Kwang-Kuo Hwang provides numerous recommendations for how to develop an indigenous cultural psychology. These recommendations may be understood to suggest proceeding according to three stages: (1) beginning with philosophical reflection on the meaning of modernization and exploring the topics of reality and structure (where such reflections ground one’s subsequent development of meta-models concerning self and social interaction), (2) adopting such meta-models as a hermeneutic for interpreting texts associated with one’s cultural tradition, and (3) conducting experimental studies on the basis of hypotheses derived from such cultural interpretations. Hwang’s philosophy is valuable in that it exemplifies a postmodern approach to cultural psychology that integrates traditional pre-modern forms of wisdom with modern methods of scientific investigation.
AlexanderJ.SmithP. (2001). The strong program in cultural theory: Elements of a structural hermeneutics. In TurnerJ. H. (Ed.), Handbook of sociological theory (pp. 135–150). Springer.
2.
ArcherM. S. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge University.
3.
ArcherM. S. (2005). Structure, culture and agency. In JacobsM. D.HanrahanN. W. (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to the sociology of culture (pp. 17–34). Blackwell Publishing.
4.
ArcherM. S.Elder-VassD. (2012). Cultural system or norm circles? An exchange. European Journal of Social Theory, 15(1), 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431011423592
5.
BedfordO.HwangK.-K. (2003). Guilt and shame in Chinese culture: A cross-cultural framework from the perspective of morality and identity. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 33(2), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5914.00210
6.
BerryJ. (2000). Cross-cultural psychology: A symbiosis of cultural and comparative approaches. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3(3), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839x.00064
7.
BhaskarR. (1975). A realist theory of science. Humanities Press.
8.
BhaskarR. (1978). The possibility of naturalism. Humanities Press.
9.
BourdieuP. (1990). In other words: Essays towards a reflexive sociology. Stanford University Press.
ChenR.HwangK.-K. (2016). Nation, face, and identity: An initial investigation of national face in east Asia. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01557
12.
ChengS. W. (1991). A cross-cultural investigation of research on the development of moral judgment. In YangC. F.KaoH. S. J. (Eds.), Chinese people and Chinese mind (pp. 213–304). Yuan-liu. (In Chinese).
13.
ChiaoC. (1982). Guanxi: A preliminary conceptualization. In YangK.-S.WenC. I. (Eds.), The sinicization of social and behavioral science research in China (pp. 345–360). Academia Sinica. (In Chinese).
14.
ChristopherJ. C.WendtD. C.MarecekJ.GoodmanD. M. (2014). Critical cultural awareness: Contributions to a globalizing psychology. The American Psychologist, 69(7), 645–655. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036851
15.
Confucius. (1979). The Analects. Penguin Classics.
16.
DeutschM. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice. Journal of Social Issues, 31(3), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1975.tb01000.x
17.
DiltheyW. (2002). The formation of the historical world in the human sciences. Princeton University Press.
18.
EvendenM.SandstromG. (2011). Calling for scientific revolution in psychology: K. K. Hwang on indigenous psychologies. Social Epistemology: A Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Policy, 25(2), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2011.552127
19.
FreudS. (1899). The interpretation of dreams. 3rd ed.The Macmillan Company.
20.
GadamerH.-G. (1960). Truth and method. Seabury Press.
21.
GeertzC. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books.
22.
GiddensA. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press.
23.
GreenfieldP. M. (2000). Three approaches to the psychology of culture: Where do they come from? Where can they go?Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3(3), 223–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839X.00066
24.
HabermasJ. (1978). Theory of communicative action, Vol. 2. Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason. Beacon Press.
HeideggerM. (1966). Discourse on thinking. Harper & Row.
28.
HempelC. G. (1966). Philosophy of natural science. Prentice-Hall.
29.
HongY. Y.MorrisM. W.ChiuC. Y.VeronicaB. M. (2000). Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. The American Psychologist, 55(7), 709–720. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.55.7.709
30.
HsuH.-P.HwangK.-K. (2016). Serendipity in relationship: A tentative theory of the cognitive process of Yuanfen and its psychological constructs in Chinese cultural societies. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(282), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00282
31.
HusserlE. (1936/1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. Northwestern University Press.
32.
HwangK.-K. (1987). Face and favor: The Chinese power game. American Journal of Sociology, 92(4), 944–974. https://doi.org/10.1086/228588
33.
