Dugong v. Rumsfeld : social movements and the construction of ecological security

Abstract

Two high-profile social movements against the construction of military bases in Jeju, South Korea, and Okinawa, Japan, represent a contest between anti-militarist ecological security and traditional military security. At the heart of these movements, which went from a local phenomenon to a transnational cause célèbre, are two iconic movement symbols: Gureombi, a unique lava rock formation, and the dugong, an endangered marine mammal. By analyzing the emergence and resonance of the two nonhuman movement symbols, the paper joins the continuing debates in International Relations (IR) over what constitutes security and who deserves protection. The contributions are twofold. First, it employs theories of social and transnational movements to establish movement actors as practitioners of ecological security, showing how recent theoretical debates in IR on ecological security parallel new developments in social movements against military bases. Second, by analyzing the emergence and resonance of nonhuman beings as anti-militarist ecological symbols, the paper also contributes to the growing literature on ecological security that currently lacks empirical examinations.

Keywords

Militarization security civil society social movement transnational civil society nonstate actor

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Asahi Shimbun (2019) Tokyo admits design change in cards for Henoko due to seafloor. The Asahi Shimbun, 21 January. Available at: http://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/AJ201901210036.html

Ashton

(2015) Elusive Asian Manatee: icon in fight over U.S. military in Japan. McClatchy, 22 November. Available at: https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/world/article45242418.html

Barnett

(2001) The Meaning of Environmental Security: Ecological Politics and Policy in the New Security Era. London: Zed Books.

Benford

Snow

(2000) Framing processes and social movements: an overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology 26: 611–639.

Bob

(2005) The Marketing of Rebellion: Insurgents, Media, and International Activism. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Brysk

(1995) ‘Hearts and minds’: bringing symbolic politics back in. Polity 27(4): 559–585.

Brysk

(2013) Speaking Rights to Power: Constructing Political Will. New York: Oxford University Press.

Burke

Fishel

Mitchell

, et al. (2016) Planet politics: a manifesto from the end of IR. Millennium 44(3): 499–523.

Carpenter

(2005) ‘Women, children and other vulnerable groups’: gender, strategic frames and the protection of civilians as a transnational issue. International Studies Quarterly 49(2): 295–334.

10.

Center for Biological Diversity (2017) Court affirms right to Sue U.S. military over new base’s threats to endangered Okinawa dugong, 21 August. Available at: https://www.biologicaldiversity.org/news/press_releases/2017/okinawa-dugong-08-21-2017.php

11.

Center for Biological Diversity (2018a) Dugong Mascot to join courthouse rally against U.S. military’s threat to endangered marine mammal, 26 June. Available at: https://www.biologicaldiversity.org/news/press_releases/2018/okinawa-dugong-rally-06-26-2018.php

12.

Center for Biological Diversity (2018b) Legal appeal challenges U.S. military base construction in Japan, threat to rare Okinawa dugongs, 24 September. Available at: https://www.biologicaldiversity.org/news/press_releases/2018/okinawa-dugong-09-24-2018.php

13.

Chandler

(2008) Review essay: human security: the dog that didn’t bark. Security Dialogue 39(4): 427–438.

14.

Channel

(2018) Okinawa No Jugon Wa Ima. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Un6SDcjI2EY

15.

Chosun Ilbo (2012) Jeju giji bandae, maengkkongi, ‘gureombi bawi,’ daeumen tto mwonga, 8 March. Available at: http://news.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2012/03/08/2012030803053.html

16.

Colgan

(2018) Climate change and the politics of military bases. Global Environmental Politics 18(1): 33–51.

17.

Cooley

(2008) Base Politics: Democratic Change and the U.S. Military Overseas. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

18.

Cudworth

Hobden

(2013) Complexity, ecologism, and posthuman politics. Review of International Studies 39(3): 643–664.

19.

Cultural Heritage Administration (2012) Jeju Gureombi Bawi Munhwajae Jijeonggachie Daehayeo Balkimnida, 12 March. Available at: https://www.cha.go.kr/newsBbz/

20.

Dalby

(1992) Security, modernity, ecology: the dilemmas of post-cold war security discourse. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 17(1): 95–134.

21.

Del Felice

(2014) Power in discursive practices: the case of the STOP EPAs campaign. European Journal of International Relations 20(1): 145–167.

22.

Detraz

Betsill

(2009) Climate change and environmental security: for whom the discourse shifts. International Studies Perspectives 10(3): 303–320.

23.

Deudney

(1990) The case against linking environmental degradation and national security. Millennium 19(3): 461–476.

