The contested meaning-making of diplomatic norms: competence in practice in Southeast Asian multilateralism

Abstract

The supposedly fixed set of norms within the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), commonly referred to as the “ASEAN way,” is both celebrated and maligned as a key element of Southeast Asian diplomacy. In this article, we contest this orthodoxy through a practitioner-near account of ASEAN diplomatic norms in practice. We find that the “ASEAN way” is best understood as a rhetorical commonplace, a well-established topological resource that social agents use to advance and contest claims of competent diplomatic practice in the ASEAN community of practice. We build on and bridge insights from norm contestation, practice theory, and discourse literatures to develop an original framework for the study of contestation in communities of practice. Drawing from documentary evidence and 61 interviews with practitioners of ASEAN diplomacy, we illustrate our argument by examining contestation in practice in the context of the organization’s response to the Rohingya crisis and the South China Sea disputes.

Keywords

Regionalization constructivism norms governance discourse diplomacy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Acharya

(2014) Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN And the Problem of Regional Order. New York: Routledge.

Adler

Pouliot

(2011) International practices. International Theory 3(1): 1–36.

Adler-Nissen

(2011) Inter- and transnational field(s) of power: on a field trip with Bourdieu. International Political Sociology 5(1): 327–330.

Adler-Nissen

(2014) Opting Out of the European Union: Diplomacy, Sovereignty and European Integration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Adler-Nissen

Pouliot

(2014) Power in practice: negotiating the international intervention in Libya. European Journal of International Relations 20(4): 889–911.

ASEAN (2003) Joint communiqué of the 36th AMM, 17 June.

ASEAN (2005) Joint communiqué of the 38th AMM, 26 July.

ASEAN (2007) Joint communiqué of the 40th AMM, 30 July.

ASEAN-Malaysia Secretariat (2016) ASEAN foreign ministers’ meeting on the Rohingya: foreign minister of Malaysia to lead delegation to Yangon, Myanmar 19 December 2016. Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)-Malaysia Secretariat, 19 December. Available at: https://myasean.kln.gov.my/index.php/latest/113-asean-foreign-ministers-meeting-on-the-rohingya-foreign-minister-of-malaysia-to-lead-delegation-to-yangon-myanmar-19-december-2016 (accessed 29 July 2022).

10.

(2009) [Re]negotiating East and Southeast Asia: Region, Regionalism and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

11.

(2019) ASEAN’s constructed dichotomies: the ongoing need for complexity-sensitive research agendas. Pacific Review 582–592.

12.

Bangkok Post (2012) Asean divided against itself. Bangkok Post, 16 July. Available at: https://www.bangkokpost.com/opinion/opinion/302589/asean-divided-against-itself

13.

Basilio

(2012) Why there’s no ASEAN communiqué. Philippine Daily Inquirer, 19 July. Available at: https://www.pressreader.com/philippines/philippine-daily-inquirer-1109/20120719/281505043336441

14.

Bernstein

Laurence

(2022) Practices and norms: relationships, disjunctures and change. In: Drieschova

Bueger

Hopf

(eds) Conceptualizing International Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 77–99.

15.

Bode

Karlsrud

(2019) Implementation in practice: the use of force to protect civilians in United Nations peacekeeping. European Journal of International Affairs 25(2): 458–485.

16.

Bower

(2012) China reveals its hand on ASEAN in Phnom Penh. CSIS Commentary, 20 July. Available at: https://www.csis.org/analysis/china-reveals-its-hand-asean-phnom-penh

17.

Boyle

(2018) ASEAN talks tough on Rohingya crisis. Voice of America News, 5 October. Available at: https://www.voanews.com/a/asean-talks-tough-rohingya-crisis/4601349.html

18.

Bueger

(2013) Communities of security practice at work? The emerging African maritime security regime. African Security 6(3–4): 297–316.

19.

Bueger

(2014) Pathways to practice: praxiography and international politics. European Political Science Review 6(3): 383–406.

20.

Bueger

Gadinger

(2015) The play of international practice. International Studies Quarterly 59(3): 449–460.

21.

Caballero-Anthony

(2005) Regional Security in Southeast Asia: Beyond the ASEAN Way. Singapore: ISEAS.

