The main objective of this study is to understand the origin, history, and meaning that lie behind the practice of knitting mochilas, which is a daily activity of women, both young and old in the Arhuaca community. This study has been designed as qualitative and narrative in nature and is based upon an analysis of three specific cases, whose participants are young indigenous women from the Arhuaca community of the Sierra Nevada of Santa Marta (Colombia). The results showed how there are aspects related to personal identity, in both historical and contemporary ways that are linked to culture, origin of the mochila, its design and knitting as well as intrinsic meaning of knitting mochilas. Therefore, the approach to this study is to restore the importance of this daily activity in its development, establishment of identity and lifestyle of the participants – within the framework of Cultural Psychology – and its contribution to preservation of values, laws and significance belonging to indigenous cultures.
ArocaA. (2008a) Figure analysis to traditional of Arhuacas backpacks. Arhuaca Indian Community. Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, Colombia. Boletim de Educação Matemática21(30): 1–17.
2.
ArocaA. (2008b) Geometric thinking in backpacks Arhuacas. Revista U. D. C. A. Actualidad & Divulgación Científica11(2): 71–83.
3.
BatesonG. (2011) Spirit and nature, (3rd edn. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Amorrortu.
4.
BerkesF. (1999) Sacred ecology: Traditional ecological knowledge and resource management, Philadelphia and London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
5.
BocarejoD. (2011) Two Colombian paradox of multiculturalism: The specialization of indigenous difference and political isolation. Revista Colombiana de Antropología47(2): 97–121.
6.
BonfilG. (2000) Our cultural heritage: A maze meanings. Revista Mexicana de Estudios AntropológicosXLV–XLVI: 16–39.
7.
BrunerJ. (1991) Acts of meaning. Beyond the cognitive revolution, Madrid, Spain: Alianza.
8.
BrunerJ. S. (1990) Acts of meaning, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
CarreteroM. (2007) Identity documents. The construction of historical memory in a global world, Buenos Aires, Argentina: Paidós.
10.
ColeM. (2003) Cultural psychology, (2nd edn. Madrid, Spain: Ediciones Morata.
11.
CristanchoS.ViningJ. (2009) Perceived intergenerational differences in the transmission of traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) in two indigenous groups from Colombia and Guatemala. Culture & Psychology15(2): 229–254. doi:10.1177/1354067X09102892. Retrieved from http://cap.sagepub.com/content/15/2/229.
12.
DermanB. (2003) Cultures of development and indigenous knowledge: The erosion of traditional boundaries. Africa Today50(2): 67–85.
13.
DerridaJ. (1999) File mal, Madrid, Spain: Trotta.
14.
EscobarH.MantillaF. (2006) The decentered self and situated in culture. Univ. Psychol. Bogotá (Colombia)6(1): 39–48.
15.
EspinosaM. (2007) Cultural memory and the continuing genocide: The indigenous in Colombia. Antípoda5: 53–73.
16.
GeertzC. (2005) The interpretation of cultures, Barcelona, Spain: Gedisa.
17.
GiraldoN. (2010) Spiral path. Territory sacred and traditional authorities in the indigenous community Iku of the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, Colombia. Revista Pueblos y Fronteras Digital6(9): 180–222.
18.
GreenfieldP. (2001) Three approaches to the psychology of culture: Where do they come from? Where can they go?Asian Journal of Social Psychology3: 223–240.
19.
GuitartM. (2008) Towards a cultural psychology. Origin, development and perspectives. Fundamentos en Humanidades2(18): 7–23.
20.
GuitartM. (2010) The ten principles of cultural-historical psychology. Fundamentos en HumanidadesXI(II): 45–60. .
21.
GuitartM.RatnerC. (2010) History, foundational concepts and contemporary perspectives in cultural psychology. Revista de Historia de la Psicología31(2–3): 117–136.
22.
HaleH.de AbreuG. (2010) Drawing on the notion of symbolic resources in exploring the development of cultural identities in immigrant transitions. Culture & Psychology16(3): 395–415.
23.
KimU. (2001) Indigenous, cultural, and cross-cultural psychology: A theoretical, conceptual, and epistemological analysis. Asian Journal of Social Psychology3: 265–287.
24.
KimU.ParkY.ParkD. (2000) The challenge of cross-cultural psychology: The role of indigenous psychologies. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology31: 63–75.
25.
LeffE. (2001) Space, place and time. The social reappropriation of nature and the local construction of environmental rationality. Nueva Sociedad175: 28–42.
26.
LehmanD.ChiyueC.SchallerM. (2004) Psychology and culture. Annual Reviews Psychol55: 689–714. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141927.
27.
McGintyS. (2012) Engaging indigenous knowledge(s) in research and practice. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies12(1): , Special Section, 5–15. Retrieved from http://ejournal.ukm.my/gema/article/view/18.
NavarroO. (2002) Social representations of the adaptive culture in an indigenous town of the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta. Investigación y Desarrollo10(2): 208–221.
Republic of Colombia. (1991). Political Constitution of Colombia. Bogotá: Republic of Colombia.
34.
RossN. (2002) Lacandon Maya intergenerational change and the erosion of folk biological knowledge. In: SteppJ. R.WyndhamF. S.ZargerR. K. (eds) Ethnobiology and biocultural diversity: Proceedings of the Seventh International Congress of Ethnobiology, Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
35.
SagásteguiD. (2004) A commitment to culture: Situated learning. Sinéctica24: 30–39.
36.
SandínM. (2003) Qualitative research in education, Barcelona, Spain: McGrawHill.
37.
SerjeM. (2008) The invention of the Sierra Nevada. Antípoda7: 197–229.
38.
ShwederR. (2001) The psychology of practice and the practice of the three psychologies. Asian Journal of Social Psychology3: 207–222.
39.
TurnerV. W. (1967) Símbolos en el ritual ndembu. En La selva de los símbolos, Madrid, Spain: Siglo XXI.
40.
UicholK.YangK.Kwang-KuoH. (2006) Indigenous and cultural psychology, understanding people in context, New York, NY: International and Cultural Psychology Series.
41.
UlloaA. (2010) Conceptual, political and territorial reconfigurations in the demands of autonomy of the indigenous towns in Colombia. Tabula Rasa13: 73–92.
42.
ValsinerJ. (2001) Comparative study of human cultural development, Madrid, Spain: Fundación Infancia y Aprendizaje.
43.
ValsinerJ. (2006) Developmental epistemology and implications for methodology. In: DamonW.LernerR. M. (eds) Handbook of child psychology. Theoretical models of human development, (6th edn. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
44.
Valsiner, J. (2013). An invitation to Cultural Psychology. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
45.
ValsinerJ.van der VeerR. (2000) The social mind. Construction of the idea, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
YangP.LuF. (2007) Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context – A book review from the transpersonal psychology perspective. Pastoral Psychology56: 1–9. doi:10.1007/s11089-007-0090-1.
48.
ZaragozaL. (2010) Culture, identity and ethnicity, approaches to multicultural environment: Breaking paradigms and everyday customs. Cuicuilco48: 149–164.
