Manifold forms of sensemaking processes and their simultaneity pose many questions about their integration and also on their development. Human beings mean their own experience and activity in the world by forms of symbolic meaning but also by several forms of embodied meaning, in an endo-semiotic and exo-semiotic key, such as the construction of artifacts, instruments, monuments, stories, myths. The culture in this perspective is not considered a repository of information and become an intersubjective process that develops over time and is rooted deeply in various embodied forms. Authors discuss the notion of threshold through two possible paths. The first one allows us to demarcate the boundaries of the domain of semiotic research and at the same time to reflect on the specificity of the different processes of sensemaking, from biological processes (vegetative and animal) to typically psychological processes, characteristic of human beings and of cultural dynamics. The second one deals with dynamics of transformation of the processes of sensemaking, claiming that the relationship between an organism and its environment has a gestaltic quality, whose form is constantly changing. The notion of threshold is developed in reference to the changes and transformations that mark discontinuous passages and developments within phases of stability.
BainsP. (2006) The primacy of semiosis: An ontology of relations, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
2.
BatesonG. (1979) Mind and nature: A necessary unity, New York: Dutton, pp. 238.
3.
Branco, A., & Valsiner, J. (2010). Towards cultural psychology of affective processes: Semiotic regulation of dynamic fields. Estudios de Psicología, 31(3), 243–251.
4.
Chiozza, L. A. (1976). Cuerpo, afecto y lenguaje: psicoanálisis y enfermedad somática (Vol. 66). Buenos Aires: Editorial Paidos.
5.
D'ArcyT. W. (1942) On Growth and form (Revised edn), Cambridge: Cambridge University.
6.
De Luca PicioneR. (2014) The case of Neuman’s “Computational Cultural Psychology”: An innovative theoretical proposal and welcomed toolbox advancements. Europe's Journal of Psychology10: 783–791.
7.
De Luca PicioneR. (2015) The idiographic approach in psychological research. The challenge of overcoming old distinctions without risking to homogenize. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science49: 360–370.
8.
De Luca PicioneR.DicèF.FredaM. F. (2015) La comprensione della diagnosi di DSD da parte delle madri. Uno studio sui processi di sensemaking attraverso una prospettiva semiotico-psicologica. Rivista di Psicologia della Salute2: 47–75.
9.
De Luca PicioneR.FredaM. F. (2014) Catalysis and morphogenesis: The contextual semiotic configuration of form, function, and fields of experience. In: CabellK. R.ValsinerJ. (eds) The catalyzing mind. Beyond models of causality. Annals of Theoretical PsychologyVol. 11, New York, NY: Springer, pp. 29–43.
10.
De Luca PicioneR.FredaM. F. (2015) The processes of meaning making, starting from the morphogenetic theories of René Thom. Culture & Psychology22: 139–157.
11.
De Luca PicioneR.FredaM. F. (2016) Borders and modal articulations. Semiotic constructs of sensemaking processes enabling a fecund dialogue between cultural psychology and clinical psychology. Journal of Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science50: 29–43. DOI 10.1007/s12124-015-9318-2.
12.
Eco, U. (1976). A theory of semiotics (W. Weaver, Trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
13.
Ehrenfels C. von (1890/1988). On “Gestalt Qualities”. In B. Smith (Ed. & Trans.), Foundations of Gestalt Theory (pp. 82–117). Wien: Philosophia Verlag.
14.
EspositoG.FredaM. F. (2015) Evaluating training context competence of use: Productive and unproductive models of use. Evaluation and Program Planning50: 77–87.
15.
EspositoG.FredaM. F. (2016) Reflective and agentive functions of narrative writing: A qualitative study on the narratives of university students. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science50(2): 333–357. doi: 10.1007/s12124-015-9323-5.
16.
Fabbri, P. (1998). La svolta semiotica. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
17.
FredaM. F. (2011) Understanding continuity to recognize discontinuity. Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science45(3): 335–346.
18.
FredaM. F.De Luca PicioneR. (2014) The identity as a system of translation of the boundary between subject and context. In: SalvatoreS.GennaroA.ValsinerJ. (eds) Yearbook of idiographic scienceVol. V, Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
19.
FredaM. F.De Luca PicioneR.MartinoM. L. (2015) Time of illness and illness of time. In: SimãoL. M.GuimarãesD. S.ValsinerJ. (eds) Temporality: Culture in the flow of human experience, Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publisher.
20.
GoetheJ. W. von. (1790) Versuch die metamorphose der pflanzen zu erklären, Gotha: Carl Wilhelm Ettinger.
21.
Goethe, J. W. von (1807/1817). Die Absichteingeleitet. In ZurMorphologie. Jena.
22.
GouldS. J. (1982) Exaptation – A missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology8(1): 4–15.
23.
InnisR. (2016) Between philosophy and cultural psychology: Pragmatist and semiotic reflections on the thresholds of sense. Culture & Psychology. 22(3), 331–361.
24.
KatzD. (1950) Gestalt psychology: Its nature and significance, New York, NY: Ronald.
