This paper considers mental processes unfolding during humans’ movement in a foreign environment and aims to overcome theoretical discrepancies concerning culture and acculturation between sociocultural anthropology and cross-cultural psychology under the frame of cultural psychology. I propose to perceive culture as a multi-self-centered semiotic field, which is populated by signs and meanings, necessarily emphasizing its heterogeneity and incoherence. Cultures have hazy boundaries and are embedded into the wider web of meanings. In fact, there is one big global culture and all humans are involved in mediating it through intersubjective interactions. Further, the term proculturation is used to fill the gaps left by mainstream acculturation research, which has been mainly oriented on measuring ontologized trait-like characteristics in terms of bidimensional mechanic relationship between cultures and related correlations. Namely, proculturation specifically reflects real-life human experiences and the role of (inter)subjectivity in the process of adaptation in emigration or elsewhere in any unfamiliar environment. Most importantly proculturation implies triadic semiotic relations and the possibility of the creation of novel fusions of meanings, by mixing various ingredients in the process of mediation between familiar and unfamiliar ideas and experiences. Proculturation is catalytically conditioned by references to temporal dimensions and essentially is ever-continuing process.
AndersonB. R. O.BenedictR. O. (2006). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism.
3.
AndreouliE. (2013).
Identity and acculturation: The case of naturalised citizens in Britain. Culture & Psychology,
19(2), 165–183. doi:10.1177/1354067X13478984
4.
Arends-Tóth, J., & Vijver, F. J. R. v. d. (2006). Issues in the Conceptualization and Assessment of Acculturation. In M. H. Bornstein & L. R Cote (Eds.), Acculturation and parent-child relationships: Measurement and development (pp. 33–62). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
5.
BaumanZ. (2001).
Identity in the globalizing world. Social Anthropology,
9(2), 121–129. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8676.2001.tb00141.x
6.
BecksteadZ. (2010).
Commentary: Liminality in acculturation and pilgrimage: When movement becomes meaningful. Culture & Psychology,
16(3), 383–393. doi:10.1177/1354067X10371142
7.
BerryJ. W. (2005).
Acculturation: Living successfully in two cultures. International Journal of Intercultural Relations,
29(6), 697–712. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.07.013
8.
BerryJ. W. (2008).
Globalisation and acculturation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations,
32(4), 328–336. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2008.04.001
9.
BertalanffyL. V. (1969). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. (Rev. ed.). New York: Braziller.
10.
BhatiaS. (2002).
Acculturation, dialogical voices and the construction of the diasporic self. Theory & Psychology,
12(1), 55–77. doi:10.1177/0959354302121004
11.
BoskiP. (2008).
Five meanings of integration in acculturation research. International Journal of Intercultural Relations,
32(2), 142–153. doi:10.1016/J.IJINTREL.2008.01.005
12.
BrancoA. U.ValsinerJ. (1997).
Changing methodologies: A co-constructivist study of goal orientations in social interactions. Psychology and Developing Societies,
9(1), 35–64. doi:10.1177/097133369700900103
13.
BrinkmannS. (2016).
Methodological breaching experiments: Steps toward theorizing the qualitative interview. Culture and Psychology,
22(4), 520–533. doi:10.1177/1354067X16650816
14.
BrunerJ. (1984).
Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development: The hidden agenda. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development,
23, 93–97. doi:10.1002/cd.23219842309
15.
ChirkovV. (2009).
Critical psychology of acculturation: What do we study and how do we study it, when we investigate acculturation?International Journal of Intercultural Relations,
33(2), 94–105. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2008.12.004
16.
DoucerainM.DereJ.RyderA. G. (2013).
Travels in hyper-diversity: Multiculturalism and the contextual assessment of acculturation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations,
37(6), 686–699. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2013.09.007
17.
GamsakhurdiaV. L. (2017).
Quest for ethnic identity in the modern world – The Georgian case. Cogent Social Sciences,
3(1). doi:10.1080/23311886.2017.1309735
18.
GamsakhurdiaV. L. (2018a).
Adaptation in a dialogical perspective – From acculturation to proculturation. Culture and Psychology,
24, 545–559.
19.
GamsakhurdiaV. L. (2018b).
Constructive urge for self-presentation-mediating between the past and the future. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 1–20. doi:10.1007/s12124-018-9466-2
20.
GamsakhurdiaV. L. (in press). Self-expansion through proculturation – Semiotic movement towards curvilinear development. In F. Van Alpen & S. Normann (Ed.), Cultural psychology in communities: Tensions and transformations. Information age publishing.
21.
GeertzC. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures: selected essays (pp. 1–15). New York: Basic Books. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2012.12.017.3D
22.
GűrsoyS.KuntN. (2018).
Acculturation of university students in Northern Cyprus. Culture & Psychology. doi:10.1177/1354067X18808213
23.
Haviland, W. A., Prins, H. E., McBride, B., & Walrath, D. (2010). Cultural anthropology: the human challenge (13th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
24.
HermansH. J. M. (1999).
Dialogical thinking and self-innovation. Culture & Psychology,
5(1), 67–87. doi:10.1177/1354067X9951004
25.
HermansH. J. M.Hermans-KonopkaA. (2010). Dialogical self theory: Positioning and counter-positioning in a globalizing society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26.
HermansH. J. M.KonopkaA.OosterwegelA.ZomerP. (2017).
Fields of tension in a boundary-crossing world: Towards a democratic organization of the self. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science,
51(4), 505–535. doi:10.1007/s12124-016-9370-6
27.
HerskovitsM. J. (1949). Man and his works; the science of cultural anthropology. Man and his works; the science of cultural anthropology.
Oxford, UK:
Alfred A. Knopf.
28.