24.

Ehman

(1998) Dugong found in Okinawan history from days of the Ryukyu kingdom. Japan Update, 21 February. Available at: http://www.japanupdate.com/archive/?id=3766

25.

Einwohner

(2002) Bringing the outsiders in: opponents’ claims and the construction of animal rights activists’ identity. Mobilization: An International Quarterly 7(3): 253–268.

26.

Environmental Justice Atlas (2019) Expansion of US military base puts endangered Henoko Bay Dugong at risk on Okinawa, Japan. 2019. Available at: https://ejatlas.org/conflict/henoko-bay-dugong-or-us-base-for-okinawa

27.

Fagan

(2017) Security in the anthropocene: environment, ecology, escape. European Journal of International Relations 23(2): 292–314.

28.

Gaji maru ga omou Okinawa (2014) Kazakami ni okenu mono, 7 March. Available at: https://blog.goo.ne.jp/gajimaru18/e/e126ab16613762f2126b3af682e91cff

29.

Gamson

Meyer

(1996) Framing political opportunity. In: McAdam

McCarthy

Zald

(eds) Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 275–290.

30.

Gomez

Gasper

(2013) Human security: a thematic guidance note for regional and national human development report teams. United Nations Development Programme Human Development Report Office. Available at: http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-security-guidance-note

31.

Gould

(2007) The ecological costs of militarization. Peace Review 19(3): 331–334.

32.

Gwon

(2013) Remembering 4/3 and resisting the remilitarisation of Jeju: building an international peace movement. In: Broudy

Simpson

Arakaki

(eds) Under Occupation: Resistance and Struggle in a Militarised Asia-Pacific. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

33.

Hankyoreh (2015) ‘Gangjeong gureombi doechatja’: pagoe 3-dol maja haengsa, 4 March. Available at: http://www.hani.co.kr/arti/area/area_general/680890.html

34.

Hankyoreh 21 (2011) Oeroun pyeonghwaui gitbal, gangjeong, 1 August. Available at: http://h21.hani.co.kr/arti/cover/cover_general/30159.html

35.

Hibbett

(2019) In their fight to stop a new US military base, Okinawans confront two colonizers. The Nation, 16 May. Available at: https://www.thenation.com/article/okinawa-japan-us-military/

36.

Holmes

(2014) Social Unrest and American Military Bases in Turkey and Germany Since 1945. New York: Cambridge University Press.

37.

Holzscheiter

(2005) Discourse as capability: non-state sctors’ capital in global governance. Millennium 33(3): 723–746.

38.

Hoshino

(2016) US military bases and human security in Okinawa. In: Ishihara

Hoshino

Fujita

(eds) Self-Determinable Development of Small Islands. Singapore: Springer, 3–32.

39.

Inoue

(2007) Okinawa and the U.S. Military: Identity Making in the Age of Globalization. New York: Columbia University Press.

40.

Jasper

(2004) A strategic approach to collective action: looking for agency in social-movement choices. Mobilization: An International Quarterly 9(1): 1–16.

41.

Jeju Chapter of Korea Federation for Environmental Movements (2009) Jeju haegungiji hwangyeongyeonghyangpyeongga jolsoksimuie ttareun hwangyeongdanche gangjeongmaeulhoe gongdong gijahoegyeon, 30 September. Available at: http://jeju.ekfem.or.kr/archives/1091

42.

Jeju Hwangyeong Ilbo (2012) Dojisaneun wae hanmadido motaneunga, 22 March. Available at: http://www.newsje.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=20853

43.

Jeong

W-s

(2011) A, kkaejineun gureombi bawiyeo! Pressian, 9 September. Available at: http://www.pressian.com/news/article.html?no=62636

44.

Joongang Ilbo (2012a) ‘Geunyang bawi’ vs ‘myeoljong wigijong seosikji’ . . . Gureombiui gachineun? 8 March. Available at: https://news.joins.com/article/7569115

45.

Joongang Ilbo. ——— (2012b) Jeju Haegungiji Geonseol Chanban Siwi, 13 March. Available at: http://www.koreadaily.com/news/read.asp?art_id=1375448

46.

Keck

Sikkink

(1998) Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

47.

Kim

(2018) Bases that leave: consequences of US base closures and realignments in South Korea. Journal of Contemporary Asia 48(2): 339–357.

48.

Kirk

(2013) Okinawa and Jeju: Bases of Discontent. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

49.

Levy

(1995) Is the environment a national security issue? International Security 20(2): 35–62.

50.