25.
KoffkaK. (1935) Principles of Gestalt psychology, New York, NY: Harcourt Brace.
26.
KuhnT. S. (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
27.
KullK. (2001) Jakob von Uexküll: An introduction. Semiotica134: 1–59.
28.
KullK. (2009) Vegetative, animal, and cultural semiosis: The semiotic threshold zones. Cognitive Semiotics4(Supplement): 8–27.
29.
LangerS. K. (1967) Mind: An essay on human feelingVol. 1, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
30.
LotmanJ. (2000) Universe of the mind, Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.
31.
LotmanJ. (2005) On the semiosphere. Sign Systems Studies33(1): 205–229.
32.
LotmanJ. (2009) Culture and explosion, Berlin: De GruyterMouton.
33.
MargheritaG.GargiuloA.MartinoM. L. (2015) Dream narration in healthy and at-risk pregnancy. Dreaming25(2): 88–102.
34.
MartinoM. L.OnoratoR.D’OrianoV.FredaM. F. (2013) Donne e tumore al seno: Effetti del protocollo guidato di scrittura sui sintomi associati al disturbo post traumatico da stress. Psicologiadella Salute1: 125–137.
35.
MasulloP. A. (1992) Patosofia. L’antropologia relazionale di Viktor von Weizsäcker, Milano: Edizioni Angelo Guerini e Associati.
36.
MaturanaH. R.VarelaF. J. (1980) Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living (No. 42), Boston: Springer Science & Business Media.
37.
MaturanaH. R.VarelaF. J. (1987) The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding, Boston & London: New Science Library/Shambhala Publications.
38.
MaruyamaM. (1963) The second cybernetics, deviation-amplifying mutual causal process. American Scientist51: 164–179, 250–256.
39.
MaruyamaM. (1978) Heterogenistics and morphogenetics: Toward a new concept of the scientific. Theory and Society5: 75–96.
40.
MaruyamaM. (1980) Mindscapes and science theories. Current Anthropology21: 589–608.
41.
NeumanY. (2003) Processes and boundaries of the mind: Extending the limit line, New York: Academic/Plenum Publishers, Springer.
42.
NeumanY. (2008) Reviving the living: Meaning making in living systems, Oxford, United Kingdom: Elsevier.
43.
PeirceC. S. (1935) Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44.
SebeokT. (2001) Signs: An introduction to semiotics, (2nd edn. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
45.
SebeokT. A. (1986) I think I am a verb. More Contributions to the Doctrine of Signs, New York: Plenum.
46.
SebeokT. A. (1996) Signs, bridges, origins. In: TrabantJ. (ed.) The origins of language, Budapest: Collegium Budapest Institute for Advanced Study.
47.
SebeokT. A. (1999) The sign science and the life science. Applied Semiotics3(6/7): 85–96.
48.
SebeokT. A.DanesiM. (2000) The forms of meaning: Modeling systems theory and semiotic analysisVol. 1, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
49.
Spencer-BrownG. (1979) Laws of form, New York, NY: E.P. Dutton.
50.
TateoL. (2015) Giambattista Vico and the psychological imagination. Culture & Psychology21(2): 145–161.
51.
TateoL.MarsicoG. (2014) Open complementarity in cultural psychology. In: WagonerB.ChaudharyN.HviidP. (eds) Culture psychology and Its future: Complementarity in a New Key, Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, pp. 77–91.
52.
ThomR (1972) Stabilitè structurelle et morphogenesè, New York, Benjamin, Paris: Ediscience.
ThomR. (2006) Morfologia del semiotico, Roma: Meltemi Editore.
55.
TronickE. Z. (2004) Why is connection with others so critical? The formation of dyadic states of consciousness and the expansion of individuals' states of consciousness: Coherence-governed selection and the co-creation of meaning out of messy meaning making. In: NadelJ.MuirD. (eds) Emotional development, New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 293–315.
56.
TronickE. Z. (2007) The neurobehavioral and social emotional development of infants and children, New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
57.
UexküllJ. Von (1934/1957) A stroll through the world of animals and men: A picture book of invisible worlds. In: SchillerC. (eds) Instinctive behavior: The development of a modern concept, New York, NY: International Universities Press, pp. 5–80.
58.
Valsiner, J. (2005). Open intransitivity cycles in the processes of development and their methodological implications. Invited Lecture – IV Congresso Norte Nordeste de Psicologia, Salvador, Bahia.
59.
ValsinerJ. (2007) Culture in minds and societies: Foundations of cultural psychology, New Delhi: Sage.
60.
ValsinerJ. (2014) An invitation to cultural psychology, London: Sage.
61.
Valsiner, J., & Rudolph, L. (2011). Who shall survive? Psychology that replaces quantification with qualitative mathematics. In Abbey, E. (ed.), Emerging methods in psychology (pp. 121–140). Seth Surgan. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
62.
WeizsäckerV. V. (1940) Der Gestaltkreis. Theorie der Einheit von Wahrnehmen und Bewegen, Leipzig: Georg Thieme-Verlag.