JahodaG. (2012).
Critical reflections on some recent definitions of “culture”. Culture & Psychology,
18(3), 289–303. doi:10.1177/1354067X12446229
29.
LebedevaN.TatarkoA.BerryJ. W. (2016).
Intercultural relations among migrants from Caucasus and Russians in Moscow. International Journal of Intercultural Relations,
52, 27–38. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2016.03.001
30.
MärtsinM. (2010a).
Identity in dialogue: Identity as hyper-generalized personal sense. Theory & Psychology,
20(3), 436–450. doi:10.1177/0959354310363513
31.
MärtsinM. (2010b).
Rupturing otherness: Becoming Estonian in the context of contemporary Britain. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science,
44(1), 65–81. doi:10.1007/s12124-009-9109-8
32.
MärtsinM.MahmoudH. W. (2012).
Never “at-home”?: Migrants between societies. In J. Valsiner (Ed.) The Oxford handbook of culture and psychology (pp.730–746). New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.
33.
MernissiF. (1982).
Virginity and patriarchy. Women’s Studies International Forum,
5(2), 183–191. doi:10.1016/0277-5395(82)90026-7
34.
NavasM.GarcíaM. C.SánchezJ.RojasA. J.PumaresP.FernándezJ. S. (2005).
Relative acculturation extended model (RAEM): New contributions with regard to the study of acculturation. International Journal of Intercultural Relations,
29(1), 21–37. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2005.04.001
35.
OzerS. (2013).
Theories and methodologies in acculturation psychology: The emergence of a scientific revolution?Psychological Studies,
58(3), 339–348. doi:10.1007/s12646-013-0203-0
RedfieldR.LintonR.HerskovitsM. J. (1936).
Memorandum for the study of acculturation. American Anthropologist, 38, 149–152. doi:10.1525/aa.1936.38.1.02a00330
38.
RudminF. W. (2003).
“Critical history of the acculturation psychology of assimilation, separation, integration, and marginalization”: Correction to Rudmin (2003). Review of General Psychology,
7(3), 250–250. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.7.3.250
39.
RudminF. W. (2009). Catalogue of acculturation constructs: Descriptions of 126 taxonomies, 1918–2003. In Online readings in psychology and culture. doi:10.9707/2307-0919.1074
40.
SamD. L.BerryJ. W. (2010a).
Acculturation: When individuals and groups of different cultural backgrounds meet. Perspectives on Psychological Science,
5(4), 472–481. doi:10.1177/1745691610373075
41.
SamD. L.BerryJ. W. (2010b).
Acculturation. Perspectives on Psychological Science,
5(4), 472–481. doi:10.1177/1745691610373075
42.
SatoT.HidakaT.FukudaM. (2009). Depicting the dynamics of living the life: The trajectory equifinality model. In Dynamic process methodology in the social and developmental sciences (pp. 217–240). New York: Springer US. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-95922-1_10
43.
SatōT.MoriN.ValsinerJ. (2016). Making of the future: The trajectory equifinality approach in cultural psychology.
44.
TateoL. (2016).
Toward a cogenetic cultural psychology. Culture & Psychology,
22(3), 433–447. doi:10.1177/1354067X16645297
45.
TateoL. (2018).
Affective semiosis and affective logic. New Ideas in Psychology,
48, 1–11. doi:10.1016/J.NEWIDEAPSYCH.2017.08.002
46.
ValsinerJ. (2000). Culture and human development: An introduction. London: Sage Publications. doi:10.4135/9781446217924.
47.
ValsinerJ. (2009). Integrating psychology within the globalizing world: A requiem to the post-modernist experiment with wissenschaft. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 1--21. doi:10.1007/s12124-009-9087-x.
48.
Valsiner, J. (2013). Creating sign hierarchies: Social representation in its dynamic context. Papers on Social Representations, 22(2), 16–1.
49.
Valsiner, J. (2014). An invitation to cultural psychology. London: SAGE Publications. doi: 10.4135/9781473905986
50.
ValsinerJ. (2017a). From methodology to methods in human psychology.
Cham, Switzerland:
Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-61064-1.
51.
ValsinerJ. (2017b). Springer briefs in psychology from methodology to methods in human psychology. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-61064-1.
52.
Valsiner, J., & Rosa, A. (Eds.). (2007). The Cambridge handbook of sociocultural psychology. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511611162
53.
ValsinerJ.Van Der VeerR. (2014). Encountering the border: Vygotsky’s zona blizhaishego razvitia and its implications for theories of development. In YasnitskyA.van der VeerR.FerrariM. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of cultural-historical psychology (pp. 148–173).
Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139028097.009.
54.
Van de VijverF. J. R.BlommaertJ.GkoumasiG.StogianniM. (2015).
On the need to broaden the concept of ethnic identity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations,
46, 36–46. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2015.03.021.
55.
WaldramJ. B. (2009).
Is there a future for “culture” in acculturation research? An anthropologist’s perspective. International Journal of Intercultural Relations,
33(2), 173–176. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2009.03.004.
56.
WeinreichP. (2009). “
Enculturation”, not “acculturation”: Conceptualising and assessing identity processes in migrant communities. International Journal of Intercultural Relations,
33(2), 124–139. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2008.12.006.
57.
Zittoun, T. (2012). Life-course: A socio-cultural perspective. In Handbook of culture and psychology (Vol. 60, No. 23, pp. 513–535). Oxford University Press.
58.
Zittoun, T. (2016). A sociocultural psychology of the life-course. Social Psychological Review, 18(1), 6–17.
59.
Zittoun, T. (2018). Symbolic Resources and Imagination in the Dynamics of Life. In A. Rosa & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural Psychology (pp. 178–204). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781316662229.011.