22.

Channel News Asia (2018) Mahathir at UN condemns Myanmar’s treatment of Rohingya. Channel News Asia, 29 September. Available at: https://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asia/mahathir-at-un-condemns-myanmar-s-treatment-of-rohingya-10770568 (accessed 27 July 2022).

23.

Chongkittavorn

(2012a) Asean and China—Bickering threatens consensus. Irrawaddy, 10 September. Available at: https://www.irrawaddy.com/opinion/guest-column/asean-and-china-bickering-threatens-consensus.html (accessed 27 July 2022).

24.

Chongkittavorn

(2012b) Key players holding ASEAN hostage! Nation, 15 July. Available at: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/opinion/Key-players-holding-Asean-hostage!-30186219.html (accessed 27 July 2022).

25.

Collins

(2019) W(h)Ither the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), w(h)Ither constructivism: fixity of norms and the ASEAN way. International Relations 33(3): 413–432.

26.

Dancel

(2017) Philippines “respects” Malaysia’s dissent on Asean’s Rakhine crisis statement. Strait Times, 25 September. Available at: https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/philippines-respects-malaysias-dissent-on-aseans-rakhine-crisis-statement (accessed 27 July 2022).

27.

Davies

(2016) A community of practice: explaining change and continuity in ASEAN’s diplomatic environment. Pacific Review 29(2): 211–233.

28.

Davies

(2017) Is ASEAN a newfound voice for the Rohingya? East Asia Forum, 28 March. Available at: https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2017/03/28/rohingya-a-threat-to-asean-stability/ (accessed 27 July 2022).

29.

Davies

(2018) Ritual and Region: The Invention of ASEAN. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

30.

Deitelhoff

Zimmermann

(2019) Norms under challenge: unpacking the dynamics of norm robustness. Journal of Global Security Studies 4(1): 2–17.

31.

Doty

(1997) Aporia: a critical exploration of the agent-structure problematique in international relations theory. European Journal of International Relations 3(3): 365–392.

32.

Emmerson

(2012) ASEAN stumbles in Phnom Penh. East Asia Forum, 23 July. Available at: https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2012/07/23/asean-stumbles-in-phnom-penh-2/

33.

Emmerson

(2017) Mapping ASEAN’s Futures. Contemporary Southeast Asia 39(2): 280–287.

34.

Epstein

(2008) The Power of Words in International Relations: Birth of an Anti-whaling Discourse. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

35.

Faizullaev

Cornut

(2017) Narrative PRACTICE in international politics and diplomacy: the case of the crimean crisis. Journal of International Relations and Development 20(3): 578–604.

36.

Freistein

(2013) ‘A living document’: promises of the ASEAN Charter. Pacific Review 26(4): 407–429.

37.

Glas

(2017) Habits of peace: long-term regional cooperation in Southeast Asia. European Journal of International Relations 23(4): 833–856.

38.

Glas

(2022) Practicing Peace: Conflict Management in Southeast Asia and South America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

39.

Glas

Laurence

(2022) Changing norms in practice: noninterference in the UN and ASEAN. Journal of Global Security Studies 7(2): ogac003.

40.

Haacke

(2003) Asean’s Diplomatic and Security Culture: Origins, Development and Prospects. New York: Routledge.

41.

Haacke

(2005) “Enhanced interaction” with Myanmar and the project of a security community: is ASEAN refining or breaking with its diplomatic and security culture? Contemporary Southeast Asia 27(2): 188–216.

42.

Hansen

(2006) Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War. London; New York: Routledge.

43.

Heydarian

(2021) Myanmar’s coup splits an already deeply divided region. Asia Times, 5 February. Available at: https://asiatimes.com/2021/02/myanmars-coup-splits-an-already-deeply-divided-region/ (accessed 27 July 2022).

44.

Hos

(2012) Communiqué only through full consensus. Philippine Star, 30 July. Available at: https://www.philstar.com/other-sections/letters-to-the-editor/2012/07/30/832894/communiqu-only-through-full-consensus

45.

Jackson

(2006) Civilizing the Enemy: German Reconstruction and the Invention of the West. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

46.

