The way that people think about moral responsibility and personal freedom in their moral judgments is a complex issue that has been extensively theorized and researched from the perspective of Social Domain Theory. In this study, I offer a cultural reinterpretation of the Social Domain Theory of moral reasoning to examine how judgments about helping others are linked to cultural visions of morality and personal freedom within U.S. evangelical Christian religious cultures. Sixteen parent–child dyads from an evangelical Christian church produced conversations in response to hypothetical vignettes about helping others in need. Mixed quantitative and qualitative analyses revealed conceptions of personal freedom that prioritized personal regulation of self in line with standards for helping actions and desires determined by God, rather than personal determination of correct action and desire. Findings are interpreted and discussed in light of local conceptions of morality, self, and helping. I conclude by using these findings to illuminate the role of culture in constituting domains of social knowledge.
CausadiasJ. M. (2013). A roadmap for the integration of culture into developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 25(4pt2), 1375–1398.
3.
ChuangS. S. (2006). Taiwanese–Canadian mothers’ beliefs about personal freedom for their young children. Social Development, 15(3), 520–536.
4.
de WaalF. (2006). Morally evolved: Primate social instincts, human morality, and the rise and fall of “veneer theory.”. In: de WaalF. (Ed.), Primates and philosophers, (pp. 3–58). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5.
EisenbergN. (1986). Altruistic emotion, cognition, and behavior, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6.
FasuloA.LoydH.PadiglioneV. (2007). Children’s socialization into cleaning practices: A cross-cultural perspective. Discourse and Society, 18(1), 11–33.
7.
FungH.ChenE. C.-H. (2001). Across time and beyond skin: Self and transgression in the everyday socialization of shame among Taiwanese preschool children. Social Development, 10(3), 419–437.
8.
GoodnowJ. (2010). Culture. In: BornsteinM. (Ed.), Handbook of cultural developmental science, New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.
9.
GrahamJ.HaidtJ.KolevaS.MotylM.IyerR.WojcikS.DittoP. H. (2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47: 55–130.
10.
HaidtJ. (2003). Elevation and the positive psychology of morality. In: KeyesC. L. M.HaidtJ. (Eds.), Flourishing: Positive psychology and the life well-lived, (pp. 275–289). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
11.
HaidtJ. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion, New York, NY: Pantheon.
12.
HaidtJ.KesebirS. (2010). Morality. In: FiskeSTGilbertDTLindzeyG (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology, (5th edn., pp. 797–832). Hobeken, NJ: Wiley.
13.
HaidtJ.KollerS. H.DiasM. G. (1993). Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 613–628.
14.
HickmanJ.DiBianca FasoliA. (2015). The dynamics of ethical co-occurrence in Hmong and American evangelical families: New directions for three ethics research. In: JensenL. (Ed.), Moral development in a global world: Research from a cultural-developmental perspective, (pp. 141–169). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
15.
JensenL. A. (1997a). Culture wars: American moral divisions across the adult lifespan. Journal of Adult Development, 4(2), 107–121.
16.
JensenL. A. (1997b). Different worldviews, different morals: America’s culture war divide. Human Development, 40(6), 325–344.
17.
JensenL. A. (1998). Moral divisions within countries between orthodoxy and progressivism: India and the United States. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 37(1), 90–107.
18.
JensenL. A. (2004). Coding Manual: Ethics of autonomy, community, and divinity, (Revised). Retrieved from www.LeneArnettJensen.com
19.
JensenL. A. (2011). The cultural development of three fundamental ethics: Autonomy, community and divinity. Zygon, 46(1), 150–167.
20.
JensenL. A. (2015). How liberals and conservatives are alike and apart: A research autobiography. In: JensenL. A. (Ed.), Moral development in a global world: Research from a cultural-developmental perspective, (pp. 170–191). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
21.
JensenL. A.McKenzieJ. (2016). The moral reasoning of U.S. evangelical and mainline Protestant children, adolescents, and adults: A cultural-developmental study. Child Development, 87(2), 446–464.
22.
KillenM.SmetanaJ. G. (2015). Origins and development of morality. In: LambM. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, (7th edn., Vol. III., pp. 701–749). New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
23.
LagattutaK. H.NucciL.BosackiS. L. (2010). Bridging theory of mind and the personal domain: Children’s reasoning about resistance to parental control. Child Development, 81(2), 616–635.
24.
McKenzieJ.JensenL. A. (2016). Charting the moral life courses: A theory of moral development in U.S. evangelical and mainline protestant cultures. To appear in. Culture & Psychology,
25.
MacIntyreA. C. (2007). After virtue: A study in moral theory, Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
26.
MillerJ. G. (1991). A cultural perspective on the morality of beneficence and interpersonal responsibility. International and Intercultural Communication Annual, 15: 11–23.
27.
MillerJ. G. (2005). Essential role of culture in developmental psychology. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 109: 33–41.
28.
MillerJ. G. (2015). Taking culture and context into account in understanding moral development. In: JensenL. A. (Ed.), Moral development in a global world: Research from a cultural-developmental perspective, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 195–203.
