In this article, we develop the concept of ‘dialogical exemplars’ as communicative tools for scholars who wish to ‘resituate knowledge’ from dialogical single case studies. Exemplars are typological representatives that try to convey typicality in non-taxonomic terms, yet in the existing literature, they are defined in terms of their relationship to a population, class or sample. We suggest instead that ‘dialogical exemplars’, as specific instances that have the self-other at their core, can be used to convey the ‘wholeness’ of cases to various audiences. To support this proposition, we draw upon two single case studies, built 30 years apart, that are concerned with children’s daily lives and experiences. Specifically, we develop a dialogue with and between examples from each case of children's play, not only to make the case for ‘dialogical exemplars’, but also to evidence the process through which we arrived at this concept. We highlight that this process is one that researchers often go through, but, rather curiously, rarely document. In conclusion, we suggest that ‘resituating knowledge’ might be best thought of as several, non-linear, stages in the process of dialogical research that involve, and invite further dialogue.
AlessandroniN.Moreno-NúñezA.RodríguezC.Del OlmoM. J. (2019). Musical dynamics in early triadic interactions: A case study. Psychological Research. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01168-4
2.
ArcherJ.LloydB. (1986). Sex and gender.
Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press.
3.
AvelingE. L.GillespieA.CornishF. (2015).
A qualitative method for analysing multivoicedness. Qualitative Research,
15, 670–687.
4.
BakhtinM. M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. In EmersonC. (Ed.),
Minneapolis, MN:
University of Minnesota Press.
5.
ButlerJ. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity.
New York, NY:
Routledge.
6.
ButlerJ. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of ‘sex’.
New York, NY:
Routledge.
7.
CabellK. (2010).
Mediators, regulators and catalysers: A context-inclusive model of trajectory development. Psychology & Society,
3, 26–41.
8.
CabraM. (2019). Gender differentiation in children’s actions: A sociocultural perspective on the transition from kindergarten to primary school. Neuchâtel. Manuscript in preparation.
9.
CabraM. (in press). Dialogical ethnography: A sociocultural approach to group interactions. In HuberM.FroehlichD. (Eds.), Guidebook for analyzing group interactions.
New York, NY:
Routledge.
10.
CornishF. (2020). Towards a methodology for dialogical single case studies. Culture & Psychology.
11.
DuveenG. (1997). Psychological development as a social process. In SmithL.TomlinsonP.DockerellJ. (Eds.), Piaget, Vygotsky and beyond (pp. 67–90).
London, UK:
Routledge.
12.
DuveenG. (2000).
Piaget ethnographer. Social Science Information,
39, 79–97.
13.
FahyK. (2008).
Writing for publication: Argument and evidence. Women and Birth,
21, 113–117.
14.
FlyvbjergB. (2006).
Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry,
12, 219–245.
15.
ForresterJ. (1996).
If p, then what? Thinking in cases. History of the Human Sciences,
9, 1–25.
16.
GaskellG.BauerM. W. (2000). Towards public accountability: Beyond sampling, reliability and validity. In BauerM.W.GaskellG. (Eds.), Qualitative researching with text, image and sound: A practical handbook (pp. 318–335).
London, UK:
SAGE.
17.
GeertzC. (1973). The interpretation of cultures.
New York, NY:
Basic Books.
18.
GillespieA. (2005).
Malcolm X and his autobiography: Identity development and self-narration. Culture & Psychology,
11, 77–88.
19.
GillespieA.CornishF. (2010).
What can be said? Identity as a constraint on knowledge production. Papers on Social Representations,
19, 5.1–5.13.
20.
GillespieA.CornishF. (2014).
Sensitizing questions: A method to facilitate analyzing the meaning of an utterance. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science,
48, 435–452.
21.
GillespieA.ZittounT. (2010).
Using resources: Conceptualising the mediation and reflective use of tools and signs. Culture & Psychology,
16, 37–62.
22.
GillespieA.CornishF.AvelingE.-L.ZittounT. (2008).
Living with war: Community resources, self-dialogues and psychological adaptation to World War II. Journal of Community Psychology,
36, 35–52.
23.
HowarthC. (2010).
Revisiting gender identities and education: Notes for a social psychology of resistant identities in modern culture. Papers on Social Representations,
19, 8.1–8.17.
24.
HviidP. (2008).
Next year we are small, right? Different times in children’s development. European Journal of Psychology of Education,
23, 183–198.