Jones

Smith

MLR

(2007) Making process, not progress: ASEAN and the evolving East Asian Regional Order. International Security 32(1): 148–184.

47.

Jones

(2008) ASEAN’s Albatross: ASEAN’s Burma Policy, from Constructive Engagement to Critical Disengagement. Asian Security 4(3): 271–293.

48.

Jones

(2010) ASEAN’s unchanged melody? The theory and practice of “non-Interference” in Southeast Asia. Pacific Review 23(4): 479–502.

49.

Jurkovitch

(2020) What isn’t a norm? Redefining the conceptual boundaries of “norms” in the human rights literature. International Studies Review 22(3): 693–711.

50.

Kao

(2012) Govt takes issue with PDZ story. Phnom Penh Post, 20 July. Available at: http://www.cambodianembassy.jp/web2/?p=191

51.

Kassim

(2012) ASEAN and China navigating turbulent waters ahead. Nation, 24 August. Available at: https://www.nationthailand.com/opinion/30189015

52.

Katsumata

(2004) Why is ASEAN diplomacy changing? From “non-interference” to ‘open and frank discussions. Asian Survey 44(2): 237–254.

53.

Kivimäki

(2001) The long peace of ASEAN. Journal of Peace Research 38(1): 5–25.

54.

Kornporbst

(2014) From political judgements to public justifications (and vice versa): how communities generate reasons upon which to act. European Journal of International Relations 20(1): 192–216.

55.

Koy

(2012a) Letter to Mr. Kevin Doyle, Editor-in-Chief. Cambodia Daily, 19 July. Available at: http://www.cambodianembassy.jp/web2/?m=201207

56.

Koy

(2012b) Setting the record straight. Phnom Penh Post, 25 July. Available at: https://www.phnompenhpost.com/national/setting-record-straight-0

57.

Krebs

Jackson

(2007) Twisting tongues and twisting arms: the power of political. European Journal of International Relations 13(1): 35–66.

58.

Loh

DMH

(2020) Institutional habitus, state identity, and China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs. International Studies Review 22(4): 879–902.

59.

Martel

(2020) The polysemy of security community-building: toward a “people-centered” Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)? International Studies Quarterly 64(3): 588–599.

60.

Martel

(2022) Enacting the Security Community: ASEAN’s Never-Ending Story. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

61.

Milliken

(1999) The study of discourse in international relations: a critique of research and methods. European Journal of International Relations 5(2): 225–254.

62.

Mitton

(2012) ASEAN struggles for unity. Phnom Penh Post, 23 July. Available at: https://www.phnompenhpost.com/columns/asean-struggles-unity

63.

Mogato

Grudgings

(2012) “ASEAN Way” founders in South China Sea storm. Reuters, 17 July. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-asean-china/asean-way-founders-in-south-china-sea-storm-idUSBRE86G09N20120717

64.

Mustapha

(2019) Writing Southeast Asian Security: Regional Security and the War on Terror after 9/11. New York: Routledge.

65.

Nair

(2019) Saving face in diplomacy: a political sociology of face-to-face interactions in the association of Southeast Asian Nations. European Journal of International Relations 25(3): 672–697.

66.

Narine

(2002) Explaining ASEAN: Regionalism in Southeast Asia. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

67.

Natalegawa

(2018) Does ASEAN Matter? A View from within. Singapore: ISEAS Publishing.

68.

Neumann

(2002) Returning practice to the linguistic turn: the case of diplomacy. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 31(3): 627–651.

69.

Neumann

(2007) “A speech that the entire ministry may stand for,” or: why diplomats never produce anything new. International Political Sociology 1(2): 183–200.

70.

Niemann

Schillinger

(2017) Contestation ‘all the way down’? The grammar of contestation in norm research. Review of International Studies 43(1): 29–49.

71.

Pouliot

(2010) International Security in Practice: The Politics of Nato-russia Diplomacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

72.

Prak

Rondonuwu

(2020) ASEAN urges South China Sea pact but consensus elusive. Reuters, 20 July. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-asean-sea/asean-urges-south-china-sea-pact-but-consensus-elusive-idUSBRE86J09W20120720 (accessed 27 July 2022).

73.

