Review Essay: Social Knowledge and Social Representations: Boon and Bane of Complex Integrative Concepts

Abstract

Sandra Jovchelovitch claims to evaluate knowledge in reference to social contexts and functions. She develops a widespread social-psychological approach. Central in her conceptual framework is the construct of representation. Representations are the matter and substance of knowledge and situated at the intersection of self, social interactions and objective world. The excellence of the contribution consists in its integrative power. On the other hand the central concepts of knowledge and representation often remain ambiguous and inconsistent. Actual developments in constructivism and systems theory (e.g. the work of Niklas Luhmann) could offer a theoretical framework to capture the dialectic and dynamic relationship between the individual and the social.

Keywords

constructivism culture social context social knowledge social representations systems theory

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bachelard, G. (1996). La formation de l'esprit scientifique: Contribution à une psychanalyse de la connaissance (16th ed.). Paris: Libraire Philosophique J. Vrin .

Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind: Essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution and epistemology. San Francisco, CA: Chandler.

Foerster, H. von. (1981). Das Konstruieren einer Wirklichkeit. In P. Watzlawick (Ed.), Die erfundene Wirklichkeit (pp. 39-60). Munich: Piper.

Freire, P. (2001). Pedagogy of freedom, democracy and civic courage . Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield .

Glasersfeld, E. von. (1997). Einführung in den Radikalen Konstruktivismus. In P. Watzlawick (Ed.), Die erfundene Wirklichkeit (9 ed., pp. 16-38). Munich : Piper.

Habermas, J. (1991). The theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization of society. Cambridge: Polity.

Jodelet, D. (1991). Madness and social representations. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester/Wheatsheaf.

Luhmann, N. (1984). Soziale Systeme: Grundriss einer allgemeinen Theorie . Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Luhmann, N. (2005a). Einführung in die Theorie der Gesellschaft. Heidelberg: Carl-Auer-Systeme.

10.

Luhmann, N. (2005b). Konstruktivistische Perspektiven (3rd ed.). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

11.

Maturana, H. , & Varela, F. (1987). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Boston, MA: Random House.

12.

Mead, G.H. (1932). Mind, self and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

13.

Moscovici, S. (1961). La psychanalyse, son image et son public. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

14.

Moscovici, S. (1989). Des représentations collectives aux représentations sociales: Éléments pour une histoire. In D. Jodelet (Ed.), Les représentations sociales (pp. 62-86). Paris : Presses Universitaire de France.

15.

Moscovici, S. (2000). Social representations: Explorations in social psychology. Cambridge: Polity.

16.

Moscovici, S. (2007). Psychoanalysis and its public. Cambridge: Polity.

17.

Piaget, J. , & Inhelder, B. (1969). The psychology of the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

18.

Schmidt, S.J. (Ed.). (1987). Der Diskurs des Radikalen Konstruktivismus. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

19.

Stern, D. (1974). Mother and infant at play: The dyadic interaction involving facial, vocal and gaze behaviour. In M.L. Lewis & L. Rosenblum (Eds.), The effect of the infant on its caregiver (pp. 187-213). New York: Wiley.

20.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of the higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

21.

Winnicott, D.W. (1965). The maturational process and the facilitating environment. London: Hogarth.

22.

Winnicott, D.W. (1971). Playing and reality. London : Tavistock.