Youth’s distancing from traditional politics and their preference for new forms of civic participation has become an international issue in the last decades. Based on a sociocultural dialectical framework, this study analyzes the relations between acting, thinking, and feeling in the development of civic engagement as an expression of civic identity in the autobiographical narratives of Argentinean adolescents (N = 23) aged between 15 and 18 who engage in some practice to transform their community. Participants elaborate on their autobiographical narrative during interviews. The information gathered made it possible to distinguish two profiles in the development of civic engagement: individual and collective. The former includes the explanation of society as the result of personal actions and the involvement in practices aimed at the transformation of the local community the adolescents are a part of, and it is the one that prevails among the participants. The latter refers to the tendency to think about society by considering historical-political factors and practices aimed at long-term objectives, as they contribute to a general transformation of society and imply a future-oriented perspective. In both profiles, participation in high school students’ unions plays a formative role in the feeling of efficacy that underlies adolescents’ civic engagement.
AbbottP. (2018). The cambridge introduction to narrative. Cambridge University Press.
2.
AmnåE. (2012). How is civic engagement developed over time? Emerging answers from a multidisciplinary field. Journal of Adolescence, 35(3), 611–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.04.011
3.
AmnåE.EkmanJ. (2014). Standby citizens: Diverse faces of political passivity. European Political Science Review, 6(2), 261–281. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175577391300009X
4.
ArsenioW.WillemsC. (2017). Adolescents' conceptions of national wealth distribution: Connections with perceived societal fairness and academic plans. Developmental Psychology, 53(3), 463–474. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000263
5.
AtkinsR.HartD. (2003). Neighborhoods, adults, and the development of civic identity in Urban youth. Applied Developmental Science, 7(3), 156–164. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532480XADS0703_6
BarreiroA. (2020). A developmental approach to remembering: The dialectical relation between collective memory and identity construction. In WagonerB.BrescóI.ZadehS. (Eds.), Memory in the wild (pp. 127–142). Information Age Publishing.
8.
BarreiroA.ArsenioW.WainrybC. (2019). Adolescents’ conceptions of wealth and societal fairness amid extreme inequality: An Argentine sample. Developmental Psychology, 55(3), 498–508. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000560
9.
BarreiroA.CastorinaJ. A. (2012). La investigación del desarrollo de la justicia: ¿Racionalidad inmanente o polifasia cognitiva?Nuances: estudos sobre Educacao, 23(24), 35–54. https://doi.org/10.14572/nuances.v23i24.1890
10.
BarreiroA.CastorinaJ. A. (2022). Extendiendo la conversación sobre los juicios morales: contribuciones del intuicionismo social, el constructivismo y la psicología cultural. Revista de Humanidades de Valparaíso, (19), 181–202. https://doi.org/10.22370/rhv2022iss19pp181-202
11.
BarreiroA.UngarettiJ.BrunoD. (2022). Representaciones y juicios sobre la justicia social en la Argentina durante la pandemia de COVID-19. Observatorio de Psicología Social Aplicada, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Buenos Aires. Recovered from. https://www.psi.uba.ar/opsa/informes/Informe_Justicia_Social_2.pdf
12.
BazánA.De la VegaJ.DreizikM.ImhoffD. (2018). Trayectorias de militancia y procesos de socialización política de estudiantes universitarios/as de Córdoba (Argentina). Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud, 16(1), 297–313. https://doi.org/10.11600/1692715x.16118
13.
BowmanB.MagioglouT.HasteH. (2022). ‘Can I trust my future?’: Youth civic engagement, civic identity, and dystopias. In WeinbergA. (Ed.), Psychology of democracy: Of the people, by the people, for the people (pp. 332–353). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108774871.019
14.
BrunerJ. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Harvard University Press.
15.
BrunoD.BarreiroA. (2021a). Cognitive polyphasia, social representations and political participation in adolescents. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Sciences, 55(1), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-020-09521-8
16.
BrunoD.BarreiroA. (2021b). La política en la vida cotidiana de los y las adolescentes: representaciones sociales, prácticas políticas y polifasia cognitiva. In CastorinaJ. A.BarreiroA. (Eds.), Hacia una dialéctica entre individuo y cultura en la construcción de conocimientos sociales (pp. 137–162). Miño y Dávila.
17.
BrussinoS. (2017). Políticamente. CONICET y. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba.
18.
BrussinoS.RabbiaH.SorribasP. (2008). Una propuesta de categorización de la participación política de jóvenes cordobeses. Revista Psicología Política, 8(16), 285–304.
19.