Pratt

(2020) From norms to normative configurations: a pragmatist and relational approach to theorizing normativity in IR. International Theory 12(1): 59–82.

74.

Ralph

Gifkins

(2017) The purpose of United Nations Security Council practice: contesting competence claims in the normative context created by the Responsibility to Protect. European Journal of International Relations 23(3): 630–653.

75.

Ruggie

(1998) What makes the world hang together? Neo-utilitarianism and the social constructivist challenge. International Organization 52(4): 855–885.

76.

Rüland

(2000) ASEAN and the Asian crisis: theoretical implications and practical consequences for Southeast Asian regionalism. Pacific Review 13(3): 421–451.

77.

Siagian

(2012) Insight: the un-ASEAN way of treating unresolved issues. Jakarta Post, 16 July. Available at: https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2012/07/16/the-un-asean-way-treating-unresolved-issues.html (accessed 27 July 2022).

78.

Storey

(2015) ASEAN’s failing grade in the South China Sea. ASAN Forum, 31 July. Available at: http://www.theasanforum.org/aseans-failing-grade-in-the-south-china-sea/ (accessed 27 July 2022).

79.

Stubbs

(2019) ASEAN sceptics versus ASEAN proponents: evaluating regional institutions. Pacific Review 32(6): 923–950.

80.

Tan

(2013) The Making of the Asia Pacific: Knowledge Brokers and the Politics of Representation. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

81.

Tan

(2015) Claims of Asean disunity at summit unfounded. Strait Times, 26 November. Available at: https://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/claims-of-asean-disunity-at-summit-unfounded (accessed 27 July 2022).

82.

Tani

(2018) ASEAN aims to express “concern” on Rohingya crisis for first time. Nikkei Asian Review, 13 November. Available at: https://asia.nikkei.com/Politics/International-relations/ASEAN-aims-to-express-concern-on-Rohingya-crisis-for-first-time (accessed 27 July 2022).

83.

Tansubhapol

(2012) Foreign ministers unhappy after meeting. Bangkok Post, 15 July. Available at: https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/politics/302485/foreign-ministers-unhappy-after-meeting (accessed 27 July 2022).

84.

Tay

SSC

Estanislao

Soesastro

(2001) Reinventing ASEAN. Singapore: ISEAS Publishing.

85.

Thayer

(2012) ASEAN’s code of conduct in the South China Sea: a litmus test for community-building? The Asia-pacific Journal 10(34): 1–22.

86.

The Guardian (2016) Malaysia PM urges world to act against “genocide” of Myanmar’s Rohingya. The Guardian, 4 December. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/dec/04/malaysia-pm-urges-world-to-act-against-genocide-of-myanmars-rohingya (accessed 27 July 2022).

87.

True

Wiener

(2019) Everyone wants (a) peace: the dynamics of rhetoric and practice on “women, peace and security.” International Affairs 95(3): 553–574.

88.

Wæver

(2002) Identity, communities and foreign policy: discourse analysis as foreign policy theory. In: Hansen

Wæver

(eds) European Integration and National Identity—the Challenge of the Nordic States. New York: Routledge, pp. 20–49.

89.

Wiener

(2009) Enacting meaning-in-use: qualitative research on norms and international relations. Review of International Studies 35(1): 175–193.

90.

Williams

(2015) Myanmar: Rohingya comments show Mahathir “out of touch.” Anadolu Agency, 16 June. Available at: https://www.aa.com.tr/en/politics/myanmar-rohingya-comments-show-mahathir-out-of-touch/35876 (accessed 27 July 2022).

91.

You

(2012) Cambodia not at fault over joint communique. Nation, 24 July. Available at: https://www.nationthailand.com/noname/30186893 (accessed 27 July 2022).

92.

Yukawa

(2018) The ASEAN way as a symbol: an analysis of discourses on the ASEAN norms. Pacific Review 31(3): 298–314.

93.

Yunus

(2016) Najib tells Suu Ky “enough is enough” at Rohingya solidarity rally. New Strait Times, 4 December. Available at: https://www.nst.com.my/news/2016/12/194271/najib-tells-suu-kyi-enough-enough-rohingya-solidarity-rally-video (accessed 27 July 2022).