In this study, we aimed to explore the various ways in which the past is constructed, using or tinkering with a national master narrative, by students surrounded by and immersed in contemporary transnational plurality. Specifically, we studied the permanence of or variations on the Spanish ‘reconquest’ narrative among 14 to 15-year-old students of a public school in Madrid. Semi-structured individual interviews were carried out with 30 students whose families came from Madrid, other regions in Spain and other countries around the world. We carried out a detailed narrative analysis of their constructions of the medieval past on the Iberian Peninsula and found that the ‘reconquest’ narrative still predominates. Few variations in their narratives were found that hint at counternarratives, the ‘travelling’ of narrative schema across national borders, or the transnational trajectories in their families feeding into their constructions. Given these findings, we discuss the role of alternative narrative schema and dynamic concepts of nation and national identity in challenging national master narratives.
AbascalS. [@Santi_ABASCAL]. (2018, January 2). El 2 de enero de 1942 concluyó la reconquista con la toma de granada derrotando así al último reducto islamista [Tweet]. Twitter. https://twitter.com/santi_abascal/status/948164179080466432
2.
AndersonB. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Verso.
3.
AparicioR.PortesA. (2014). Crecer en España. La integración de los hijos de inmigrantes. Obra Social “la Caixa”.
4.
ArigitaE. (2019). Narratives on the margins of history: memory and the commemoration of the moriscos. The Journal of North African Studies, 24(1), 134-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629387.2018.1459267
BartonK. C. (2021). Schematic templates and diverse populations in the United States: Narrative limitations in young people’s understanding. In BrescóI.van AlphenF. (Eds), Reproducing, rethinking, resisting national narratives. A sociocultural approach to schematic narrative templates (pp. 79-95). Information Age Publishing.
7.
BartonK. C.LevstikL. S. (2004). Teaching history for the common good. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
BhatiaS. (2007). Rethinking culture and identity in psychology: Towards a transnational cultural psychology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 27-28(2-1), 301-321. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0091298
10.
BilligM. (1995). Banal nationalism. Sage.
11.
BrescóI.van AlphenF. (2021). Reconquista or regaining Spain from the internal other. In BrescóI.van AlphenF. (Eds), Reproducing, rethinking, resisting national narratives. A sociocultural approach to schematic narrative templates (pp. 59-76). Information Age Publishing.
12.
CarreteroM.BermúdezA. (2012). Constructing histories. In ValsinerJ. (Ed), Oxford handbook of culture and psychology (pp. 625-646). Oxford University Press.
13.
CarreteroM.van AlphenF. (2014). Do master narratives change among high school students? A characterization of how national history is represented. Cognition and Instruction, 32(3), 290-312. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2014.919298
14.
EpsteinT.SchillerJ. (2005). Perspective matters: Social identity and the teaching and learning of national history. Social Education, 69(4), 201-204.
15.
ErllA. (2018). Media and the dynamics of memory. In WagonerB. (Ed), Handbook of culture and memory (pp. 305-324). Oxford University Press.
16.
García SanjuánA. (2013). La conquista islámica de la península Ibérica y la tergiversación del pasado. Marcial Pons Historia.
GreverM.StuurmanS. (2007). Beyond the canon: History for the 21st century. Macmillan.
19.
GutierrezK. D.RogoffB. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practices. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19-25. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X032005019
20.
HalbwachsM. (1992). On collective memory. The University of Chicago Press.
HobsbawmE.RangerT. (2004). The invention of tradition. Cambridge University Press.
23.
LétourneauJ.ChapmanA. (2017). Negotiating the nation: Young people, national narratives and history education. London Review of Education, 15(2), 149-151. https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.15.2.01
24.
LopezC. (2019). When ‘we’ are the alien forces: Misremembering the Conquest of America through the ‘Triumph over alien forces’ schematic narrative template. Culture and Psychology, 27(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X19894937
25.
LopezC.CarreteroM.Rodriguez-MoneoM. (2015). Conquest or reconquest? Students’ conceptions of nation embedded in a historical narrative. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 24(2), 252-285. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2014.919863
26.
MahalingamR.RabeloV. C. (2013). Theoretical, methodological, and ethical challenges to the study of immigrants: Perils and possibilities. In HernándezM. G.NguyenJ.SaetermoeC. L.Suárez-OrozcoC. (Eds.), Frameworks and ethics for research with immigrants (pp. 25-42). Wiley: New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 141.
27.
Martín RojoL. (2010). Constructing inequality in multilingual classrooms. Mouton de Gruyter.
28.
Martín RojoL.MolinaC. (2017). Cosmopolitan stance negotiation in multicultural academic settings. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 21(5), 672-695. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12265
PeckC. (2010). ‘It’s not like [I’m] Chinese and Canadian. I am in between’: Ethnicity and students’ conceptions of historical significance. Theory and Research in Social Education, 38(4), 574-617. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2010.10473440
31.
Rasskin-GutmanI.BrescóI. (2019). Identidad y alteridad en libros de texto escolares: Un estudio de caso sobre la representación de Al-andalus. Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana, 37(3), 471-488. http://dx.doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/apl/a.7942
32.
Ríos SalomaM.F. (2005). From the Restoration to the Reconquest: The construction of a national myth (An historiographical review. 16th-19th centuries). En la España medieval, 28, 379-414.
33.
Sáiz SerranoJ. (2017). Pervivencias escolares de narrativa nacional española: Reconquista, Reyes Católicos e Imperio en libros de texto de historia y en relatos de estudiantes. Historia y Memoria de la Educación, 6, 165-201. https://doi.org/10.5944/hme.6.2017.17137
34.
Tutiaux-GuillonN. (Ed). (2018). Enseigner l'histoire en contexte de pluralité identitaire. L'Harmattan. RAISONS COMPARAISONS EDUCATIONS La Revue française d’éducation comparée, 17.
35.
van AlphenF. (2020). Beyond the master narrative: Memories in the globalizing educational context. In WagonerB.BrescóI.ZadehS. (Eds), Memory in the wild (pp. 165-183). Information Age Publishing.
36.
van AlphenF.CarreteroM. (2015). The construction of the relation between national past and present in the appropriation of historical master narratives. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 49(3), 512-530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-015-9302-x
37.
van AlphenF.WagonerB. (2021). Reconstructing the “reconquista”: Students’ negotiation of a Spanish master narrative. Memory studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/17506980211033325
38.
WagonerB. (2017). The constructive mind: Bartlett’s psychology in reconstruction. Cambridge University Press.
39.
WertschJ. V. (1998). Mind as action. Oxford University Press.
40.
WertschJ. V. (2002). Voices of collective remembering. Cambridge University Press.
WertschJ. V. (2018). National memory and where to find it. In WagonerB. (Ed), Handbook of culture and memory (pp. 259-281). Oxford University Press.
43.
WertschJ. V.O’ConnorK. (1994). Multivoicedness in historical representation: American college students’ accounts of the origins of the United States. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 4(4), 295-309. https://doi.org/10.1075/jnlh.4.4.04mul
44.
WertschJ. V.RoedigerH. L. (2008). Collective memory: Conceptual foundations and theoretical approaches. Memory, 16(3), 318-326. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210701801434
45.
WillsJ. S. (2011). Misremembering as mediated action: Schematic narrative templates and elementary students’ narration of the past. Theory & Research in Social Education, 39(1), 115-144. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2011.10473449
