Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

How does a state initially form its stance on artificial intelligence (AI) governance before projecting it onto the international stage? Drawing on field theory, this article argues that such formation is both a pluralistic process – where diverse normativities, or understandings of appropriateness, emerge across intersecting yet distinct fields – and a dynamic one, shaped by competition among various actors seeking to influence the state’s overall approach. Using China as a least-likely case study, this article finds that different normativities of AI governance emerge across three fields: security, technology and diplomacy. These variations are driven by two factors: (1) the specific issues at stake within each field and (2) the dominant actors whose practices produce these normativities. It introduces two mechanisms to explain how these diverse normativities combine to shape China’s overarching, state-level normativity regarding AI governance. This analysis extends a Bourdieu-informed perspective on norm research, showing the complexity and fluidity of emerging normativities as well as the hierarchies and power relations that shape them. It also offers empirical insights for working with China on prospective global AI governance frameworks.

Keywords

artificial intelligence governance China constructivism norms and normativity practice theory technology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Acharya

(2004) How ideas spread: Whose norms matter? Norm localization and institutional change in Asian regionalism. International Organization 58(2): 239–275.

Acharya

(2011) Norm subsidiarity and regional orders: Sovereignty, regionalism, and rule-making in the third world. International Studies Quarterly 55(1): 95–123.

Adler

(2008) The spread of security communities: Communities of practice, self-restraint, and NATO’s Post – Cold War transformation. European Journal of International Relations 14(2): 195–230.

Adler

(2019) World Ordering: A Social Theory of Cognitive Evolution. Cambridge University Press.

Adler

Pouliot

(2011) International practices. International Theory 3(1): 1–36.

Adler-Nissen

(2012) Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethinking Key Concepts in IR. Routledge.

Adler-Nissen

Pouliot

(2014) Power in practice: Negotiating the international intervention in Libya. European Journal of International Relations 20(4): 889–911.

Allen

(2019) Understanding China’s AI Strategy: Clues to Chinese Strategic Thinking on Artificial Intelligence and National Security. Center for a New American Security. Available at: https://www.cnas.org/publications/reports/understanding-chinas-ai-strategy

Björkdahl

(2008) Norm advocacy: A small state strategy to influence the EU. Journal of European Public Policy 15(1): 135–154.

10.

Bode

(2015) Individual Agency and Policy Change at the United Nations. Routledge. Available at: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781317615149

11.

Bode

(2023) Practice-based and public-deliberative normativity: Retaining human control over the use of force. European Journal of International Relations 29(4): 990–1016.

12.

Bode

(2024) Emergent normativity: Communities of practice, technology, and lethal autonomous weapon systems. Global Studies Quarterly 4(1): ksad073.

13.

Bode

Karlsrud

(2019) Implementation in practice: The use of force to protect civilians in United Nations peacekeeping. European Journal of International Relations 25(2): 458–485.

14.

Bode

Watts

TFA

(2023) Loitering Munitions and Unpredictability: Autonomy in Weapon Systems and Challenges to Human Control. Center for War Studies. Available at: https://usercontent.one/wp/www.autonorms.eu/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Loitering-Munitions-Unpredictability-WEB.pdf?media=1629963761

15.

Bode

Huelss

Nadibaidze

, et al. (2023) Prospects for the global governance of autonomous weapons: Comparing Chinese, Russian, and US practices. Ethics and Information Technology 25(1): 5.

16.

Bourdieu

(1985) The social space and the genesis of groups. Social Science Information 24(2): 723–744.

17.

Bourdieu

(1986) The forms of capital. In: Richardson

(ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Greenwood Press, pp. 241–258.

18.

Bourdieu

(1994) The Field of Cultural Production. Columbia University Press.

19.

Bourdieu

(1998) Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action. Polity Press.

20.

Bourdieu

(2005) The Social Structures of the Economy. Polity Press.

21.

Bourdieu

Wacquant

(1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. University of Chicago Press.

22.

Bower

(2015) Arguing with law: Strategic legal argumentation, US diplomacy, and debates over the International Criminal Court. Review of International Studies 41(2): 337–360.

