In this article, I propose a sociocultural psychological and dialogical approach of a Czech hill. I first briefly present how I came to study and built it into a dialogical case study. I then explore sociogenetic dynamics at stake – the historical and mythical existence of the hill, and how it reflects in its appearances and its uses – microgenetic dynamics – everyday encounters around the hill – and ontogenetic dynamics – the lives of people under the hill. Drawing on a series of sociocultural theoretical tools and on dialogical authors, I try to show how phenomena at each level of analysis are deeply affected by, or affecting, phenomena at other levels, and I highlight specific dialogical dynamics and patterns. I then discuss the more fundamental dialogical encounter that takes place between a researcher and such complex dialogical case study in terms of dialogical ethics. I finally reflect on issues of generalisation that may follow from as such case study, and on the dialogue it engages with current scientific debates.
AalbersD.TeoT. (2017).
The American Psychological Association and the torture complex: A phenomenology of the banality and workings of bureaucracy. Journal Für Psychologie,
25(1), 179–204.
BakhtinM. M. (1982). The dialogic imagination: Four essays.
Austin:
University of Texas Press.
4.
BakhtinM. M. (1996). Speech genres and other late essays.
Austin:
University of Texas Press.
5.
BuberM. (1953). I and Thou (2nd English ed., Original 1923; R. G. Smith, Trans.). Edinburgh, UK: T.T Clarke.
6.
CornishF. (2019a). Communicative generalisation: Dialogical means of advancing knowledge through a case study of an ‘unprecedented’ disaster. Culture & Psychology.
7.
CornishF. (2019b). Conclusion: Towards a methodology for dialogical single case studies. Culture & Psychology.
8.
CoultasC. (2019). The performativity of monitoring and evaluation in international development interventions: Building a dialogical case study of evidence-making that situates “the general”. Culture & Psychology.
9.
de Saint-GeorgesI. (2018).
Generalizing from case studies: A commentary. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science,
52(1), 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-017-9402-x
10.
DemuthC. (2018).
Generalization from single cases and the concept of double dialogicality. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science,
52(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-017-9399-1
11.
DevereuxG. (1967). From anxiety to method in the behavioral sciences.
The Hague, Netherlands /Paris, France:
Mouton & Company.
12.
DuveenG. (1997). Psychological development as social process. In SmithL.BockrellJ.TomlinsonP. (Eds), Piaget, Vygotsky and beyond (pp. 67–90).
London, UK:
Routledge.
Freud, S. (1919). The ‘Uncanny’. In J. Strachey (Ed.) (1955). The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud: Vol. XVII (1917--1919) (pp. 217--256). London: The Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psychoanalysis.
15.
GillespieA. (2005).
Malcolm X and his autobiography: Identity development and self-narration. Culture & Psychology,
11(1), 77–88.
16.
GillespieA.CornishF. (2010).
What can be said? Identity as a constraint on knowledge production. Papers on Social Representations,
19, 5.1–5.13.
17.
GillespieA.CornishF.AvelingE.-L.ZittounT. (2008).
Living with war: Community resources, self-dialogues and psychological adaptation to World War II. Journal of Community Psychology,
36(1), 35–52.
18.
GillespieA.KadianakiI.O’Sullivan-LagoR. (2012). Encountering alterity: Geographic and semantic movements. In ValsinerJ. (Ed.), Oxford Handbook of Culture and Psychology (pp. 695–719).
Oxford, UK:
Oxford University Press.
19.
GillespieA.ZittounT. (2015). Social and psychological movement: Weaving individual experience into society. In WagonerB.ChaudharyN.HviidP. (Eds), Integrating experiences: Body and mind moving between contexts (pp. 279–294).
Charlotte, NC:
Information Age Publishing.
20.
HviidP. (2019). Dialogical experiences in practice–research with Danish daycare: Moving from abstract to concrete generalisations. Culture & Psychology, DOI: 10.1177/1354067X19888191
MarkováI.ZadehS.ZittounT. (2019). Introduction to the special issue on generalisation from dialogical single case studies. Culture & Psychology, Special Issue on Dialogical Generalisation.
28.
MolenaarP. C. M.ValsinerJ. (2008). How generalization works through the single case: A simple idiographic process analysis of an individual psychotherapy. In SalvatoreS.ValsinerJ.Strout-YagodzynskiS.CleggJ. (Eds), YIS. Yearbook of Ideographic Science (pp. 23–38).
Rome, Italy:
Firera Publishing.
29.
PachuckiM. A.PendergrassS.LamontM. (2007).
Boundary processes: Recent theoretical developments and new contributions. Poetics,
35(6), 331–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2007.10.001
30.
SalvatoreS.ValsinerJ. (2010).
Between the general and the unique: Overcoming the nomothetic versus idiographic opposition. Theory & Psychology,
20(6), 817–833. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354310381156
StennerP. (2017). Liminality and experience. A transdisciplinary approach to the psychosocial.
London, UK:
Palgrave Macmillan.
33.
ValsinerJ. (2015).
The place for synthesis Vygotsky’s analysis of affective generalization. History of the Human Sciences,
28(2), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695114559530
34.
ValsinerJ. (2017). Generalization from single instances. In SpringerBriefs in psychology. From methodology to methods in human psychology (pp. 81–85). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61064-1_8
35.
ValsinerJ. (2019a). Generalization in science: Abstracting from unique events. In HøjholtC.SchraubeE. (Eds), Subjectivity and knowledge: Generalization in the psychological study of everyday life.
New York, NY:
Springer.
36.
ValsinerJ. (2019b). Ornamented lives.
Charlotte, NC:
Information Age Publishing.
37.
WallS. (2006).
An autoethnography on learning about autoethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Methods,
5(2), Article 9.
38.
WimmerA. (2008).
The making and unmaking of ethnic boundaries: A multilevel process theory. American Journal of Sociology,
113(4), 970–1022.
39.
ZadehS.CabraM. (2019). Movement in and between cases: From gender identities to gender differentiation and back again. Culture & Psychology.
40.
ZavershnevaE.van der VeerR. (2018). Vygotsky’s notebooks. A selection.
Singapore:
Springer.
41.
ZittounT. (2006). Transitions. Development through symbolic resources.
Greenwich, CT:
Information Age Publishing.
42.
ZittounT. (2011). A girl like a will-o’-the whisp: Listening to reports of cultural experiences as a methodological mean of accessing the preconscious dynamics of sense making. In SalvatoreS.ZittounT. (Eds), Cultural psychology and psychoanalysis: pathways to synthesis (pp. 151–179).
Charlotte, NC:
Information Age Publishing.
43.
ZittounT. (2017).
Modalities of generalization through single case studies. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science,
51(2), 171–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-016-9367-1
44.
Zittoun, T. (2019). Sociocultural psychology at the regional scale: A case study of a hill. Cham (Switzerland): Springer.
45.
ZittounT.GillespieA. (2015). Integrating experiences: Body and mind moving between contexts. In WagonerB.ChaudharyN.HviidP. (Eds), Integrating experiences: Body and mind moving between contexts (pp. 3–49).
Charlotte, NC:
Information Age Publishing.
46.
ZittounT.GillespieA. (2016). Imagination in human and cultural development.
London, UK:
Routledge.
47.
ZittounT.ValsinerJ.VedelerD.SalgadoJ.GonçalvesM.FerringD. (2013). Human development in the lifecourse. Melodies of living.
Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press.
