Abstract
Matusov distinguishes two usually counterposed modern schools of psychology that stem from Vygotsky's theory, the sociocultural and cultural-historical. I suggest that the sociocultural approach is fundamentally deficient in ignoring a need for cognitive analysis and not taking seriously the notion of hierarchical development. Problems that arise from the acognitive-adevelopmental position of the sociocultural approach are analyzed in respect of three issues: ethnocentrism, the natural-cultural line of development, and testing in education. The cultural-historical approach, in turn, is deficient in ignoring cultural diversity and the content of the psyche. The superficially opposed sociocultural and cultural-historical Vygotskian schools complement each other if it is realized that both schools represent different levels of analysis.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