23.

Breslin

Nesadurai

HES

(2018) Who governs and how? Non-state actors and transnational governance in Southeast Asia. Journal of Contemporary Asia 48(2): 187–203.

24.

Bueger

Gadinger

(2018) International Practice Theory. Springer. Available at: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-73350-0

25.

CAC (2021) Regulations on the management of algorithmic recommendation in internet information services. Available at: https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2022-01/04/content_5666429.htm

26.

CAC (2022) Regulations on the management of deep synthesis in Internet information services. Available at: https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2022-12/12/content_5731431.htm

27.

CAC (2023) Measures for the management of generative AI services. Available at: https://www.cac.gov.cn/2023-07/13/c_1690898327029107.htm

28.

CAICT (2022) White papers on AI. Available at: http://www.caict.ac.cn/kxyj/qwfb/bps/202204/P020220412613255124271.pdf

29.

CESI (2021) AI standardisation white paper. Available at: https://www.cesi.cn/202107/7796.html

30.

Chan

(2024) Public administration in authoritarian regimes: Propositions for comparative research. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration 46(3): 213–235.

31.

Chin

(2018) China spends more on domestic security as Xi’s powers grow. The Wall Street Journal, 6 March. Available at: https://www.wsj.com/articles/china-spends-more-on-domestic-security-as-xis-powers-grow-1520358522

32.

China Law Translate (2023) Comparison chart of current vs. draft rules for generative AI. Available at: https://www.chinalawtranslate.com/en/comparison-chart-of-current-vs-draft-rules-for-generative-ai/

33.

Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2024) Remarks by China’s permanent representative to the UN Ambassador Fu Cong at the UN Security Council Briefing on artificial intelligence. Available at: https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/xw/zwbd/202412/t20241225_11517873.html?ref=blog.denic.de

34.

Clapp

Swanston

(2009) Doing away with plastic shopping bags: International patterns of norm emergence and policy implementation. Environmental Politics 18(3): 315–332.

35.

Coleman

(2013) Locating norm diplomacy: Venue change in international norm negotiations. European Journal of International Relations 19(1): 163–186.

36.

Cornut

De Zamaróczy

(2021) How can documents speak about practices? Cooperation and Conflict 56(3): 328–345.

37.

Davies

PHJ

(2001) Spies as informants: Triangulation and the interpretation of elite interview data in the study of the intelligence and security services. Politics 21(1): 73–80.

38.

Deitelhoff

(2009) The discursive process of legalization: Charting Islands of persuasion in the ICC case. International Organization 63(1): 33–65.

39.

Ding

(2018) Deciphering China’s AI Dream. Centre for the Governance of AI.

40.

Drinhausen

Legarda

(2022) ‘Comprehensive National Security’ unleashed: How Xi’s approach shapes China’s policies at home and abroad. Available at: https://merics.org/en/report/comprehensive-national-security-unleashed-how-xis-approach-shapes-chinas-policies-home-and

41.

Elgström

(2017) Norm advocacy networks: Nordic and like-minded countries in EU gender and development policy. Cooperation and Conflict 52(2): 224–240.

42.

Evans

Kay

(2008) How environmentalists ‘greened’ trade policy: Strategic action and the architecture of field overlap. American Sociological Review 73(6): 970–991.

43.

Eyal

(2013) Spaces between fields. In: Gorski

(ed.) Bourdieu and Historical Analysis. Duke University Press, pp. 158–182.

44.

Finnemore

Sikkink

(1998) International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization 52(4): 887–917.

45.

Fligstein

McAdam

(2015) A Theory of Fields. Oxford University Press.

46.

Flonk

(2021) Emerging illiberal norms: Russia and China as promoters of internet content control. International Affairs 97(6): 1925–1944.

47.

Foot

(2020) China, the UN, and Human Protection: Beliefs, Power, Image. Oxford University Press.

48.

Fordham

Asal

(2007) Billiard balls or snowflakes? Major power prestige and the international diffusion of institutions and practices. International Studies Quarterly 51(1): 31–52.

49.

Frieman

(2004) China, Arms Control, and Non-Proliferation. Routledge. Available at: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781135995980

50.