CarreteroM. (2011). Constructing Patriotism. Information Age Publishing.
20.
CarreteroM.HasteH.BermúdezA. (2016). Civic education. In CornoL.AndermanE. M. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 295–308). Routledge.
21.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (2008). Basic of qualitative research: Sage.
22.
DahlV.AmnåE.BanajiS.LandbergM.ŠerekJ.RibeiroN.BeilmannM.PavlopoulosV.ZaniB. (2018). Apathy or alienation? Political passivity among youths across eight European union countries. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 15(3), 284–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2017.1404985
23.
DelfinoG. I.ZubietaE. M. (2011). Interés y preferencias políticas en estudiantes universitarios de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Perspectivas, 8(2), 1–24.
24.
DelvalJ. (2017).El desarrollo humano. Siglo XXI.
25.
DiemerM. A.VoightA. M.MarchandA. D.BañalesJ. (2019). Political identification, political ideology, and critical social analysis of inequality among marginalized youth. Developmental Psychology, 55(3), 538–549. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000559
26.
FivushR.BookerJ.GraciM. (2017). Ongoing narrative meaning-making within events and across the life span. Imagination, Cognition and Personality: Consciousness in Theory, Research, and Clinical Practice, 37(2), 127–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276236617733824
27.
FlanaganC.CumsilleP.GillS.GallayL. S. (2007). School and community climates and civic commitments: Patterns for ethnic minority and majority students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 421–431. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.421
28.
FlanaganC.GallayE.PykettA.SmallwoodM. (2019). The environmental commons in urban communities: The potential of place-based education. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(226), 226–311. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00226
29.
FlanaganC.KimT.PykettA.FinlayA.GallayE.PancerM. (2014). Adolescent’s theories about economic inequality: Why are some people poor while others are rich?Developmental Psychology, 50(11), 2512–2525. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037934
30.
FlanaganC.KornbluhM. (2019). How unequal is the United States? Adolescents’ images of social stratification. Child Development, 90(3), 957–969. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12954
31.
FreireP. (1970/2003). Pedagogía del oprimido. Siglo XXI.
32.
GaticaL.MartiniJ. P.DreizikM.ImhoffD. (2017). Predictores psicosociales y psicopolíticos de la justificación de la desigualdad social. Revista de Psicología, 35(1), 279–310. https://doi.org/10.18800/psico.201701.010
33.
HabermasT.BluckS. (2000). Getting a life: The emergence of the life story in adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 126(5), 748–769. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.5.748
34.
HabermasT.de SilveiraC. (2008). The development of global coherence in life narratives across adolescence: Temporal, causal, and thematic aspects. Developmental Psychology, 44(3), 707–721. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.44.3.707
35.
HabermasT.ReeseE. (2015). Getting a life takes time: The development of the life story in adolescence, its precursors and consequences. Human Development, 58(3), 172–201. https://doi.org/10.1159/000437245
36.
HammackP. (2008). Narrative and the cultural psychology of identity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(3), 222–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308316892
37.
HartD.GullanR. (2010). The sources of adolescent activism: Historical and contemporary findings. In SherrodL.Torney-PurtaJ.FlanaganC. (Eds.), Handbook of research on civic engagement in youth. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
38.
HartD.RichardsonC.WilkenfeldB. (2011). Civic identity. In SchwartzS.LuyckxK.VignolesV. (Eds.), Handbook of identity theory and research (pp. 771–787). Springer.
39.
HasteE. (2017). Nueva ciudadanía y educación. Paidós.
40.
HasteH.HoganA. (2006). Beyond conventional civic participation, beyond the moral-political divide: Young people and contemporary debates about citizenship. Journal of Moral Education, 35(4), 473–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240601012238
41.
HelmanM.HornA.CastorinaJ. A. (2021). El derecho a la intimidad en la escuela secundaria: ideas de los y las adolescentes. In CastorinaJ. A.BarreiroA. (Eds.), Hacia una dialéctica entre individuo y cultura en la construcción de conocimientos sociales (pp. 225–248). Miño y Dávila.
42.
ImhoffD.GutierrezJ.BrussinoS. (2009). Jóvenes y Ciudadanía: indagación acerca del modo de ejercicio de la ciudadanía de los/as jóvenes a partir de la relación de las orientaciones psicológicas de la politización juvenil con la participación política. Tesis, (2), 21–38.
43.
ImohffD.BrussinoS. (2017). Socialización política: la dialéctica entre individuo y sociedad. In BrussinoS. (Ed.), Políticamente (pp. 37–70). CONICET-UNC.
