The conception of duty that is outlined by the Moghaddam, Slocum, Finkel, Mor and HarrÈ (2000) is primarily based on the language of rights. Arights-based code is put into service by many Americans to understand conceptions of duty. There is much to be gained by locating the ‘social psychology’ of duty- and rights-based discourses with present-day India. Currently in India, alongside the multiple duty-based traditions of Hinduism, Buddhism and Jainism, there also exists a discourse about western notions of liberal humanism and secular ideologies of human rights. The discussion suggests that both duty- and rights-based discourses need reexamination because they have implications for how we make meanings about issues of morality and selfhood across cultures.
Aziz, N.
(1999). The human rights debate in an era of globalization: Hegemony of discourses. In V.N. Peter (Ed.), Debating human rights(pp. 31–55). New York: Routledge.
2.
Bhatia, S.
(in press). Language socialization and the construction of sociomoral meanings. Journal of Moral Education, 29.
3.
Biliomoria, P.
(1993). Is adhikaragood enough for ‘rights’?Asian Philosophy, 3, 3–13.
4.
Brown, C.
(1999). Universal human rights: A critique. In T. Dunne & N.J. Wheeler (Eds.), Human rights in global politics(pp. 103–127). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Chih-yu, S.
(1999). Human rights as identities: Difference and discrimination in Taiwan’s China policy. In V.N. Peter (Ed.), Debating human rights(pp. 21–144). New York: Routledge.
6.
Cushman, P.
(1990). Why the self is empty: Towards a historically situated psychology. American Psychologist, 45, 599–611.
7.
de Bary, W.T.
(1998). Asian values and human rights. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
de Bary, W.T.
, & Weiming, T. (1998). Confucianism and human rights. New York: Columbia University Press.
9.
Derrett, D.J.
(1978). The concept of duty in ancient Indian jurisprudence: The problem of ascertainment. In W.D. O’Flaherty & J.D. Derrett (Eds.), The concept of duty in South Asia(pp. 18–65). New Delhi: Vikas.
10.
Donnelly, C.
(1999). The social construction of international human rights. In T. Dunne & N.J. Wheeler (Eds.), Human rights in global politics(pp. 80–81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Dumont, L.
(1986). Essays on individualism: Modern ideology in anthropological perspective. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12.
Fromm, E.
(1955). The sane society.New York: Fawcett Premier.
13.
Hann, C.
(1997). The nation-state, religion and uncivil society: Two perspectives from the periphery. Daedalus, 126, 27–45.
14.
Jhingran, S.
(1989). Aspects of Hindu morality. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
15.
Kakar, S.
(1996). The Indian psyche. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16.
Kinsley, D.R.
(1993). Hinduism: A cultural perspective. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
17.
Madan, T.N.
(1987). Non-renunciation: Themes and interpretations of Hindu culture. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
18.
Maslow, A.H.
(1961). Peak experiences as acute identity-experiences. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 21, 254–260.
19.
Moghaddam, F.M.
(1999, June 3–6). Toward a social psychology of duties. Presented to the American Psychological Society, 11th Annual Convention, Denver, CO.
20.
Moghaddam, F.M.
, Slocum, N.R., Finkel, N., Mor, T., & HarrÈ, R. (2000). Toward a cultural theory of duties. Culture & Psychology, 6, 275–303.
21.
Muzzafar, C.
(1993). Human rights and the new world order. Penang: Just World Trust.
22.
Nandy, A.
(1983). The intimate enemy: Loss and recovery of self under colonialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23.
O’Flaherty, W.D.
, & Derrett, D.J. (1978). Introduction. In W.D. O’Flaherty & J.D. Derrett (Eds.), The concept of duty in South Asia(pp. xiii–xix). New Delhi: Vikas.
24.
Rogers, C.
(1961). On becoming a person. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
25.
Shweder, R.A.
, Mahapatra M., & Miller J.G. (1990). Cultural and moral development. In J.W. Stigler, R.A. Shweder, & G. Herdt (Eds.), Cultural psychology: Essays on comparative human development(pp. 130–204). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26.
Taylor, C.
(1989). Sources of the self: The making of modern identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27.
Vanaik, A.
(1997). The furies of Indian communalism: Religion, modernity and secularization. New York: Verso.