Mainichi Shimbun (2019) Dead dugong found floating at Okinawa fishing port, 19 March. Available at: https://mainichi.jp/english/articles/20190319/p2a/00m/0na/018000c

51.

Mathews

(1989) Redefining security. Foreign Affairs 68(2): 162–177.

52.

McCammon

Newman

Muse

, et al. (2007) Movement framing and discursive opportunity structures: the political successes of the U.S. Women’s Jury Movements. American Sociological Review 72(5): 725–749.

53.

McCormack

Norimatsu

(2012) Resistant Islands: Okinawa Confronts Japan and the United States. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

54.

McDonald

(2018) Climate change and security: towards ecological security? International Theory 10(2): 153–180.

55.

Media Jeju (2017) 5-nyeon jeon baro geunal, gureombi bawi balpaui gieogeul sohwanhada, 7 March. Available at: http://www.mediajeju.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=193885

56.

Metu

(2018) Standing up for the dugong, in costumes and in court. Earthjustice, 9 July. Available at: https://earthjustice.org/blog/2018-july/standing-up-for-the-dugong-in-costumes-and-in-court

57.

Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan (2010) Joint Statement of the U.S.-Japan Security Consultative Committee, 28 May. Available at: https://www.mofa.go.jp/region/n-america/us/security/scc/joint1005.html

58.

Mische

(1989) Ecological security and the need to reconceptualize sovereignty. Alternatives 14(4): 389–427.

59.

Mitchell

(2014) Only human? A worldly approach to security. Security Dialogue 45(1): 5–21.

60.

Mitchell

(2017) Is IR going extinct? European Journal of International Relations 23(1): 3–25.

61.

Nadelmann

(1990) Global prohibition regimes: the evolution of norms in international society. International Organization 44(4): 479–526.

62.

Newman

(2010) Critical human security studies. Review of International Studies 36(1): 77–94.

63.

Nogami

(2019) Experts waging war with defense ministry over Okinawa coral: the Asahi Shimbun. Asahi Shimbun, 25 April. Available at: http://www.asahi.com/ajw/articles/AJ201904250005.html

64.

Okinawa Defense Bureau (2018) Jugon Kanshi Keikai Shisutemu Ni Yoru Chōsa No Jisshi Jōkyō Ni Tsuite, February 2018. Available at: https://www.mod.go.jp/rdb/okinawa/07oshirase/chotatsu/kankyoukansiiinkai/kankyoukansiiinkai12/H29no12Siryo0401.pdf

65.

Okinawa Prefectural Government Washington D.C. Office (2016) Why do we oppose the relocation to Henoko? 2016. Available at: http://dc-office.org/post/753

66.

Okinawa Times (2019) ‘Jugon, sango, umi ga naite iru zo’ shimin-ra kōgi, 19 March. Available at: https://www.okinawatimes.co.jp/articles/-/398249

67.

Pae

K-JC

(2014) Feminist activism as interfaith dialogue: a lesson from Gangjeong village of Jeju island, Korea. Journal of Korean Religions 5(1): 55–69.

68.

Paris

(2001) Human security: paradigm shift or hot air? International Security 26(2): 87–102.

69.

Park

J-J

(2015) The 3rd year remembrance on the blasting of Gureombi rock. Save Jeju Now, 7 March. Available at: http://savejejunow.org/portfolio/3rd-year-remembrance-on-the-blasting-of-gureombi-rock/

70.

People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy (2012a) Gureombineun ajikdo noraehago itda. People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy, 17 March. Available at: http://www.peoplepower21.org/Peace/881075

71.

People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy (2012b) Piheullineun gureombi samseongmulsan ap chulhyeon. People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy, 29 March. Available at: https://www.peoplepower21.org/Peace/887287

72.

People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy (2017) Gangjeong haegungiji tujaeng 10-nyeon, gureombi gieokaengdongjugan. People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy, 12 May. Available at: http://www.peoplepower21.org/Peace/1505498

73.

Pressian (2012) Ahn Hyung-Hwan: ‘Gureombi Bawiui Nunmul? Bawiga Museun Nunmureultt,’ 8 March. Available at: http://www.pressian.com/news/article/?no=38272#09T0

74.

Redford

(2012) The battle for Jeju island: how the arms race is threatening a Korean paradise. OnEarth, 3 February.

75.

Rucht

(2004) Movement allies, adversaries, and third parties. In: Snow

Soule

Kriesi

(eds) The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. 1st edn. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 197–216. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470999103

76.

Ryukyu Shimpo (2007) Jugon Soshō de Bē Bengoshi Ga Raioki, 24 June.

