen, K. (1990). Organizational forgetting: An activity-theoretical perspective. In D.Middleton & D. Edwards (Eds.), Collective remembering. London: Sage.
18.
Foucault, M.
(1972). The archaeology of knowledge, and the discourse on language. New York: Tavistock.
19.
Gruber, H.E.
(1989). Networks of enterprise in creative scientific work. In B.Gholson, W.R. Shadish, R.A. Niemeyer, & A.C. Houts (Eds.), Psychology of science: Contributions to metascience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Harris. A.D.
, & Zangwill, O.L. (1973). The writings of Sir Frederick Bartlett, CBE, FRS: An annotated handlist. British Journal of Psychology, 64,(4), 493-510.
21.
Latour, B.
(1987). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
Middleton, D.
& Crook, C. (1996). Bartlett and socially ordered consciousness: A discursive perspective. Comments on Rosa (1996). Culture & Psychology, 2(4), 379-396.
23.
Myers, C.S.
, & Bartlett, F.C. (1925). A text-book of experimental psychology with laboratory exercises: Part II. Laboratory exercises. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Paris, C. (1982). Posicion de la ciencia en el complejo cultural: Contra la autonomia de la ciencia. Actas del ler Congreso de Teoria y Metodologia de las Ciencias. Oviedo: Pentalfa.
25.
Rosa, A.
(1994a). What do people consume history for? (If they do); Learning history as a process of knowledge consumption and construction of meaning. In M. Carretero & J. Voss (Eds.), Learning processes in history and social sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26.
Rosa, A.
(1994b). History of psychology as a ground for reflexivity. In A. Rosa & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Historical and theoretical discourse in social-cultural psychology. Madrid: Infancia y Aprendizaje.
27.
Rosa, A. (1995). Introducci6n a la edici6n espafxola. Remembering y la obra de Frederick Charles Bartlett. In F.C. Bartlett, Recordar, pp. 9-43. Madrid: Alianza.
Rosa, A.
(in press). Personal culture, national identity and representation of the past. In J. Wertsch & K. Junefelt (Eds.), National and cultural identity. Oslo: Oslo University Press.
30.
Rosa, A.
, Blanco, F., & Huertas, J.A. (1991). Para que hacemos Historia de la Psicologia?Revista de Historia de la Psicologia, 12(3-4), 405-412.
31.
Rosa, A.
, & Valsiner, J. (1994). Coda: Discourse, meaning and knowledge. A reflection on the socio-cultural approach within the crisis of modernity. In A. Rosa & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Historical and theoretical discourse in social-cultural psychology. Madrid: Infancia y Aprendizaje.
32.
Smith, E.M.
, & Bartlett, F.C. (1919). On listening to sounds of weak intensity: Part I. British Journal of Psychology, 10, 101-129.
33.
Smith, E.M.
, & Bartlett, F.C. (1920). On listening to sounds of weak intensity: Part II. British Journal of Psychology, 10, 133-169.
34.
Valsiner, J.
(1994). Reflexivity in context: Narratives, hero-myths, and the making of histories of psychology. In A. Rosa & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Historical and theoretical discourse in social-cultural psychology. Madrid: Infancia y Aprendizaje.