HwangK.-K. (1988). Confucianism and East Asian modernization. Chu-Lin Book Co. (InChinese).
34.
HwangK.-K. (1995a). Easternization and productivity: Aligning to quality of life. In HwangK.-K. (Ed.), Easternization: Socio-cultural impact on productivity (pp. 1–13). Asian Productivity Organization.
35.
HwangK.-K. (1995b). Knowledge and action: A social-psychological interpretation of Chinese cultural tradition. Sin-Li Book Co. (In Chinese).
36.
HwangK.-K. (1995c). The struggle between Confucianism and legalism in Chinese society and productivity: A Taiwan experience. In HwangK.-K. (Ed.),Easternization: Socio-cultural impact on productivity (pp. 15–46). Asian Productivity Organization.
37.
HwangK.-K. (1997–1998). Guanxi and mientze: Conflict resolution in Chinese society. Intercultural Communication Studies, 7(1), 17–38.
38.
HwangK.-K. (1998). Two moralities: Reinterpreting the findings of empirical research on moral reasoning in Taiwan. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1(3), 211–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839x.00015
39.
HwangK.-K. (1999). Filial piety and loyalty: Two types of social identification in Confucianism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2(1), 163–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-839x.00031
40.
HwangK.-K. (2000). Chinese relationalism: Theoretical construction and methodological considerations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 30(2), 155–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5914.00124
41.
HwangK.-K. (2001a). The deep structure of Confucianism: A social psychological approach. Asian Philosophy, 11(3), 179–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/09552360120116928
42.
HwangK.-K. (2001b). The logic of social science. Psychological Publishing Co. (In Chinese).
43.
HwangK.-K. (2003a). Critique of the methodology of empirical research on individual modernity in Taiwan. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 6(3), 241–262. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-839x.2003.00125.x
HwangK.-K. (2004). The epistemological goal of indigenous psychology: The perspective of constructive realism. In SetiadiB. N.SupratiknyaA.LonnerW. J.PoortingaY. H. (Eds.), Ongoing themes in psychology and culture: Proceedings from the 16th international congress of the international association for cross-cultural psychology (pp. 169–185). The International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology.
46.
HwangK.-K. (2005a). From anticolonialism to postcolonialism: The emergence of Chinese indigenous psychology in Taiwan. International Journal of Psychology, 40(4), 228–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590444000177
47.
HwangK.-K. (2005b). A philosophical reflection on the epistemology and methodology of indigenous psychologies. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 8(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839x.2005.00153.x
48.
HwangK.-K. (2006a). Constructive realism and Confucian relationalism: An epistemological strategy for the development of indigenous psychology. In KimU.YangK.-S.HwangK.-K., Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context (pp. 73–107). Springer.
49.
HwangK.-K. (2006b). Moral face and social face: Contingent self-esteem in Confucian society. International Journal of Psychology, 41(4), 276–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590544000040
50.
HwangK.-K. (2009a). The development of indigenous counseling in contemporary Confucian communities. The Counseling Psychologist, 37(7), 930–943. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000009336241
51.
HwangK.-K. (2009b). New approach of indigenous social psychology in the age of globalization. Taiwan Journal of East Asian Studies, 6(2), 111–130.
HwangK.-K. (2011b). A proposal for scientific revolution in psychology. Psychological Publishing Co. (In Chinese).
55.
HwangK.-K. (2011c). Reification of culture in indigenous psychologies: Merit or mistake?Social Epistemology: A Journal of Knowledge, Culture, and Policy, 25(2), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2011.552125
56.
HwangK.-K. (2012). Foundations of Chinese psychology: Confucian social relations. Springer.
57.
HwangK.-K. (2013a). The construction of culture-inclusive theories by multiple philosophical paradigms. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, 2(7), 46–58.
58.
HwangK.-K. (2013b). Linking science to culture: Challenge to psychologists. Social Epistemology. A Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Policy, 27(1), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2012.760665
59.
HwangK.-K. (2014). Dual belief in heaven and spirits: Metaphysical foundations of Confucian morality. In TurnerB. S.SaleminkO. (Eds.), Routledge handbook of religions in Asia (pp. 47–62). Routledge.
60.
HwangK.-K. (2015a). Cultural system vs. pan-cultural dimensions: Philosophical reflection on approaches for indigenous psychology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 45(1), 2–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12051
61.