29.
MillerJ. G.BersoffD. M. (1992). Culture and moral judgment: How are conflicts between justice and interpersonal responsibilities resolved?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(4), 541–554.
30.
MillerJ. G.BersoffD. M. (1998). The role of liking in perceptions of the moral responsibility to help: A cultural perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34(5), 443–469.
31.
MillerJ. G.BersoffD. M.HarwoodR. L. (1990). Perceptions of social responsibilities in India and in the United States: Moral imperatives or personal decisions?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(1), 33–47.
32.
MillerJ. G.LutherS. (1989). Issues of interpersonal responsibility and accountability: A comparison of Indians’ and Americans’ moral judgments. Social Cognition, 3: 237–261.
33.
MillerP.FungH. (2012). How socialization happens on the ground: Narrative practices as alternate socializing pathways in Taiwanese and European-American families: I. Introduction. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 77(1), 1–14.
34.
MillerP.LinS.ChenE.FungH. (2012). How socialization happens on the ground: Narrative practices as alternate socializing pathways in Taiwanese and European-American families: V. Children navigating stories. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 77(1), 77–104.
35.
NucciL. P. (1981). Conceptions of personal issues: A domain distinct from moral or societal concepts. Child Development, 52(1), 114–121.
36.
NucciL. P. (1996). Morality and the personal sphere of actions. In: ReedE.TurielE.BrownT. (Eds.), Values and knowledge, (pp. 41–60). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
37.
NucciL. P. (2014). The personal and the moral. In: KillenM.SmetanaJ. (Eds.), Handbook of moral development, (2nd edn., pp. 538–558). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
38.
NucciL. P.TurielE. (2000). The moral and the personal: Sources of social conflicts. In: NucciL.SaxeG.TurielE. (Eds.), Culture, thought, and development, (pp. 115–137). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
39.
NucciL.WeberE. K. (1995). Social interactions in the home and the development of young children’s conceptions of the personal. Child Development, 66(5), 1438–1452.
40.
Padilla-WalkerL. M.NelsonL. J. (2015). Moral worldviews of American religious emerging adults: Three patterns of negotiation between development and culture. In: JensenL. A. (Ed.), Moral development in a global world: Research from a cultural-developmental perspective, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 92–116.
RecchiaH. E.WainrybC.BourneS.PasupathiM. (2014). The construction of moral agency in mother–child conversations about helping and hurting across childhood and adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 50(1), 34–44.
43.
RichardsP. S.DavisonM. L. (1992). Religious bias in moral development research: A psychometric investigation. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 31(4), 467–485.
44.
ShwederR. A. (1999). Why cultural psychology?Ethos, 27(1), 62–73.
45.
ShwederR. A. (2014). Let me tell you a story about Hindu temples and run away trolleys: In honor of Sudhir Kakar. In: SharmaD. (Ed.), Psychoanalysis, culture, and religion, India: Oxford University Press, pp. 270–282.
46.
ShwederR. A.MahapatraM.MillerJ. G. (1987). Culture and moral development. The emergence of morality in young children, (pp. 1–83). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
47.
ShwederR.MuchN. (1991). Determinations of meaning: Discourse and moral socialization. In: ShwederR. (Ed.), Thinking through cultures: Expeditions in cultural psychology, (pp. 186–240). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
48.
ShwederR.MuchN.MahapatraM.ParkL. (1997). The “big three” of morality (autonomy, community, divinity) and the “big three” explanations of suffering. In: BrandtA.RozinP. (Eds.), Morality and health, (pp. 119–169). London, UK: Routledge.
49.
SmetanaJ. G. (1989). Adolescents’ and parents’ reasoning about actual family conflict. Child Development, 60(5), 1052–1067.
50.
SmetanaJ.JambonM.BallC. (2014). The social domain approach to children’s moral and social judgments. In: KillenM.SmetanaJ. (Eds.), Handbook of moral development, (2nd edn., pp. 23–45). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
51.
StarksB.RobinsonR. V. (2009). Two approaches to religion and politics: Moral cosmology and subcultural identity. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 48(4), 650–669.
52.
TrommsdorffG. (2015). The next step for the cultural-developmental approach: From moral reasoning to moral intentions and behavior. In: JensenLA (Ed.), Moral development in a global world: Research from a cultural-developmental perspective, (pp. 204–218). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
53.
TurielE. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
54.
VasquezK.KeltnerD.EbenbachD.BanaszynskiT. (2001). Cultural variation and similarity in moral rhetorics: Voices from the Philippines and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32: 93–120.
55.
WalkerL. J. (2004). Progress and prospects in the psychology of moral development. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 50(4), 546–557.
56.
WarrenS. R. (2003). Purpose driven life, Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan Publishing Company.
57.
WuthnowR. (1988). The restructuring of American religion: Society and faith since World War II, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
58.
YamadaH. (2004). Japanese mothers’ views of young children’s areas of personal discretion. Child development, 75(1), 164–179.