JostJ. (2019). A quarter century of system justification theory: Questions, answers, criticisms, and societal applications. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(2), 263–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12297
46.
JostJ. (2020). A theory of system justification. Harvard University Press.
47.
JostJ.BanajiM. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system‐justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x
48.
KayA. C.JostJ. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of “poor but happy” and “poor but honest” stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 823–837. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.823
49.
KrigerM. (2021). La buena voluntad. El vínculo de los jóvenes argentinos con la política, entre dos paradigmas de Estado. CLACSO.
50.
Lannegrand-WillemsL.ChevrierB.PerchecC.CarrizalesA. (2018). How is civic engagement related to personal identity and social identity in late adolescents and emerging adults? A person-oriented approach. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(4), 731–748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0821-x
51.
MartínezM. L.RopertM. T.RivasC.ValdésN. (2023). Identity narratives of youth involved and uninvolved in social and political participation. Qualitative Psychology, 10(2), 186–207. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000260
52.
McAdamsD. (1996). Personality, modernity, and the storied self: A contemporary framework for studying persons. Psychological Inquiry, 7(4), 295–321. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0704_1
53.
McAdamsD. (2018). Narrative identity: What is it? What does it do? How do you measure it?Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 37(3), 359–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276236618756704
54.
McIntoshH.HartD.YounissJ. (2011). The influence of family political discussion on youth civic development: Which parent qualities matter?Political Science and Politics, 40(3), 495–499. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096507070758
55.
NuñezP. (2019). La irrupción de la política en la escuela secundaria: nuevas figuras de ciudadanía. Estudios Sociales, 56(1), 155–177. https://doi.org/10.14409/es.v56i1.7105
56.
Perez-ManjarrezE.CarreteroM. (2021). Key features of citizenship and its intersections with history education. Bloomsbury History: Theory and Method. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350970809.006
PiagetJ. (1926/1986). La representación del mundo en el niño. Morata.
59.
RodríguezM.KohenR.DelvalJ.MessinaC. (2016). From democratic school to civic and political participation / De la escuela democrática a la participación política y ciudadana. Culture and Education, 28(1), 99–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2015.1120449
60.
RubinB. (2007). “There’s still not justice”: Youth civic identity development amid distinct school and community contexts. Teacher College Record, 109(2), 449–481. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810710900202
61.
SabucedoJ. M. (1996). Psicología política. Síntesis.
62.
SainzM.García-CastroJ. D.Jiménez-MoyaG.LobatoR. (2022). How do people understand the causes of poverty and wealth? A revised structural dimensionality of the attributions about poverty and wealth scales. Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 31(1), 81–100. https://doi.org/10.1332/175982721X16645485533332
63.
SherrodL.Torney-PurtaJ.FlanaganC. (2010). Handbook of research on civic engagement in youth. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
64.
SiedeI. (2021). Hacia una didáctica de la educación ciudadana. HomoSapiens.
65.
SmetanaJ.VillalobosM. (2009). Social Cognitive Development in Adolescence. In LernerR. M.StenbergL. (Eds.), Handbook of Adolescent Psychology (pp. 187–228). Wiley.
66.
SorribasP.BrussinoS. (2017). Dimensiones y factores explicativos de la participación política: la relevancia del enfoque psico-social. In BrusinoS. (Ed.), Políticamente (pp. 105–132). CONICET-UNC.
67.
StattinH.EckesteinK.AmnáE. (2022). Why some adolescents are open to their parents' political communication. Journal of Youths and Adolescence, 51(11), 2235–2247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-022-01653-x
68.
van GoethemA.van HoofA.Orobio de CastroB.Van AkenM.HartD. (2014). The role of reflection in the effects of community service on adolescent development: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 85(6), 2114–2130. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12274
69.
VigotskyL. S. (1931–1933/2004). Teoría de las emociones. Estudio histórico-psicológico. Akal.
70.
WandersF.DijkstraA.MaslowskiR.van der VeenI.AmnåE. (2021). The role of teachers, parents, and friends in developing adolescents’ societal interest. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 65(5), 736–751. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2020.1754901
71.
WestheimerJ. (2015). What kind of citizen? Education our children for the common good. Teachers College Press.
72.
WestheimerJ.KaneJ. (2004). Educating the “good” citizen: Political choices and pedagogical goals. Political Science and Politics, 37(2), 241–247.
73.
YatesM.YounissJ. (1998). Community service and political identity development in adolescence. Journal of Social Issues, 54(3), 495–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.791998079
74.
YounissJ.HartD. (2005). Intersection of social institutions with civic development. New Directions for Child and Adolescents Development, (109), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.139