Gadinger

(2022) The normativity of international practices. In: Drieschova

Bueger

Hopf

(eds) Conceptualizing International Practices. Cambridge University Press, pp. 100–121.

51.

Gan

(2023) China ups diplomatic offensive with drastic increase in budget – and hardened stance on US. Available at: https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/08/china/china-budget-diplomatic-expenditure-intl-hnk

52.

Garcia

(2024) The AI Military Race: Common Good Governance in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Oxford University Press.

53.

Gill

Medeiros

(2000) Foreign and domestic influences on China’s arms control and nonproliferation policies. The China Quarterly 161: 66–94.

54.

Glas

Martel

(2024) Boundary work, overlapping identities, and liminality in communities of practice: Diplomacy within and beyond ASEAN. Global Studies Quarterly 4(1): ksad072.

55.

Græger

(2016) European security as practice: EU–NATO communities of practice in the making? European Security 25(4): 478–501.

56.

Hanrieder

(2016) Orders of worth and the moral conceptions of health in global politics. International Theory 8(3): 390–421.

57.

Hartig

(2016) How China understands public diplomacy: The importance of national image for national interests. International Studies Review 18(4): 655–680.

58.

Hasmath

Hsu

JYJ

(2016) NGO Governance and Management in China. Routledge. Available at: https://www.routledge.com/NGO-Governance-and-Management-in-China/Hasmath-Hsu/p/book/9780815383963

59.

Hofferberth

Weber

(2015) Lost in translation: A critique of constructivist norm research. Journal of International Relations and Development 18(1): 75–103.

60.

Horsburgh

(2015) China and Global Nuclear Order: From Estrangement to Active Engagement (1st edn). Oxford University Press.

61.

International Committee of the Red Cross (2023) What you need to know about artificial intelligence in armed conflict? Available at: https://www.icrc.org/en/document/what-you-need-know-about-artificial-intelligence-armed-conflict

62.

Johnston

(2008) Social States: China in International Institutions, 1980-2000. Princeton University Press.

63.

Kania

(2018) China’s strategic ambiguity and shifting approach to lethal autonomous weapons systems. Lawfare. Available at: https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/chinas-strategic-ambiguity-and-shifting-approach-lethal-autonomous-weapons-systems

64.

Kania

(2021) ‘Artificial Intelligence in China’s Revolution in Military Affairs’, Journal of Strategic Studies 44(4): 515–542.

65.

Kania

Laskai

(2021) Myths and Realities of China’s Military-Civil Fusion Strategy (Center for a New American Security, 2021). Available at: https://www.cnas.org/publications/reports/myths-and-realities-of-chinas-military-civil-fusion-strategy

66.

Krebs

Jackson

(2007) Twisting tongues and twisting arms: The power of political rhetoric. European Journal of International Relations 13(1): 35–66.

67.

Lai

Kang

S-J

(2014) Domestic bureaucratic politics and Chinese foreign policy. Journal of Contemporary China 23(86): 294–313.

68.

Lesch

Loh

DMH

(2022) Field overlaps, normativity, and the contestation of practices in China’s belt and road initiative. Global Studies Quarterly 2: ksac068.

69.

Ling

Yang

(2019) The evolution of China’s National Security concept over the past 70 years [Xinzhongguo 70nian guojia anqunguan de yanbian]. Journal of International Security Studies [Guoji Anquan Yanjiu] 6: 3–29.

70.

Liu

(2021) Between social spaces. European Journal of Social Theory 24(1): 123–139.

71.

Liu

(2018) Interviewing elites: Methodological issues confronting a novice. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 17(1): 1609406918770323.

72.

Loh

DMH

(2018) Diplomatic control, foreign policy, and change under Xi Jinping: A field-theoretic account. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs 47(3): 111–145.

73.

Loh

DMH

(2020) Institutional habitus, state identity, and China’s ministry of foreign affairs. International Studies Review 22(4): 879–902.

74.

Loh

DMH

(2024) China’s Rising Foreign Ministry. Stanford University Press.

75.

