Voelklein and Howarth's article characterizes social representations theory
(SRT) in the light of criticism from British discursive psychology and focuses on a
number of critical issues that are consistently misinterpreted in theoretical
interpretations of SRT. I argue that on a more general level, difficulties in proper
understanding of SRT stem from its underlying dialectical assumptions. Some critical
points related to SRT that are most often misinterpreted are discussed: aggregate
and systemic concepts of sociality, individual agency, the role of social practice,
among others.
Bauer, M.W.
, &
Gaskell, G.
(1999).
Towards a paradigm for research on social representations
. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 29,
163–185
.
2.
HarrÈ, R.
(1998). The epistemology of social
representations. In
U. Flick
(Ed.), The psychology of the social(pp.
129–137).
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
Levin, K.
(1939).
Field theory and experiment in social psychology: Concepts and methods
. American Journal of Sociology, 44,
868–897
.
5.
Liu, L.
(2004).
Sensitizing concept, themata and sharedness: A dialogical perspective of
social representations
. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 34,
249–264
.
6.
Lom, P.
(Director). (2004). Bride kidnapping in Kyrgyzstan. A
documentary sponsored by the Soros Foundation, Canada/Kyrgyzstan.
7.
Lotman, J.
(1992a). O semiosfere [On the semiosphere]. In
Izbrannyie stati [Collected articles] (Vol. 1, pp.
11–24).
Tallinn: Aleksandra
.
8.
Lotman, J.
(1992b). Semiotika kultury i ponyatie telska [Semiotics of
culture and the notion of text]. In Izbrannyie stati [Collected
articles] (Vol. 1, pp. 129–132).
Tallinn: Aleksandra
.
9.
Marková, I.
(2000).
AmÈdÈe or How to get rid of it: Social
representations from a dialogical perspective
. Culture & Psychology, 6,
419–460
.
10.
Moscovici, S. (1961). La psychanalyse, son image et son public.
Paris: Presses Universitaires de France (2nd ed., 1976).
11.
Moscovici, S. (1988). La machine ‡ faire des dieux.
Paris. Fayard.
12.
Moscovici, S.
(1990). The generalized self and mass society. In
H.T. Himmelweit
&
G. Gaskell
(Eds.), Societal psychology(pp.
66–91).
London: Sage
.
13.
Moscovici, S.
(1992).
Social representations and pragmatic communication
. Social Science Information, 33,
163–177
.
14.
Moscovici, S.
(1997). Social representations theory and social
constructionism (http://psyberlink.flogiston.ru/internet/bits/mosc1.htm).
15.
Moscovici, S.
(1998). The history and actuality of social
representations. In
U. Flick
(Ed.), The psychology of the social(pp.
209–247).
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
16.
Moscovici, S.
(2001). Why a theory of social representations?
In
K. Deaux
&
G. Philogène
(Eds.), Representations of the social: Bridging theoretical
traditions (pp. 8–35).
Oxford: Blackwell
.
17.
Moscovici, S.
, &
Marková, I.
(1998).
Presenting social representations: A conversation
. Culture & Psychology, 4,
371–410
.
18.
Stetsenko, A.
, &
Arievitch, I.M.
(2004).
The self in cultural-historical activity theory: Reclaiming the unity of
social and individual dimensions of human development
. Theory & Psychology, 14,
475–503
.
19.
Valsiner, J.
(2003).
Enabling a theory of enablement: In search for a theory–method link
. Papers on Social Representations, 12,
12.1–12.8
.
20.
Voelklein, C.
, &
Howarth, C.S.
(2005).
A review of controversies about social representations theory: A British debate
. Culture & Psychology, 11,
431–454
.
21.
Vygotsky, L.S.
(1984). Orudie i znak v razvitii rebyonka [The role of
tools and signs in child development]. In Sobraniye sochinenii
[Collected papers] (Vol. 6, pp. 5–90).
Moscow: Pedagogika
.
22.
Wagner, W.
(1994).
Fields of research and socio-genesis of social representations: A
discussion of criteria and diagnostics
. Social Science Information, 33,
199–228
.
23.
Wagner, W.
(1995).
Social representations, group affiliation and projection: Knowing the
limits of validity
. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25,
125–139
.
24.
Wagner, W.
(1998).
Social representations and beyond: Brute facts, symbolic coping and
domesticated worlds
. Culture & Psychology, 4,
297–330
.
25.
Wertsch, J.V.
(1995).
Sociocultural research in the copyright age
. Culture & Psychology, 1,
81–102
.