77.

Ryukyu Shimpo (2014) Kenedi Amerika Taishi Raiken, 13 February.

78.

Ryukyu Shimpo (2019) One of only three Okinawa dugong specimens found dead, whereabouts of other two unknown, 20 March. Available at: http://english.ryukyushimpo.jp/2019/03/28/30127/

79.

Save Jeju Now (2012) Support an INDEPENDENT Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) to Combat the Navy’s Lies, 29 August. Available at: http://savejejunow.org/support-independent-eia/

80.

Save Jeju Now (2013) Recollection on the blast of the Gureombi rock and oppression on international activists, 10 March. Available at: http://savejejunow.org/recollection-on-the-blast-of-the-gureombi-rock-and-oppression-on-international-activists/

81.

Save Jeju Now (2015) Jeju island anti-base activists on US national speech and film tour, 27 February. Available at: http://savejejunow.org/2015-us-film-speech-tour/

82.

Save the Dugong Campaign Center (2019) Sign petition: save Japan’s dugong from extinction! Care2 (2019) Available at: https://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/361/244/102/

83.

Snow

Rochford

Worden

, et al. (1986) Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review 51(4): 464–481.

84.

Spencer

(2003) Meeting of the dugongs and the cooking pots: anti-military base citizens’ groups on Okinawa. Japanese Studies 23(2): 125–140.

85.

Steinem

(2011) The arms race intrudes on a South Korean paradise. The New York Times, 6 August. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/07/opinion/sunday/Steinem-the-arms-race-intrudes-on-a-south-korean-paradise.html

86.

Takahashi

(2004) Okinawa Dugong v. Rumsfeld: extraterritorial operation of the U.S. military and wildlife protection under the National Historic Preservation Act. Environs: Environmental Law and Policy Journal 28: 181–197.

87.

Tanji

(2008) US court rules in the ‘Okinawa Dugong’ case: implications for US military bases overseas. Critical Asian Studies 40(3): 475–487.

88.

Tarrow

(2005) The New Transnational Activism. New York: Cambridge University Press.

89.

Taylor

(2010) Antimilitary and environmental movements in Okinawa. In: Karan

Suganuma

(eds) Local Environmental Movements: A Comparative Study of the United States and Japan. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky, 271–280.

90.

Voice of the People (2012) Gureombi Balpaneun Chong Eomneun 4.3, 20 March. Available at: http://www.vop.co.kr/V00000485135.html

91.

Welch

Røkkum

Jefferson

, et al. (2010) An anthropological study of the significance of the dugong in Okinawa culture. International Archaeological Research Institute.

92.

Wheeler

(2015) Greenpeace investigation reveals extensive dugong feeding troughs near planned U.S. military base in Okinawa. Greenpeace USA (blog), 5 November. Available at: https://www.greenpeace.org/usa/news/greenpeace-investigation-reveals-extensive-dugong-feeding-troughs-near-planned-u-s-military-base-in-okinawa/

93.

Wright

(2016) After eight years of protest of construction of naval base, Gangjeong villagers Sued by South Korean Navy. Save Jeju Now, 11 June. Available at: http://savejejunow.org/after-eight-years-of-protest-of-construction-of-naval-base-gangjeong-villagers-sued-by-south-korean-navy/

94.

Yeo

(2011) Activists, Alliances, and Anti-U.S. Base Protests. New York: Cambridge University Press.

95.

Yeo

(2018) Realism, critical theory, and the politics of peace and security: lessons from anti-base protests on Jeju island. European Journal of International Security 3(2): 235–255.

96.

Yonhap News Agency (2012) Haegungiji ‘dongmul isabi’ 1-eok 4-cheon 500-manwon, 14 March. Available at: https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20120314159900043

97.

Yoon

Y-Y

(2017) Gangjeong, Maeure Daehan Se Gaji Siseon. ECO 21(1): 71–109.

98.

Yoon

Y-Y

(2018) Gangjeong village ‘Jikimis’ as commoners: for a commons paradigm-based social movement theory. Development and Society 47(2): 237–259.

99.

Yoshikawa

(2009) Dugong swimming in uncharted waters: US judicial intervention to protect Okinawa’s ‘Natural Monument’ and halt base construction. The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus 7(6): No pagination.

100.

Yoshikawa

(2017) Seawall construction on Oura bay: internationalizing the Okinawa struggle. The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus 15(11): No pagination.

101.

Youatt

(2014) Interspecies relations, international relations: rethinking anthropocentric politics. Millennium 43(1): 207–223.