Madokoro

(2019) International commissions as norm entrepreneurs: Creating the normative idea of the responsibility to protect. Review of International Studies 45(1): 100–119.

76.

Mattern

Zarakol

(2016) Hierarchies in world politics. International Organization 70(3): 623–654.

77.

McCourt

(2016) Practice theory and relationalism as the new constructivism. International Studies Quarterly 60(3): 475–485.

78.

MFA (2022) China’s position paper on strengthening AI ethics governance. Available at: https://www.mfa.gov.cn/web//ziliao_674904/zcwj_674915/202211/t20221117_10976728.shtml

79.

MFA (2023) Global AI governance initiative. Available at: https://www.mfa.gov.cn/eng/wjdt_665385/2649_665393/202310/t20231020_11164834.html

80.

MFA (2024) The document submitted by China to the UN Secretary-General on the issue of ‘Lethal Autonomous Weapon Systems’. Available at: https://www.mfa.gov.cn/web/wjb_673085/zzjg_673183/jks_674633/fywj_674643/202405/t20240523_11310587.shtml

81.

MIIT (2017) Three-year action plan for promoting the development of the new generation AI industry. Available at: https://www.cac.gov.cn/2017-12/15/c_1122114520.htm

82.

MOST (2019) New generation AI governance principles – Developing responsible AI. Available at: https://www.most.gov.cn/kjbgz/201906/t20190617_147107.html

83.

MOST (2021) Code of ethics for new generation AI. Available at: https://www.most.gov.cn/kjbgz/202109/t20210926_177063.html

84.

Nadibaidze

Bode

Zhang

(2024) AI in Military Decision Support Systems: A Review of Developments and Debates. Center for War Studies.

85.

Nyman

(2023) Towards a global security studies: What can looking at China tell us about the concept of security? European Journal of International Relations 29(3): 673–697.

86.

PLA Daily (2019) Accelerate the advancement of military intelligentisation. Available at: http://www.mod.gov.cn/jmsd/2019-10/08/content_4852384.htm

87.

PLA Daily (2020) Actively respond to the challenges posed by the intelligentisation of warfare. Available at: http://www.mod.gov.cn/education/2020-02/06/content_4859784.htm

88.

Pouliot

(2008) The logic of practicality: A theory of practice of security communities. International Organization 62(2): 257–288.

89.

Pouliot

Cornut

(2015) Practice theory and the study of diplomacy: A research agenda. Cooperation and Conflict 50(3): 297–315.

90.

Pratt

(2020) From norms to normative configurations: A pragmatist and relational approach to theorizing normativity in IR. International Theory 12(1): 59–82.

91.

Putnam

(1998) Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. International Organization 42(3): 427–460.

92.

Kamnerdrat

(2025) How epistemic community shapes global governance of AI in military domain? The Chinese Journal of International Politics 18(1): 85–122.

93.

Qiao-Franco

(2022) Can track II dialogues be the new ‘ping-pong’ diplomacy to thaw the Sino-US relationship on Military AI? AutoNorms. Available at: https://www.autonorms.eu/can-track-ii-dialogues-be-the-new-ping-pong-diplomacy-to-thaw-the-sino-us-relationship-on-military-ai/

94.

Qiao-Franco

Bode

(2023) Weaponised artificial intelligence and Chinese practices of human–Machine interaction. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 16(1): 106–128.

95.

Qiao-Franco

Van Beek

(2025) China’s Strategy for Global AI Governance. LeidenAsiaCentre.

96.

Qiao-Franco

Zhu

(2024) China’s artificial intelligence ethics: Policy development in an emergent community of practice. Journal of Contemporary China 33(146): 189–205.

97.

Qiushi (2020) A holistic view of national security. Available at: http://en.qstheory.cn/HolisticApproachtoNationalSecurity.html

98.

Ralph

Gifkins

(2017) The purpose of United Nations Security Council practice. European Journal of International Relations 23(3): 630–653.

99.

Risse

Ropp

Sikkink

(1999) The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. Cambridge University Press.

100.