HwangK.-K. (2015b). Culture-inclusive theories of self and social interaction: The approach of multiple philosophical paradigms. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 45(1), 40–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12050
62.
HwangK.-K. (2016a). Philosophical switch for the third wave of psychology in the age of globalization. Japanese Psychological Research, 58(1), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12085
63.
HwangK.-K. (2016b). The structure of Confucian ethics and morality. In FullerM. (Ed.), Psychology of morality: New research (pp. 19–59). Nova Publishers.
64.
HwangK.-K. (2017a). An epistemological strategy for initiating the third wave of psychology. Journal of Gerontology & Geriatric Research, 6(2), 1–2.
65.
HwangK.-K. (2017b). The rise of indigenous psychologies: In response to Jahoda’s criticism. Culture & Psychology, 23(4), 551–565. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X16680338
66.
HwangK.-K. (2018). Contemporary applications of Confucian healing. In FernandoS.MoodleyR., Global psychologies: Mental health and the global south (pp. 299–306). Palgrave Macmillan.
67.
HwangK.-K. (2019a). Culture-inclusive theories. Cambridge University Press.
68.
HwangK.-K. (2019b). Enhancing cultural awareness by the construction of culture-inclusive theories. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 39(2), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/teo0000086
69.
HwangK.-K. (2019c). Reply. Positivism versus realism: Two approaches of indigenous psychologies. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 39(2), 127–129. https://doi.org/10.1037/teo0000117
HwangK.-K. (2020a). Escape from Kantian Eurocentric bias in cross-cultural psychology. Culture & Psychology, 26(4), 863–878. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X20922145
72.
HwangK.-K. (2020b). Philosophical reflection on Prof. K. S. Yang’s vision of global psychology and indigenous compatibility. In SundararajanL.HwangK.-K.YehK.-H. (Eds.), Global psychology from indigenous perspectives: Visions inspired by K. S. Yang (pp. 45–74). Palgrave.
73.
HwangK.-K. (2021a). Fallacy of methodologism and its theoretical implication. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 51(4), 614–618. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12328
74.
HwangK.-K. (2021b). Human beings and human becomings: The creative transformation of Confucianism by disengaged reason. In HershockP. D.AmesR. T. (Eds.), Human beings or human becomings? A conversation with Confucianism on the concept of person (pp. 121–147). State University of New York Press.
75.
HwangK.-K. (2022). An epistemological strategy for initiating scientific revolution against weird psychology. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, Online First. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-022-09681-9
76.
HwangK.-K.ChangJ. (2009). Self-cultivation: Culturally sensitive psychotherapies in Confucian societies. The Counseling Psychologist, 37(7), 1010–1032. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000009339976
77.
HwangK.-K.HanK.-H. (2010). Face and morality in Chinese society. In BondM. H. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of Chinese psychology (pp. 479–498). Oxford University Press.
78.
HwangK.-K.ShiahY.-J.YitK.-T. (2017). Editorial. Eastern philosophies and psychology: Towards a psychology of self-cultivation. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(1083), 1–2.
79.
HwangK.-K.YangK.-S. (1972). Individual modernity and social orientation. Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnology, Academia Sinica, 32, 245–278. (In Chinese).
80.
JaffeA. (1964). Symbolism in the visual arts. In JungC. G. (Ed.), Man and his symbols (pp.230–268). Dell Publishing Company.
81.
JullienF. (1998). Un sage est sans idée ou l’autre de la philosophie. Seuil.
82.
JungC. G. (1964). Man and his symbols. Dell Publishing Company.
83.
KimU.BerryJ. W. (1993). Introduction. In KimU.BerryJ. W. (Eds.), Indigenous psychologies: Research and experience in cultural context (pp. 1–29). Sage Publications.
84.
KingA. Y.-C. (1980). An analysis of ‘renqing’ in interpersonal relationships: A preliminary inquiry. Proceedings of the international conference on sinology (pp. 413–428). Academia Sinica.
85.
KingA. Y.-C.MyersJ. T. (1977). Shame as an incomplete conception of Chinese culture: A study of face. Social Research Center, Chinese University of Hong Kong.
86.
KitayamaS. (2002). Culture and basic psychological processes—toward a system view of culture: Comment on Oyserman et al. (2002). Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.89
87.