25.
HviidP. (2016).
Borders in education and living – A case of trench warfare. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science,
50, 44–61.
26.
HviidP. (2020). Dialogical experiences in practice – Research with Danish daycare: Moving from abstract to concrete generalisations. Culture & Psychology.
27.
HviidP.BecksteadZ. (2011). Dialogues about research. In MӓrtsinM.WagonerB.AvelingE-L.KadianakiI.WhittakerL. (Eds.), Dialogicality in focus: Challenges to theory, method and application (pp. 147–162).
New York, NY:
Nova Science Publishers.
28.
KadianakiI.ZittounT. (2014). Catalysts and regulators of psychological change in the context of immigration ruptures. In CabellK. R.ValsinerJ. (Ed.), The catalysing mind: Beyond models of causality (pp. 191–207).
New York, NY:
Springer.
29.
LloydB.DuveenG. (1990). A semiotic analysis of the development of social representations of gender. In DuveenG.LloydB. (Eds.), Social representations and the development of knowledge (pp. 27–46).
Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge UP.
LucalB. (1999).
What it means to be gendered me: Life on the boundaries of a dichotomous gender system. Gender & Society,
13, 781–797.
32.
MarkováI. (2016). The dialogical mind: Common sense and ethics.
Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press.
33.
MarkováI. (2017).
The making of the theory of social representations. Cadernos de Pesquisa,
47, 358–375.
34.
MarkováI.JesuinoJ. C. (2018).
Social psychology as a developmental discipline in the dynamics of practical life: Gustav Jahoda’s pioneering studies on children’s social thinking. Culture & Psychology,
24, 343–357.
MarkováI.ZadehS.ZittounT. (2020). Introduction to the special issue on generalisation from dialogical single case studies. Culture & Psychology.
37.
MorganM. S. (2014).
Resituating knowledge: Generic strategies and case studies. Philosophy of Science,
81, 1012–1024.
38.
MoscoviciS. (1990). Social psychology and developmental psychology: Extending the conversation. In DuveenG.LloydB. (Eds.), Social representations and the development of knowledge (pp. 164–185).
Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge UP.
PiagetJ. (1932/2001). The moral judgement of the child.
Oxon, UK:
Routledge.
41.
PiagetJ. (1979). Correspondences and transformations. In MurrayF. (Ed.), Impact of Piagetian theory : On education, philosophy, psychiatry, and psychology.
Baltimore, MD:
University Park Press.
42.
SalvatoreS.ValsinerJ. (2010).
Between the general and the unique. Overcoming the nomothetic versus idiographic opposition. Theory and Psychology,
20, 817–833.
43.
StennerP. (2017). Liminality and experience: A transdisciplinary approach to the psychosocial.
London, UK:
Palgrave Macmillan.
44.
TauR. (2018). The comprehension of death and afterlife in children. In CannC. K. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of death and the afterlife (pp. 195–207).
London, UK:
Routledge.
45.
ValsinerJ. (2019). Generalization in science: Abstracting from unique events. In HøjholtC.SchraubeE. (Eds.), Subjectivity and knowledge: Generalization in the psychological study of everyday life.
New York, NY:
Springer.
46.
WestC.ZimmermanD. H. (1987).
Doing gender. Gender and Society,
1, 125–151.
47.
ZadehS. (2017).
The implications of dialogicality for ‘giving voice’ in social representations research. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour,
47, 263–278.
48.
ZittounT. (2014). Trusting for learning. In LinellP.MarkováI. (Eds.), Trust and language (pp. 125–151).
Charlotte, NC:
Information Age Publishing.
49.
ZittounT. (2017).
Modalities of generalization from single case studies. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science,
51, 171–194.
50.
ZittounT. (2018). The velvet revolution of land and minds. In WagonerB.MoghaddamF.ValsinerJ. (Eds.), The psychology of radical social change: From rage to revolution (pp. 140–158).
Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press.
51.
ZittounT. (2020). Generalising from a regional case study: A dialogue with a hill. Culture & Psychology.
52.
ZittounT.DuveenG.GillespieA.IvinsonG.PsaltisC. (2003).
The use of symbolic resources in developmental transitions. Culture & Psychology,
9, 415–448.
53.
ZittounT.LevitanD.CangiáF. (2018).
A sociocultural approach to mobile families: A case study. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology,
24, 424–432.