Roberts

Cowls

Hine

, et al. (2023) Governing artificial intelligence in China and the European Union: Comparing aims and promoting ethical outcomes. The Information Society 39(2): 79–97.

101.

Roberts

Cowls

Morley

, et al. (2021) The Chinese approach to artificial intelligence: An analysis of policy, ethics, and regulation. AI & Society 36(1): 59–77.

102.

Roberts

Hine

Taddeo

, et al. (2024) Global AI governance: Barriers and pathways forward. International Affairs 100: 1275–1286.

103.

Rosert

(2019) Norm emergence as agenda diffusion: Failure and success in the regulation of cluster munitions. European Journal of International Relations 25(4): 1103–1131.

104.

Rosert

Sauer

(2021) How (not) to stop the killer robots: A comparative analysis of humanitarian disarmament campaign strategies. Contemporary Security Policy 42(1): 4–29.

105.

Rühlig

(2023) Chinese influence through technical standardization power. Journal of Contemporary China 32(139): 54–72.

106.

Schmid

Pham

B-C

Ferl

A-K

(2024) Trust in artificial intelligence: Producing ontological security through governmental visions. Cooperation and Conflict. Epub ahead of print 19 October. DOI: 10.1177/00108367241288073.

107.

Sending

(2015) The Politics of Expertise: Competing for Authority in Global Governance. University of Michigan Press.

108.

Sheehan

(2023) China’s AI Regulations and How They Get Made. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Available at: https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2023/07/chinas-ai-regulations-and-how-they-get-made?lang=en

109.

Stefan

(2017) On non-Western norm shapers: Brazil and the responsibility while protecting. European Journal of International Security 2(1): 88–110.

110.

Tallberg

Erman

Furendal

, et al. (2023) The global governance of artificial intelligence: Next steps for empirical and normative research. International Studies Review 25(3): viad040.

111.

The State Council Information Office (2019) China’s national defense in the new era. Available at: https://english.www.gov.cn/archive/whitepaper/201907/24/content_WS5d3941ddc6d08408f502283d.html

112.

The State Council Information Office (2023) A global community of shared future: China’s proposals and actions. Available at: http://english.scio.gov.cn/node_9004328.html

113.

UNODA (2022) Working paper of the People’s Republic of China on lethal autonomous weapons systems. Available at: https://documents.unoda.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Working-Paper-of-the-Peoples-Republic-of-China-on-Lethal-Autonomous-Weapons-Systems%EF%BC%88English%EF%BC%89.pdf

114.

Van Staden

(2023) China announces double-digit budget increase for diplomacy. The China-Global South Project, 9 March. Available at: https://chinaglobalsouth.com/2023/03/09/china-announces-double-digit-budget-increase-for-diplomacy/

115.

Vaughn

Dunne

(2015) Leading from the front: America, Libya and the localisation of R2P. Cooperation and Conflict 50(1): 29–49.

116.

Warren

Hillas

(2022) ‘Xi Jinping thought’: Lethal autonomous weapons systems and military modernization with Chinese characteristics. International Relations 7(1): 1–32.

117.

Wiener

(2014) A Theory of Contestation. Springer.

118.

Wiener

(2022) Societal multiplicity for international relations: Engaging societal interaction in building global governance from below. Cooperation and Conflict 57(3): 348–366.

119.

(2016) Cooperation, competition and shaping the outlook. International Affairs 92(4): 849–867.

120.

Zeng

(2021a) China’s artificial intelligence innovation: A top-down national command approach? Global Policy 12(3): 399–409.

121.

Zeng

(2021b) Securitization of artificial intelligence in China. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 14(3): 417–445.

122.

Zeng

(2025) The US factor in Chinese perceptions of militarized artificial intelligence. International Affairs 101: 677–689.

123.

Zhang

(2023) The 20th CPC National Congress and China’s Foreign Policy: Implication and reflection. China International Strategy Review 5(1): 1–23.

124.

Zhang

(2025) ‘Navigating the in-between space: The roles of Chinese think tanks in artificial intelligence governance’. Global Policy 16(3): 494–500.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.36 MB

Different fields,different appropriateness? Unpacking emerging normativity in China’s AI governance

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material