KitayamaS.MarkusH. R. (1999). Yin and yang of the Japanese self: The cultural psychology of personality coherence. In CervoneD.ShodaY. (Eds.), The coherence of personality: Social cognitive bases of personality consistency, variability, and organization (pp. 242–302). The Guilford Press.
88.
KohlbergL. (1981). Essays on moral development, Vol. 1: The philosophy of moral development. Harper & Row.
89.
KohlbergL. (1984). Essays on moral development, Vol. 2: The psychology of moral development. Harper & Row.
90.
LeggeJ. (1895). The Chinese classics, Vol. 2: The works of Mencius. 2nd ed.Oxford.
91.
Lévi-StraussC. (1973). Structural anthropology: Vol 1. University of Chicago.
92.
Lévi-StraussC. (1978). Structural anthropology: Vol. 2. University of Chicago.
93.
LiY. Y. (1992). In search of equilibrium and harmony: On the basic value orientation of traditional Chinese peasants. In NakaneC.ChiaoC. (Eds.), Home bound: Studies in east Asian society (pp. 127–148). The Center for East Asian Cultural Studies.
94.
LinD. (2002). Confucian ethics under the globalization: Confucian ethics and legal culture. China University of Political Science and Law.
95.
LinY. S. (1979). The crisis of Chinese consciousness: Radical anti-Traditionalism in the May fourth era. The University of Wisconsin Press.
96.
PopperK. (1934/1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Hutchinson.
97.
PopperK. (1963). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
98.
QuahS. R. (1995). Socio-cultural factors and productivity: The case of Singapore. In HwangK.-K. (Ed.), Easternization: Socio-cultural impact on productivity (pp. 266–333). Asian Productivity Organization.
99.
RamboE.ChanE. (1990). Text, structure, and action in cultural sociology. Theory and Society, 19(5), 635–648. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00147029
100.
ShenQ. (1994). Confucianism, Taoism, and constructive realism. WUV-Universitäsverlag.
101.
ShiahY. J.HwangK.-K. (2019). Socialized reflexivity and self-exertion: Mandala model of self and its role in mental health. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 22(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajsp.12344
102.
ShilsE. (1981). Tradition. University of Chicago Press.
103.
ShwederR. A.GoodnowJ.HatanoG.LeVineR.MarkusH.MillerP. (1998). The cultural psychology of development: One mind, many mentalities. In DamonW. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1, Theoretical models of human development (pp. 865–937). Wiley.
104.
SimpsonE. L. (1974). Moral development research: A case study of scientific cultural bias. Human Development, 17(2), 81–106. https://doi.org/10.1159/000271335
105.
SuS. Y.HwangK.-K. (2003). Face and relation in different domains of life: A comparison between senior citizens and university students. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 45, 295–311.
106.
TaylorC. (1973). Interpretation and the sciences of man. In CarrD.CaseyE. S. (Eds.), Explorations in phenomenology (pp. 47–101). Springer.
107.
TaylorC. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Harvard University Press.
108.
TuW. M. (1998). Probing the three bonds and five relationships in Confucian humanism. In De VosG. A. (Ed.), Confucianism and the family (pp. 121–136). State University of New York Press.
109.
VygotskyL. S. (1927/1997). The historical meaning of the crisis in psychology: A methodological investigation. In R. W. Rieber & J. Wollock (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, Vol. 3: Problems of the history and theory of psychology (pp. 233–343). Plenum Press.
110.
WallnerF. (1994). Constructive realism: Aspects of a new epistemological movement. W. Braumuller.
111.
WatermanA. S. (2008). Reconsidering happiness: A eudaimonist’s perspective. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(4), 234–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760802303002
112.
WeiC. F.HwangK.-K. (1998). Positive duties and negative duties: A cross-cultural comparison of moral judgment between Taiwanese and American college students. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 40, 137–153.
113.
WenC.-I. (1982). Repay and revenge: An analysis of social exchange behavior. In YangK.-S.WenC. I. (Eds.), The sinicization of social and behavioral science research in China (pp. 311–344). Academia Sinica. (In Chinese).
114.
WundtW. M. (1873). Grundzuge der physiologischen psychologie. Wilhelm Engelmann.
115.
YangK.-S. (1988). Will modernization eventually eliminate cross-cultural psychological differences? In BondM. H. (Ed.), The cross-cultural challenge to social psychology (pp. 67–85). Sage.
